Prognostic significance of body mass index and weight loss in patients with idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (IPPFE) is a rare form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias; its physical characteristics include a slender build with platythorax and progressive weight loss. However, the clinical significance of body mass index (BMI) and weight loss remains unclear in patients with IPPFE. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the association between baseline BMI, weight loss after diagnosis, and the prognosis of patients with IPPFE. METHODS: This retrospective study included 71 patients diagnosed with IPPFE at our institution between 2005-2021. BMI at diagnosis was classified into three: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (≥18.5 to <25.0 kg/m2), or overweight (≥25.0 kg/m2). An annual rate of weight change after the diagnosis was evaluated, and ≥5% per year decrease was defined as a significant weight loss. We investigated clinical features and prognosis based on baseline BMI and weight loss. RESULTS: Of the 71 patients, 48 (67.6%) and 23 (32.4%) were classified as underweight and normal weight, respectively, and none were overweight. Significant weight loss occurred in 24 (33.8%) patients, and they tended to have more cases of dyspnea and had significantly older age, lower BMI, higher rates of co-existence of lower-lobe interstitial lung disease, lower pulmonary function test results and higher incidence of pneumothorax after the diagnosis than those without weight loss. Patients with BMI <18.5 kg/m2 and those with weight loss had a significantly worse prognosis than those with BMI ≥18.5 kg/m2 or those without weight loss, respectively (p=0.005, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that low BMI and weight loss were independent poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Low BMI and weight loss are associated with poor prognosis in patients with IPPFE.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio being associated with mortality risk in patients receiving antifibrotic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Antifibrotic therapy is widely used for patients with progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), regardless of etiology. There is an urgent need for a simple, inexpensive, and repeatable biomarker to evaluate disease severity and mortality risk. METHODS: This retrospective multicohort study assessed the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios (NLRs) of 416 patients with ILD who received antifibrotic therapy (Hamamatsu cohort, n = 217; Seirei cohort, n = 199). The mortality risk vs. NLR relationship was evaluated at therapy initiation and 1 year. The optimal NLR cutoff of 2.7 was selected according to the mortality risk. RESULTS: Survival was shorter in patients with high NLR than with low NLR (median: 2.63 vs. 4.01 years). The NLR classification results (cutoff: 2.7) were longitudinally preserved in >70 % of the patients, and patients with consistently high NLR had a higher risk of mortality than others (median, 2.97 vs. 4.42 years). In multivariate analysis, high NLR was significantly associated with mortality independent of age, sex, forced vital capacity, lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), or the gender-age-physiology (GAP) index. A combined GAP index-NLR assessment classified mortality risk into four groups. Subset analyses revealed that NLR assessment was more applicable to patients without advanced disease, not taking steroids, and with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) than to patients with advanced disease, taking steroids, and patients with Non-IPF. CONCLUSION: High NLR was associated with an increased mortality risk in patients with ILDs receiving antifibrotic therapy. Assessment of NLR may help predict disease severity and mortality risk in antifibrotic therapy.

Prognostic Role of Interferon-λ3 in Anti-Melanoma Differentiation-Associated Gene 5-Positive Dermatomyositis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Interferon-λ3 (IFNλ3) is a cytokine with antiviral functions on barrier surfaces, and it is associated with disease activity in autoimmune diseases. This study assessed the clinical significance of serum IFNλ3 levels in polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: We measured serum IFNλ3 levels in 221 patients with PM/DM-ILD (155 in the derivation cohort, 66 in the validation cohort) and 38 controls. We evaluated factors associated with mortality risk among 79 patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive DM-ILD. RESULTS: Serum IFNλ3 levels at diagnosis were significantly higher in patients with PM/DM-ILD than in healthy controls. Remarkably, serum IFNλ3 levels were specifically increased in patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD in both the derivation and validation cohorts. In anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD, patients with high IFNλ3 levels (>120 pg/mL) had significantly lower survival rates than those with low IFNλ3 levels (≤120 pg/mL). A multivariate analysis revealed that high IFNλ3 levels, as well as old age and low Pao2, were significantly associated with poor prognoses in patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD. In a classification analysis of patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD based on age, IFNλ3 level, and Pao2, patients with old age (>53 years), high IFNλ3 levels (>120 pg/mL), and low Pao2 (<75 mm Hg) had the worst survival. In lung pathologic analyses, IFNλ3-positive staining was observed in macrophages, airway epithelial cells, the pleural region, and intrapulmonary veins in patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD. CONCLUSION: Serum IFNλ3 is a promising biomarker for identifying patients at high risk of poor outcomes in anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD.

Olanzapine Plus Triple Antiemetic Therapy for the Prevention of Carboplatin-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of antiemetic therapy with olanzapine, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (RA), a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) RA, and dexamethasone for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving carboplatin-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients scheduled to receive carboplatin (AUC ≥5) were randomly assigned to receive either olanzapine 5 mg once daily (olanzapine group) or placebo (placebo group) in combination with aprepitant, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone. The primary end point was the complete response (CR; no vomiting and no rescue therapy) rate in the overall phase (0-120 hours). Secondary end points included the proportion of patients free of nausea and safety. RESULTS: In total, 355 patients (78.6% male, median age 72 years, 100% thoracic cancer), including 175 and 180 patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups, respectively, were evaluated. The overall CR rate was 86.9% in the olanzapine group versus 80.6% in the placebo group. The intergroup difference in the overall CR rate was 6.3% (95% CI, -1.3 to 13.9). The proportions of patients free of chemotherapy-induced nausea in the overall (88.6% in the olanzapine group v 75.0% in the placebo group) and delayed (89.7% v 75.6%, respectively) phases were significantly higher in the olanzapine group than in the placebo group (both P < .001). Somnolence was observed in 43 (24.6%) and 41 (22.9%) patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups, respectively, and no events were grade ≥3 in severity. CONCLUSION: The addition of olanzapine was not associated with a significant increase in the overall CR rate. Regarding the prevention of nausea, adding olanzapine provided better control in patients receiving carboplatin-containing chemotherapy, which needs further exploration.