Lost, gained, and regained functional and phylogenetic diversity of European mammals since 8000 years ago.

Mammals have experienced high levels of human-mediated extirpations but have also been widely introduced to new locations, and some have recovered from historic persecution. Both of these processes-losses and gains-have resulted in concern about functional losses and changes in ecological communities as new ecological states develop. The question of whether species turnover inevitably leads to declines in functional and phylogenetic diversity depends, however, on the traits and phylogenetic distinctiveness of the species that are lost, gained, or regained. Comparing ~8000 years ago with the last century, we show that extirpations and range retractions have indeed reduced the functional and phylogenetic diversity of mammals in most European regions (countries and island groups), but species recoveries and the introduction of non-native species have increased functional and phylogenetic diversity by equivalent or greater amounts in many regions. Overall, across Europe, species richness increased in 41 regions over the last 8000 years and declined in 1; phylogenetic diversity increased in 33 and declined in 12, while functional diversity results showed 20 increases and 25 decreases. The balance of losses (extirpations) and gains (introductions, range expansions) has, however, led to net increases in functional diversity on many islands, where the original diversity was low, and across most of western Europe. Historically extirpated mega- and mesofaunal species have recolonized or been reintroduced to many European regions, contributing to recent functional and phylogenetic diversity recovery. If conservation rewilding projects continue to reintroduce regionally extirpated species and domestic descendants of "extinct" species to provide replacement grazing, browsing, and predation, there is potential to generate net functional and phylogenetic diversity gains (relative to 8000 years ago) in most European regions.

Mediation of area and edge effects in forest fragments by adjacent land use.

Habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation have pervasive detrimental effects on tropical forest biodiversity, but the role of the surrounding land use (i.e., matrix) in determining the severity of these impacts remains poorly understood. We surveyed bird species across an interior-edge-matrix gradient to assess the effects of matrix type on biodiversity at 49 different sites with varying levels of landscape fragmentation in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest-a highly threatened biodiversity hotspot. Both area and edge effects were more pronounced in forest patches bordering pasture matrix, whereas patches bordering Eucalyptus plantation maintained compositionally similar bird communities between the edge and the interior and exhibited reduced effects of patch size. These results suggest the type of matrix in which forest fragments are situated can explain a substantial amount of the widely reported variability in biodiversity responses to forest loss and fragmentation.

Mediación de los Efectos de Área y de Borde sobre los Fragmentos de Bosque Causados por el Uso de Suelo Adyacente Resumen La pérdida del hábitat, la fragmentación y la degradación tienen efectos nocivos generalizados sobre la biodiversidad de los bosques tropicales. A pesar de esto, el papel del uso de suelo de los terrenos adyacentes (es decir, la matriz) en la determinación de la gravedad de estos impactos todavía está poco entendido. Censamos las especies de aves a lo largo de un gradiente de borde interno de matriz para evaluar los efectos del tipo de matriz sobre la biodiversidad en al menos 49 sitios con diferentes niveles de fragmentación del paisaje en el Bosque Atlántico Brasileño - un punto caliente de biodiversidad que se encuentra severamente amenazado. Tanto los efectos de área como los de borde estuvieron más pronunciados en los fragmentos de bosque que limitan con la matriz de pasturas, mientras que los fragmentos que limitan con plantaciones de Eucalyptus mantuvieron comunidades de aves similares en composición con aquellas entre el borde y el interior y mostraron efectos reducidos del tamaño de fragmento. Estos resultados sugieren que el tipo de matriz en el cual están situados los fragmentos de bosque puede explicar una cantidad sustancial de la ampliamente reportada variabilidad de respuestas a la pérdida del bosque y a la fragmentación.

Trait-based indicators of bird species sensitivity to habitat loss are effective within but not across data sets.

Species' traits have been widely championed as the key to predicting which species are most threatened by habitat loss, yet previous work has failed to detect trends that are consistent enough to guide large-scale conservation and management. Here we explore whether traits and environmental variables predict species sensitivity to habitat loss across two data sets generated by independent avifaunal studies in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil, both of which detected a similar assemblage of species, and similar species-specific responses to habitat change, across an overlapping sample of sites. Specifically, we tested whether 25 distributional, climatic, ecological, behavioral, and morphological variables predict sensitivity to habitat loss among 196 bird species, both within and across studies, and when data were analysed as occurrence or abundance. We found that four to nine variables showed high explanatory power within a single study or data set, but none performed as strong predictors across all data sets. Our results demonstrate that the use of species traits to predict sensitivity to anthropogenic habitat loss can produce predictions that are species- and site-specific and not scalable to whole regions or biomes, and thus should be used with caution.

Publisher Correction: Distance to range edge determines sensitivity to deforestation.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Distance to range edge determines sensitivity to deforestation.

It is generally assumed that deforestation affects a species consistently across space, however populations near their geographic range edge may exist at their niche limits and therefore be more sensitive to disturbance. We found that both within and across Atlantic Forest bird species, populations are more sensitive to deforestation when near their range edge. In fact, the negative effects of deforestation on bird occurrences switched to positive in the range core (>829 km), in line with Ellenberg's rule. We show that the proportion of populations at their range core and edge varies across Brazil, suggesting deforestation effects on communities, and hence the most appropriate conservation action, also vary geographically.