The Use of Mobile Medical Units for Populations Experiencing Homelessness in the United States: A Scoping Review.

With annual point-in-time counts indicating a rise in unsheltered homelessness in the United States, much attention has been paid to how to best provide care to this population. Mobile medical units (MMUs) have been utilized by many programs. However, little is known regarding the evidence behind their effectiveness. A scoping review is conducted of research on MMU provision of medical services for populations experiencing homelessness in the USA to examine the extent and nature of research activity, summarize available evidence, and identify research gaps in the existing literature. Following guidelines for scoping reviews, PubMed and Google Scholar were used to identify an initial 294 papers published from January 1, 1980, to May 1, 2023, using selected keywords, which were distilled to a final set of 50 studies that met eligibility criteria. Eligible articles were defined as those that pertain to the provision of healthcare (inclusive of dental, vision, and specialty services) to populations experiencing homelessness through a MMU in the United States and have been published after peer review. Of the 50 studies in the review, the majority utilized descriptive (40%) or observational methods (36%), with 4 review and 8 controlled studies and no completed randomized controlled trials. Outcome measures utilized by studies include MMU services provided (58%), patient demographics (34%), health outcomes (16%), patient-centered measures (14%), healthcare utilization (10%) and cost analysis (6%). The studies that exist suggest MMUs can facilitate effective treatment of substance use disorders, provision of primary care, and services for severe mental illness among people experiencing homelessness. MMUs have potential to provide community-based healthcare services in settings where homeless populations reside, but the paucity of randomized controlled trials indicates further research is needed to understand if MMUs are more effective than other care delivery models tailored to populations experiencing homelessness.

Recent Advances in the Treatment of Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Narrative Review of Literature Published from 2018 to 2023.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review recent advances in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD), a disorder with very limited treatment options until recently. We examine advances in psychotherapeutic, psychopharmacologic, and interventional psychiatry approaches to treatment of TRD. We also highlight various definitions of TRD in recent scientific literature. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent evidence suggests some forms of psychotherapy can be effective as adjunctive treatments for TRD, but not as monotherapies alone. Little recent evidence supports the use of adjunctive non-antidepressant pharmacotherapies such as buprenorphine and antipsychotics for the treatment of TRD; side effects and increased medication discontinuation rates may outweigh the benefits of these adjunctive pharmacotherapies. Finally, a wealth of recent evidence supports the use of interventional approaches such as electroconvulsive therapy, ketamine/esketamine, and transcranial magnetic stimulation for TRD. Recent advances in our understanding of how to treat TRD have largely expanded our knowledge of best practices in, and efficacy of, interventional psychiatric approaches. Recent research has used a variety of TRD definitions for study inclusion criteria; research on TRD should adhere to inclusion criteria based on internationally defined guidelines for more meaningfully generalizable results.

Primary Care for Veterans Experiencing Homelessness: a Narrative Review of the Homeless Patient Aligned Care Team (HPACT) Model.

In 2011, the U.S. Department of Veterans Health (VA) implemented a homeless-tailored primary care medical home model called the Homeless Patient Aligned Care Teams (HPACTs). The impact of HPACTs on health and healthcare outcomes of veterans experiencing homelessness has not been adequately synthesized. This narrative review summarized peer-reviewed studies published in databases Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and APA PsycInfo from 1946 to February 2022. Only original research studies that reported outcomes of the HPACT model were included in the review. Of 575 studies that were initially identified and screened, 26 studies met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Included studies were categorized into studies that described the following: (1) early HPACT pilot implementation; (2) HPACT's association with service quality and utilization; and (3) specialized HPACT programs. Together, studies in this review suggest HPACT is associated with reductions in emergency department utilization and improvements in primary care utilization, engagement, and positive patient experiences; however, the methodological rigor of the included studies was low, and thus, these findings should only be considered preliminary. There is a need for randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of the PACT model on key outcomes of interest, as well as to determine whether the model is a viable way to manage healthcare for persons experiencing homelessness outside of the VA system.

Characterization of quality of life among individuals with current treated, untreated, and past alcohol use disorder.

Background: Understanding health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among those who seek treatment for their alcohol use disorder (AUD) and those not seeking AUD treatment is critical to decreasing morbidity and mortality, yet HRQOL in these groups has been little characterized.Objectives: Characterize HRQOL among those who meet diagnostic criteria for AUD, both receiving and not receiving treatment.Methods: This analysis used the NESARC-III database (n = 36,309; female = 56.3%), a nationally representative survey of US adults, to compare four groups: those treated for current AUD; those untreated for current AUD; those with past AUD only; and those who never met criteria for AUD. Multiple regression analysis was used to account for differences in sociodemographic and other behavioral factors across these groups. HRQOL was operationalized using annual quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).Results: Patients treated for past-year AUD had a deficit of 0.07 QALYs/year compared to those who never met criteria for AUD (P < .001). They retained a still clinically meaningful 0.03 QALYs/year deficit after controlling for concomitant psychiatric disorders and other behavioral health factors (P < .001). Those with past-year untreated AUD or past AUD had a near-zero difference in QALYs compared with those who never met criteria for AUD.Conclusion: These findings suggest that previously-reported differences in HRQOL associated with AUD may be due to the problems of the relatively small sub-group who seek treatment. Clinicians seeking to treat those with currently untreated AUD may do better to focus on the latent potential health effects of AUD instead of current HRQOL concerns.

Abbreviation: AUD: alcohol use disorder; HRQOL- health-related quality of life; NESARC-III: National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions Wave III; SF-12: 12-Item Short Form Survey; SF-6D: Short-Form Six-Dimension; QALYs: Quality adjusted life years; AUDADIS-5: Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-5; NIAAA: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; MCS: mental component summary; PCS: physical component summary; EuroQOL-5D: EuroQOL 5-Dimension; SUD: substance use disorder.

Association of mental health related quality of life and other factors with treatment seeking for substance use disorders: A comparison of SUDs rooted in legal, partially legal, and illegal substances.

The association of subjective mental health-related quality of life (MHRQOL) and treatment use among people experiencing common substance use disorders (SUDs) is not known. Furthermore, the association of a given substance's legal status with treatment use has not been studied. This work aims determine the association of MHRQOL with SUD treatment use, and how substance legal status modulates this relationship. Our analysis used nationally-representative data from the NESARC-III database of those experiencing past-year SUDs (n = 5,808) to compare rates of treatment use and its correlates among three groups: those with illicit substance use disorders (ISUDs); those with partially legal substance use disorders, i.e., cannabis use disorder (CUD); and those with fully legal substance use disorders, i.e., alcohol use disorder (AUD). Survey-weighted multiple regression analysis was used to assess the association of MHRQOL with likelihood of treatment use among these three groups, both unadjusted and adjusted for sociodemographic, behavioral, and diagnostic factors. Adults with past-year ISUDs were significantly more likely to use treatment than those with CUD and AUD. Among those with ISUDs, MHRQOL had no significant association with likelihood of treatment use. Those with past-year CUD saw significant negative association of MHRQOL with treatment use in unadjusted analysis, but not after controlling for diagnostic and other behavioral health factors. Those with past-year AUD had significant negative association of MHRQOL with treatment use in both unadjusted and adjusted analysis. If legalization and decriminalization continue, there may be a greater need for effective public education and harm reduction services to address this changing SUD landscape.

"Black Is Not Monolithic": Complexities in COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making.

BACKGROUND: Longstanding inequities in the USA have resulted in the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on Black Americans. Coupled with medical mistrust, COVID-19 vaccine uptake is lower in Black populations. METHODS: We sought to understand the perspectives of Black parents on the COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 vaccination for themselves and their children, and trust with the medical community. Using qualitative methodology, we conducted in-depth semi-structured in-person interviews of Black parents of children admitted to the inpatient pediatric units in our tertiary academic medical center in Connecticut from July to November 2021. We used the grounded theory approach, and the constant comparative method until saturation was reached. RESULTS: We interviewed 20 parents who identified as Black; 50% were vaccinated against COVID-19. The following 5 themes and sub-themes emerged: (1) mixed feelings influenced COVID-19 vaccine decision-making ranging from much needed relief and feelings of uncertainty, distrust, and fear; (2) COVID-19 vaccine uptake was influenced by individual and family's health concerns and job or school mandates; (3) deferring the COVID-19 vaccine was influenced by the perception of risk and concerns about vaccine integrity; (4) institutional mistrust within the Black community bred by systemic racism influenced vaccine decision-making; and (5) conflicted feelings about the COVID-19 vaccine for their child. CONCLUSION: Our findings reiterate the complexities around vaccine decision-making and underscore the importance of recognizing the pervasive influence of institutional mistrust when counseling Black families about the COVID-19 vaccine.

Distribution of CARES Act Provider Relief Funding to Psychiatric Care Organizations.

More than $100 billion in Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act funding was intended to support financially stressed health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The distribution of the CARES Act's Provider Relief Fund among psychiatrists is poorly understood. Analyzing funding received by 2,593 psychiatric care organizations (PCOs), the authors found that funding was more equally distributed across care organizations of different sizes in psychiatry versus other specialties. Substantially less relief funding was received by PCOs per provider relative to other specialties. This disparity in relief funding is surprising given that specific earmarks of the CARES Act were intended to improve U.S. mental health care capacity, meriting further attention.

National Trends in and Concentration of Industry Payments to U.S. Psychiatrists, 2015-2021.

Industry payments to psychiatrists remain poorly characterized. Using data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the authors of this repeated cross-sectional study detail the extent and concentration of nonresearch industry payments to psychiatrists from 2015 to 2021. The proportion of psychiatrists receiving industry payments, payment distribution, and payment concentration among psychiatrists was assessed. Among 56,955 psychiatrists, 75.0% received any industry payments from 2015 to 2021. These payments, totaling $357,971,774, were highly concentrated: 1% of psychiatrists received 74.7% of industry payments, with notable state-level variations in concentration of top industry-paid psychiatrists. The median psychiatrist received $0 from industry each year.

The Top 50 Articles and Authors of the New Millennium in Psychiatry: A Bibliometric Analysis.

The field of psychiatry faces significant challenges in the new millennium, marked by a surge in mental health diagnoses coupled with barriers to accessing adequate care. Despite obstacles, notable advancements have been achieved throughout the field, including the release of DSM-5, the introduction of esketamine, and the development of innovative assessment tools. This study aims to comprehensively analyze recent advances in psychiatry by examining the top 50 most cited articles and authors since 2000, addressing a gap in the literature left by previous subfield-focused bibliometric studies. Utilizing the Web of Science (WOS) database, this bibliometric analysis examined all publications in psychiatric journals from January 1, 2000, to September 18, 2022. The top 50 most cited articles and authors were identified and characterized based on various metrics, including times cited, article type, and institutional affiliations. WOS extracted 699,005 articles, with authors from the United States contributing the highest number of publications. The top 50 articles spanned a variety of formats, with cross-sectional studies, new measures, literature reviews, and randomized controlled trials being the most prevalent. The American Journal of Psychiatry emerged as the leading journal, hosting eight of the top 50 articles. Among the top 50 authors, female representation was limited, comprising 24% of first authors and 22% overall. Institutional affiliations revealed a majority of top authors worked at universities affiliated with the top 40 NIH-funded departments of psychiatry, with those affiliated with Harvard University leading in authorship contributions. This study sheds light on recent advancements in psychiatry, emphasizing the underrepresentation of female authors and the prevalence of top authors affiliated with major NIH-funded programs. This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of recent advances and the top recent contributors in the field, fostering a deeper understanding of the evolving landscape of psychiatry in the new millennium.

Comparison of industry payments to psychiatrists and psychiatric advanced practice clinicians in the USA, 2021: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare industry payment patterns among US psychiatrists and psychiatric advanced practice clinicians (APCs) and determine how scope of practice laws has influenced these patterns. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: This study used the publicly available US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Sunshine Act Open Payment database and the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES) database for the year 2021. PARTICIPANTS: All psychiatrists and psychiatric APCs (subdivided into nurse practitioners (NPs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs)) included in either database. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Number and percentage of clinicians receiving industry payments and value of payments received. Total payments and number of transactions by type of payment, payment source and clinician type were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 85 053 psychiatric clinicians (61 011 psychiatrists (71.7%), 21 895 NPs (25.7%), 2147 CNSs (2.5%)) were reviewed; 16 240 (26.6%) psychiatrists received non-research payment from industry, compared with 10 802 (49.3%) NPs and 231 (10.7%) CNSs (p<0.001) for pairwise comparisons). Psychiatric NPs were significantly more likely to receive industry payments compared with psychiatrists (incidence rate ratio (IRR), 1.85 (95% CI 1.81 to 1.88); p<0.001)). Compared with psychiatrists, NPs were more likely to receive payments of > United States Dollars (US) $) 100 (33.9% vs 14.6%; IRR, 2.14 (2.08 to 2.20); p<0.001) and > US$ 1000 (5.3% vs 4.1%; IRR, 1.29 (1.20 to 1.38); p<0.001) but less likely to receive > US$ 10 000 (0.4% vs 1.0%; IRR, 0.39 (0.31 to 0.49); p<0.001). NPs in states with 'reduced' or 'restricted' scope of practice received more frequent payments (reduced: IRR, 1.22 (1.18 to 1.26); restricted: IRR, 1.26 (1.22 to 1.30), both p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric NPs were nearly two times as likely to receive industry payments as psychiatrists, while psychiatric CNSs were less than half as likely to receive payment. Stricter scope of practice laws increases the likelihood of psychiatric NPs receiving payment, the opposite of what was found in a recent specialty agnostic study.

Association of Malnutrition with Surgical and Hospital Outcomes after Spine Surgery for Spinal Metastases: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study of 1613 Patients.

Background: Malnutrition is a common condition that may exacerbate many medical and surgical pathologies. However, few have studied the impact of malnutrition on surgical outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for metastatic disease of the spine. This study aims to evaluate the impact of malnutrition on perioperative complications and healthcare resource utilization following surgical treatment of spinal metastases. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2011-2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Adult patients with spinal metastases who underwent laminectomy, corpectomy, or posterior fusion for extradural spinal metastases were identified using the CPT, ICD-9-CM, and ICD-10-CM codes. The study population was divided into two cohorts: Nourished (preoperative serum albumin values ≥ 3.5 g/dL) and Malnourished (preoperative serum albumin values < 3.5 g/dL). We assessed patient demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative variables, postoperative adverse events (AEs), hospital LOS, discharge disposition, readmission, and reoperation. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with a prolonged length of stay (LOS), AEs, non-routine discharge (NRD), and unplanned readmission. Results: Of the 1613 patients identified, 26.0% were Malnourished. Compared to Nourished patients, Malnourished patients were significantly more likely to be African American and have a lower BMI, but the age and sex were similar between the cohorts. The baseline comorbidity burden was significantly higher in the Malnourished cohort compared to the Nourished cohort. Compared to Nourished patients, Malnourished patients experienced significantly higher rates of one or more AEs (Nourished: 19.8% vs. Malnourished: 27.6%, p = 0.004) and serious AEs (Nourished: 15.2% vs. Malnourished: 22.6%, p < 0.001). Upon multivariate regression analysis, malnutrition was found to be an independent and associated with an extended LOS [aRR: 3.49, CI (1.97, 5.02), p < 0.001], NRD [saturated aOR: 1.76, CI (1.34, 2.32), p < 0.001], and unplanned readmission [saturated aOR: 1.42, CI (1.04, 1.95), p = 0.028]. Conclusions: Our study suggests that malnutrition increases the risk of postoperative complication, prolonged hospitalizations, non-routine discharges, and unplanned hospital readmissions. Further studies are necessary to identify the protocols that pre- and postoperatively optimize malnourished patients undergoing spinal surgery for metastatic spinal disease.

Association Between Intravenous to Oral Opioid Transition Time and Length of Hospital Stay After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Transitioning from intravenous (IV) to oral opioids after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is necessary during the postoperative course. However, few studies have assessed the effects of longer transition times on hospital length of stay (LOS). This study investigated the impact of longer IV to oral opioid transition times on LOS after PSF for AIS. METHODS: The medical records of 129 adolescents (10-18 years old) with AIS undergoing multilevel PSF at a major academic institution from 2013 to 2020 were reviewed. Patients were categorized by IV to oral opioid transition time: normal (≤2 days) vs prolonged (≥3 days). Patient demographics, comorbidities, deformity characteristics, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, and LOS were assessed. Multivariate analyses were used to determine odds ratios for risk-adjusted extended LOS. RESULTS: Of the 129 study patients, 29.5% (n = 38) had prolonged IV to oral transitions. Demographics and comorbidities were similar between the cohorts. The major curve degree (P = 0.762) and median (interquartile range) levels fused (P = 0.447) were similar between cohorts, but procedure time was significantly longer in the prolonged cohort (normal: 6.6 ± 1.2 hours vs prolonged: 7.2 ± 1.3 hours, P = 0.009). Postoperative complication rates were similar between the cohorts. Patients with prolonged transitions had significantly longer LOS (normal: 4.6 ± 1.3 days vs prolonged: 5.1 ± 0.8 days, P < 0.001) but similar discharge disposition (P = 0.722) and 30-day readmission rates (P > 0.99). On univariate analysis, transition time was significantly associated with extended LOS (OR: 2.0, 95% CI [0.9, 4.6], P = 0.014), but this assocation was not significant on multivariate analysis (adjusted OR: 2.1, 95% CI [1.3, 4.8], P = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: Longer postoperative IV to oral opioid transitions after PSF for AIS may have implications for hospital LOS.

Higher Hospital Frailty Risk Score is associated with increased complications and healthcare resource utilization after endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

AIM: To use the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) to investigate the impact of frailty on complication rates and healthcare resource utilization in patients who underwent endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample database. All adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing endovascular treatment for IAs after subarachnoid hemorrhage were identified using ICD-10-CM codes. Patients were categorized into frailty cohorts: low (HFRS <5), intermediate (HFRS 5-15) and high (HFRS >15). Patient demographics, adverse events, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and total cost of admission were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of prolonged LOS, increased cost, and non-routine discharge. RESULTS: Of the 33 840 patients identified, 7940 (23.5%) were found to be low, 20 075 (59.3%) intermediate and 5825 (17.2%) high frailty by HFRS criteria. The rate of encountering any adverse event was significantly greater in the higher frailty cohorts (low: 59.9%; intermediate: 92.4%; high: 99.2%, p<0.001). There was a stepwise increase in mean LOS (low: 11.7±8.2 days; intermediate: 18.7±14.1 days; high: 26.6±20.1 days, p<0.001), mean total hospital cost (low: $62 888±37 757; intermediate: $99 670±63 446; high: $134 937±80 331, p<0.001), and non-routine discharge (low: 17.3%; intermediate: 44.4%; high: 69.4%, p<0.001) with increasing frailty. On multivariate regression analysis, a similar stepwise impact was found in prolonged LOS (intermediate: OR 2.38, p<0.001; high: OR 4.49, p<0.001)], total hospital cost (intermediate: OR 2.15, p<0.001; high: OR 3.62, p<0.001), and non-routine discharge (intermediate: OR 2.13, p<0.001; high: OR 4.17, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that greater frailty as defined by the HFRS was associated with increased complications, LOS, total costs, and non-routine discharge.

Hospital Frailty Risk Score Predicts Adverse Events and Readmission Following a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Surgery for Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) on unplanned readmission and health care resource utilization in normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) patients undergoing a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmission Database. All NPH patients (≥60 years) undergoing a VP shunt surgery were identified using ICD-10-CM diagnostic and procedural codes. Patients were dichotomized into 2 cohorts as follows: Low HFRS (<5) and Intermediate-High HFRS (≥5). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was then used to identify independent predictors of adverse event (AE) and 30- and 90-day readmission. RESULTS: Of 13,262 patients, 4386 (33.1%) had an Intermediate-High HFRS score. A greater proportion of the Intermediate-High HFRS cohort experienced at least one AE (1.9 vs. 22.1, P < 0.001). The Intermediate-High HFRS cohort also had a longer length of stay (2.3 ± 2.4 days vs. 7.0 ± 7.7 days, P < 0.001), higher non-routine discharge rate (19.9% vs. 39.9%, P < 0.001), and greater admission cost ($14,634 ± 5703 vs. $21,749 ± 15,234, P < 0.001). The Intermediate-High HFRS cohort had higher rates of 30- (7.6% vs. 11.0%, P < 0.001) and 90-day (6.8% vs. 8.3%, P < 0.001) readmissions. On a multivariate regression analysis, Intermediate-High HFRS compared to Low HFRS was an independent predictor of any AE (odds ratio, 16.6; 95% confidence interval, [12.9-21.5]; P < 0.001) and 30-day readmission (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, [1.2-1.7]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that frailty, as defined by HFRS, is associated with increased resource utilization in NPH patients undergoing VP shunt surgery. Furthermore, HFRS was an independent predictor of adverse events and 30-day hospital readmission.

Association of inpatient opioid consumption on postoperative outcomes after open posterior spinal fusion for adult spine deformity.

INTRODUCTION: Opioids are the most commonly used analgesic in the postoperative setting. However, few studies have analyzed the impact of high inpatient opioid use on outcomes following surgery, with no current studies assessing its effect on patients undergoing spinal fusion for an adult spinal deformity (ASD). Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for high inpatient opioid use, as well as to determine the impact of high opioid use on outcomes such as adverse events (AEs), hospital length of stay (LOS), cost of hospital admission, discharge disposition, and readmission rates in patients undergoing spinal fusion for ASD. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the Premier healthcare database from the years 2016 and 2017. All adult patients > 40 years old who underwent thoracic or thoracolumbar fusion for ASD were identified using the ICD-10-CM diagnostic and procedural coding system. Patients were then categorized into three cohorts based on inpatient opioid use: Low MME (morphine milligram equivalents), Medium MME, and High MME. Patient demographics, comorbidities, treating hospital characteristics, intraoperative variables, postoperative AEs, LOS, discharge disposition, and total cost of hospital admission were assessed in the analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was done to determine independent predictors of high inpatient MME, prolonged LOS, and increased hospital cost. RESULTS: Of 1673 patients included, 417 (24.9%) were classified as Low MME, 840 (50.2%) as Medium MME, and 416 (24.9%) as High MME. Age significantly decreased with increasing MME (Low: 71.0% 65 + years vs Medium: 62.0% 65 + years vs High: 47.4% 65 + years, p < 0.001), while the proportions of patients presenting with three or more comorbidities were similar across the cohorts (Low: 20.1% with 3 + comorbidities vs Medium: 18.0% with 3 + comorbidities vs High: 24.3% with 3 + comorbidities, p = 0.070). With respect to postoperative outcomes, the proportion of patients who experienced any AE (Low: 60.2% vs Medium: 68.8% vs High: 70.9%, p = 0.002), extended LOS (Low: 6.7% vs Medium: 20.7% vs High: 45.4%, p < 0.001), or non-routine discharge (Low: 66.6% vs Medium: 73.5% vs High: 80.1%, p = 0.003) each increased along with total MME. In addition, rates of 30-day readmission were greatest among the High MME cohort (Low: 8.4% vs Medium: 7.9% vs High: 12.5%, p = 0.022). On multivariate analysis, medium and high MME were associated with prolonged LOS [Medium: OR 4.41, CI (2.90, 6.97); High: OR 13.99, CI (8.99, 22.51), p < 0.001] and increased hospital cost [Medium: OR 1.69, CI (1.21, 2.39), p = 0.002; High: OR 1.66, CI (1.12, 2.46), p = 0.011]. Preadmission long-term opioid use [OR 1.71, CI (1.07, 2.7), p = 0.022], a prior opioid-related disorder [OR 11.32, CI (5.92, 23.49), p < 0.001], and chronic pulmonary disease [OR 1.39, CI (1.06, 1.82), p = 0.018] were each associated with a high inpatient MME on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that increasing inpatient MME consumption was associated with extended LOS and increased hospital cost in patients undergoing spinal fusion for ASD. Further studies identifying risk factors for increased MME consumption may provide better risk stratification for postoperative opioid use and healthcare resource utilization.

Hospital Frailty Risk Score and Healthcare Resource Utilization After Surgery for Primary Spinal Intradural/Cord Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is a metric that measures frailty among patients in large national datasets using ICD-10 codes. While other metrics have been utilized to demonstrate the association between frailty and poor outcomes in spine oncology, none have examined the HFRS. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of frailty using the HFRS on complications, length of stay, cost of admission, and discharge disposition in patients undergoing surgery for primary tumors of the spinal cord and meninges. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2018. Adult patients undergoing surgery for primary tumors of the spinal cord and meninges were identified using ICD-10-CM codes. Patients were categorized into 2 cohorts based on HFRS score: Non-Frail (HFRS<5) and Frail (HFRS≥5). Patient characteristics, treatment, perioperative complications, LOS, discharge disposition, and cost of admission were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 5955 patients identified, 1260 (21.2%) were Frail. On average, the Frail cohort was nearly 8 years older (P < .001) and experienced more postoperative complications (P = .001). The Frail cohort experienced longer LOS (P < .001), a higher rate of non-routine discharge (P = .001), and a greater mean cost of admission (P < .001). Frailty was found to be an independent predictor of extended LOS (P < .001) and non-routine discharge (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to use the HFRS to assess the impact of frailty on patients with primary spinal tumors. We found that frailty was associated with prolonged LOS, non-routine discharge, and increased hospital costs.

The Case for Ethical Efficiency: A System That Has Run Out of Time.

The American health care system increasingly conflates physician "productivity" with true clinical efficiency. In reality, inordinate time pressure on physicians compromises quality of care, decreases patient satisfaction, increases clinician burnout, and costs the health care system a great deal in the long term even if it is financially expedient in the short term. Inadequate time to deliver care thereby conflicts with the core principles of biomedical ethics, including autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. We propose that the health care system adjust its focus to recognize the nonmonetary value of physician time while still realizing the need to deploy resources as effectively as possible, a concept we describe as "ethical efficiency."

Differences in Health Care Resource Utilization After Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Column Tumors in Patients with a Concurrent Affective Disorder in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Affective disorders, such as depression and anxiety, are exceedingly common among patients with metastatic cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between affective disorders and health care resource utilization in patients undergoing surgery for a spinal column metastasis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2016-2018 National Inpatient Sample database. All adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing surgery for a metastatic spinal tumor were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification coding systems. Patients were categorized into 2 cohorts: no affective disorder (No-AD) and affective disorder (AD). Patient demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, intraoperative variables, postoperative adverse events (AEs), length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and total cost of hospital admission were assessed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of increased cost, nonroutine discharge, and prolonged LOS. RESULTS: Of the 8360 patients identified, 1710 (20.5%) had a diagnosis of AD. Although no difference was observed in the rates of postoperative AEs between the cohorts (P = 0.912), the AD cohort had a significantly longer mean LOS (No-AD, 10.1 ± 8.3 days vs. AD, 11.6 ± 9.8 days; P = 0.012) and greater total cost (No-AD, $53,165 ± 35,512 vs. AD, $59,282 ± 36,917; P = 0.011). No significant differences in nonroutine discharge were observed between the cohorts (P = 0.265). On multivariate regression analysis, having an affective disorder was a significant predictor of increased costs (odds ratio, 1.45; confidence interval, 1.03-2.05; P = 0.034) and nonroutine discharge (odds ratio, 1.40; confidence interval, 1.06-1.85; P = 0.017), but not prolonged LOS (P = 0.067). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that affective disorders were significantly associated with greater hospital expenditures and nonroutine discharge, but not prolonged LOS, for patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases.

Assessment of Frailty Indices and Charlson Comorbidity Index for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Spine Metastases: A National Database Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the predictive ability of Metastatic Spinal Tumor Frailty Index (MSTFI) and the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) on adverse outcomes, compared with the known Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2019. All adult patients undergoing various procedures for extradural spinal metastases were identified. Patients were stratified into frail and nonfrail cohorts based on CCI, mFI-5, and MSTFI scores. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of prolonged length of stay, nonroutine discharge, adverse events, and unplanned readmission. RESULTS: Of the 1613 patients included in this study, 21.4% had a CCI >0, 56.6% had an mFI-5 >0, and 76.7% of patients had an MSTFI >0. On multivariate analysis, all 3 indices were found to be predictive of nonroutine discharge (CCI: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.41 vs. mFI-5: aOR, 1.37 vs. MSTFI: aOR, 1.5) and adverse events (CCI: aOR, 1.53 vs. mFI-5: aOR, 1.23 vs. MSTFI: aOR, 1.43). High CCI (adjusted relative risk, 1.67) and MSTFI (adjusted relative risk, 1.14), but not mFI-5, were also associated with a prolonged length of stay, whereas MSTFI was found to be the only significant predictor of unplanned readmission (aOR, 1.22). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that MSTFI frailty index may be more sensitive than both CCI and mFI-5 in identifying adverse outcomes after spine surgery for metastases.

Impact of Frailty on Morbidity and Mortality in Adult Patients Undergoing Surgical Evacuation of Acute Traumatic Subdural Hematoma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether baseline frailty is an independent predictor of extended hospital length of stay (LOS), nonroutine discharge, and in-hospital mortality after evacuation of an acute traumatic subdural hematoma (SDH). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. All adult patients who underwent surgery for an acute traumatic SDH were identified using the National Trauma Database from the year 2017. Patients were categorized into 3 cohorts based on the criteria of the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5): mFI = 0, mFI = 1, or mFI = 2+. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of extended LOS, nonroutine discharge, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of the 2620 patients identified, 41.7% were classified as mFI = 0, 32.7% as mFI = 1, and 25.6% as mFI = 2+. Rates of extended LOS and in-hospital mortality did differ significantly between the cohorts, with the mFI = 0 cohort most often experiencing a prolonged LOS (mFI = 0: 29.41% vs. mFI = 1: 19.45% vs. mFI = 2+: 19.73%, P < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (mFI = 0: 24.66% vs. mFI = 1: 18.11% vs. mFI = 2+: 21.58%, P = 0.002). On multivariate regression analysis, when compared with mFI = 0, mFI = 2+ (odds ratio 1.4, P = 0.03) predicted extended LOS and nonroutine discharge (odds ratio 1.61, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that baseline frailty may be an independent predictor of extended LOS and nonroutine discharge, but not in-hospital mortality, in patients undergoing evacuation for an acute traumatic SDH. Further investigations are warranted as they may guide treatment plans and reduce health care expenditures for frail patients with SDH.