Do colorectal cancer resections improve diabetes in long-term survivors? A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: A clinical study was designed that aimed to analyze whether resection of the large bowel in cancer patients might benefit diabetes mellitus. METHODS: This prospective case-control study included retrospective information. Patients (n = 247) included diabetic and euglycemic groups with colorectal cancer operations (n = 60), cancer gastrectomy (n = 72), exclusive chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer (n = 46), and noncancer clinical controls (n = 69). Follow-up periods were, respectively, 79.2 ± 27.4, 86.8 ± 25.1, 70.0 ± 26.3, and 85.1 ± 18.2 months (NS). Diabetes groups included patients with prediabetes. RESULTS: Diabetes remission, defined as conversion from diabetes to prediabetes or from this condition to normal, was documented in, respectively, 32.4 % (11 of 34), 41.2 % (14 of 34), 7.1 % (1 of 14), and 7.7 % (3 of 39) in the four cohorts (P = 0.004). Within the same period, progression of euglycemic participants to diabetes occurred in 30.8 % (8 of 26), 63.2 % (24 of 38), 25.0 (8 of 32), and 20.0 % (6 of 30) (P = 0.028). Diabetes amelioration was associated with weight loss in gastrectomy patients but not in the other groups. Dietary intake, estimated in the two surgical populations, did not predict outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes amelioration after colorectal interventions was demonstrated, but progression of euglycemic patients toward prediabetes was not changed in comparison with nonsurgical controls. It is speculated that reshaping of the bowel microbiome or hormone changes after colorectal interventions underlay the improvement in diabetes. Body weight fluctuations could not be incriminated in this investigation.

Does Roux-en-Y gastrectomy for gastric cancer influence glucose homeostasis in lean patients?

BACKGROUND: Cancer gastrectomy seems to benefit type 2 diabetes; however, results are conflicting. In a prospective protocol, including retrospective information, the aim was assessment of changes in glucose profile in patients with both normal and deranged preoperative glucose homeostasis. METHODS: Patients (N = 164) with curative subtotal or total Roux-en-Y gastrectomy for gastric cancer (n = 92), or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity (RYGB, n = 72) were preoperatively classified into diabetes (including prediabetes) and control group. Postoperative diabetes outcome was stratified as responsive or refractory, and results in controls were correspondingly defined as stable or new-onset diabetes (NOD), according to fasting blood glucose and HbA1c. Dietary intake and biochemical profile was documented. Statistical methods included analysis of variance, multivariate logistic regression, and propensity score matching according to postoperative weight loss. RESULTS: Age of cancer cases was 67.9 ± 11.5 years, 56.5 % males, initial body mass index (BMI) 24.7 ± 3.7, current BMI 22.6 ± 3.8 kg/m(2), and follow-up 102.1 ± 51.0 months, whereas in bariatric individuals age was 51.4 ± 10.1 years, 15.3 % males, initial BMI 56.7 ± 12.2, current BMI 34.8 ± 8.1 kg/m(2), and follow-up 104.1 ± 29.7 months. Refractory disease corresponded to 62.5 % (cancer) versus 23.5 % (bariatric) (P = 0.019), whereas NOD represented 69.2 versus 23.8 % respectively (P = 0.016). Weight loss (ΔBMI) was associated with diabetes response in cancer patients but not with NOD. No difference between subtotal and total gastrectomy was detected. Divergent outcomes (refractory vs. responsive) were confirmed in BMI-similar, propensity-matched cancer gastrectomy patients with preoperative diabetes, consistent with weight-dependent and -independent benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes response was confirmed, however with more refractory cases than in bariatric controls, whereas high proportions of NOD occurred. Such dichotomous pattern seems unusual albeit consistent with previous studies.

Refractory and new-onset diabetes more than 5 years after gastric bypass for morbid obesity.

BACKGROUND: Few studies about long-term glucose homeostasis in bariatric patients are available. In a prospective protocol that included retrospective information, outcome of patients with both impaired and normal fasting blood glucose (FBG) was monitored to assess frequencies and correlates. METHODS: Patients submitted to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were classified as group I, elevated FBG, and group II, normal controls. Those in group I with improvement in FBG were defined as responsive and the others as refractory. Group II participants progressing to new-onset diabetes (NOD) or prediabetes represented NOD cases; the remaining were listed as stable controls. FBG was the main endpoint, but HbA1c results were considered, along with diet composition and general biochemical profile. RESULTS: Among 97 selected patients, 51 belonged to group I (52.4 ± 10.5 years, 29.6 % males, initial body mass index (BMI) 58.4 ± 13.4, current BMI 35.1 ± 8.4 kg/m(2)) and 46 to group II (48.2 ± 10.5 years, 19.6 % males, initial BMI 55.5 ± 8.8, current BMI 33.9 ± 6.9 kg/m(2)). Follow-up was 7-9 years, and 31.4 % (16/51) of group I were classified as refractory, whereas 15.2 % (7/46) of the controls converted to NOD. Multivariate analysis pointed out higher current BMI, older age, consumption of antidiabetic drugs, and male gender as features of refractory cases, whereas NOD participants were not significantly different from non-progressing controls. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first investigation, to the best of our knowledge, to underscore the correlates of refractory and NOD within the bariatric context. Further studies are recommended as such information could be valuable for patient selection, prognostic scoring, and outcome monitoring.

Interference of silicone breast implants on bioimpedance measurement of body fat.

BACKGROUND: No study targeting the impact of silicone breast implants on body composition measured by bioimpedance analysis was identified. OBJECTIVE: Aiming to clarify this question a prospective clinical study was designed. METHODS: Adult candidates were submitted to conventional analysis at baseline and two months after the surgical intervention. In addition, unwrapped prostheses were positioned in the axillary cavity before operation and bioimpedance was measured, both with and without application of ultrasound gel for improved conductivity (sham implantation). RESULTS: Patients (N = 20) were young and healthy (26.8 ± 3.6 years old, BMI 22.1 ± 3.7 kg/m(2)). In comparison with preoperative results, sham procedures pointed out increased body fat and body resistance (13.2 ± 5.6 vs 13.6 ± 5.4 kg, P = 0.017 and 523 ± 54 vs 569 ± 53 Ω, P = 0.003, respectively). Two-month follow-up confirmed the same pattern after surgical intervention, with minor discrepancies (13.2 ± 5.6 vs 13.8 ± 5.7 kg, P = 0.011 and 523 ± 54 vs 549 ± 62 Ω, P = 0.032, respectively). BMI remained stable and did not correlate with bioimpedance changes. CONCLUSIONS: Silicone was recognized as adipose tissue. Difference in total body fat (approximately 600 g) was consistent with used amount.