Validation of a perioperative population factor VIII pharmacokinetic model with a large cohort of pediatric hemophilia a patients.

AIMS: Population pharmacokinetic (PK) models are increasingly applied to perform individualized dosing of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in haemophilia A patients. To guarantee accurate performance of a population PK model in dose individualization, validation studies are of importance. However, external validation of population PK models requires independent data sets and is, therefore, seldomly performed. Therefore, this study aimed to validate a previously published population PK model for FVIII concentrates administrated perioperatively. METHODS: A previously published population PK model for FVIII concentrate during surgery was validated using independent data from 87 children with severe haemophilia A with a median (range) age of 2.6 years (0.03-15.2) and body weight of 14 kg (4-57). First, the predictive performance of the previous model was evaluated with MAP Bayesian analysis using NONMEM v7.4. Subsequently, the model parameters were (re)estimated using a combined dataset consisting of the previous modelling data and the data available for the external validation. RESULTS: The previous model underpredicted the measured FVIII levels with a median of 0.17 IU mL-1 . Combining the new, independent and original data, a dataset comprising 206 patients with a mean age of 7.8 years (0.03-77.6) and body weight of 30 kg (4-111) was obtained. Population PK modelling provided estimates for CL, V1, V2, and Q: 171 mL h-1  68 kg-1 , 2930 mL 68 kg-1 , 1810 mL 68 kg-1 , and 172 mL h-1  68 kg-1 , respectively. This model adequately described all collected FVIII levels, with a slight median overprediction of 0.02 IU mL-1 . CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the importance of external validation of population PK models using real-life data.

Dosing of factor VIII concentrate by ideal body weight is more accurate in overweight and obese haemophilia A patients.

AIMS: Under- and, especially, overdosing of replacement therapy in haemophilia A patients may be prevented by application of other morphometric variables than body weight (BW) to dose factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates. Therefore, we aimed to investigate which morphometric variables best describe interindividual variability (IIV) of FVIII concentrate pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. METHODS: PK profiling was performed by measuring 3 FVIII levels after a standardized dose of 50 IU kg-1 FVIII concentrate. A population PK model was constructed, in which IIV for clearance (CL) and central volume of distribution (V1) was quantified. Relationships between CL, V1 and 5 morphometric variables (BW, ideal BW [IBW], lean BW, adjusted BW, and body mass index [BMI]) were evaluated in normal weight (BMI < 25 kg m-2 ), overweight (BMI 25-30 kg m-2 ) and obese haemophilia A patients (BMI > 30 kg m-2 ). RESULTS: In total, 57 haemophilia A patients (FVIII≤0.05 IU mL-1 ) were included with median BW of 83 kg (range: 53-133) and median age of 48 years (range: 18-77). IBW best explained observed variability between patients, as IIV for CL and V1 was reduced from 45.1 to 37.6 and 26.% to 14.1%, respectively. CL, V1 and half-life were similar for all BMI categories. The national recommended dosing schedule did not result in adequate trough levels, both in case of dosing based on BW and IBW. However, dosing based on IBW prevented unnecessary high FVIII peaks. CONCLUSION: IBW is the most suitable morphometric variable to explain interindividual FVIII PK variability and is more appropriate to dose overweight and obese patients.

Current dosing practices for perioperative factor VIII concentrate treatment in mild haemophilia A patients result in FVIII levels above target.

BACKGROUND: In patients with haemophilia A (HA) perioperative dosing of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate is based on body weight, historical FVIII level, in vivo recovery and FVIII level target values. In moderate and severe HA patients, this dosing regimen frequently leads to perioperative FVIII levels below and above target. This has not yet been evaluated in mild HA patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate perioperative FVIII concentrate treatment in mild HA patients and to assess the frequency of FVIII levels below or above target. PATIENTS/METHODS: This retrospective single-centre study collected data from medical files of mild HA patients undergoing surgery and treated with FVIII concentrate. FVIII levels were compared to their target ranges and predictive factors for levels outside the target ranges were determined by logistic regression. RESULTS: Fifty surgeries performed in 34 patients were evaluated. Median age was 47 years and median historical FVIII level was 0.14 IU/mL. Preoperative peak FVIII level was above or below the target range in 80% and 6.7% of surgeries, respectively. Postoperatively, the percentages above and below target trough ranges were 55.8% and 12.8%. Patients with blood group 0 had the highest risk on the preoperative peak FVIII level being above target. In addition, patients who had a preoperative baseline FVIII level of >0.10 IU/mL higher than their historical FVIII level had a higher preoperative peak FVIII level than patients without this increase. CONCLUSIONS: Dosing above FVIII target ranges with FVIII concentrates occurs frequently during perioperative treatment of mild HA patients. These results underline the necessity for better patient-tailored treatment.

Population pharmacokinetics of the von Willebrand factor-factor VIII interaction in patients with von Willebrand disease.

Recent studies have reported that patients with von Willebrand disease treated perioperatively with a von Willebrand factor (VWF)/factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate with a ratio of 2.4:1 (Humate P/Haemate P) often present with VWF and/or FVIII levels outside of prespecified target levels necessary to prevent bleeding. Pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing may resolve this problem. As clinical guidelines increasingly recommend aiming for certain target levels of both VWF and FVIII, application of an integrated population PK model describing both VWF activity (VWF:Act) and FVIII levels may improve dosing and quality of care. In total, 695 VWF:Act and 894 FVIII level measurements from 118 patients (174 surgeries) who were treated perioperatively with the VWF/FVIII concentrate were used to develop this population PK model using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. VWF:Act and FVIII levels were analyzed simultaneously using a turnover model. The protective effect of VWF:Act on FVIII clearance was described with an inhibitory maximum effect function. An average perioperative VWF:Act level of 1.23 IU/mL decreased FVIII clearance from 460 mL/h to 264 mL/h, and increased FVIII half-life from 6.6 to 11.4 hours. Clearly, in the presence of VWF, FVIII clearance decreased with a concomitant increase of FVIII half-life, clarifying the higher FVIII levels observed after repetitive dosing with this concentrate. VWF:Act and FVIII levels during perioperative treatment were described adequately by this newly developed integrated population PK model. Clinical application of this model may facilitate more accurate targeting of VWF:Act and FVIII levels during perioperative treatment with this specific VWF/FVIII concentrate (Humate P/Haemate P).

Perioperative pharmacokinetic-guided factor VIII concentrate dosing in haemophilia (OPTI-CLOT trial): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Dosing of replacement therapy with factor VIII concentrate in patients with haemophilia A in the perioperative setting is challenging. Underdosing and overdosing of factor VIII concentrate should be avoided to minimise risk of perioperative bleeding and treatment costs. We hypothesised that dosing of factor VIII concentrate on the basis of a patient's pharmacokinetic profile instead of bodyweight, which is standard treatment, would reduce factor VIII consumption and improve the accuracy of attained factor VIII levels. METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial (OPTI-CLOT), patients were recruited from nine centres in Rotterdam, Groningen, Utrecht, Nijmegen, The Hague, Leiden, Amsterdam, Eindhoven, and Maastricht in The Netherlands. Eligible patients were aged 12 years or older with severe or moderate haemophilia A (severe haemophilia was defined as factor VIII concentrations of <0·01 IU/mL, and moderate haemophilia as 0·01-0·05 IU/mL), without factor VIII inhibitors, and planned for elective low or medium risk surgery as defined by surgical risk score. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a web-based randomisation system and treatment minimisation, stratified by method of administration of factor VIII concentrate (continuous infusion vs bolus administration) and risk level of surgery (low and medium risk surgery), to the pharmacokinetic-guided or standard treatment group. The primary endpoint was total amount of infused factor VIII concentrate (IU per kg bodyweight) during perioperative period (from day of surgery up to 14 days after surgery). Analysis was by intention to treat and the safety analysis population comprised all participants who underwent surgery with factor VIII concentrate. This study is registered with the Netherlands Trial Registry, NL3955, and is now closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between May 1, 2014, and March 1, 2020, 98 patients were assessed for eligibility and 66 were enrolled in the trial and randomly assigned to the pharmacokinetic-guided treatment group (34 [52%]) or the standard treatment group (32 [48%]). Median age was 49·1 years (IQR 35·0 to 62·1) and all participants were male. No difference was seen in consumption of factor VIII concentrate during the perioperative period between groups (mean consumption of 365 IU/kg [SD 202] in pharmacokinetic-guided treatment group vs 379 IU/kg [202] in standard treatment group; adjusted difference -6 IU/kg [95% CI -88 to 100]). Postoperative bleeding occurred in six (18%) of 34 patients in the pharmacokinetic-guided treatment group and three (9%) of 32 in the standard treatment group. One grade 4 postoperative bleeding event occurred, which was in one (3%) patient in the standard treatment group. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: Although perioperative pharmacokinetic-guided dosing is safe, it leads to similar perioperative factor VIII consumption when compared with standard treatment. However, pharmacokinetic-guided dosing showed an improvement in obtaining factor VIII concentrations within the desired perioperative factor VIII range. These findings provide support to further investigation of pharmacokinetic-guided dosing in perioperative haemophilia care. FUNDING: Dutch Research Council (NWO)-ZonMw and Takeda.

Predictors of oral cavity bleeding and clinical outcome after dental procedures in patients on vitamin K antagonists. A cohort study.

Patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKA) often undergo invasive dental procedures. International guidelines consider all dental procedures as low-risk procedures, while bleeding risk may differ between standard low-risk (e. g. extraction 1-3 elements) and extensive high-risk (e. g. extraction of >3 elements) procedures. Therefore current guidelines may need refinement. In this cohort study, we identified predictors of oral cavity bleeding (OCB) and evaluated clinical outcome after low-risk and high-risk dental procedures in patients on VKA. Perioperative management strategy, procedure risk, and 30-day outcomes were assessed for each procedure. We identified 1845 patients undergoing 2004 low-risk and 325 high-risk procedures between 2013 and 2015. OCB occurred after 67/2004 (3.3 %) low-risk and 21/325 (6.5 %) high-risk procedures (p=0.006). In low-risk procedures, VKA continuation with tranexamic acid mouthwash was associated with a lower OCB risk compared to continuation without mouthwash [OR=0.41, 95 %CI 0.23-0.73] or interruption with bridging [OR=0.49, 95 %CI 0.24-1.00], and a similar risk as interruption without bridging [OR=1.44, 95 %CI 0.62-3.64]. In high-risk procedures, VKA continuation was associated with an increased OCB risk compared to interruption [OR=3.08, 95 %CI 1.05-9.04]. Multivariate analyses revealed bridging, antiplatelet therapy, and a supratherapeutic or unobjectified INR before the procedure as strongest predictors of OCB. Non-oral cavity bleeding (NOCB) and thromboembolic event (TE) rates were 2.1 % and 0.2 %. Bridging therapy was associated with a two-fold increased risk of NOCB [OR=1.93, 95 %CI 1.03-3.60], but not with lower TE rates. In conclusion, predictors of OCB were mostly related to perioperative management and differed between low-risk and high-risk procedures. Perioperative management should be differentiated accordingly.

Pharmacokinetic-guided dosing of factor VIII concentrate in a patient with haemophilia during renal transplantation.

A 29-year-old man with severe haemophilia A and end-stage renal disease underwent a renal transplantation. To prevent bleeding, patient was treated with replacement therapy using factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate, according to National guidelines. Bayesian analysis was performed by combining observed FVIII concentrations with a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for patients with severe haemophilia A in a perioperative setting. Application of Bayesian analysis led to accurate prediction of observed concentrations after prescribing dosing advice. We believe that PK-guided dosing of factor concentrates is a valuable step towards further individualisation of treatment in patients with bleeding disorders, especially in those patients requiring precise targeting of coagulation factor levels due to high risk of either bleeding or thrombosis, as illustrated by this patient undergoing a major surgical procedure.

The "OPTI-CLOT" trial. A randomised controlled trial on periOperative PharmacokineTIc-guided dosing of CLOTting factor concentrate in haemophilia A.

Haemophilia A is an X-linked inherited, rare bleeding disorder, caused by a deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Previous studies in prophylactic dosing have demonstrated that FVIII consumption can be significantly reduced by individualising dosing based on combined analysis of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) profiling and population PK data (Bayesian analysis). So far, no studies have been performed that address perioperative concentrate consumption using iterative PK-guided dosing based on a PK population model. The "OPTI-CLOT" trial is an open-label, prospective, multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (RCT), aiming to detect a 25 % difference in perioperative FVIII concentrate consumption with iterative Bayesian PK-guided dosing in comparison to the standard dosing procedure. Sixty haemophilia A patients ≥ 12 years of age, with FVIII plasma levels ≤ 0.05 IUml(-1) will be included requiring FVIII replacement therapy administered either by continuous or bolus infusion for an elective, low or medium risk surgical procedure. The proposed study aims to investigate a novel perioperative iterative PK-guided dosing strategy, based on a recently constructed perioperative PK population model. This model will potentially decrease underdosing and overdosing of clotting factor concentrate and is expected to overall reduce FVIII consumption by minimally 25 %. Moreover, participating hospitals will gain experience with PK-guided dosing, facilitating future implementation of this intervention which is expected to optimise current care and reduce costs of treatment.