Evolution of psychosocial burden and psychiatric symptoms in patients with psychiatric disorders during the Covid-19 pandemic.

The Covid-19 pandemic highly impacts mental health worldwide. Patients with psychiatric disorders are a vulnerable risk population for worsening of their condition and relapse of symptoms. This study investigates the pandemic-related course of psychosocial burden in patients with pre-existing mental disorders. With the newly developed Goettingen psychosocial Burden and Symptom Inventory (Goe-BSI) psychosocial burden has been traced retrospectively (1) before the pandemic (beginning of 2020), (2) at its beginning under maximum lockdown conditions (March 2020), and (3) for the current state after maximum lockdown conditions (April/May 2020). The Goe-BSI also integrates the Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM-20), assesses general psychiatric symptoms, and resilience. A total of 213 patients covering all major psychiatric disorders (ICD-10 F0-F9) were interviewed once in the time range from April, 24th until May 11th, 2020. Across all diagnoses patients exhibited a distinct pattern with an initial rise followed by a decline of psychosocial burden (p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.09; Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons between all three time-points: p < 0.05 to 0.001). Female gender and high ADNM-20 scores were identified as risk factors for higher levels and an unfavorable course of psychosocial burden over time. Most psychiatric symptoms remained unchanged. Trajectories of psychosocial burden vary in parallel to local lockdown restrictions and seem to reflect an adaptive stress response. For female patients with pre-existing mental disorders and patients with high-stress responses, timely and specific treatment should be scheduled. With the continuation of the pandemic, monitoring of long-term effects is of major importance, especially when long incubation times for the development of mental health issues are considered.

Medium-term and peri-lockdown course of psychosocial burden during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study on patients with pre-existing mental disorders.

While the COVID-19 pandemic continues, patients with pre-existing mental disorders are increasingly recognized as a risk group for adverse outcomes. However, data are conflicting and cover only short time spans so far. Here, we investigate the medium-term and peri-lockdown-related changes of mental health outcomes in such patients in a longitudinal study. A cohort of 159 patients comprising all major mental disorders (ICD-10 F0-F9) were interviewed twice with the Goettingen psychosocial Burden and Symptom Inventory (Goe-BSI) to evaluate psychosocial burden, psychiatric symptoms and resilience at the end of the first (April/May 2020) and the second lockdown in Germany (November/December 2020). For the primary outcome "psychosocial burden" ratings also comprised retrospective pre-pandemic (early 2020) and very early states during the pandemic (March 2020). For all diagnostic groups, psychosocial burden varied significantly over time (p < 0.001) with an increase from the pre-pandemic to the initial phase (p < 0.001), followed by a steady decrease across both lockdowns, normalizing in November/December 2020. Female gender, high adjustment disorder symptom load at baseline and psychiatric comorbidities were risk factors for higher levels and an unfavorable course of psychosocial burden. Most psychiatric symptoms changed minimally, while resilience decreased over time (p = 0.044 and p = 0.037). The longitudinal course of psychosocial burden indicates an initial stress response, followed by a return to pre-pandemic levels even under recurrent lockdown conditions, mimicking symptoms of an adjustment disorder. Strategies for proactive, specific and continuous treatment have to address resilience capacities before their depletion in the pandemic aftermath, especially for patients with additional risk factors.

Stressors related to the Covid-19 pandemic, climate change, and the Ukraine crisis, and their impact on stress symptoms in Germany: analysis of cross-sectional survey data.

BACKGROUND: Climate change, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the Ukraine crisis are considered unprecedented global stressors, potentially associated with serious health consequences. However, simultaneous effects of these stressors are not yet understood, making it difficult to evaluate their relative contribution to the population burden and potential future manifestations in clinically significant psychiatric disorders. This study aimed at disentangling the relative contribution of the three stressor groups on current sub-clinical stress symptoms. METHODS: A cross-sectional, representative survey study was conducted two months after the outbreak of the Ukraine war in Germany. Proportional quota sampling was applied for age, gender, income, and regional characteristics. Data were recruited by means of an online survey. 3094 data sets (1560 females) were included. Age ranged from 18-89 (M: 50.4 years; SD: 17.2). The Subclinical Stress Questionnaire (SSQ-25) served as main outcome measure. In collaboration with a professional media agency, 20 items were generated to capture salient population stressors. A three-factor exploratory structural equation model confirmed the appropriateness of this scale. RESULTS: (1) Differences in subjective rankings revealed that stressors related to the Ukraine crisis were rated as most worrying, followed by climate change, and the Covid-19 pandemic (Generalized-Linear-Model: Epsilon = .97; F(1.94, 6001.14) = 1026.12, p < .001; ηp2 = .25). (2) In a linear regression model (R2 = .39), Covid-19 pandemic stressors were the only meaningful predictors for current ill-health (standardized ß = .48). Ukraine crisis did not predict stress symptom profiles in the present sample. (3) Older and male individuals report less and/or less severe stress symptoms, although effect sizes were small (range: η2 .11-.21). An older age also reduced the impact of Covid-19 stressors. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers from the health sciences must consider overlapping effects from population stressors. Although the Ukraine crisis and climate change mark salient stressors, including economic threats, the Covid-19 pandemic still has a profound effect on ill-health and must be considered as a relevant factor in future manifestations of psychiatric and associated health consequences.

Current clinical practice of electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychiatry, a German sample.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the current clinical practice of Electroconvulsive Therapy and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in German psychiatry. Case-based data (> 1.000.000 cases) were collected according to §21 of the German hospital remuneration law from January 2015 to December 2017. The study cohort comprises approximately 35-40% of the annual psychiatric cases and hospitals in Germany. Frequency of ECT and rTMS cases were investigated considering main diagnoses according to ICD-10 and treatment settings (inpatient vs. day-care). ECT cases with short-term hospitalization (≤ 4 days) were supposed to be maintenance ECT cases. A linear regression analysis was conducted to estimate trends in the use of ECT and rTMS. Different groups were compared using Chi-square tests. ECT and rTMS cases appear to increase in total during the observation period possibly due to facilities newly introducing ECT and rTMS but also to increased frequency of treatments. Both treatments were rarely performed in day-care settings (0.89% and 11.25%). ECT was performed in 1.72% of all cases with affective disorders and in 1.48% with major depressions, respectively. Age ≥ 65 years, females, severe and psychotic depression were significantly associated with a higher rate of ECT cases. > 40% of all ECT cases were possibly maintenance ECT cases. Only 0.60% of these were performed in day- care settings. rTMS was primarily performed in major depression (86,7% of all rTMS cases). This study suggests a growing demand for ECT and rTMS. Nevertheless, the use of ECT is still low compared to the high prevalence of treatment resistant depression. The use of rTMS is even lower and seems to be restricted to specialized institutions. Maintenance ECT is frequently carried out in an inpatient setting. Limitations of this study are the case- and group-based analysis, missing data on outpatient services and treatment sessions per case. Therefore, the database is not necessarily representative for the entire German healthcare system. Further studies are needed to verify the presented findings and should address the feasibility of ambulatory and day-care ECT services.

Prevalence of affective disorders and dementia in inflammatory polyarthropathies.

Comorbid disorders are common in psychiatric diseases and understanding the risk of secondary diseases can aid successful clinical treatment. The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of comorbid dementia, affective disorders, and inflammatory polyarthropathies. Healthcare data obtained via the German Hospital Fees Act from two independent databases with more than 7.4 million cases were analyzed to compare the prevalence of comorbid disorders. Comorbid inflammatory polyarthropathy was observed in 2.27% of patients diagnosed with affective disorders and 1.35% of patients with dementia (p < 0.001). Among patients with a primary diagnosis of inflammatory polyarthropathy, 1.27% of patients were diagnosed with dementia, whereas 4.55% of age-matched patients without inflammatory polyarthropathies had comorbid dementia (p < 0.001). The opposite effect was demonstrated for affective disorders, as 5.77% of patients with a primary diagnosis of inflammatory polyarthropathy also had comorbid affective disorders, while 4.87% of age-matched patients without inflammatory polyarthropathy had an accompanying affective disease (p < 0.001). These findings show an association between the occurrence of inflammatory polyarthropathies, dementia, and affective disorders. This correlation might improve diagnosis and treatment for patients with comorbidities. Moreover, further exploration of the molecular pathophysiology underlying these relationships could be relevant for the development of novel treatment options.

Safety Profile of Methylphenidate Under Long-Term Treatment in Adult ADHD Patients - Results of the COMPAS Study.

INTRODUCTION: The Comparison of Methylphenidate and Psychotherapy in adult ADHD Study (COMPAS) was a prospective, randomized multicenter clinical trial, comparing methylphenidate (MPH) with placebo (PLAC) in combination with cognitive behavioral group psychotherapy (GPT) or individual clinical management (CM) over the period of 1 year. Here, we report results on treatment safety. METHODS: MPH and PLAC were flexibly dosed. Among 433 randomized patients, adverse events (AEs) were documented and analyzed on an "as received" basis during week 0-52. Electrocardiogram data were recorded at baseline and week 24. RESULTS: Comparing 205 patients who received ≥1 dose of MPH with 209 patients who received PLAC, AEs occurring significantly more frequently in the MPH group were decreased appetite (22 vs. 3.8%), dry mouth (15 vs. 4.8%), palpitations (13 vs. 3.3%), gastrointestinal infection (11 vs. 4.8%), agitation (11 vs. 3.3%), restlessness (10 vs. 2.9%), hyperhidrosis, tachycardia, weight decrease (all 6.3 vs. 1.9%), depressive symptom, influenza (both 4.9 vs. 1.0%), and acute tonsillitis (4.4 vs. 0.5%). Syncope occurred significantly more often in the PLAC group (2.4 vs. 0%). Clinically relevant ECG changes occurred very rarely in both groups. Serious AEs were rare and without a significant group difference. The comparison of 206 patients treated with GPT versus 209 patients who received CM revealed no major differences. Serious AE classified as psychiatric occurred in 5 cases in the CM group and in 1 case in the GPT group. CONCLUSION: In this so far longest-running clinical trial, methylphenidate treatment was safe and well-tolerated.

Nuclear medical imaging as part of dementia diagnostics in psychiatric day-care clinics and inpatient care settings.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines support the use of nuclear medical imaging (NMI) techniques for differential diagnostics of certain cases of dementia. AIMS: We aimed at studying the association between using NMI and the accuracy of dementia diagnoses. Additionally, we evaluated the effect of conducting NMI on the duration of hospital treatment. METHODS: This study was based on data collected according to §21 of the German hospital remuneration law, including relevant diagnostic and procedural codes for NMI in dementia patients. In total, more than 7.2 million cases treated in German psychiatric and somatic hospitals between 2015 and 2017 were included. Associations between the frequency of NMI and the accuracy of dementia diagnoses in terms of specific vs. unspecific diagnostic codes were analyzed using Fischer's exact test. RESULTS: In total, 351,106 cases with a dementia diagnosis were encoded during the study period. NMI was performed in 1.03% or 0.15% of all patients with dementia in psychiatric or somatic clinics, respectively. In psychiatric clinics, the proportion of unspecific dementia diagnoses decreased from 20.86% in 2015 to 17.73% in 2017. NMI was mainly performed within psychiatric day-care settings. Interestingly, patients receiving NMI stayed shorter within day-care settings (8.1 ± 16.0 days) compared to inpatient settings (38.3 ± 44.7 days). CONCLUSIONS: Nuclear medical imaging is often performed in psychiatric day-care settings. Further studies are warranted to understand the predictive diagnostic value of NMI in dementia diagnosis compared with clinical, CSF and structural imaging in different healthcare settings.

Association between longitudinal clinical outcomes in patients with hip fracture and their pre-fracture place of residence.

BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes of patients with proximal femoral fracture within 1 year after hospitalization are presented. In particular, associations between the patients' clinical status and their pre-fracture residence were evaluated (community-dwelling vs nursing home). METHODS: Patients aged ≥60 years with proximal femoral fractures were included in a prospective, single-centre observational study and followed for 12 months. Patients' clinical status at baseline was compared to their health status at follow-up 12 months later. Several standardized questionnaires were used to evaluate the patients' functional and cognitive capacity (e.g. Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, Barthel Index, and Mini-Mental State Examination), mobility (timed up-and-go test, Tinetti Test, and Harris Hip Score), quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions index and EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale), and psychological status (Geriatric Depression Scale). RESULTS: This study included 402 patients (mean age: 81.3 ± 8.2 years, 72% women). Patients stayed in hospital for 13.7 ± 6.1 days on average. The comparison of patients' clinical status at baseline and at 12-month follow-up revealed that the Mini-Mental State Examination and Charlson Comorbidity Index remained unchanged (P = 0.527 and P = 0.705), the level of depression (Geriatric Depression Scale) significantly decreased (P < 0.001), and quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions index) diminished (P < 0.001). Although patients' mobility increased after 12 months (P < 0.001 for timed up-and-go test and Harris Hip Score), their functional capacity was significantly reduced (P < 0.001 for Barthel Index and Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale). Nursing home residents showed a significantly higher impairment at baseline than community-dwelling individuals and less improvement in functional and cognitive tests at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes after hip fracture are significantly associated with patients' pre-fracture residence status. Place of residence as well as functional and cognitive status on admission may lead to differences in functional recovery and affect therapeutic and rehabilitative decision-making.

Prescription of Benzodiazepines and Related Drugs in Patients with Mild Cognitive Deficits and Alzheimer's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Benzodiazepines and related drugs (BZDR) should be avoided in patients with cognitive impairment. We evaluated the relationship between a BZDR treatment and the health status of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Cross-sectional study in 395 AD patients using bivariate and multiple logistic analyses to assess correlations between the prescription of BZDR and patients' characteristics (cognitive and functional capacity, health-related quality of life (HrQoL), neuropsychiatric symptoms). RESULTS: BZDR were used in 12.4% (n=49) of all participants. In bivariate analyses, the prescription was associated with a lower HrQoL, a higher need of care, and the presence of anxiety. Multivariate models revealed a higher risk of BZDR treatment in patients with depression (OR 3.85, 95% CI: 1.45 - 10.27). Community-dwelling participants and those treated by neurologists/psychiatrists had a lower risk of receiving BZDR (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12 - 0.89 and OR 0.16, 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.36). DISCUSSION: The inappropriate use of BZDR conflicts with national and international guidelines. We suggest evaluating indications and treatment duration and improving the knowledge of alternative therapies in healthcare institutions.

Antidepressant medication in a German cohort of patients with Alzheimer's disease
.

OBJECTIVE: The use of antidepressant drugs in dementia patients is associated with the risk of adverse events, and the evidence for relevant effects is scarce. We aimed to determine the associations between the prescription of antidepressants and patients' sociodemographic (e.g., age, gender, living situation) and clinical characteristics (e.g., disease severity, neuropsychiatric symptoms). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 395 institutionalized and community-dwelling patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) across all severity stages of dementia in a cross-sectional study design. The patients' clinical characteristics comprised of cognitive status, daily activities, depressive symptoms, further neuropsychiatric symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HrQoL). We conducted multiple logistic regression analyses for the association between the use of antidepressant drugs and the covariates. RESULTS: Approximately 31% of the participants were treated with antidepressant drugs, with a higher chance of being medicated for institutionalized patients (χ2-test: p = 0.010). In the bivariate analyses, the use of antidepressants was significantly associated with higher levels of care, lower cognitive and daily life capacity, higher extent of neuropsychiatric symptoms, and a lower proxy-reported HrQoL. Finally, multiple logistic regression models showed a significantly higher use of antidepressants in patients treated by psychiatrists and neurologists (OR 2.852, 95% CI: 1.223 - 6.652). CONCLUSION: The use of antidepressant drugs in the study population was high, and the suitability of the treatment with antidepressants remains unclear. Participants with diminished cognitive and functional capacity, higher extent of neuropsychiatric symptoms, and those treated by neuropsychiatric specialists were more likely to be treated with antidepressants. The pharmaceutical treatment of patients with these clinical characteristics should be particularly considered in the daily care for dementia patients. Further longitudinal studies should evaluate the appropriateness of indications for antidepressants and the causative direction of correlations with the patients' clinical characteristics.
.

Antipsychotic treatment of community-dwelling and institutionalised patients with dementia in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: A restrictive use of antipsychotic drugs in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is recommended due to an increased risk of cerebrovascular events and mortality. We hypothesise that the prescription of antipsychotics is associated with the patients' socio-demographic and clinical status (e.g., dementia severity). METHODS: The prescription of antipsychotics was cross-sectionally evaluated in 272 community-dwelling and 123 institutionalised patients with AD across all severity stages of dementia. The patients' clinical characteristics covered the cognitive status, neuropsychiatric symptoms, daily activities, and quality of life (HrQoL). To determine associations with the use of antipsychotics bivariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Totally, 25% of the patients were treated with antipsychotics. significantly less frequently than nursing home inhabitants (15.1% vs. 45.5%). Severely demented patients (MMSE 0-9) received antipsychotics most often (51.5%). Additionally, multiple regression analyses revealed a higher chance of prescription for participants with depressive symptoms (OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.019-5.160) and those treated by neuropsychiatric specialists (OR 3.4, 95% CI: 1.408-8.328). CONCLUSIONS: Further longitudinal studies are required to assess the appropriateness of indications for antipsychotics and the reasons for a higher use in nursing home inhabitants and patients with severe dementia and depression.

Cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities in patients with Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia compared to a psychiatric control cohort.

BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity in dementia is associated with an increased risk of complications and a higher need for care. Having knowledge of cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities is crucial when making decisions about diagnostic procedures and therapies. We compared the prevalence of comorbidities in hospitalized patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia, and psychiatric diseases other than dementia. Additionally, we compared clinically relevant health-care indicators (length of hospital stay, rate of re-hospitalization) between these groups. METHODS: We used information from a database of treatment-relevant indicators from psychiatric and psychosomatic hospitals throughout Germany. This database contains routinely recorded data collected from 85 German hospitals from 2011 to 2015. In total, 14 411 AD cases, 7156 vascular dementia cases, and 34 534 cases involving non-demented psychiatric patients (used as controls) were included. To analyze comorbidities and health-care indicators, χ2 tests and t-tests were used. RESULTS: Diabetes mellitus, lipoprotein disorders, coronary artery diseases, cardiac arrhythmia and insufficiency, and atherosclerosis were significantly more prevalent in patients with vascular dementia than in those with AD and psychiatric controls. Hypertension and coronary artery diseases were less frequently associated with AD than with non-demented psychiatric controls (P < 0.001). Additionally, dementia patients with cardiovascular or metabolic diseases exhibited longer hospital stays (+ 1.4 days, P < 0.001) and were more often re-hospitalized within 3 weeks (P < 0.001) and 1 year (P < 0.001) compared to dementia patients without these comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of somatic comorbidities in patients with dementia is crucial to avoid complications during inpatient treatment. The occurrence of comorbid disorders was associated with longer and more frequent hospital stays, which potentially lead to higher health-care costs. Further studies should evaluate the causative association between somatic comorbidities and inpatient costs in dementia patients.

To Be Continued? Long-Term Treatment Effects of Antidepressant Drug Classes and Individual Antidepressants on the Risk of Developing Dementia: A German Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Given the need for disease-modifying therapies for dementia, drug repurposing appears to be a promising approach, at least as a risk reduction treatment. Preclinical studies suggest that antidepressants-in particular selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors-have beneficial effects on dementia-related biomarkers and functional outcomes, although clinical data are inconclusive. The present case-control study aimed to evaluate the effects of antidepressant drug classes and individual compounds with different treatment durations on the risk of developing dementia. METHODS: Analyses are based on data from the German Disease Analyzer database (owned and maintained by IQVIA) and included 62,317 subjects with an incident dementia diagnosis (ICD-10: F01, F03, G30, F06.7) and controls matched by age, sex, and physician between January 2013 and December 2017. Logistic regression analyses adjusting for health insurance status and comorbid diseases associated with dementia or antidepressant use were performed to investigate the association between dementia incidence and treatment with 4 major antidepressant drug classes and 14 of the most frequently prescribed individual substances. RESULTS: In 17 of 18 comparisons, long-term treatment (≥ 2 years) with any antidepressant was associated with a lower incidence of dementia than short-term treatment. Tricyclic and herbal antidepressants were associated with a decrease in dementia incidence, especially with long-term treatment. The lowest risks for dementia on an individual substance basis were identified for long-term treatment with escitalopram (odds ratio [OR] = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.89) and Hypericum perforatum (OR = 0.6; 95% CI, 0.51-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with tricyclic antidepressants, Hypericum perforatum, or escitalopram may be associated with reduced incidence of dementia. If antidepressant therapy is well tolerated, continuation-even if depressive symptoms have resolved-may be considered even beyond the purpose of relapse prevention. Future combined analyses of multinational registries and long-term clinical trials are needed to substantiate these findings.

Claims Data Analysis on the Dispensing of Tricyclic Antidepressants Among Patients With Dementia in Germany.

Objective: A restrictive use of tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) in patients with dementia (PwD) is recommended due to the hazard of anticholinergic side effects. We evaluated the frequency of TCA dispensing in PwD over a period of 1 year and the use of TCA before and after the incident diagnosis of dementia. Methods: This analysis was based on administrative data from a German statutory health insurance for a period of 2 years. Totally, 20,357 patients with an incident diagnosis of dementia in 2014 were included. We evaluated the dispensing of TCA in 2015. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate associations between the incident diagnosis of dementia and modifications in TCA dispensing. Results: In 2015, 1,125 dementia patients (5.5%) were treated with TCA and 31% were medicated with TCA in all four quarters of 2015. Most dispensings were conducted by general practitioners (67.9%). On average, patients received 3.7 ± 2.6 dispensings per year. Amitriptyline (56.3%), doxepin (26.8%), and trimipramine (16.8%) were dispensed most often. Subgroup analyses revealed that the dispensing of TCA remained mainly unchanged following the incident diagnosis. Conclusion: A relevant number of PwD were treated with TCA. To maintain the patients' safety, an improved implementation of guidelines for the pharmaceutical treatment of PwD in healthcare institutions might be required. Since 68% of the patients suffered from depression, future studies should further evaluate the indications for TCA.

Impaired empathy but no theory of mind deficits in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The cognitive capacity to change perspective is referred to as theory of mind (ToM). ToM deficits are detectable in a variety of psychiatric and neurological disorders. Since executive abilities are closely associated with ToM skills, we suspected that due to a common neuropsychological basis, ToM deficits exist in treatment-naïve adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: Performance of treatment-naïve adults with ADHD (N = 30) in tasks assessing executive functions (Trail Making Test, Stroop color-word test, and Test Battery for Attentional Performance), empathy skills (Cambridge Behaviour Scale), and ToM (Movie for Assessment of Social Cognition) was compared with that of a healthy control group (N = 30) matched according to basic demographic variables. RESULTS: Compared to healthy controls, treatment-naïve adults with ADHD showed deficits in various executive functions and the ability to empathize (all p < .05). However, no performance differences were found with regard to ToM (all n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Since studies in juveniles with ADHD often show impaired ToM performance, it is conceivable that ToM deficits may become attenuated due to neuronal development in adolescence. Furthermore, our findings imply that ToM impairments, even when present in adult ADHD, appear to be independent of executive deficits and might be explained by comorbid disorders.

[Differences Between Self- and Proxy-Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease]. / Unterschiede in der Selbst- und Fremdbeurteilung gesundheitsbezogener Lebensqualität bei Patienten mit leichter kognitiver Beeinträchtigung und Demenz vom Alzheimer-Typ.

OBJECTIVE: The self-assessment of health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment is commonly higher than the proxy-assessment by caregivers. This study aims at evaluating sociodemographic and clinical factors to explain this difference. METHODS: HrQoL of 241 community-dwelling patients was analysed using the dementia-specific Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease questionnaire (QoL-AD). Behavioural and psychological symptoms and functional capacity were evaluated using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living scale (ADCS-ADL). RESULTS: The self-assessment of patients' HrQoL was significantly higher than the caregiver-ratings (mean difference: 7.4 ±â€Š5.6, p < 0.001). Considerable influencing factors were the extent of depressive symptoms (GDS), the degree of impairment in functional performance (ADCS-ADL) and the relationship between patients and caregivers. CONCLUSION: Independent variables explained 23 % of the variance in the difference between self- and proxy-assessment of HrQoL. Future studies should include further influencing factors such as caregivers' mental health.

Continuity of treatment with benzodiazepines in dementia patients: an analysis of German health insurance claims data.

Long-term treatment with benzodiazepines (BZD) should be avoided in dementia patients because of an increased risk of adverse events. We evaluated how continuously dementia patients were prescribed BZD over 12 months. For this observational study, we used claims data from a large German public sickness fund for 2014 and 2015, including patients with an incident diagnosis of dementia in 2014. The aim was to evaluate the continuity of treatment, the frequency of BZD prescriptions and defined daily doses were evaluated. In total, 1298 (5.6%) patients received 4.7±5.2 BZD prescriptions in 2015 on average. Thereof, lorazepam (47.5%), oxazepam (18.6%), diazepam (14.5%), and bromazepam (12.2%) were most often prescribed. 30.7% of the patients received at least one BZD prescription in each quarter of 2015. Although the total number of patients receiving BZD decreased in 2015, defined daily doses for single substances remained mainly unchanged. The incident diagnosis of dementia was not associated with modifications of prescription behavior. The treatment with BZD was not discontinued in a large proportion of dementia patients, increasing the risk of adverse events. Physicians' awareness of avoiding BZD should be improved and further evidence for the appropriate treatment of psychiatric symptoms in dementia (e.g. sleep disturbances, anxiety) is required.

Use of antidementia drugs in German patients with Alzheimer's disease.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of antidementia drugs (ADDs) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) regarding German guideline recommendations and to assess correlations between the use of ADDs and the patients' characteristics. A total of 395 community-dwelling and institutionalized patients with AD across all severity stages of dementia were recruited in this cross-sectional study. Associations between the prescription of ADDs and patients' sociodemographic and clinical parameters (neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognitive capacity, daily activities, and health-related quality of life) were analyzed in multiple logistic regression analyses. ADDs were prescribed in 46.6% of all participants and less often in institutionalized patients (38.2 vs. 50.4%, P=0.025). Patients with mild-to-moderate dementia had a higher chance of receiving ADDs [odds ratio (OR)=3.752, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.166-12.080 and OR=3.526, 95% CI: 1.431-8.688] as well as those treated by neurologists/psychiatrists (OR=2.467, 95% CI: 1.288-4.726). Overall, 39% of the patients with mild cognitive deficits (Mini-Mental Status Examination 27-30) received ADDs and 21% of the mildly demented patients (Mini-Mental Status Examination 20-26) received memantine. The treatment with ADDs was in part not in line with German guideline recommendations. Particularly, the lower use of ADDs in patients not attending neuropsychiatric specialists should be further evaluated.