Illness perceptions amongst individuals with dental caries.

OBJECTIVE: To assess individuals' perception of dental caries, in order to explain how illness representations might influence their coping with the disease. METHODS: Cross-sectional questionnaire study. PARTICIPANTS: 520 consecutive patients (aged ≥18 years) of the General Dentistry Clinic at Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Pasto, Colombia who had experienced dental caries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Illness perception of dental caries was assessed using the Illness Perception Questionnaire Revised (IPQ-R). RESULTS: The most frequent self-reported symptoms associated with dental caries were "toothache" (56.2%), "tooth sensitivity" (53.8%) and "mild to sharp pain when eating or drinking" (51.2%). The dimensions of illness perception were related to socio-economic status (SES). Symptoms of "loose or separating teeth" and "pus in your tooth" were associated with dental caries by low SES participants, while "bleeding while brushing, flossing or eating hard food" and "mild to sharp pain when eating or drinking something sweet, hot or cold" were related more to higher SES. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions of caries were related to socioeconomic status. Interventions to promote health literacy in order to improve the capacity to obtain, process and understand basic oral health information could increase an early detection of caries.

Somatosensory function in old age.

Sensory decline is viewed as an inevitable consequence of the ageing process. However, reports of declines have not been a consistent finding across the sensory systems. Reports from psychophysical studies indicate that the most common declines with ageing are in vision and audition and, to a lesser degree, olfaction and gustation. Findings for the somatosensory system (mechanoreception, warming and cooling thermoreception and pain) are less conclusive. Factors that contribute to individual differences in sensory ratings beyond chronological ageing include stimulus factors including stimulus type and body location, response measures and instructions, systemic disease that may affect the peripheral or central nervous system and environmental factors that may affect the skin integrity.

Assessing the Translation of Research and Innovation into Dental Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past 100 y, there have been an unprecedented number of innovations that have improved oral health and functioning. Variations in lag times between discovery and clinical adoption are related to dentist education, the clinical availability of technology, and the perceived value of an innovation. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this cross-sectional study were 1) catalogue research discoveries and innovations over the past 30 y and 2) from that list identify those which practicing dentists believe have maximally affected patient care. METHODS: Thirty International Association for Dental Research leaders identified innovations over the past 30 y that have significantly affected dental care. The 30 most cited innovations were included in a questionnaire that was sent to a random sample of US dentists who graduated dental school during or before 1995 (before the recency of identified discoveries) and devoted ≥50% of their time to patient care. Eighty-two percent of respondents identified as general dentists and 18% as specialists. Respondents were asked to identify 5 to 7 items whose loss would have the most adverse effects on patient care. RESULTS: The most cited advances were adhesive dental materials (74.5%), dental implants (71.9%), direct bonding systems (71.2%), dental loupes (54.7%), universal precautions for infection control (48.6%), and digital imaging (46.0%). There were differences in the ranking of responses between generalists and specialists. For the oral surgeons and periodontists (OMSPER, n = 51), top choices were dental implants (82%), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging (74%), regenerative dentistry and tissue engineering (68%), universal precautions (58%), digital imaging (56%), and dental loupes (48%). CONCLUSIONS: There was agreement among generalists and specialists about the importance of dental implants, digital imaging, use of dental loupes, and universal precautions in improving patient care. However, generalists also cited the importance of adhesive dental materials and bonding, and OMSPER cited CBCT and biological-based tissue restoration as major advances. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: Many advances in dental patient care capitalize on innovations and technologies that have emerged after dentists graduate from dental school. Adoption of new technologies is influenced by information acquired from professional journals, continuing education, industry marketing activities, and interactions with colleagues. The results of this study suggest that innovations that are directly related to clinical procedures were rated most impactful. Future research should consider cost-effectiveness and patient perceptions on the impact of innovations and technologies.

Patient-Centered Dentinal Hypersensitivity Treatment Outcomes: Results from the National Dental PBRN.

Dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) can have a significant impact on oral health and functioning, and it is a clinical symptom commonly managed by dentists during routine clinical practice. DH symptoms are typically elicited by otherwise innocuous, nonpainful stimuli applied to exposed dentin (e.g., tactile stimuli, warming or cooling temperatures or air puffs). Treatment approaches have sought to directly target the dentinal pulp tissues or close dentinal tubules via dental office care and treatment services (fluoride varnishes, glutaraldehydes, bonding agents, sealants, oxalates, or lasers) or home care services (toothpastes or dentifrices containing fluoride or potassium nitrate compounds). The purpose of this prospective multicenter cohort study was to assess how community-based dentists from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (National Dental PBRN) manage DH and whether the effectiveness of DH treatments can be assessed in those settings. A total of 171 dentists recruited 1862 subjects with DH from their existing patients. Dentists then recommended and provided DH treatment as appropriate. Treatment choice was at the discretion of the dentists. Patients rated their DH pain at baseline and 1, 4, and 8 wk during the course of their treatments. They used pain intensity and unpleasantness visual analog scales and 4 labeled magnitude scales and rated their satisfaction with treatment after 8 wk. Patients were provided reminders postbaseline via email, texting, or voice mail. These patient-centered outcomes served as the principal measures for the assessment of treatment because treatments sought to alleviate DH symptoms. The patients with DH who reported pain reduction from dentist-provided treatments (glutaraldehyde/HEMA [hydroxyethyl methacrylate] compounds, oxalates, and bonding agents), dentists' advice and counseling regarding oral habits and diet, and patient-applied fluoride toothpaste reported a concomitant positive rating of satisfaction with DH treatments. The results from this study support the feasibility of engaging network practices to assess the effectiveness of clinical DH treatments. Knowledge Transfer Statement: National Dental PBRN dentists provide a range of procedures to treat dentinal hypersensitivity. In this large nonrandomized study designed to assess clinical care and to capture patient-reported outcomes, about 60% of patients reported improvement in pain. This study demonstrated the feasibility of engaging network dentists and their patients to assess treatment effectiveness. Future studies will explore the feasibility of imposing randomization and measuring patient compliance with treatment in the manner that this treatment is provided.

Taste loss and recovery following radiation therapy.

Previous investigators have reported deficits in taste acuity in patients following radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer. In the present longitudinal study, 13 patients (mean age = 51.6 yrs) received conventional or hyperfractionated radiotherapy (63-76.8 Gy) for primary tumors of the oropharynx. One or both parotid glands and at least two-thirds of the tongue were included in the radiation field. Smell recognition and taste detection thresholds were determined at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year post-radiation. Differences for smell recognition and the 4 taste qualities were assessed (independently) at the 4 time intervals, with a one-way ANOVA. Smell recognition was unaffected by radiation. There were significant elevations in thresholds for sweet (p < 0.005), salty (p < 0.005), bitter (p < 0.005), and sour (p< 0.001) during radiation therapy that were restored to baseline levels at 6 months and 1 year after radiation. This study demonstrated that radiation-induced taste deficits can be recovered by 6 months.

An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain.

Seven subjects judged the differences between electrocutaneous shocks and words from two category rating lists describing those sensations in each of two differences estimation experiments. The electrocutaneous shocks used for the two experiments were 10 suprathreshold shock intensities determined separately for each subject. There were two distinct 7-word category rating lists. Both lists shared 6 common words; however, the seventh word made the rational ordering of the two lists different. Magnitude scales of meaning for the category rating words and sensory scales for the electrocutaneous shock intensities were determined for each of the two experiments for each subject using conjoint measurement analysis. Comparisons of the sensory scales for electrocutaneous shock between the two difference estimation experiments for each subject showed that they judged the electrocutaneous shocks similarly with the two words lists. This allowed for comparisons between the scales of meaning for the words from the category rating lists. The two word lists were not equivalent. There was substantial agreement among the subjects on characteristic spacings of quantitative values for the category rating items. These results suggest that clinical ratings scales used for analgesimetry should not assume homogeneity of spacing of category items. A scale incorporating our subjects' common understanding is presented.

Non-pain and pain sensations evoked by tooth pulp stimulation.

This study investigated the quality and magnitude of sensations evoked by electrical tooth pulp stimulation. Detection threshold (the minimum current intensity that evoked a sensation) and pain threshold were determined for tooth pulp stimuli varying in frequency from 5 to 500 Hz. The effect of frequency and intensity of tooth pulp stimulation on the magnitude of sensations was assessed using visual analog scales and verbal descriptor scales. Detection thresholds were stable over experimental sessions and independent of the frequency of the stimulating current. Pain threshold varied as a function of frequency with a minimum value at 100 Hz. Stimuli that evoked non-pain sensations at low frequencies evoked pain sensations when frequency was increased from 5 to 100 Hz. Subjects were able to scale non-pain sensations over a range of stimulus intensities and frequencies. The lowest currents evoked sensations that were non-painful and were of constant magnitude despite changes in the frequency of stimulation. Higher stimulus currents evoked sensations that were non-painful at low stimulus frequencies and painful at high stimulus frequencies. Sensation magnitude at each stimulus intensity increased as a function of frequency. Temporal summation occurred in proportion to stimulus intensity. These findings suggest that the non-pain sensations evoked in tooth pulp are mediated by a distinct population of afferents that are not involved in the coding of pain. High frequency stimulation that increased the discharge rate of the lowest threshold pulpal afferents resulted in no summation of non-pain sensation and never produced pain. However, high frequency stimulation evoked greater magnitude sensations at higher stimulus currents, indicating that central summation mechanisms were critical for higher threshold afferents signaling more intense non-pain and pain sensations.

Orofacial pain symptom prevalence: selective sex differences in the elderly?

This study investigated sex differences in orofacial pain symptoms in a sample of elderly adults. Furthermore, differences across sex were tested on symptom continuity, overall duration, pain severity, activity reduction, and health care utilization, related to each specific symptom. Telephone interviews were conducted with a stratified random sample of community dwelling older (65+) north Floridians. A total of 5860 households were contacted and screened, with 75.3% participating to the point where their eligibility for the study could be determined. Of the remaining households, 1636 completed the interview. Of the total sample, 17.4% reported experiencing at least one of the four target orofacial pain symptoms (jaw joint pain, face pain, oral sores, burning mouth) during the past year, suggesting that orofacial pain symptoms are common in older adults. Our findings for prevalence of each specific symptom (jaw joint pain, 7.7%; face pain, 6.9%; oral sores, 6.4%; toothache, 12.0%; burning mouth, 1.7%) are similar to those estimated by the 1989 National Health Interview Survey, for the US adult population. Consistent with other epidemiological and clinical studies, we found that females were more likely to report jaw joint pain and face pain than males. In contrast to clinical studies, no differences were found on subjective ratings of pain severity, for any symptom. Differences across sex were most likely to be reported for jaw joint pain related variables, suggesting undetermined sex-uniqueness for these symptoms. In contrast to previous studies, older females tended to report lower levels of health care utilization than older males. This is the first study to our knowledge that reports orofacial symptom-specific sex differences among the elderly.

Health care utilization by older adults in response to painful orofacial symptoms.

The purpose of this study was to determine which specific attributes of painful orofacial symptoms serve as predictors of health care utilization in a population based sample of elderly subjects. Furthermore, we documented patterns of health care utilization selection by type of health care provider. To our knowledge, these specific utilization patterns have never before been reported in the pain literature. Telephone interviews were conducted with a stratified random sample of 1636 community dwelling older (65+) north Floridians. A total of 5860 households were contacted and screened, with 75.3% participating to the point where their eligibility for the study could be determined. The percentage of subjects reporting health care utilization for a specific symptom ranged from 62 to 32%. One or more health care visits were reported by at least 50% of those reporting symptoms of toothache pain, facial pain, jaw joint pain and burning mouth in the past 12 months. These rates suggest that elderly individuals are willing and able to seek health care for painful orofacial symptoms. We found that pain intensity was the best predictor of whether an elderly individual utilized health care or not, which suggests that some pain intensity threshold may exist at which health care seeking behavior is initiated. The overall number of visits was not predicted by pain intensity but by other qualities more associated with time or level of dysfunction caused by the symptom. We also found that elderly adults, typically seek care for toothache from a dentist and from physicians for painful orofacial symptoms not associated with the teeth or mouth. These decisions regarding the selection of a health care professional may, in part, be a function of financial and insurance considerations, anatomical site and perception of the role of dentistry in orofacial care.

Does the Illness Behavior Questionnaire measure abnormal illness behavior?

Abnormal illness behavior (AIB) has been proposed as a construct measuring the inappropriate or maladaptive modes of responding to one's state of health, and the Illness Behavior Questionnaire (BQ; Pilowsky, 1975) was designed to measure this construct. Previous studies using small samples have failed to agree on the factor structure of this questionnaire. The present paper examines the factor structure of the Illness Behavior Questionnaire and critically evaluates the interpretation of its dimensions as well as the construct of AIB. A factor analysis of responses from 1,061 health care and nonhealth care seeking subjects yielded six interpretable factors which substantially replicated Pilowsky's previous results. Six scales were calculated and correlated with several personality measures. The results indicated that the Illness Behavior Questionnaire is saturated with neuroticism, a dimension known to be related to excessive medical complaints. But excessive medical complaints cannot be equated with hypochondriasis or AIB in the absence of objective medical information. In the absence of evidence for the discriminant validity of the IBQ, its use as a diagnostic device is unwarranted. Treating elevated IBQ scores as indicators of abnormal illness behavior without corroborating medical information may be more misleading than accepting patients' symptom reports at face value.

Unstimulated and stimulated parotid salivary flow rate in individuals of different ages.

Both unstimulated and stimulated parotid saliva samples were collected from 85 healthy, unmedicated individuals between the ages of 23 and 81 years. There were no significant differences in flow rate related to age with either unstimulated or stimulated secretion.

Nitrous oxide analgesia: a psychophysical evaluation using verbal descriptor scaling.

The effect of 33% nitrous oxide/67% oxygen was compared with 100% oxygen and air on verbal reports of either sensory intensity or unpleasantness of sensations associated with painful electrical tooth pulp stimulation. Forty-eight subjects used words describing the sensory intensity (i.e., weak, mild, strong) or degree of unpleasantness (i.e., annoying, unpleasant, distressing) to assess the sensations produced by a broad range of tooth pulp stimuli. Within the experimental session, a given subject assessed the painful sensations under all three treatments delivered through a nasal inhaler in a double-blind manner. The incorporation of within-subject placebo (nasal inhaler + air) and active placebo (nasal inhaler + oxygen) controls allowed for rigorous assessment of the components of nitrous oxide analgesia. The results of this study suggest that 33% nitrous oxide analgesia reduces the intensity but not the unpleasantness of painful tooth pulp sensations. Further, 100% oxygen provides no analgesic effect.

Orofacial pain.

Orofacial pain is an area of considerable interest in aging. Orofacial nociceptive pain arises mainly from injury or disease afflicting the teeth or the supporting structures of the teeth (periodontium); however it may arise from other intraoral or nonintraoral structures. Because of the rich innervation of the orofacial complex, pain may be referred to remote sites. Neuropathic pains, such as trigeminal neuralgia and postherpetic neuralgia, result from nerve injury and are usually seen only in older adults. Establishment of the source and cause of the pain results in effective pain management.

Tooth loss and caries prevalence in older Floridians attending senior activity centers.

Older adults attending 14 senior activity centers in six countries of Florida cooperated for a questionnaire and an oral examination. The mean age was 76.5 yr, and about one-third were 80 yr or older. One-third of the dentate persons had dental caries. Most of the carious lesions were on the crown, not the root, and most of the decay was primary, not recurrent. Most of the persons with a need for caries treatment were likely to seek dental care; however, the majority of carious surfaces were in persons who reported being infrequent users of care. These results from ambulatory older adults suggest that older adults have significant caries treatment needs, and provide support for the view that the treatment of older U.S. adults may grow in the coming decades.

Mouth dryness as reported by older Floridians.

Thirty-nine percent of 600 community-dwelling older Floridians (mean age of 78 yr) reported having mouth dryness. Seventy-nine percent of respondents reported at least one medical condition, 57% were taking at least one prescribed or over-the-counter medication, and 33% were taking at least one potentially xerostomic medication. Reported mouth dryness was highly associated with the number of potentially xerostomic medications. After stratification by medication usage, age, diabetes, arthritis, perceived medical health, and dependence in physical functioning were significantly associated with mouth dryness. Persons with dry mouth were also more likely to have reported dental symptoms, signs of dental disease, sensory changes, and other oral symptoms. Ten percent of those who reported mouth dryness also said that their mouths felt dry when eating a meal, 10% said that they had difficulties swallowing foods, and 15% of persons with dry mouth also said that the amount of saliva in their mouths was too little. Sixty-five percent of persons with dry mouth reported doing one or more dryness-related behaviors. These results suggest that the prevalence of xerostomia was high, and the impact of dry mouth on individuals' daily behaviors was significant.

Attitudinal and behavioral characteristics of older Floridians with tooth loss.

In this cross-sectional study of Floridians aged 65 yr or older, 600 persons were interviewed to identify the characteristics of individuals who survived into old age with an intact or nearly intact dentition. Persons with total or partial tooth loss reported less frequent dental care, less ability to pay dental care fees, less frequent dental hygiene, and were more likely to have been smokers or diabetic. Persons with tooth loss also had less positive attitudes toward dentists and dental care. These cross-sectional findings are consistent with tooth loss being the result of disease-, behavior-, and attitude-related causes, and/or their interactions. Tobacco use, diabetes, and infrequent oral hygiene and dental care may increase risk for dental disease; decreased ability to pay for dental treatment may impair utilization of non-extraction treatment options, and negative attitudes toward dental treatment may influence the desire for non-extraction treatment options. Research targeted toward modifying attitudes toward dental treatment may be useful in preventing or delaying tooth loss, and measurement of attitudes may be a useful way to identify individuals at the greatest risk for tooth loss for intervention studies.

Oral disadvantage among dentate adults.

Oral disadvantage can be defined as the avoidance of certain daily activities because of decrements in oral health. These decrements include oral disease and tissue damage, pain, and functional limitation. The Florida Dental Care Study (FDCS) is a longitudinal study of changes in oral health, which included at baseline 873 subjects who had at least 1 tooth, were 45 years old or older, and who participated for an interview and clinical examination. Three objectives of the FDCS are: (1) to describe selected psychometric properties of the measurement of oral disadvantage; (2) to describe oral disadvantage in a diverse sample of dentate adults; and (3) to describe the relationship between disadvantage and other aspects of oral health, such as disease/tissue damage, pain, and functional limitation. The prevalence of oral disadvantage within the previous 6 months, using eight self-reported measures, ranged from 5% to 25%, depending upon the measure. Factor analysis suggested that oral disadvantage is best described as three factors: disadvantage due to (1) oral disease/tissue damage, (2) oral pain, and (3) oral functional limitation. Irregular dental attenders, poor persons, and blacks had the highest prevalence of oral disadvantage. Clinical measures of oral disease/tissue damage, self-reported measures of oral disease/tissue damage, oral pain, and oral functional limitation were strongly associated with the presence of oral disadvantage. In multivariate analyses that accounted for differences in clinical measures of disease/tissue damage, self-reported disease/tissue damage, oral pain, and oral functional limitation, females were more likely to report disadvantage due to disease/tissue damage, and middle-aged persons and irregular dental attenders were more likely to report oral disadvantage due to pain. In these same regressions, differences in disadvantage due to race, poverty status, socioeconomic status, and rural/urban area of residence were not evident. These results have implications regarding the use of oral disadvantage to assess the long-term effectiveness of dental care.

Five-year retrospective evaluation of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis.

This retrospective study is aimed to evaluate the long-term outcome of arthrocentesis for the treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) internal derangements, and to document the impact of patient, time and symptom-related factors on the outcome of the procedure. Thirty-four patients (48 joints) who underwent TMJ arthrocentesis were included in this study. The scores for preoperative maximal mouth opening, and VAS scores for pain and dysfunction were compared with the follow-up scores obtained by the questionnaire and clinical examination. Several factors that may affect the long-term outcome of arthrocentesis are further evaluated. Statistical evaluation of the baseline and follow-up data was made by linear regression analysis and paired t-test. The mean follow-up period was 22 months. There was a significant (P< 0.001) increase in the maximal mouth opening (MMO) postoperatively that held during the longer term follow-up period. The pain and dysfunction levels at the follow-up were significantly (P< 0.001) lower than the preoperative values. Twenty-six per cent of patients were pain free and also showed a total relief in dysfunction at the follow-up. Although both preoperative and follow-up pain scores were higher in patients with bruxism, there was not a significant difference in the outcome when compared with non-bruxers. However, there was a greater reduction in dysfunction with improvement in MMO in non-bruxers. The duration of symptoms before arthrocentesis has not been found to affect the outcome. Also, there were no significant differences between the results of follow-up when comparing the shorter follow-up time results (<20 months) and longer term results. Arthrocentesis for the treatment of TMJ internal derangements offers favourable long-term stable results with regard to increasing maximal mouth opening, and reducing pain and dysfunction.

Older Floridians' attitudes toward and use of dental care.

Older Floridians (mean age 78 years) were interviewed regarding their use of dental care, attitudes toward dental care, and other characteristics hypothesized as being explanatory of dental care use. Fifty-two percent of respondents reported having been to a dentist within the past year, and 31% had not been within the previous 5 years. Five constructs measured attitudes toward dental care and dental health: (a) the importance placed on regular dental care and oral hygiene, (b) the importance of avoiding tobacco to prevent oral cancer, (c) the value of dental care, (d) negative aspects of dental care, and (e) satisfaction with the last dental visit. In a multivariate model, the value of dental care and importance of regular care and oral hygiene wer significantly correlated with dental care use. These findings are consistent with the conclusion that attitudes contribute to understanding dental care use in later life, a contribution that is independent of the direct effects of socioeconomic status and dentate status.

Oral signs, symptoms, and behaviors in older Floridians.

Six hundred community-dwelling older Floridians were interviewed regarding the presence of reported signs of dental conditions, dental and oral symptoms, behavioral impact from dental conditions, and orofacial sensory changes. The prevalence of any single oral sign, symptom, or behavioral impact was generally low. A notable exception was the 39 percent prevalence of dry mouth. However, from 10 percent to 29 percent of persons had at least one of these dental signs, dental symptoms, dental behavioral impacts, or sensory changes. These findings are consistent with a noteworthy burden from nonoptimal oral health status, and these burdens were significantly more prevalent in irregular dental attenders, persons with lower household incomes, and persons who reported poorer general health. Inclusion of these non-disease items in an assessment of oral health status seems warranted, and would allow a broader evaluation of oral health outcomes.