Infant Exposure to Dolutegravir Through Placental and Breast Milk Transfer: A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of DolPHIN-1.

BACKGROUND: Rapid reduction in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) load is paramount to prevent peripartum transmission in women diagnosed late in pregnancy. We investigated dolutegravir population pharmacokinetics in maternal plasma, umbilical cord, breast milk, and infant plasma samples from DolPHIN-1 participants (NCT02245022) presenting with untreated HIV late in pregnancy (28-36 weeks gestation). METHODS: Pregnant women from Uganda and South Africa were randomized (1:1) to daily dolutegravir (50 mg/d) or efavirenz-based therapy. Dolutegravir pharmacokinetic sampling (0-24 hours) was undertaken 14 days after treatment initiation and within 1-3 weeks after delivery, with matched maternal and cord samples at delivery. Mothers were switched to efavirenz, and maternal and infant plasma and breast milk samples were obtained 24, 48, or 72 hours after the switch. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to describe dolutegravir in all matrices and to evaluate covariates. RESULTS: A total of 28 women and 22 infants were included. Maternal dolutegravir was described by a 2-compartment model linked to a fetal and breast milk compartment. Cord and breast milk to maternal plasma ratios were 1.279 (1.209-1.281) and 0.033 (0.021-0.050), respectively. Infant dolutegravir was described by breast milk-to-infant and infant elimination rate constants. No covariate effects were observed. The median predicted infant dolutegravir half-life and median time to protein-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration (0.064 mg/L) for those above this threshold were 37.9 (range, 22.1-63.5) hours and 108.9 (18.6-129.6) hours (4.5 [0.8-5.4] days) (n = 13), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Breastfeeding contributed relatively little to infant plasma exposure, but a median of 4.5 days of additional prophylaxis to some of the breastfed infants was observed after cessation of maternal dolutegravir (3-15 days postpartum), which waned with time postpartum as transplacental dolutegravir cleared.

Transoral Laser or Robotic Surgery Outcomes for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: Secondary Analysis of the PATHOS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) or transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) offer excellent oncological outcomes for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. TORS may offer greater margin clearance around tumors than TLM. Objective: To determine whether the differing energy sources used and surgical technique of TORS or TLM is associated with postoperative early swallowing function, feeding tube use, and specific factors related to quality of life. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prespecified cohort study was performed within the Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment for HPV-Positive Tumours (PATHOS) randomized clinical trial at 40 centers in the UK, Germany, France, the US, and Australia between November 1, 2015, and August 31, 2023. PATHOS trial participants with HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma of stages T1 to T3 and N0 to N2b M0 (TNM7) who underwent TLM or TORS were eligible. Of 989 consecutively recruited patients on the PATHOS trial, 508 were eligible for this substudy. Exposures: The exposure of interest was TORS or TLM. Main Outcomes and Measures: Preplanned outcome measures included nasogastric tube insertion rates within 4 weeks after surgery, length of in-hospital stay following surgery, specific scales from the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), 35-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck Questionnaire (H&N35), and 30-item Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ C30), water swallow test results, and videofluoroscopy scores. Results: Of the 508 patients included in the analysis (390 [76.8%] male; median age, 58.3 [IQR, 52.8-63.6] years), 195 had TLM and 313 had TORS. Nasogastric tube insertion rates were higher after TORS than TLM (85 of 189 [45.0%] vs 10 of 126 [7.9%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.41 [95% CI, 1.01-19.32]). Mean scores favored TLM with small effect sizes in all MDADI domains and the H&N35 swallowing item at 4 weeks after surgery; between-group difference for the MDADI composite score was -4.89 (95% CI, -8.27 to -1.50); for the MDADI physical functioning score, -6.37 (95% CI, -10.15 to -2.59); for the MDADI global score, -10.02 (95% CI, -16.50 to -3.54); and for H&N35 swallowing score, 7.24 (95% CI, 2.17-12.30). No other measures showed evidence of clinically meaningful differences. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, functional outcomes were moderately less impaired 4 weeks following TLM compared with TORS. Once the longer-term outcomes for these patients are known, these findings could aid the design and use of future head and neck-specific surgical robots. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02215265.

Nurse versus doctor management of HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (CIPRA-SA): a randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Expanded access to combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-poor settings is dependent on task shifting from doctors to other health-care providers. We compared outcomes of nurse versus doctor management of ART care for HIV-infected patients. METHODS: This randomised non-inferiority trial was undertaken at two South African primary-care clinics. HIV-positive individuals with a CD4 cell count of less than 350 cells per microL or WHO stage 3 or 4 disease were randomly assigned to nurse-monitored or doctor-monitored ART care. Patients were randomly assigned by stratified permuted block randomisation, and neither the patients nor those analysing the data were masked to assignment. The primary objective was a composite endpoint of treatment-limiting events, incorporating mortality, viral failure, treatment-limiting toxic effects, and adherence to visit schedule. Analysis was by intention to treat. Non-inferiority of the nurse versus doctor group for cumulative treatment failure was prespecified as an upper 95% CI for the hazard ratio that was less than 1.40. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00255840. FINDINGS: 408 patients were assigned to doctor-monitored ART care and 404 to nurse-monitored ART care; all participants were analysed. 371 (46%) patients reached an endpoint of treatment failure: 192 (48%) in the nurse group and 179 (44%) in the doctor group. The hazard ratio for composite failure was 1.09 (95% CI 0.89-1.33), which was within the limits for non-inferiority. After a median follow-up of 120 weeks (IQR 60-144), deaths (ten vs 11), virological failures (44 vs 39), toxicity failures (68 vs 66), and programme losses (70 vs 63) were similar in nurse and doctor groups, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Nurse-monitored ART is non-inferior to doctor-monitored therapy. Findings from this study lend support to task shifting to appropriately trained nurses for monitoring of ART. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health; United States Agency for International Development; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.