A brief introduction to PAs in Germany.

ABSTRACT: The first German physician assistant (PA) program began in 2005 at Steinbeis University in Berlin. Since 2005, there has been a rapid expansion of PA education, and 22 German universities have opened or are planning to develop PA programs. In fall 2021, about 1,100 PAs worked in Germany, mostly in the inpatient setting, with a scope of practice focused on delegation and the performance of medical and administrative activities. After completing a PA program, students are awarded a bachelor of science; programs also offer options for specialization. With no formal PA program-specific accreditation processes, the universities are responsible for ensuring the quality and content of PA courses. The profession is not regulated in Germany, and laws to guide PA education and scope of practice are necessary for the further development of the profession.

A cross-sectional survey of German PA employment and workforce entry.

OBJECTIVE: The contribution of physician assistants (PAs) to the German healthcare workforce has increased significantly since their introduction in 2005. From five training programs, the number has increased to the current 18, with 560 PAs awarded the PA bachelor of science degree as of 2020. Despite the growth, researchers lack systemic and reliable empirical data that provide insight into the German PA educational and professional profile. The German University Association Physician Assistant (DHPA) undertook the first nationwide cross-sectional survey on PAs in Germany to understand the German PA movement. This survey aimed to describe German PAs' entry into the profession and PA educational and job satisfaction. METHODS: PA alumni of all universities affiliated with the DHPA and all subscribers of the Facebook online social media platform PA Blog were invited to complete an online questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the 282 PAs who completed the survey, 77% were female and under age 25 years. Almost all (94%) were employed, predominantly as PAs (91%, 241 of 265), although some held other positions. Most worked full time (87%), with some citing child-care needs as reasons for part-time employment (n = 21). Few reported unemployment (1.4%, 4 of 282). Eighty-two percent said they would probably or very likely choose the same course of study again. Most employed participants found the inclusion of frequent rotations between didactic and clinical training in PA programs beneficial. However, a small number of participants (26.8%) agreed that German PA programs' didactic and clinical teaching objectives were well aligned. CONCLUSIONS: German PAs have a high level of satisfaction with their profession and report low unemployment. Improvement in the alignment of didactic and clinical educational objectives to improve academic qualifications and satisfaction emerged as an area of research.

Curricula Mapping of Physician Associate/Physician Assistant-Comparable Professions Worldwide Using the Learning Opportunities, Objectives, and Outcomes Platform.

ABSTRACT: Given the international growth of physician associate/physician assistant (PA) and PA-comparable professions, it is crucial to understand the educational curricula of PA/PA-comparable professions worldwide. This article provides an overview of the process and development of the PA/PA-comparable curricula mapping design applying an international framework. It uses an innovative web-based tool, the Learning Opportunities, Objectives, and Outcomes Platform (LOOOP), to map and evaluate course content, teaching strategies, assessment formats, and learning outcomes. It highlights the project's rationale, challenges, and future implications.

Emotional and psychological safety in the context of digital transformation in healthcare: a mixed-method strategic foresight study.

BACKGROUND: Perceived safety has received attention in the digital transformation of healthcare. However, the impact of perceived safety on the future of digital transformation has not been fully elucidated. AIM: To investigate perceived safety in the context of the digital transformation of healthcare while considering relevant needs, influencing factors and impacts, including crisis events, to provide recommendations for action based on a participatory, multiperspective, strategic 5-year foresight viewpoint. METHODS: A strategic foresight study is conducted via a participatory mixed-methods design to understand the present related factors that are likely to be relevant to future developments in the digital transformation of healthcare. RESULTS: We observed that feeling safe plays a complex role in the digital transformation of healthcare. How perceived safety is considered has and will continue to impact the individual, organisational and system levels. Regarding a potential crisis event, controversial consequences have been observed. At its core, digital (health) literacy related to equity of access and human support is one of the crucial aspects in the context of perceived safety related to the successful implementation of digital technologies in healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: The scenarios showed that a continuation of the current situation over the next 5 years may result in partly desirable and partly undesirable outcomes. Concrete key factors should be used in practice to support both education and healthcare quality development and research. The essence of the scenarios should serve as a starting point for research agenda setting and political decision-making in the future. However, additional research is needed to quantify the correlations among the relevant factors.

[Physician assistants as a future model in primary care: Experiences, needs, potentials and barriers]. / Physician Assistants als Zukunftsmodell in der hausärztlichen Versorgung ­ Erfahrungen, Bedarfe, Potenziale und Hürden.

INTRODUCTION: In the coming decades, demographic change will dramatically increase health care needs, especially for general practitioners (GPs). However, there is a shortage of young primary care physicians, with signs of (impending) underuse already becoming apparent in rural and structurally weak areas. Innovative care concepts are needed to counteract this development and ensure the future of primary care. In addition to medical assistants (MFA), academically trained physician assistants (PAs) could be considered for more demanding delegation tasks and be involved in direct patient care under the responsibility of a physician in the practice team. In England, the Netherlands and the USA, PAs have been a part of the health care systems for many years. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: 1) What are the potentials for delegation/possibilities for PAs working in primary care practices in contrast to medical assistants? 2) What structural requirements are necessary to regularly integrate PAs in primary care practices? METHODS: After preliminary interviews with PA experts and primary care researchers and practitioners (n=29), four expert interviews (n=4) with GPs and PAs were performed in a case analysis in order to elicit experiences with PAs in family practice. Based on this, three focus groups were conducted with GPs and practice staff (n=15) to discuss the extent, the need and the willingness to delegate physician services to PAs, as well as existing barriers. After transcription, analyses were performed using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. RESULTS: The participants acknowledged the potential to reduce physician workloads and showed a high willingness to delegate tasks. Practical examples suggest that a clearly defined delegation of medical tasks to PAs, e.g. participation in infection consultations, is possible after only a few weeks working in family practices. Thus, the cooperation between GPs, PAs and medical assistants can be successful. Uncertainties exist regarding the legal possibilities and limits of delegation as well as the current and future financial reimbursement of PAs. DISCUSSION: The legal and financial framework for the utilization of PAs in ambulatory care should be reliably clarified as well as transparently communicated so that the considerable potentials of delegating tasks to academically trained staff, e.g. PAs, especially in the GP sector, can be exploited in the future. CONCLUSION: Participation of PAs in the GP team could be key to overcoming the often threatening or already existing under-provision of medical care in structurally weak regions.

Validation of the German Version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool-Revised.

INTRODUCTION: The second victim phenomenon that occurs after critical events poses a serious factor for patient and workplace safety. These experiences can be evaluated using the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST), originally in English, or the translated and validated Korean or Chinese versions. In 2020, a revised version was published (SVESTR) with the addition of resilience items. The aim of this study is the validation of the German version, the G-SVESTR, in a multiprofessional setting. METHODS: The G-SVESTR questionnaire was designed according to World Health Organization recommendations. This entails translation, test for face validity, back translation, pretest, expert panel evaluation, and a test in a large population for validity and reliability. We provided an anonymous online questionnaire to physicians, nurses, paramedics, medical assistants, and physician assistants to test our developed tool. Statistics were accomplished using XL-Stats. RESULTS: Altogether, 72% (306 of 428) of the participants completed the survey. The mean time for completion was 9.4 minutes. Physician assistants and medical assistants were significantly younger than other respondents. The analysis revealed satisfactory reliability (Cronbach α = 0.844). A principal component analysis showed 11 factors with eigenvalues greater than 1. Factor loading on distinct dimensions was satisfactory with one exception, the absenteeism item (item 31), which showed cross-loadings and poor factor loading on the absenteeism dimension. The results of the G-SVESTR revealed only some differences between the professional subgroups. CONCLUSION: The G-SVESTR is a valid and reliable testing instrument for the evaluation of second victim experiences in different medical professions.

[What is the contribution of physician assistants to health care in Germany? A differentiation between physician assistants and physicians in training]. / Welchen Beitrag können Physician Assistants zur Gesundheitsversorgung leisten? Eine Abgrenzung zu Ärztinnen und Ärzten in Weiterbildung.

BACKGROUND: Physicians in training are major contributors to the German health care system. After graduation from medical school, physicians in training qualify for a certain specialty. The workload of physicians in training in Germany is so high that they have expressed their need for support. One opportunity to support physicians in training is by delegating tasks to physician assistants (medical assistants qualified by a specific course of study, graduated from universities of applied sciences). However, there is a lack of knowledge about the qualification of physician assistants and the conditions which allow support of physicians in training by physician assistants in Germany. METHODS: Based on a focused internet search, this paper describes the development of the profession physician assistance in Germany and the currently offered graduation courses including their duration and qualification requirements. Furthermore, we present available recommendations for the content of physician assistants' education and characterize conditions for the support of physicians in training by physician assistants. RESULTS: In Germany, physician assistance has been an academic discipline since 2005, the profession is, however, still quite seldom. Qualification requirements and the duration of education are determined by the universities. The aim is to qualify students for several competencies, which enable physician assistants to perform tasks of physicians under delegation. The conditions for delegation to physicians in training and to physician assistants are quite similar, resulting in partly comparable practice. Major differences relate to the so called "physician reservation" or physicians' core area, both of which define tasks that may only be carried out by physicians. DISCUSSION: Integrating physician assistants into a medical team means supporting the specialists by delegating tasks, thus reducing the workload of all physicians in the team, including physicians in training. Currently, there are no data on and no outcomes of the performance of physician assistants in Germany. CONCLUSION: In everyday practice, health care delivered by physician assistants and by physicians in training is similar, at least as regards activities and tasks that do not need physician supervision.