Cost-effectiveness of revascularization for limb preservation in patients with marginal functional status.

BACKGROUND: Revascularization and limb salvage attempts are often offered to patients with foot wounds and chronic limb ischemia who are thought to be good-risk candidates, but some skepticism remains about the utility of these efforts for elderly patients with marginal functional status. We sought to determine whether limb preservation efforts in this population could be justified from a patient-centered, cost-effectiveness perspective. METHODS: A probabilistic Markov model was used to simulate the clinical outcomes, health utilities, and costs over a 10-year period with various management strategies. Clinical parameter estimates were obtained from previous clinical trials and large observational series. Cost estimates were obtained from cost literature and also a single-center study that reviewed total costs accumulated (including secondary amputations, wound care, outpatient nursing care, and nursing home costs). Cost (in 2011 U.S. dollars) per year of ambulation (with limb preservation or with a prosthesis after amputation) was the primary measure of cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The total 10-year costs of revascularization--either endovascular or surgical--were lower than the costs of either local wound care alone or primary amputation. Revascularization strategies also produced more health benefits as measured in terms of years of ambulatory ability, years of limb salvage, or quality-adjusted life-years. In none of the scenarios modeled in deterministic sensitivity analyses did primary amputation prove to be cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Revascularization and limb preservation attempts appear less costly and provide more health benefits than wound care alone or primary amputation, even among patients with marginal functional status at baseline.

Telehealth Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

For patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a home-based, interactive telehealth program can improve accessibility to pulmonary rehabilitation and reduce travel costs.

Acute and Long-Term Effects of Multidirectional Treadmill Training on Gait and Balance in Parkinson Disease.

BACKGROUND: Treadmill training has been shown to be a promising rehabilitation strategy for improving gait and balance in persons with Parkinson disease (PD). Most studies have involved only forward walking as an intervention. The effects of multidirectional treadmill (forward, backward, and left and right sideways) on gait and balance have not been reported. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the acute and long-term effects of multidirectional treadmill training (MDTT) on gait and balance in persons with PD, and to determine the optimal training duration. DESIGN: Single group, repeated-measures design. SETTING: Research laboratory in a hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Ten persons with PD (mean age 65.9 ± 7.4 years; average disease duration 3.90 ± 2.18 years). INTERVENTIONS: MDTT was used. Participants walked forward, backward, and left and right sideways for 5-7 minutes in each direction at their fastest tolerated speed. The training was 3 days per week continuously for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Gait speed, cadence, and stride length of forward, backward and sideways walks; time and number of steps to turn 360°; and the timed 5-step test and Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) test were performed after the first session of MDTT and every 2 weeks. Effect size of MDTT on each gait and balance variable was measured every 2 weeks for 8 weeks to determine the optimal training duration. Gait and balance variables after the first session of MDTT were compared to the baseline values (pre-MDTT) to study the acute effect of MDTT. RESULTS: Stride length of forward, backward, and sideways walks improved immediately after 1 session of MDTT (P = .031, .012, and .001, respectively). The number of steps to turn and the timed 5-step test score decreased after the first session (P = .016, and .010, respectively). Six weeks of training was found to yield the largest mean effect size of all gait and balance variables. At 6 weeks of MDTT, gait speed of all walking directions (P = .001-.031), stride length of backward (P < .005) and sideways (P = .001) walks, cadence of sideways walk (P = .036), number of steps to turn (P = .014), and timed 5-step test (P = .033) improved from pre-MDTT measures. CONCLUSIONS: MDTT immediately improved gait and balance in persons with PD. Six weeks of MDTT might be the optimal training duration to improve gait and balance in the long term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Choosing appropriate comparison group participants in studies of veterans: Characteristics of orthopedically injured and uninjured Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn veterans.

INTRODUCTION: Research addressing deployment-related traumatic brain injury (TBI) is fairly complex due to a high prevalence of comorbid conditions, multiple exposures, and the lack of acute medical records. Therefore, there is a need for a well-defined, matching comparison group. This study compared deployment-related characteristics, everyday functioning, and cognitive performance in recently deployed veterans who had not sustained any injuries with those who had orthopedic injuries during deployment, but who were without a history of TBI. METHOD: Participants included 45 individuals who had been deployed and who were without injuries and a group of 27 individuals who reported at least one orthopedic injury during deployment. The Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4, Community Integration Questionnaire, Veterans RAND 36 Item Health Survey, Brief Pain Inventory, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist-Civilian (PCL-C) were used to assess daily functioning. Cognitive performance was measured using the Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Trail Making Test, Color-Word Interference Test, and Verbal Selective Reminding Test. The two groups were compared using t tests based on equal variances. The effect size was calculated. RESULTS: There were no between-group differences, with all variables having p-values >.1 and small to medium effect sizes. DISCUSSION: Orthopedic injuries sustained during deployment that did not require evacuation or hospitalization did not have any lasting effect on participants' health, cognition, and daily functioning relative to other deployed individuals with no history of injury. These results indicate the two groups are comparable and that their data could be potentially combined to create a single comparison group. Due to the small sample available for this study, the current results are considered preliminary, and further investigation is needed.

Combat exposure, PTSD symptoms, and cognition following blast-related traumatic brain injury in OEF/OIF/OND service members and Veterans.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are frequently documented among the Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn (OEF/OIF/OND) veterans. This study will investigate both combat exposure and PTSD as factors that may influence objective cognitive outcomes following blast-related mild TBI (mTBI). Participants included 54 OEF/OIF/OND veterans who had been exposed to blast and reported symptoms consistent with mTBI and 43 combat-deployed control participants who had no history of blast exposure or TBI. Raw scores from the Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Trail Making Test, Color-Word Interference Test, and Verbal Selective Reminding Test were used to measure cognitive functioning. All participants demonstrated adequate effort on the Word Memory Test. Demographics, injury characteristics, overall intellectual functioning, and total scores from the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C) and Combat Exposure Scale (CES) were used as the predictors for each cognitive measure. History of mTBI was significantly associated with higher PCL-C and CES scores. Multivariable linear regression, however, showed no significant differences in cognitive performance between groups. The absence of effect of mTBI, PTSD, and combat exposure on cognitive functioning noted in this study may be partially explained by the inclusion of only those participants who passed performance validity testing.

Association of hemoglobin levels, acute hemoglobin decrease, age, and co-morbidities with rehabilitation outcomes after total knee replacement.

OBJECTIVE: A study was undertaken to assess the association of preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels with rehabilitation outcomes, age, and selected co-morbidities DESIGN: Charts of 49 patients admitted to rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty due to degenerative joint disease were reviewed. Outcome measures included rehabilitation admission and discharge motor FIMtrade mark scores, motor FIM gain, and rehabilitation length of stay. RESULTS: Patients with higher preoperative hemoglobin levels had higher rehabilitation admission motor FIM scores (r=0.38, P<0.01) and lower motor FIM gains (r=-0.45, P<0.001). Patients who had higher hemoglobin levels at rehabilitation admission had higher admission motor FIM scores and shorter length of stay. Patients with diabetes had lower preoperative hemoglobin levels. Patients with hypertension had longer length of stay. Older patients had lower admission and discharge motor FIM scores and longer length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted to rehabilitation after total knee replacement have the potential to improve motor function, regardless of their preoperative and rehabilitation admission hemoglobin levels and the decrease in hemoglobin levels. However, those admitted to rehabilitation with lower hemoglobin levels, those with lower admission motor FIM scores, those who are older, and those who have hypertension may expect longer hospital stays to reach their functional goals.

Telerehabilitation for veterans with a lower-limb amputation or ulcer: Technical acceptability of data.

A study was undertaken to determine the technical acceptability of information available via a customized telerehabilitation system regarding patients with lower-limb ulcers or recent lower-limb amputations receiving care at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Among the 54 participants, 57 wounds (39 ulcers, 19 amputation incisions) were evaluated by means of still photographs and skin temperature data sent via ordinary telephone lines. Three experienced clinicians served as raters. Intrarater agreements and McNemar chi(2) tests were assessed between decisions made after telerehabilitation sessions and decisions made by the same rater after in-person sessions. Interrater agreements and kappa coefficients were assessed between two raters for both telerehabilitation and in-person sessions. The intrarater agreement on 57 wounds for the primary rater was 93%, and the McNemar test indicated no significant difference in the ratings (p < 0.63). Interrater agreement on 18 wounds was 78% (kappa = 0.55, p < 0.02) for the telerehabilitation sessions and 89% (kappa = 0.77, p < 0.001) for the in-person sessions. Most qualitative comments by three clinicians on picture quality (54/63 = 86%) and temperature data (39/44 = 88%) were favorable (good to excellent). The information yielded from this study provides evidence that the telerehabilitation system has the potential to present sufficient information to experienced clinicians so they can make informed decisions regarding wound management. The next phase of the study will include in-home trials and improvements in the technology.