Impact of COVID-19 outbreak in reperfusion therapies of acute ischaemic stroke in northwest Spain.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spain has been one of the countries more heavily stricken by SARS-CoV-2, which has had huge implications for stroke care. The aim was to analyse the impact of the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak on reperfusion therapies for acute ischaemic stroke in the northwest of Spain. METHODS: This was a Spanish multicentre retrospective observational study based on data from tertiary hospitals of the NORDICTUS network. All patients receiving reperfusion therapy for ischaemic stroke between 30 December 2019 and 3 May 2020 were recorded, and their baseline, clinical and radiological characteristics, extra- and intra-hospital times of action, Code Stroke activation pathway, COVID-19 status, reperfusion rate, and short-term outcome before and after the setting of the emergency state were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 796 patients received reperfusion therapies for ischaemic stroke. There was a decrease in the number of patients treated per week (46.5 patients per week vs. 39.0 patients per week, P = 0.043) and a delay in out-of-hospital (95.0 vs. 110.0 min, P = 0.001) and door-to-needle times (51.0 vs. 55.0, P = 0.038). Patients receiving endovascular therapy obtained less successful reperfusion rates (92.9% vs. 86.6%, P = 0.016). COVID-19 patients had more in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: A decrease in the number of patients benefiting from reperfusion therapies was found, with a delay in out-of-hospital and door-to-needle times and worse reperfusion rates in northwest Spain. COVID-19 patients had more in-hospital mortality.

[Antiepileptic drugs used in childhood. New products and new concepts]. / Fármacos antiepilépticos utilizados en la infancia. Nuevos productos y nuevos conceptos.

INTRODUCTION: Eight new antiepileptic drugs (AED) have been marketed in Spain since 1990 and others will soon follow. OBJECTIVE: To review the concepts underlying the development of the new drugs, as well as their indications, efficacy and safety. DEVELOPMENT: Pharmacologic antiepileptic intervention is no longer solely directed towards an anticonvulsant effect, but also to epileptogenic prevention, disease modification and reversal of pharmacoresistance. The development of new AED, initially based on the screening of putative products in animal models, changed during the last half of the century to a rational design based on known facts about excitatory /inhibitory neuronal mechanisms. More recently, attention has focussed on pharmacogenetics. The new AED were initially indicated for partial epilepsies, but some have been shown to have a broader clinical spectrum. Some show the ideal pharmacokinetic mechanisms, avoiding hepatic metabolism and protein binding. Drug interactions and adverse effects, especially severe idiosyncratic adverse effects, are rare, although there are some exceptions. In most cases, however, seizure control does not seem to be better than with the classic AED. Because of the specific characteristics of childhood epilepsy and pharmacokinetics, as well as the regulations governing the development of clinical trials, the use of new products in children is circumspect, which in turn delays the access of such patients to a possible therapeutic benefit.