RESUMO
There is growing evidence that gender is an important determinant of mental health and well-being. In this sense, both biological and socio-economic factors play a key role in how people experience psychological disturbances. This study examine whether there were sex- and gender-based differences in the management of psychiatric disorders in the emergency department (ED). A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted in the ED over the 2017-2019 period. Sex was codified as female/male and socio-economic deprivation index was compiled to address the impact of social determinants. Episodes were reclassified according to four major clusters. Psychotropic drug prescription was categorized according to the ATC classification. Poisson regression models, adjusted for age and socioeconomic status, were used. A total of 9789 episodes (53.9% females) of individuals who required an acute-related psychiatric intervention were retrieved. Age distribution and socioeconomic quintiles revealed gender differences. Anxiety-related consultations accounted for up to 50% of all episodes. Female gender was found to be overrepresented in anxiety and stress-related disorders, mood disorders, and personality disorders. In contrast, Males accounted for 70% of all psychoactive substance use disorders. Considering main clinical syndromic clusters, analysis showed that female patients were more likely to be prescribed with anxiolytic treatment in ED treatment than men in the categories of "Common mental disorders" (PR = 1.122 [1.014-1.242; p = 0.025), "Severe Mental Disorders" (PR = 1.217[1.054-1.406] p = 0.007) and "Personality disorders" (PR = 1.398 (1.038 - 1.884); p = 0.028). This study highlights the relevance of considering sex and gender as potential determinants in both the clinical presentation and management of psychiatric emergencies.
Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Fatores Sexuais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologia , Serviço Hospitalar de EmergênciaRESUMO
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV are major causes of worldwide disease. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a combined screening programme, which included a risk-assessment questionnaire and rapid tests for point-of-care diagnosis, on screening and new diagnosis rates. This prospective, cluster randomized study was carried out in primary care. The intervention arm included a 4-hour educational programme, the use of a risk-assessment questionnaire and rapid tests. In the control centres, only the educational intervention was provided. The main variables compared were the screening coverage and the number and rate of new HCV and HIV diagnoses. Of a total of 7991 participants, 4670 (58.5%) and 2894 (36.2%) presented a risk questionnaire for HIV or HCV, respectively. The younger participants, men and those from Latin America and Eastern Europe, showed the greatest risk of presenting with a positive questionnaire. The overall screening coverage was higher within the intervention arm (OR 17.7; 95% CI 16.2-19.5; P < .001). Only two HIV-positives were identified compared to one in control centres. The rate of HCV diagnoses was higher among intervention centres, with 37 versus seven positive tests (OR 5.2; 95% CI 2.3-11.6; P < .001). Of them, 10 were new diagnoses and 27 had been previously diagnosed, although not linked to care. In conclusion, a simple operational programme can lead to an increase in HCV and HIV screening rates, compared to an exclusively educational programme. The selection of at-risk patients with a self-questionnaire and the use of rapid tests significantly increased the diagnostic rate of HCV infection.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Hepatite C , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Hepacivirus , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Antipsychotic long-acting formulations (LAI-AP) have emerged as a new therapeutic choice to treat patients presenting a severe mental disorder. Despite that, to date, there is a lack of safety data and studies regarding the use of LAI-AP formulations in pregnant women. Here we present the first six-case series of pregnant women with schizophrenia treated with aripiprazole-LAI reported in the literature. All patients remained psychopathologically stable through pregnancy and the postpartum period, and all of them were in treatment with aripiprazole-LAI. To date, all infants remain healthy with normal developmental milestones, without the presence of congenital malformations or adverse effects. Lack of information on safety data regarding the use of new antipsychotic formulations remains important in treating women with mental illness who desire to become pregnant. Further studies in this clinical population with a larger number of patients included remains necessary.
RESUMO
Introduction: The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the coronavirus family, a group of viruses that can cause upper respiratory infections in humans. Among other symptoms, it can present as an asymptomatic infection or as a more severe disease requiring hospitalization. Neuropsychiatric symptoms have been described in the acute phase of the illness and as long-term repercussions. We describe the characteristics and interventions in those COVID-19 patients referred to our liaison psychiatry service. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study. This study was carried out within the Department of Psychiatry of Cruces University Hospital (Basque Country, Spain). Data from each psychiatric consultation within our consultation-liaison service were consecutively obtained for 1 month from March 17 to April 17, 2020. We recruited data regarding clinical and referral characteristics and psychiatric interventions. Results: Of a total of 721 SARS-CoV-2 hospitalizations, 43 (5.6%) patients were referred to our psychiatry liaison service. The median age was 61 years old, and 62.8% were women. The infectious disease department was the most frequent petitioner (37.2%), and the most common reason for referral was patient anxiety (25.6%). A total of 67.4% of patients received psychological counseling and 55.8% received some pharmacological approach, with a median of 3.7 visits/calls per patient. In addition, 20.3% needed a medication switch due to potential interactions between psychotropics and drugs used to treat SARS-CoV-2. Discussion: In our study, up to 5.6% of SARS-CoV-2 hospitalized patients needed a psychiatric evaluation, especially for anxiety and mood symptoms. Psychosocial factors associated with the pandemic, drugs used to treat the infection, or a direct causative effect of the virus may explain our findings.
RESUMO
Purpose: This study aims to analyze from a gender perspective the psychological distress experienced by the medical workforce during the peak of the pandemic in Spain. Methods: This is a single-center, observational analytic study. The study population comprised all associated health workers of the Cruces University Hospital, invited by email to participate in the survey. It consisted of a form covering demographic data, the general health questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28), and the perceived stress scale (PSS-14). We used multivariant regression analysis to check the effect of gender on the scores. We used gender analysis in both design and interpretation of data following SAGER guidelines. Results: Females made 74.6% of our sample, but their proportion was higher in lower-paid positions such as nursery (89.9%) than in higher-paid ones. The percentage of women categorized as cases with the GHQ-28 was 78.4%, a proportion significantly higher than in the male population (61.3%, p < 0.001). The multivariant regression analysis showed that being women, working as orderly hospital porters, and having a past psychiatric history were risk factors for higher scores in both the GHQ-28 and PSS-14. Conclusion: Women and those with lower-paid positions were at risk of higher psychological distress and worse quality of life within the medical workforce during the first wave of the pandemic. Gender analysis must be incorporated to analyze this fact better.
RESUMO
The current health crisis scenario has exposed the negative impact on mental health. This commentary highlights the main challenges and barriers that the Deaf community faces in access to health care resources and psychological support during the COVID-19 pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Assuntos
Auxiliares de Comunicação para Pessoas com Deficiência , Infecções por Coronavirus , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Transtornos Mentais , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Pandemias , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva , Pneumonia Viral , Angústia Psicológica , Adulto , COVID-19 , Humanos , RiscoRESUMO
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Spain ranked 1st in number of infected health workers. Despite the fact that up to 75% of them were women, psychological interventions to prevent distress usually lacked a gender perspective and a biopsychosocial approach. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Infecções por Coronavirus , Pessoal de Saúde , Doenças Profissionais , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Psicoterapia/normas , Transtornos de Estresse Traumático , Mulheres , Adulto , COVID-19 , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças Profissionais/terapia , Espanha , Transtornos de Estresse Traumático/terapiaRESUMO
Background: Eating disorders (EDs) are serious and life-threatening mental diseases characterized by abnormal or altered eating habits. The prevalence is variable, being influenced by diverse sociocultural factors. Historically, the prevalence of EDs has been higher in women (90%), although the incidence of these disorders in men appears to be increasing. In daily medical practice, when considering the presentation of other medical complications associated to the development of an ED, few is known about its real prevalence in men. Among them, some severe gastrointestinal complications that are rarely presented, such as the superior mesenteric artery syndrome (SMAS), can produce life-threatening results. Despite that, very few cases of men presenting this pathology are reported in literature. Case Presentation: A 38-year-old man without a history of psychiatric disease was admitted to the emergency department with nausea, abdominal pain, and severe malnutrition (body mass index 15.7 kg/m2). He was diagnosed with SMAS and was studied by multiple specialists on suspicion of a probable organic origin of his thinning. The suspected diagnosis of ED was rejected for months by some professionals, as well as by the patient and his family, until it was finally diagnosed with unspecified feeding and eating disorder (USFED). Conclusion: This case represents an example of diagnostic challenge where a delayed diagnosis of an ED in a male patient was made probably due to gender bias in clinical research and practice. In the literature, numerous reports were described in women diagnosed with SMAS with a previous diagnosis of an ED; however, few cases were found in men. In this clinical case, the patient suffered a significant diagnostic delay, probably due to the lack of diagnostic suspicion given by the differences in the prevalence and clinical presentation of EDs in women and men.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the large body of research on premorbid impairments in schizophrenia, studies comparing different early-onset psychoses are scarce. AIMS: To examine premorbid impairments in first episodes of early-onset bipolar and schizophrenia disorders. METHOD: We compared premorbid adjustment and other premorbid variables such as IQ and developmental abnormalities in a cohort of children and adolescents (N=69) with bipolar disorder (BP) or schizophrenia (SZ) experiencing their first psychotic episode and in a healthy control group (N=91). RESULTS: Schizophrenia patients showed more social impairment in childhood than bipolar patients (p<0.05) and healthy controls (p<0.001) and had higher rates of developmental abnormalities (p<0.05) than healthy controls. Between childhood and early adolescence, schizophrenia and bipolar patients showed a greater decline in academic adjustment than healthy controls, more specifically in adaptation to school (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Early-onset schizophrenia patients show more early social impairment than early-onset bipolar patients. Intellectual premorbid abnormalities are less specific and probably more linked to early-onset psychosis.