Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken) ; 5(7): e1537, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34476908

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tracheal chondrosarcoma is a rare malignancy, and formal treatment guidelines have not been established due to the lack of high quality studies. Best evidence at this time is limited to case reports. AIM: Explore the role of surgical intervention, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, and the long-term outcomes for these interventions for tracheal chondrosarcoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: A literature search was performed using PubMed (1959-2020) and ResearchGate (1959-2020) using medical subject heading terms "tracheal chondrosarcoma" OR "trachea chondrosarcoma." Additional reports were identified within reviewed articles and included for review. Articles pertaining to chondrosarcomas of the lung, bronchus, larynx, or other head and neck subsites were excluded. Cases of chondromas were excluded. Thirty-five patients with tracheal chondrosarcoma were identified in the literature since 1959. Advanced age was significantly associated with recurrent or persistent disease (p = .003). The majority (77%) of cases were treated with open surgical resection, with an open approach and negative surgical margins being significantly associated with being disease-free after treatment (p = .001 and p < .001, respectively). Adjuvant radiotherapy was reserved for those unfit for surgery or for recurrent disease. Tumor size, extra-tracheal extension, tumor calcification, location, and initial diagnosis were not associated with tumor recurrence. CONCLUSION: Non-metastatic tracheal chondrosarcoma can be treated by adequate surgical resection, with little to no role for adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Open surgery and negative margins were associated with oncologic control, while advanced age was associated with recurrent or persistent disease.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Condrossarcoma , Neoplasias Ósseas/patologia , Condrossarcoma/diagnóstico , Condrossarcoma/cirurgia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Traqueia/patologia , Traqueia/cirurgia
2.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 166(6): 1028-1037, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34126811

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Describe the relationship among rurality, socioeconomic status (SES), and patient/tumor characteristics in patients presenting with head and neck cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective single-institution study. SETTING: Academic tertiary-level medical center. METHODS: Patients with head and neck cancer presenting between 2011 and 2015 were included. Stage at presentation, insurance status, and demographic characteristics were collected. Rurality was measured through Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. SES was measured by SES index scores of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, which incorporate multiple components of SES. Associations among rurality, SES, and patient/tumor characteristics were assessed with univariate and multivariable statistics. All P values were calculated via 2-sided hypotheses. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P < .05. Statistical analyses were conducted with Stata/SE 14 (StataCorp). RESULTS: The study included 266 patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer between 2011 and 2015. Rural residence was associated with lower SES (P < .001). T and N stages were associated with rurality (P = .036 and .050, respectively). Higher educational status was associated with oropharyngeal cancer (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Rurality and SES have distinct impacts on patients with head and neck cancer. Specifically, rurality is associated with tumor stage among patients with head and neck cancer. Knowledge of disparities among patients with rural residency may help target interventions to facilitate earlier diagnosis.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , População Rural , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/epidemiologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Classe Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos
3.
Front Cell Neurosci ; 16: 841864, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36187289

RESUMO

After a damaging insult, hair cells can spontaneously regenerate from cochlear supporting cells within the first week of life. While the regenerated cells express several markers of immature hair cells and have stereocilia bundles, their capacity to differentiate into inner or outer hair cells, and ability to form new synaptic connections has not been well-described. In addition, while multiple supporting cell subtypes have been implicated as the source of the regenerated hair cells, it is unclear if certain subtypes have a greater propensity to form one hair cell type over another. To investigate this, we used two CreER mouse models to fate-map either the supporting cells located near the inner hair cells (inner phalangeal and border cells) or outer hair cells (Deiters', inner pillar, and outer pillar cells) along with immunostaining for markers that specify the two hair cell types. We found that supporting cells fate-mapped by both CreER lines responded early to hair cell damage by expressing Atoh1, and are capable of producing regenerated hair cells that express terminal differentiation markers of both inner and outer hair cells. The majority of regenerated hair cells were innervated by neuronal fibers and contained synapses. Unexpectedly, we also found that the majority of the laterally positioned regenerated hair cells aberrantly expressed both the outer hair cell gene, oncomodulin, and the inner hair cell gene, vesicular glutamate transporter 3 (VGlut3). While this work demonstrates that regenerated cells can express markers of both inner and outer hair cells after damage, VGlut3 expression appears to lack the tight control present during embryogenesis, which leads to its inappropriate expression in regenerated cells.

4.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am ; 53(6): 1077-1089, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32928584

RESUMO

Robotic surgery has become more common in otolaryngologic surgery since the introduction of the da Vinci robotic system, but has played a limited role in anterior and central skull base surgery, largely because of technical limitations of existing robots. Current robotic technology has been used in creative ways to access the skull base, but was not designed to navigate these complex anatomic constraints. Novel robots should target many of the limitations of current robotic technology, such as maneuverability, inability to suture, lack of haptic feedback, and absent integration with image guidance.


Assuntos
Cabeça/cirurgia , Pescoço/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Base do Crânio/cirurgia , Humanos , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA