A randomised-controlled trial (TARGET-C) of high vs. low target mean arterial pressure in patients with cirrhosis and septic shock.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A high mean arterial pressure (MAP) target has been associated with improved renal outcomes in patients with cirrhosis, though it has not been studied in critically ill patients with cirrhosis and septic shock (CICs). We compared the efficacy of a high (80-85 mmHg; H-MAP) vs. low (60-65; L-MAP) target MAP strategy in improving 28-day mortality in CICs. METHODS: We performed open-label 1:1 randomisation of 150 CICs (H-MAP 75; L-MAP 75). The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality and secondary endpoints included reversal of shock, acute kidney injury (AKI) at day 5, the incidence of intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and adverse events. Endothelial markers were analysed in a subset of patients. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were comparable. On intention-to-treat analysis, 28-day mortality (65% vs. 56%; p = 0.54), reversal of shock (47% vs. 53%; p = 0.41) and AKI development (45% vs. 31%;p = 0.06) were not different between the H-MAP and L-MAP groups, respectively. A lower incidence of IDH (12% vs. 48%; p <0.001) and higher adverse events necessitating protocol discontinuation (24% vs. 11%; p = 0.031) were noted in the H-MAP group. On per-protocol analysis (L-MAP 67; H-MAP 57), a significantly higher reversal of AKI (53% vs. 31%; p = 0.02) and a lower incidence of IDH (4% vs. 53%; p <0.001) were observed in the H-MAP group. Endothelial repair markers such as ADAMTS (2.11 ± 1.13 vs. 1.15 ± 0.48; p = 0.002) and angiopoietin-2 (74.08 ± 53.00 vs. 41.80 ± 15.95; p = 0.016) were higher in the H-MAP group. CONCLUSIONS: A higher MAP strategy does not confer a survival benefit in CICs, but improves tolerance to dialysis, lactate clearance and renal recovery. Higher adverse events indicate the need for better tools to evaluate target microcirculation pressures in CICs. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Maintaining an appropriate organ perfusion pressure during sepsis is the ultimate goal of haemodynamic management. A higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) improves renal outcomes in patients with hepatorenal syndrome. Patients with cirrhosis and septic shock have severe circulatory disturbances, low MAP, and poor tissue perfusion. In these patients, targeting higher MAP vs. lower MAP does not confer any survival benefit but is associated with more adverse events. A higher target strategy was associated with better tolerance and lesser episodes of hypotension on dialysis. Patients who could achieve the higher target MAP, without the development of adverse events, had improved renal outcomes and better lactate clearance. Higher MAP was also associated with improvements in markers of endothelial function. A higher target MAP strategy, with close monitoring of adverse events, may be recommended for patients with cirrhosis and septic shock. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT03145168.

A randomized-controlled trial comparing 20% albumin to plasmalyte in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis-induced hypotension [ALPS trial].

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The choice of resuscitation fluid in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis-induced hypotension is unclear. 5% albumin was superior to normal saline in the FRISC study. We compared the efficacy and safety of 20% albumin, which has greater oncotic properties, to plasmalyte in reversing sepsis-induced hypotension. METHODS: Critically ill patients with cirrhosis underwent open-label randomization to receive either 20% albumin (0.5-1.0 g/kg over 3 hours; n = 50) or plasmalyte (30 ml/kg over 3 hours, n = 50). The primary endpoint of the study was the attainment of mean arterial pressure (MAP) above 65 mmHg at 3 hours. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable in albumin and plasmalyte groups; arterial lactate (6.16±3.18 mmol/L vs. 6.38±4.77 mmol/L; p = 0.78), MAP (51.4±6.52 mmHg vs. 49.9±4.45 mmHg; p = 0.17) and SOFA score (10.8±2.96 vs. 11.1±4.2; p = 0.68), respectively. Most patients were alcoholics (39%) and had pneumonia (40%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, albumin was superior to plasmalyte in achieving the primary endpoint (62% vs. 22%; p <0.001). A faster decline in arterial lactate (p = 0.03), a reduced need for dialysis (48% vs. 62%; p = 0.16), and a longer time to initiation of dialysis (in hours) (68.13±47.79 vs. 99.7± 63.4; p = 0.06) were seen with albumin. However, the 28-day mortality rate was not different (58% vs. 62%, p = 0.57) and treatment had to be discontinued in 11 (22%) patients in the albumin group due to adverse effects compared to no discontinuations in the plasmalyte group. CONCLUSION: In patients with cirrhosis and sepsis-induced hypotension, 20% albumin leads to a faster improvement in hemodynamics and lactate clearance than plasmalyte, while 28-day survival was similar. However, patients on 20% albumin need to be closely monitored as it was more often associated with pulmonary complications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02721238. LAY SUMMARY: The current randomized-controlled trial performed in critically ill patients with cirrhosis and sepsis-induced hypotension highlights that 20% albumin restores arterial pressure more quickly but causes more pulmonary complications than plasmalyte. The impact on renal functions was also modest. These effects did not result in improvement in survival at 28 days. Plasmalyte is safer and well-tolerated and can be considered for volume resuscitation in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis-induced hypotension.

Non-resolution of acute kidney injury in the first week portends the development of chronic kidney disease in critically ill patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Renal tubular epithelial cells (RTECs) cause maladaptive repair and perpetuate renal fibrosis. AIM: To evaluate urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and RTEC as risk factors for non-resolution of acute kidney injury (AKI-NR) at day seven and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in critically ill patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed urinary NGAL and microscopy at enrolment and day 7 in all patients. We assessed 17 renal injury, endothelial injury and repair markers, genes for mitochondrial biogenesis by qRT-PCR in RTEC, and post-mortem renal biopsies for understanding mechanisms of AKI non-resolution (n = 30). RESULTS: We enrolled 310 patients, aged 48.1 ± 11.6 years, 87% male, 90% alcoholic. Of these, 36% had RTEC at enrolment, and 53% had AKI-NR on day 7. On mean follow-up of 136 days (range 43-365), 150 (48.3%) developed CKD. The presence of RTEC or granular casts, NGAL and AKI-NR were independent predictors of CKD development on competing risk analysis. Higher MCP-1, renal endothelial injury, decrease in tubular repair markers and failure of mitochondrial biogenesis in RTEC were seen in patients with AKI-NR compared with AKI-R (p < 0.05). Renal biopsies showed infiltration with monocyte-macrophage, increased α-SMA, and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Almost two-thirds of critically ill patients with cirrhosis have AKI, which resolves in only one-half at day seven and predicts the development of CKD. Higher NGAL, RTEC, or granular casts were independent predictors of AKI-NR and CKD development. Enhanced tubular and endothelial injury, decreased repair, monocyte-macrophage infiltration and mitochondrial dysfunction in RTEC are associated with AKI non-resolution and risk of renal fibrosis.