Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Crit Care Med ; 46(8): 1217-1223, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29727367

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Although the potential dangers of hyperchloremia from resuscitation fluids continue to emerge, no study to date has considered the contribution of medication diluents to cumulative volume and hyperchloremia. This study compares saline versus dextrose 5% in water as the primary medication diluent and the occurrence of hyperchloremia in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, sequential period pilot study. SETTING: Medical ICU of a large academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult patients admitted to the medical ICU were eligible for inclusion. Patients who were admitted for less than 48 hours, less than 18 years old, pregnant, incarcerated, or who had brain injury were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Saline as the primary medication diluent for 2 months followed by dextrose 5% in water as the primary medication diluent for 2 months. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 426 patients were included, 216 in the saline group and 210 in the dextrose 5% in water group. Medication diluents accounted for 63% of the total IV volume over the observation period. In the saline group, 17.9% developed hyperchloremia compared with 10.5% in the dextrose 5% in water group (p = 0.037), which was statistically significant in multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.94; p = 0.031). In the saline group, 34.2% developed acute kidney injury versus 24.5% in the dextrose 5% in water group (p = 0.035); however, this was not statistically significant when adjusting for baseline covariates. No other significant differences in dysnatremias, insulin requirements, glucose control, ICU length of stay, or ICU mortality were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified that medication diluents contribute substantially to the total IV volume received by critically ill patients. Saline as the primary medication diluent compared with dextrose 5% in water is associated with hyperchloremia, a possible risk factor for acute kidney injury.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Hidratação/efeitos adversos , Hidratação/métodos , Soluções para Reidratação/efeitos adversos , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico/induzido quimicamente , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Glucose/efeitos adversos , Glucose/química , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Soluções para Reidratação/química , Fatores de Risco , Solução Salina/efeitos adversos , Solução Salina/química , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico/complicações
2.
J Pharm Pract ; 32(1): 41-47, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29105574

RESUMO

BACKGROUND:: The Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations are used to estimate kidney function. However, utility has been questioned in the obese population. OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate differences in estimates of kidney function in obese patients and implications for drug dosing. METHODS:: This was a retrospective study of adult inpatients with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 and stable kidney function. Patients were categorized based on creatinine clearance (CrCl): group 1-CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min and group 2-CrCl 15 to 59 mL/min. Mean estimates of kidney function and recommended doses of 8 renally eliminated medications were compared. RESULTS:: For the 166 patients included, mean estimates using CG, MDRD, and CKD-EPI for group 1 were 87 (23) mL/min, 91 (21) mL/min, and 96 (23) mL/min, respectively. Group 2 estimates were 42 (13) mL/min, 51 (15) mL/min, and 51 (16) mL/min, respectively. MDRD and CKD-EPI estimates were significantly higher than CG in 125 (75%) and 140 (84%) patients, respectively. Dose discrepancies were most often due to higher dose recommendations using MDRD or CKD-EPI compared to CG. CONCLUSION:: Careful consideration of the method used to estimate kidney function, the method used for developing dosing recommendations, and the risk-benefit profile is warranted when designing drug regimens in obese individuals.


Assuntos
Cálculos da Dosagem de Medicamento , Nefropatias/diagnóstico , Obesidade/complicações , Preparações Farmacêuticas/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Índice de Massa Corporal , Creatinina/sangue , Creatinina/urina , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Testes de Função Renal , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA