Long-term results of incus vibroplasty in patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES: The principal aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of the middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) in patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss up to a mean (± standard deviation) duration of 11.1 ± 2.1 years (min. = 8.2, max. = 13.9, n = 16) after the intervention. DESIGN: This was a retrospective, single-subject repeated-measurements study over a long-term period. A total of 104 German-speaking adults (for 122 implants) were included in this study (54 male, 50 female). The mean age at implantation was 54.5 years (min. = 19.0, max. = 80.4). Audiological outcome and speech intelligibility were assessed in all VSB patients at different time points in non-overlapping groups. RESULTS: Bone conduction (BC) thresholds were preserved after the implantation and no indication was found of an increase over time of the small air-bone gaps introduced by the implantation. BC and air conduction thresholds worsened similarly in both implanted and non-implanted ears over time. The decrease in audiological benefit provided by the VSB was moderate and the Word Recognition Score in quiet conditions at 65 dB SPL was still largely improved with the VSB in the longest observed group. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that the VSB does not affect the integrity of the inner/middle ear and is still beneficial in long-term follow-up.

Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE: To compare audiological outcomes in mild-to-moderate mixed hearing loss patients treated with a bone-anchored hearing aid or an active middle-ear implant. Analysis aimed to refine criteria used in preoperative selection of implant type. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative analysis of audiological data. Follow-up time ranged between 0.55 and 8.8 years. STUDY SAMPLE: For detailed comparative analysis, 12 patients (six in each group) with comparable bone conduction thresholds and similar clinical characteristics were selected. A larger cohort of 48 patient files were used to evaluate overall audiological indication criteria (24 per group). RESULTS: In free-field tone audiometry, Baha patients showed mean aided thresholds between 40-48 dB, whereas hearing thresholds for VSB patients were 25-43 dB. Baha and VSB users had mean WRS of 56% and 82%, respectively, at 65 dB. Better speech understanding in noise was seen with the VSB. CONCLUSION: Analysis of the main cohort (n = 48) showed that treatment with round window vibroplasty leads to better hearing performance than treatment with a bone-anchored hearing device, if the bone conduction pure-tone average (0.5 to 4 kHz) is poorer than 35 dB HL. Audiological analysis in the smaller comparative analysis showed similar findings.

Power stapes: an alternative method for treating hearing loss in osteogenesis imperfecta?

OBJECTIVE: To present power stapes, stapedotomy, and middle ear implantation with Vibrant SoundBridge (VSB) performed in a one-step surgery as an alternative option for hearing rehabilitation in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary referral ear center. PATIENTS: A family with genetically proven OI Type I. INTERVENTIONS: Two patients, mother and son, with severe to profound mixed hearing loss underwent 3 power stapes, 1 unilateral and 1 bilateral sequential. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thorough audiological diagnostic batteries including aided and unaided pure-tone and free-field audiometry and Freiburg monosyllabic word test were used to assess the preoperative status and the postoperative hearing outcome. High-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bones was performed as well. Surgical procedure and any special considerations were analyzed in detail. RESULTS: The hearing outcome was favorable in all cases, showing in comparison to the preoperative values an average improvement of 36.8 dB. Severe intraoperative bleeding of the middle ear mucosa was the only complication and could be easily controlled by allowing short time intervals. Inner ear trauma did not occur in any case. CONCLUSION: Power stapes represents a safe and promising procedure for treating hearing loss in selected patients with OI. Furthermore, it introduces a new, advantageous VSB application in cases of mixed hearing loss with severe otosclerosis and increased bone-conduction thresholds.