Outcomes of Stroke Thrombectomy Performed by Interventional Radiologists versus Neurointerventional Physicians.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that interventional radiologists (IRs) and neurointerventional (NI) physicians have similar outcomes of endovascular stroke thrombectomy (EVT), which could be used to improve the availability of thrombectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight hospitals providing EVT performed by IRs and NI physicians at the same institution submitted sequential retrospective data limited to the era of modern devices. Good clinical outcomes (a 90-day modified Rankin score [mRS] of 0-2) and technically successful revascularization (a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score of ≥2b) were compared between the specialties after adjusting for treating hospital, patient age, stroke severity, Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score, time from symptom onset to door, and clot location. Propensity score matching was used to compare the outcomes. A total of 1,009 patients were evaluated (622 treated by IRs and 387 treated by NI physicians). RESULTS: The median time from stroke onset to puncture was 245 versus 253 minutes (P = .49), the technically successful revascularization rate was 81.8% versus 82.4% (P = .81), and the good clinical outcome rate was 45.5% versus 50.1% (P = .16). After adjusting, the physician specialty was not a significant predictor of good clinical outcomes (odds ratio, 1.028; 95% confidence interval, 0.760-1.390; P = .86). After matching, an mRS of 0-2 was present in 47.7% of IR treated patients and 51.1% of NI treated patients (P = .366). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in the successful revascularization rate and good clinical outcomes between IRs and NI physicians. The outcomes of EVT performed by IRs were similar to those of EVT performed by NI physicians, as determined using previously published trials and registries. This may be useful for addressing coverage and access to stroke interventions.

Real-Time Ultrasound-Guided Paracentesis by Radiologists: Near Zero Risk of Hemorrhage without Correction of Coagulopathy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the rate and risk factors for hemorrhage in patients undergoing real-time, ultrasound-guided paracentesis by radiologists without correction of coagulopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all patients who underwent real-time, ultrasound-guided paracentesis at a single institution over a 2-year period. In total, 3116 paracentesis procedures were performed: 757 (24%) inpatients and 2,359 (76%) outpatients. Ninety-five percent of patients had a diagnosis of cirrhosis. Mean patient age was 56.6 years. Mean international normalized ratio (INR) was 1.6; INR was > 2 in 437 (14%) of cases. Mean platelet count was 122 x 103/µL; platelet count was < 50 x 103/µL in 368 (12%) of patients. Seven hundred seven (23%) patients were dialysis dependent. Patients were followed for 2 weeks after paracentesis to assess for hemorrhage requiring transfusion or rescue angiogram/embolization. Univariate analysis was performed to determine risk factors for hemorrhage. Blood product and cost saving analysis were performed. RESULTS: Significant post-paracentesis hemorrhage occurred in 6 (0.19%) patients, and only 1 patient required an angiogram with embolization. No predictors of post-procedure bleeding were found, including INR and platelet count. Transfusion of 1125 units of fresh frozen plasma and 366 units of platelets were avoided, for a transfusion-associated cost savings of $816,000. CONCLUSIONS: Without correction of coagulation abnormalities with prophylactic blood product transfusion, post-procedural hemorrhage is very rare when paracentesis is performed with real-time ultrasound guidance by radiologists.

Risk factors and management of hepatic artery stenosis post liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic Artery Stenosis (HAS) after liver transplantation (LT), if untreated, can lead to hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) that carries significant morbidity. AIMS: To identify risk factors associated with HAS and determine if endovascular therapy (EVT) reduces the occurrence of HAT. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult LT patients between 2013 and 2018. The primary outcome was development of HAT, and secondary outcomes included graft failure and mortality. Logistic regression was used to ascertain the odds ratio of developing HAS. Outcomes between intervention types were compared with Fisher's-exact test. RESULTS: The odds of HAS doubled in DCD-donor recipients (OR=2.27; P = 0.04) and transplants requiring vascular reconstruction for donor arterial variation (OR=2.19, P = 0.046). Of the 63 identified HAS patients, 44 underwent EVT, 7 with angioplasty alone, 37 combined with stenting. HAT was not significantly different in those who underwent angioplasty with or without stenting than conservative treatment (P = 0.71). However, compared to patients without HAS, patients with HAS had higher odds of biliary stricture and decreased graft and overall patient survival (log-rank P < 0.001 & P = 0.019, respectively). CONCLUSION: HAS is significantly higher in DCD-graft recipients. EVT was not associated with reduction in HAT progression. HAS has poor graft and overall survival.

Utility of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement for Maintaining Portal Vein Patency in Candidates on Wait Lists Who Develop Thrombus.

OBJECTIVES: Although no longer a contraindication to liver transplant, portal vein thrombosis may lead to longer operative time and complexities in venous reconstruction. Strategies to maintain preoperative patency include systemic anticoagulation and/or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement. The former may not be ideal in cirrhotic patients prone to luminal gastrointestinal tract bleeding, and factors that predict improvements in portal vein thrombosis with the latter have not been well defined. Our goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement as monotherapy to improve and/or resolve portal vein thrombosis in otherwise eligible liver transplant candidates with partial or complete portal vein thrombosis and to identify factors predicting success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 30 patients from 2010 to 2015 who had transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placementfor primary indication to maintain portal vein patency. RESULTS: The main portal vein was completely thrombosed in 5 of 30 (16.6%), nearly completely thrombosed in 9 of 30 (30%), and partially thrombosed in 16 patients (53.3%). Twenty-four patients (80%) had improvement and/or resolution of portal vein thrombosis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement, with 18 of these (75%) having complete resolution. All 5 patients (20.8%) with complete thrombosis had improvement/resolution of portal vein thrombosis. Nine patients (30%) required hospitalization within 3 months for hepatic encephalopathy. There were 3 deaths (10%) not related to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement (10%). Nine patients underwent liver transplant after shunt placement (median 2.9 mo; range, 0.3-32 mo); all 9 received endto-end anastomosis without need for intraoperative thrombectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement may be effective as monotherapy for maintaining or restoring portal vein patency in selected livertransplant candidates, even in those with complete portal vein thrombosis. Further studies are needed to define potential responders to this approach.

Race and Gradient Difference Are Associated with Increased Risk of Hepatic Encephalopathy Hospital Admission After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a well-recognized complication of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate incidence and predictors of post-TIPS HE necessitating hospital admission in a non-clinical trial setting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study identifying 273 consecutive patients undergoing TIPS from 2010 to 2015 for any indication; 210 met inclusion/exclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was incidence of post-TIPS HE defined as encephalopathy with no other identifiable cause requiring hospitalization within 90 days of TIPS. Clinical demographics and procedural variables were collected and analyzed to determine predictors of readmission for post-TIPS HE. Categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact test; continuous variables were compared using Levene's t-test and student's t-test; P < 0.05, significant. RESULTS: Forty-two of 210 patients (20%) developed post-TIPS HE requiring hospitalization within 90 days. On analysis of cohorts (post-TIPS HE vs. no post-TIPS HE): non-white race (31.0% vs. 17.5%, P = 0.022) and increased hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) difference during TIPS (10.5 vs. 8.9 mmHg, P = 0.030) were associated with an increased incidence of HE requiring readmission within 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: HE remains a common complication of TIPS. Non-Caucasian race is a significant clinical demographic associated with increased risk for readmission. Independent of initial or final HVPG, HVPG difference appears to be a significant modifiable technical risk factor. In the absence of clear preventative strategies for post-TIPS encephalopathy, non-Caucasians with HVPG reductions >9 mmHg may require targeted follow up evaluation to prevent hospital readmission.

Refractory Hepatic Encephalopathy After Elective Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: Risk Factors and Outcomes with Revision.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common complication of elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement and is often successfully medically managed. Risk factors for refractory hepatic encephalopathy (RHE) necessitating revision of TIPS are not well defined. We evaluated the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of post-TIPS RHE necessitating TIPS revision. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study of 174 consecutive patients undergoing elective TIPS placement (2010-2015), we evaluated the incidence of post-TIPS RHE. Clinical demographics and procedural variables were collected. 1-year outcomes after revision were collected. RESULTS: Ten of 174 patients (5.7%) developed post-TIPS RHE requiring revision. Significant differences between RHE and non-refractory groups were shunt size > 8 versus ≤ 8 mm (18.5 vs. 3.4%, p = 0.001), history of HE (14 vs. 2%, p = 0.007), and serum albumin levels ≤ 2.5 versus > 2.5 g/dL (13.1 vs. 3.1%, p = 0.020). On multivariate analysis, shunt size > 8 mm (p = 0.001), history of HE prior to TIPS (p = 0.006), and low serum albumin (≤ 2.5 g/dL) (p = 0.022) remained independent predictors of RHE, controlling for age and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score. RHE improved in 8 of 10 patients but survival at 1 year without liver transplantation (LT) was only 10%. CONCLUSION: While TIPS revision successfully improves RHE in most cases, 1-year mortality rates are high, limiting the value of revision in non-LT candidates. Patients with previous history of HE and low serum albumin levels prior to TIPS may benefit most from the use of shunt sizes < 8 mm to mitigate the risk of RHE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, case series.

Hepatic arterioportal fistula presenting as gastric variceal hemorrhage.

Hepatic arterioportal fistulae (APF) are abnormal communications between the hepatic artery and the portal vein. In this report, we present the second case in the literature of a symptomatic APF presenting as a gastric variceal bleeding. A 55-year-old female presented to our facility with hematemesis. Upper endoscopy revealed a bleeding gastric varix. A computed tomography scan identified a large left hepatic lobe APF between the left hepatic artery and the left portal vein. Through angiography coil embolization was performed and with resultant loss of arterial flow, the APF was decompressed. On hospital day 3, the patient developed new melena. Portovenogram was performed and a TIPS stent was deployed. The patient subsequently did well. Hepatic arterioportal fistulae can result in portal hypertension secondary to arterial blood flowing directly into the portal vein bypassing the hepatic sinusoids. Iatrogenic causes (e.g. percutaneous liver biopsy) represent more than 50% of published cases of APFs. Most APFs resolve spontaneously as they are small and peripherally located. In rare instances, when APFs are centrally located, clinical symptoms develop. There have been 30 reported cases of symptomatic intrahepatic APFs following percutaneous liver biopsy. Of those, only one case presented as a gastric variceal bleed. Digital subtraction angiography is the gold standard in the diagnosis and treatment of APFs. In addition to initial embolization, we elected to treat the patient with TIPS due to the magnitude of her bleed. Although rare, intrahepatic APF should be kept on the differential of a patient presenting with isolated gastric varices.