Improved detection methods significantly increase the detection window for EPO microdoses.

To reproduce a potential doping scenario, a 2 week administration of recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) microdoses alone or in combination with growth hormone (GH) microdoses (three times a week) was performed on healthy and athletic male subjects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the identification capability of rEPO in samples obtained during and post treatment. Detection was tested in urine and blood using the antidoping techniques for rEPO detection (iso-electric focusing (IEF)-, sodium-dodecyl-sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and for some urine samples the sarcosyl (SAR)-PAGE method) with some improvements: for blood samples, instead of a simple concentration step, immuno-extraction of EPO was performed for all urines to limit protein contamination that can affect migration. In addition, elution buffer modifications also improved the quality of migration. The use of a recently validated biotinylated anti-EPO antibody simplified the protocols, allowing a single transfer step instead of a double-blot even by IEF with a lowered background. The criteria for suspicious blood and urine samples by IEF were also re-evaluated. While endogenous EPO was not decreased over the course of the study, EPO microdoses were detectable in blood and urine between 24 h and 72 h after an administration. Detection in urine in combination with SDS-PAGE was the most sensitive combination for prolonged detection (100% identification after 48 h, 91% after 72 h), slightly better than IEF. Urine samples also tested by SAR-PAGE indicated a similar sensitivity of detection to SDS-PAGE. GH co-administration had no impact on rEPO elimination/detection.

Combined administration of microdoses of growth hormone and erythropoietin: Effects on performance and evaluation of GH detection capability using anti-doping methods.

The combination of growth hormone (GH) and recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) is thought to be used particularly in endurance sports. Our objective was to reproduce a 2-week administration of rEPO microdoses alone or in combination with GH microdoses (three times a week) on healthy and athletic male subjects and to evaluate if GH had any additional effects compared to EPO treatment alone. The effects of the treatments on hematological parameters and VO2max were studied as well as the detection of GH in serum. While the rEPO microdose regimen was associated with a significant increase in reticulocytes, no clear elevation in hemoglobin concentration (HGB) was observed. Using a correction by plasma volume did not reveal more effects of EPO on HGB. Our results did not show any additional effect when the GH microdoses were co-administered. In addition, no clear increase in VO2max was observed after treatment, with an elevation in only half the subjects in both groups (EPO and EPO+GH). A clear effect of GH on insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) was seen but it was lower on procollagen III amino-terminal propeptide (P-III-NP). GH detection using the direct isoform test identified only one subject 24 hours after receiving GH. The GH biomarker test combining IGF-I and P-III-NP was not able to detect the GH administration. However, a longitudinal follow-up of the intraindividual variations showed a significant increase in IGF-I 24 and 48 hours after GH administration in most subjects, while the effect of GH microdoses on P-III-NP was less straightforward.