Comparing Outcomes for Emergent Cranial Neurosurgical Procedures Performed "During Hours" and "After Hours".

OBJECTIVE: Surgery performed at night and on weekends is thought to be associated with increased complications. However, the impact of time of day on outcomes has not been studied within cranial neurosurgery. We aim to determine if there are differences in outcomes for cranial neurosurgery performed after hours (AH) compared with during hours (DH). METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective study of cranial neurosurgery patients who underwent emergent surgery from January 2015 through December 2019. Surgery was considered DH if the incision occurred between 8 am and 5 pm Monday through Friday. We assessed outcome measures for differences between operations performed DH or AH. RESULTS: Three-hundred and ninety-three patients (114 DH, 279 AH) underwent surgery. There was a lower rate of return to the operating room within 30 days for AH (8.6%) compared with DH (14.0%), P = 0.03, on multivariate analysis. There were no significant differences in length of operation, estimated blood loss, improvement in Glasgow Coma Scale, intensive care unit and total hospital length of stay, 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, and in-hospital mortality for cases performed DH compared with AH. Further subgroup analyses were performed for patients who underwent immediate surgery for subdural hematomas, with no differences noted in outcomes on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that operating AH does not appear to negatively impact outcomes when compared with operating DH, in cases of cranial neurosurgical emergencies. Further study assessing the impact on elective neurosurgical cases is required.

Comparing 30-Day Outcomes After Emergent Spine Procedures Performed "During Hours" vs "After Hours".

BACKGROUND: Spinal injuries, whether mechanical or neurological, frequently require urgent intervention. Superior outcomes are associated with earlier intervention, which often requires operating overnight and on weekends. However, operating after hours has been associated with increased risks of complications in selected studies. The authors sought to determine whether there are differences in outcomes for "after hours" surgery compared with "during hours" surgery for spinal emergencies. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of spine surgery patients who underwent urgent surgery within 6 hours, from January 2015 through December 2019. Surgery was considered during hours if it started between 8 am and 5 pm Monday through Friday. After hours was defined as from 5 pm through 8 am on a weekday or Saturday or Sunday. We assessed 30-day outcome measures for differences between operations performed during hours or after hours. RESULTS: There were 241 spine procedures performed (49 during hours and 192 after hours). There was no significant difference between the length of operation (145.3 vs 129.8 minutes, P = 0.29), estimated blood loss (303.9 vs 274.4 mL, P = 0.61), improvement in American Spinal Injury Association scale (0.26 vs 0.24 grade, P = 0.85), 30-day return to the operating room (OR; 14.3% vs 6.8%, P = 0.09), 30-day readmission (2.0% vs 6.3% P = 0.24), intensive care unit length of stay (4.6 vs 6.3 days, P = 0.27), hospital length of stay (13.5 days vs 14.2 days, P = 0.72), or 30-day mortality (4.1% vs 7.3%, P = 0.42) for cases performed during hours compared with those after hours, respectively. On multivariate analysis, prior malignancy (P = 0.008) and blue immediate status (P = 0.004) were predictors of 30-day mortality. However, "after hours" surgery was not a predictor of 30-day return to the OR, readmission, or mortality in either univariate or multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Spine surgery must often be performed after hours. However, the time of day does not significantly impact the 30-day outcomes for emergent spine surgery.

Prolactin at moderately increased levels confers a neuroprotective effect in non-secreting pituitary macroadenomas.

CONTEXT: Prolactin, a hormone synthesized by the anterior pituitary gland demonstrates promise as a neuroprotective agent, however, its role in humans and in vivo during injury is not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether elevated levels of prolactin attenuate injury to the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) following compression of the optic chiasm in patients with a prolactin secreting pituitary macroadenoma (i.e., prolactinoma). DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cross-sectional study of all pituitary macroadenoma patients treated at a single institution between 2009 and 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome measures included RNFL thickness, mean deviation, and prolactin levels for both prolactin-secreting and non-secreting pituitary macroadenoma patients. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients met inclusion criteria for this study (14 prolactin-secreting and 52 non-secreting macroadenoma patients). Of 52 non-secreting macroadenoma patients, 12 had moderate elevation of prolactin secondary to stalk effect. Patients with moderate elevation in prolactin demonstrated increased RNFL thickness compared to patients with normal prolactin levels (p < 0.01). Additionally, a significant positive relation between increasing levels of prolactin and RNFL thickness was identified in patients with moderate prolactin elevation (R = 0.51, p-value = 0.035). No significant difference was identified between prolactinoma patients and those with normal prolactin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Moderately increased serum prolactin is associated with increased RNFL thickness when compared to controls. These associations are lost when serum prolactin is < 30 ng/ml or elevated in prolactinomas. This suggests a neuroprotective effect of prolactin at moderately increased levels in preserving retinal function during optic chiasm compression.

Empty Sella Syndrome as a Window Into the Neuroprotective Effects of Prolactin.

Background: The goal of this study was to relate diffusion MR measures of white matter integrity of the retinofugal visual pathway with prolactin levels in a patient with downward herniation of the optic chiasm secondary to medical treatment of a prolactinoma. Methods: A 36-year-old woman with a prolactinoma presented with progressive bilateral visual field defects 9 years after initial diagnosis and medical treatment. She was diagnosed with empty-sella syndrome and instructed to stop cabergoline. Hormone testing was conducted in tandem with routine clinical evaluations over 1 year and the patient was followed with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and automated perimetry at three time points. Five healthy controls underwent a complementary battery of clinical and neuroimaging tests at a single time point. Results: Shortly after discontinuing cabergoline, diffusion metrics in the optic tracts were within the range of values observed in healthy controls. However, following a brief period where the patient resumed cabergoline (of her own volition), there was a decrease in serum prolactin with a corresponding decrease in visual ability and increase in radial diffusivity (p < 0.001). Those measures again returned to their baseline ranges after discontinuing cabergoline a second time. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the sensitivity of dMRI to detect rapid and functionally significant microstructural changes in white matter tracts secondary to alterations in serum prolactin levels. The inverse relations between prolactin and measures of white matter integrity and visual function are consistent with the hypothesis that prolactin can play a neuroprotective role in the injured nervous system.