CT versus MR guidance for radiofrequency ablation in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a 10-year follow-up favors MR guidance.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the results of CT- vs MR-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer after 10 years of follow-up in an observational, retrospective, and multicentric study. METHODS: A total of 238 patients with 496 LM were treated with RFA either with CT (CT group) or magnetic resonance (MR group) guidance. Every ablated LM was assessed and followed up with diagnostic MRI. Technical success, technique efficacy, predictive factors, recurrence rates, and overall survival were assessed. RESULTS: The CT group comprised 143 patients and the MR group 77 patients. Eighteen patients underwent ablation with both modalities. Technical success per patient and per lesion was 88% and 93% for CT and 87% and 89.6% for MR, and technique efficacy was 97.1% and 98.6% for CT and 98.7% and 99.3% for MR respectively. Local recurrence following the first ablation (primary patency) occurred in 20.1% (CT) vs 4.6% (MR) (p < 0.001). Residual liver tumor, size of LM, and advanced N and M stage at initial diagnosis were independent predictors for overall survival in both groups. The median overall survival measured from first RFA treatment was 2.6 years. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival were 85.9%, 25.5%, and 19.1% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The MR group had significantly better local control compared to the CT group. There was no significant difference in patient survival between the two groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: MR-guided radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases is safe and effective, and offers better local control than CT-guided ablation. KEY POINTS: • Imaging modality for radiofrequency ablation guidance is an independent predictor of local recurrence in colorectal liver metastases. • MR-guided radiofrequency ablation achieved better local control of liver metastases from colorectal cancer than CT-guided. • The number and size of liver metastases are, among others, independent predictors of survival. Radiofrequency ablation with MR guidance improved clinical outcome but does not affect survival.

Efficacy and tolerability of chemosaturation in patients with hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatic metastatic uveal melanoma still have a poor outcome. PURPOSE: To evaluate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response predictors in these patients treated with chemosaturation by percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (CS-PHP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between June 2015 and March 2020, a total of 29 patients (median age 69.7 years; age range 30-81 years; 60% women; median BMI 25.7 kg/m2; range 18.7-35.3kg/m2; 1-6 procedures per patient) were treated with 53 CS-PHPs. All patients received cross-sectional imaging for initial and follow-up examinations. Baseline tumor load, extrahepatic tumor load, tumor response, PFS, and OS were assessed. Non-parametric statistics were used. RESULTS: After the initial CS-PHP, a partial response was observed in 11 patients (41%), stable disease in 12 patients (44%) and progressive disease in 4 patients (15%); two patients died before the response was evaluated. After initial CS-PHP, median OS was 12.9 ± 7.4 months and median PFS was 7.1 ± 7.4 months. OS after one year was 50%. After the second CS-PHP, median PFS was 7.9 ± 5.7 months. Seven patients had a liver tumor burden >25%, associated with a significantly shorter OS (6.0 ± 2.4 vs. 14.1 ± 12.7 months; P = 0.008). At the time of first CS-PHP, 41% (12/29) of the patients had extrahepatic metastases that did not affect OS (11.1 ± 8.4 months vs. 12.9 ± 13.6 months; P = 0.66). CONCLUSION: CS-PHP is a safe and effective treatment for the hepatic metastatic uveal melanoma, especially for patients with a hepatic tumor burden <25%.

Fluid-based augmentation of magnetic resonance visualization of interventional devices.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the transient artifact augmentation of microtubes in magnetic resonance imaging by fluid injection. METHODS: Twenty-one fluorinated ethylene propylene catheters (inner diameter 760 µm) were filled with three different contrast media at various concentrations (Ferucarbotran, Resovist®, Bayer Schering Pharma; Manganese dichloride, MnCl2, Sigma-Aldrich; Gadobutrol, Gadovist®, Bayer Schering Pharma). Artifact appearance was determined in an ex vivo phantom at 1.5 T using three different sequences: T1-weighted three-dimensional volume interpolated breath-hold examination, T2-weighted turbo spin echo, and T1-weighted fast low angle shot. Catheter angulation to the main magnetic field (B0) was varied. Influence of parameters on artifact diameters was assessed with a multiple linear regression similar to an analysis of variance. RESULTS: Artifact diameter was significantly influenced by the contrast agent (p < 0.001), concentration of the contrast agent (p < 0.001), angulation of the phantom to B0 with the largest artifact at 90° (p < 0.001), and encoding direction with a larger diameter in phase encoding direction (PED, p < 0.001). Mean artifact diameters at 90° angulation to B0 in PED were 18.5 ± 5.4 mm in 0.5 mmol/ml Ferucarbotran, 8.7 ± 2.5 mm in 1 mmol/ml Gadobutrol, and 11.6 ± 4.6 mm in 5 mmol/ml MnCl2 . CONCLUSIONS: Fluid-based contrast agents might be applied to interventional devices and thus temporarily augment the artifact ensuring both visibility and safe navigation.

MR-guided microwave ablation in hepatic malignancies: clinical experiences from 50 procedures.

Purpose: To investigate technical success, technique efficacy, safety and outcome of MR-guided microwave ablation (MWA) in hepatic malignancies.Material and methods: In this prospective IRB-approved study, patients scheduled for percutaneous treatment of hepatic malignancies underwent MR-guided MWA in a closed-bore 1.5 T MR system. Technical success was assessed on post-procedural MR control imaging. Technique efficacy was evaluated 4 weeks after the procedure on multi-parametric MRI. Assessment of safety followed the Society of Interventional Radiology grading system. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated to evaluate overall survival (OS), time to local tumor progression (TLTP), and time to non-target progression (TNTP).Results: Between 2015 and 2019, 47 patients (60.5 ± 12.2 years; 39 male) underwent 50 procedures for 58 hepatic tumors (21 hepatocellular carcinomas; 37 metastases). Mean target tumor size was 16 ± 7mm (range: 6-39 mm). Technical success and technique efficacy were 100% and 98%, respectively. Lesions were treated using 2.6 applicator positions (range: 1-6). Mean energy, ablation duration per tumor, and procedure duration were 43.2 ± 23.5 kJ, 26.7 ± 13.1 min and 211.2 ± 68.7 min, respectively. 10 minor (20%) and 3 major (6%) complications were observed. Median post-interventional hospital admission was 1 day (range: 1-19 days). Median OS was 41.6 (IQR: 26.4-) months. Local recurrence occurred after 4 procedures (8%) with TLTP ranging between 3.1 and 41.9 months. Non-target recurrence was observed in 64% of patients after a median TNTP of 13.8 (IQR 2.3-) months.Conclusion: MR-guided MWA allows for safe and successful treatment of hepatic malignancies with a high technique efficacy however with relatively long procedure durations.

Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of percutaneous MR-guided ablation of small (≤12 mm) hepatic malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous tumor ablation is commonly performed using computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US) guidance, although reliable visualization of the target tumor may be challenging. MRI guidance provides more reliable visualization of target tumors and allows for real-time imaging and multiplanar capabilities, making it the modality of choice, in particular if lesions are small. PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility, technical success, and safety of percutaneous MR-guided ablation (RFA n = 27 / MWA n = 16) of small (≤12 mm) hepatic malignancies. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective case study. POPULATION: In all, 45 patients (age: 61.1 ± 11.8) with hepatic malignancies and a lesion diameter of ≤12 mm scheduled for percutaneous MR-guided tumor ablation based on a tumor board decision were included. FIELD STRENGTH: A 1.5T MR system was used for planning, targeting, and monitoring. ASSESSMENT: Feasibility assessment included the detection of the target tumor, tumor delineation during MR-fluoroscopy guided targeting, and the number of attempts needed for precise applicator placement. Technical success was defined as successful performance of the procedure including a safety margin of 5 mm. Safety evaluation was based on procedure-related complications. STATISTICAL TEST: Frequency. RESULTS: Tumor ablation (mean diameter 9.0 ± 2.1 mm) was successfully completed in 43/45 patients. Planning imaging was conducted without a contrast agent in 79% (n = 37). In 64% (n = 30), the target tumors were visible with MR-fluoroscopy. In six patients (13%), planning imaging revealed new, unexpected small lesions, which were either treated in the same session (n = 4) or changed therapy management (n = 2) due to diffuse tumor progress. Postprocedural imaging revealed a technical success of 100% (43/43), with no major complications. During follow-up, no local tumor progression was observed (mean follow-up 24.7 ± 14.0 months) although 28% (12) patients developed new hepatic lesions distant to the ablation zone. No major complications were observed. DATA CONCLUSION: MR-guided ablation is a feasible approach for an effective and safe treatment of small hepatic malignancies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:374-381.

In vitro artifact assessment of an MR-compatible, microwave antenna device for percutaneous tumor ablation with fluoroscopic MRI-sequences.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate artifact configuration and diameters of a magnetic resonance (MR) compatible microwave (MW) applicator using near-realtime MR-fluoroscopic sequences for percutaneous tumor ablation procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two MW applicators (14 G and 16 G) were tested in an ex-vivo phantom at 1.5 T with two 3 D fluoroscopic sequences: T1-weighted spoiled Gradient Echo (GRE) and T1/T2-weighted Steady State Free Precession (SSFP) sequence. Applicator orientation to main magnetic field (B0), slice orientation and phase encoding direction (PED) were systematically varied. The influence of these variables was assessed with ANOVA and post-hoc testing. RESULTS: The artifact was homogenous along the whole length of both antennas with all tested parameters. The tip artifact diameter of the 16 G antenna measured 6.9 ± 1.0 mm, the shaft artifact diameter 8.6 ± 1.2 mm and the Tip Location Error (TLE) was 1.5 ± 1.2 mm.The tip artifact diameter of the 14 G antenna measured 7.7 ± 1.2 mm, the shaft artifact diameter 9.6 ± 1.5 mm and TLE was 1.6 ± 1.2 mm. Orientation to B0 had no statistically significant influence on tip artifact diameters (16 G: p = .55; 14 G: p = .07) or TLE (16 G: p = .93; 14 G: p = .26). GRE sequences slightly overestimated the antenna length with TLE(16 G) = 2.6 ± 0.5 mm and TLE(14 G) = 2.7 ± 0.7 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The MR-compatible MW applicator's artifact seems adequate with an acceptable TLE for safe applicator positioning during near-realtime fluoroscopic MR-guidance.

MR-guided microwave ablation in hepatic tumours: initial results in clinical routine.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the technical success, patient safety and technical effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided microwave ablation of hepatic malignancies. METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed patient consent were obtained. Fifteen patients (59.8 years ± 9.5) with 18 hepatic malignancies (7 hepatocellular carcinomas, 11 metastases) underwent MR-guided microwave ablation using a 1.5-T MR system. Mean tumour size was 15.4 mm ± 7.7 (7-37 mm). Technical success and ablation zone diameters were assessed by post-ablative MR imaging. Technique effectiveness was assessed after 1 month. Complications were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Mean follow-up was 5.8 months ± 2.6 (1-10 months). RESULTS: Technical success and technique effectiveness were achieved in all lesions. Lesions were treated using 2.5 ± 1.2 applicator positions. Mean energy and ablation duration per tumour were 37.6 kJ ± 21.7 (9-87 kJ) and 24.7 min ± 11.1 (7-49 min), respectively. Coagulation zone short- and long-axis diameters were 31.5 mm ± 10.5 (16-65 mm) and 52.7 mm ± 15.4 (27-94 mm), respectively. Two CTCAE-2-complications occurred (pneumothorax, pleural effusion). Seven patients developed new tumour manifestations in the untreated liver. Local tumour progression was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Microwave ablation is feasible under near real-time MR guidance and provides effective treatment of hepatic malignancies in one session. KEY POINTS: • Planning, applicator placement and therapy monitoring are possible without using contrast enhancement • Energy transmission from the generator to the scanner room is safely possible • MR-guided microwave ablation provides effective treatment of hepatic malignancies in one session • Therapy monitoring is possible without applicator retraction from the ablation site.

Preclinical evaluation of an MR-compatible microwave ablation system and comparison with a standard microwave ablation system in an ex vivo bovine liver model.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of a newly developed MR-compatible microwave ablation system with focus on ablation performance and comparison with a corresponding standard microwave ablation system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 52 ablations were performed with a non-cooled microwave ablation system in an ex vivo bovine liver model using the following settings: [A] 16G-standard antenna, 2 cm active tip, 2.4 m cable; [B] MR-compatible 16G-antenna, 2 cm active tip, 2.4 m cable; [C] MR-compatible 16G-antenna, 2 cm active tip, extended 6 m cable; and [D] MR-compatible 16G-antenna, 4 cm active tip, extended 6 m cable. Ablation durations were 3, 5 and 10 min, and additionally 15 min for [D]. Ablations zones were measured for short-axis diameter (SA) and long-axis diameter (LA). Settings [A]-[C] were compared regarding SA, volume (V) and generator energy output (E) with analysis of variance and Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Ablation performance of the MR-compatible settings [C] and [D] were compared regarding SA, V, E and sphericity index (SA/LA) with unpaired t-test. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between [A], [B] and [C] regarding SA and V (10 min; SA[A] = 25.8 ± 2.4 mm, SA[B] = 25.3 ± 1.9 mm, SA[C] = 25.0 ± 2.0 mm, p = 0.88; V[A] = 17.8 ± 4.4 cm³, V[B] = 16.6 ± 3.0 cm³, V[C] = 17.8 ± 2.7 cm³, p = 0.85); however, the highest energy output was measured for setting [C] (10 min; [A]: 9.9 ± 0.5 kJ, [B]: 10.1 ± 0.5 kJ, [C]: 13.1 ± 0.3 kJ, p < 0.001). SA, V and E were significantly larger with setting [D] than [C] with 10 min ablations (SA[C] = 25.0 ± 2.0 mm, SA[D] = 34.0 ± 2.9 mm, p = 0.003; V[C] = 17.8 ± 2.7 cm³, V[D] = 39.4 ± 7.5 cm³, p = 0.007; E[C] = 13.1 ± 0.3 kJ, E[D] = 16.7 ± 0.8 kJ, p = 0.002) without significant difference in sphericity index (SA/LA[C] = 0.46 ± 0.02, SA/LA[D] = 0.52 ± 0.04, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The tested MR-compatible system can be used without loss of ablation performance compared to the standard system.

In vitro artefact assessment of a new MR-compatible microwave antenna and a standard MR-compatible radiofrequency ablation electrode for tumour ablation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare artefact configuration and diameters in a magnetic resonance (MR)-compatible prototype microwave (MW) applicator and a standard MR-compatible radiofrequency (RF) applicator for MR-guided tumour ablation. METHODS: Both applicators were tested in a phantom study at 1.5T with three sequences: T1-weighted three-dimensional volume interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE), T1-weighted fast low angle shot (FLASH), T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE). Applicator orientation to main magnetic field (B0) and slice orientation were varied. Needle tip location error (TLE) was assessed, and artefact diameters were calculated. Influence of imaging parameters on artefacts was assessed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc testing. RESULTS: MW applicator: the shaft artefact diameter measured 2.3 +/- 0.8 mm. Tip artefact diameter and length measured 2.2 ± 0.8 mm and 2.4 ± 1.3 mm, respectively. A prominent oval artefact (diameter: 16.5 +/- 1.8 mm, length: 19.1 +/- 2.5 mm) appeared close to the tip. TLE: - .3 +/- 0.6 mm. RF applicator: shaft and tip diameter measured 8.9 +/- 4.7 mm and 9.0 +/- .0 mm, respectively. TLE: -0.1 +/- 0.8 mm. Minimal artefacts were measured with RF applicator orientation parallel to B0 (P < 0.0001), whereas no such influence was found for MW applicator. For both applicators, significantly large artefacts were measured with T1 FLASH (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The MW applicator's artefact is satisfactory and seems useable for MR-guided ablation procedures. KEY POINTS: MW applicator's artefact appearance is independent of angulation to main magnetic field. MW applicator's prominent distal artefact may increase visibility under MR-guidance. RF and MW applicator's artefacts are precise concerning tip depiction. Largest artefact diameters are measured with T1-weighted fast low angle shot sequence.

Diffusion-weighted imaging during MR-guided radiofrequency ablation of hepatic malignancies: analysis of immediate pre- and post-ablative diffusion characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown a benefit of magnetic resonance (MR)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for follow-up after liver radiofrequency (RF) ablation. However, no data are available concerning acute changes of DWI characteristics immediately after RF ablation. PURPOSE: To analyze and compare the MR-diffusion characteristics of pre-interventional hepatic malignancies and the ablation zone during successful MR-guided RF ablation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the local institutional review board. Forty-seven patients with 29 HCC (24 patients) and 30 hepatic metastases (23 patients) underwent MR-guided radiofrequency ablation including DWI before and immediately after ablation (b = 0, 400, 800 s/mm(2)). Two reviewers (A and B) analyzed DWI with focus on detectability of the tumor before ablation and characteristics of the coagulative area after treatment. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was compared between liver, untreated tumor, and hyperintense areas in post-ablative DWI (b = 800 s/mm(2)) with the paired Student's t-test. RESULTS: Pre-ablative: the reviewers classified 19/29 (A) and 23/29 (B) HCC and 25/30 (A and B) metastases as detectable in DWI. Post-ablative: a hyperintense rim surrounding the ablation zone was observed in 28/29 treated HCC and 30/30 treated metastases (A and B). A homogenous hypointense central ablation zone was found in 18/29 (A) and 20/29 (B) treated HCC and 17/30 (A & B) treated metastases in DWI. ADC of the rim was significantly lower than ADC of the liver (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: DWI enables visualization of the target tumor in MR-guided liver radiofrequency ablation in most cases. A common post-ablative DWI finding is a hyperintense rim with decreased ADC surrounding the ablation zone.

Liver lesion conspicuity during real-time MR-guided radiofrequency applicator placement using spoiled gradient echo and balanced steady-state free precession imaging.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the conspicuity of liver lesions in a fluoroscopic spoiled gradient echo (GRE) and a balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 103 patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) (41) or liver metastases (67) were treated using MR-guided radiofrequency ablation in a wide-bore 1.5 T scanner. A multislice real-time spoiled GRE sequence allowing for a T1 weighting (T1W) and a balanced SSFP sequence allowing for a T2/T1W contrast were used for MR guidance. The contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) of the lesions was calculated and lesion conspicuity was assessed retrospectively (easily detectable / difficult to detect / not detectable). RESULTS: HCC was easily detectable in 33/52% (GRE/SSFP), difficult to detect in 30/18%, and not detectable in 37/30% of the cases. Mean CNR varied widely (9.1 for GRE vs. 16.4 for SSFP). Liver metastases were easily detectable in 58/41% (GRE/SSFP), difficult to detect in 14/21%, and not detectable in 28/38% of the cases. Mean CNR for liver metastases was 11.5 (GRE) vs. 12.7 (SSFP). Twenty percent of all lesions could not be detected with either of the MR fluoroscopy sequences. CONCLUSION: MR fluoroscopy using GRE and SSFP contrast enabled real-time detectability of 80% of the liver lesions.

Comparison of four microwave ablation devices: an experimental study in ex vivo bovine liver.

PURPOSE: To compare volume, sphericity, and short-axis diameter of the coagulation zone of four commercially available microwave ablation systems with three technical concepts in an ex vivo setting and to formulate mathematical models to predict these quantities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two high-power systems (systems A and B), a system that enables simultaneous use of three antennas (system C), and a non-perfusion-cooled system that automatically adapts power and frequency (system D) were tested in ex vivo bovine livers (108 ablations). Coagulation volume, sphericity, and mean short-axis diameter were assessed, and mathematical functions were fitted for each system and assessed with the coefficient of determination (R(2)). Analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests were used for interdevice comparison after 5 and 10 minutes and after maximum recommended ablation time. RESULTS: Volume and short-axis diameter were determined by using a mathematical model for every system, with coefficients of determination of 0.75-0.98 and 0.70-0.97, respectively. Correlation for determination of sphericity was lower (R(2) = 0.01-0.68). Mean results with ablation performed according to manufacturer recommendations were as follows: Volume, sphericity, and short-axis diameter were 57.5 cm(3), 0.75, and 43.4 mm, respectively, for system A; 72.3 cm(3), 0.68, and 45.5 mm, respectively, for system B; 17.1 cm(3), 0.58, and 26.8 mm, respectively, for system C (one antenna); 76.5 cm(3), 0.89, and 50.6 mm, respectively, for system C (three antennas); and 56.0 cm(3), 0.64, and 40.9 mm, respectively, for system D. Systems A (mean volume, 52.4 cm(3) ± 4.5 [standard deviation]) and B (39.4 cm(3) ± 1.7) reach large ablation zones with 5-minute ablation. CONCLUSION: The largest ablation zone is obtained with systems B and C (three antennas) under maximum recommended ablation duration and with system A under short ablation time. The most spherical zone is obtained with system C (three antennas).

Magnetic Resonance-guided Procedures: Consensus on Rationale, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Magnetic resonance (MR) image guidance has demonstrated significant potential in the field of interventional radiology in several applications. This article covers the main points of MR-guided hepatic tumor ablation as a representative of MR-guided procedures. Patient selection and appropriate equipment utilization are essential for successful MR-guided tumor ablation. Intra-procedural planning imaging enables the visualization of the tumor and surrounding anatomical structures in most cases without the application of a contrast agent, ensuring optimal planning of the applicator tract. MRI enables real-time, multiplanar imaging, thus simultaneous observation of the applicator and target tumor is possible during targeting with adaptable slice angulations in case of challenging tumor positions. Typical ablation zone appearance during therapy monitoring with MRI enables safe assessment of the therapy result, resulting in a high primary efficacy rate. Recent advancements in ablation probes have shortened treatment times, while technical strategies address applicator visibility issues. MR-imaging immediately after the procedure is used to rule out complications and to assess technical success. Especially in smaller neoplasms, MRI-guided liver ablation demonstrates positive outcomes in terms of technical success rates, as well as promising survival and recurrence rates. Additionally, percutaneous biopsy under MR guidance offers an alternative to classic guidance modalities, providing high soft tissue contrast and thereby increasing the reliability of lesion detection, particularly in cases involving smaller lesions. Despite these advantages, the use of MR guidance in clinical routine is still limited to few indications and centers, due to by high costs, extended duration, and the need for specialized expertise. In conclusion, MRI-guided interventions could benefit from ongoing advancements in hardware, software, and devices. Such progress has the potential to expand diagnostic and treatment options in the field of interventional radiology.

Performing MR-guided biopsies in clinical routine: factors that influence accuracy and procedure time.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy, the duration and factors that influence the duration of MRI-guided liver or soft-tissue biopsies. METHODS: Nineteen liver biopsies and 19 soft-tissue biopsies performed using 1.5T-MRI guidance were retrospectively analysed. Diagnostic performance and complications were assessed. Intervention time was subdivided into preparation period, puncture period and control period. Correlation between procedure time and target size, skin-to-target-distance, used sequences and interventionalists' experience were analysed. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 0.86, 1.0 and 0.92, respectively. Two minor complications occurred. Overall median procedure time was 103.5 min. Liver biopsies lasted longer than soft-tissue biopsies (mean([soft-tissue]): 73.0 min, mean([liver]): 134.1 min, P < 0.001). The most time consuming part was the preparation period in both, soft-tissue and liver biopsies corresponding to 59.6% and 47.4% of the total intervention time, respectively. Total procedure time in liver biopsies (P = 0.027) and puncture period in liver and soft-tissue biopsies (P ([liver]) = 0.048, P ([soft-tissue]) = 0.005) was significantly prolonged for longer skin-to-target-distances. Lower numbers of image acquisitions (P ([liver]) = 0.0007, P ([soft-tissue]) = 0.0012) and interventionalists' experience reduces the procedure duration significantly (P < 0.05), besides all false-negative results appeared during the first five biopsies of each individual radiologist. CONCLUSION: The interventionalists' experience, skin-to-target-distances and number of image acquisition influence the procedure time significantly. KEY POINTS: •Appropriate training and supervision is essential for inexperienced interventionalists. •Two perpendicular image orientations should confirm the correct biopsy needle position. •Communication between interventionalist and technician is essential for a fluent biopsy procedure. •To shorten intervention time appropriate previous imaging is essential.

MR-guided radiofrequency ablation using a wide-bore 1.5-T MR system: clinical results of 213 treated liver lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the technical effectiveness, technical success and patient safety of MR-guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation of liver malignancies using a wide-bore 1.5-T MR system. METHODS: In 110 patients, 56 primary liver lesions and 157 liver metastases were treated in 157 sessions using percutaneous RF ablation. Mean lesion diameter was 20 mm (range 4-54 mm). All planning, procedural and post-interventional control MR investigations were carried out using a wide-bore 1.5-T MR system. Technical success was assessed by a contrast-enhanced MR liver examination immediately after the intervention. Technique effectiveness was assessed by dynamic hepatic MR study 1 month post ablation; mean follow-up period was 24.2 months (range 5-44). RESULTS: Technical success and technique effectiveness were achieved in 210/213 lesions (98.6 %). In 18/210 lesions (8.6 %), local tumour progression occurred 4-28 months after therapy. Seven of these 18 lesions were treated in a second session achieving complete ablation, 6 other lesions were referred to surgery. Overall RF effectiveness rate was 199/213 (93.4 %); overall therapy success (including surgery) was 205/213 (96.2 %). Two major complications (1.3 %) (bleeding and infected biloma) and 14 (8.9 %) minor complications occurred subsequent to 157 interventions. CONCLUSION: Wide-bore MR-guided RF ablation is a safe and effective treatment option for liver lesions.

Threshold-based prediction of the coagulation zone in sequential temperature mapping in MR-guided radiofrequency ablation of liver tumours.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate different cut-off temperature levels for a threshold-based prediction of the coagulation zone in magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation of liver tumours. METHODS: Temperature-sensitive measurements were acquired during RF ablation of 24 patients with primary (6) and secondary liver lesions (18) using a wide-bore 1.5 T MR sytem and compared with the post-interventional coagulation zone. Temperature measurements using the proton resonance frequency shift method were performed directly subsequent to energy application. The temperature maps were registered on the contrast-enhanced follow-up MR images acquired 4 weeks after treatment. Areas with temperatures above 50°, 55° and 60°C were segmented and compared with the coagulation zones. Sensitivity and positive predictive value were calculated. RESULTS: No major complications occurred and all tumours were completely treated. No tumour recurrence was observed at the follow-up examination after 4 weeks. Two patients with secondary liver lesions showed local tumour recurrence after 4 and 7 months. The 60°C threshold level achieved the highest positive predictive value (87.7 ± 9.9) and the best prediction of the coagulation zone. CONCLUSIONS: For a threshold-based prediction of the coagulation zone, the 60°C cut-off level achieved the best prediction of the coagulation zone among the tested levels. KEY POINTS: • Temperature monitoring can be used to survey MR-guided radiofrequency ablation • The developing ablation zone can be estimated based on post-interventional temperature measurements • A 60°C threshold level can be used to predict the ablation zone • The 50°C and 55°C temperature zones tend to overestimate the ablation zone.

Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with bilioenteric anastomosis undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation.

PURPOSE: To reduce risk of development of a hepatic abscess in patients with preexisting bilioenteric anastomosis (BEA) undergoing radiofrequency (RF) ablation of hepatic tumors by use of prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis over at least 10 days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 2003 and June 2011, 184 patients underwent 206 percutaneous RF ablation procedures for hepatic malignancies. Eight patients presented with BEA and were treated in 10 sessions at 14 tumor locations. These 8 patients were male and ranged in age from 55-73 years. Median follow-up was 34 months. Antibiotic prophylaxis was given before the intervention (n = 9, piperacillin/tazobactam; n = 1, ciprofloxacin). Oral antibiotic prophylaxis after the intervention was continued with ciprofloxacin for at least 10 days. In four cases, prophylaxis after the intervention was extended with additional antibiotics. RESULTS: A liver abscess occurred 22 days after 1 of 10 RF ablation sessions in patients with preexisting BEA. The patient who developed an abscess presented with a large hepatocellular carcinoma (59 mm × 54 mm) and underwent transarterial chemoembolization 8 days before RF ablation. No hepatic abscess occurred after 196 RF ablation sessions in 176 patients without BEA. CONCLUSIONS: Preexisting BEA is a risk factor for formation of hepatic abscesses after RF ablation. An antibiotic prophylaxis regimen before the intervention and for a prolonged period after the intervention that covers anaerobic bacteria for at least 10 days is presented. Combined therapy of transarterial chemoembolization and RF ablation increases the risk for complications in patients with known BEA.

Assessment of the Body Posture of Interventional Radiologists.

Physicians in interventional radiology are exposed to high physical stress. To avoid negative long-term effects resulting from unergonomic working conditions, we demonstrated the feasibility of a system that gives feedback about unergonomic situations arising during the intervention based on the Azure Kinect camera. The overall feasibility of the approach could be shown.