Healing Behavior of Simulated Fault Gouges From the Groningen Gas Field and Implications for Induced Fault Reactivation.

We investigated the frictional strength recovery (healing) and subsequent reactivation and slip-weakening behavior of simulated fault gouges derived from key stratigraphic units in the seismogenic Groningen gas field (N. E. Netherlands). Direct-shear, slide-hold-slide (SHS) experiments were performed at in situ conditions of 100 °C, 40 MPa effective normal stress and 10-15 MPa pore fluid pressure (synthetic formation brine). Sheared gouges were allowed to heal for periods up to 100 days before subsequent reshearing. The initial coefficient of (steady) sliding friction µ was highest in the Basal Zechstein caprock (µ = 0.65 ± 0.02) and Slochteren sandstone reservoir (µ = 0.61 ± 0.02) gouges, and the lowest in the Ten Boer claystone at the reservoir top (µ = 0.38 ± 0.01) and in the Carboniferous shale substrate (µ ≈ 0.45). Healing and subsequent reactivation led to a marked increase (∆µ) in (static) friction coefficient of up to ~0.16 in Basal Zechstein and ~0.07 in Slochteren sandstone gouges for the longest hold periods investigated, followed by a sharp strength drop (up to ~25%) and slip-weakening trajectory. By contrast, the Ten Boer and Carboniferous gouges showed virtually no healing or strength drop. Healing rates in the Basal Zechstein and Slochteren sandstone gouges were significantly affected by the stiffness of different machines used, in line with the Ruina slip law, and with a microphysical model for gouge healing. Our results point to marked stratigraphic variation in healed frictional strength and healing rate of faults in the Groningen system, and high seismogenic potential of healed faults cutting the reservoir and Basal Zechstein caprock units, upon reactivation.

Rock Physical Controls on Production-induced Compaction in the Groningen Field.

Advancing production from the Groningen gas field to full depletion generates substantial, field-scale deformation, and surface subsidence. Quantifying associated risk requires understanding physical processes in the subsurface, in particular those related to deformation of the Permian sandstone reservoir. Here, we report the results of a large experimental study, using fresh core material taken from the center of the field. By subjecting the material to depletion and slight unloading, complemented with a range of rock property measurements, we determine what rock physical properties control production-induced compaction in the material. Our results show that, although a large part of the deformation can be explained by classical linear poroelasticity, the contribution of inelastic (permanent) deformation is also significant. In fact, it increases with progressing pressure depletion, i.e. with increasing production. Utilizing univariate and multivariate statistical methods, we explain the additional inelastic deformation by direct effects of porosity, packing, and mineral composition. These proxies are in turn related to the depositional setting of the Permian reservoir. Our findings suggest that field-scale subsidence may not only be related to the often-used rock porosity, but also to packing, and composition, hence the local depositional environment. This motivates alternative assessments of human-induced mechanical effects in sedimentary systems.