High occurrence of perinatal risk factors and more severe impairments in children with postneonatal cerebral palsy in Norway.

AIM: To describe causal events, perinatal risk factors and clinical characteristics in children with postneonatal cerebral palsy (PNCP). METHODS: Population-based registry study of Norwegian children born 1999-2013. Prevalence, causal events and clinical characteristics of PNCP were described. The occurrence of perinatal risk factors for CP was compared with the general population. RESULTS: Among 1710 children with CP, 67 had PNCP (3.9%; 0.75 per 10,000 livebirths [95%CI: 0.59-0.96]). The prevalence of PNCP decreased during the study period. Leading causal events were cerebrovascular events (32.8%), head injuries/other accidents (22.4%), infections (19.4%) and hypoxic events (14.9%). Spastic hemiplegic (53.7%) or spastic quadriplegic/dyskinetic CP (31.3%) was more common in children with PNCP than non-PNCP (42.3% and 20.1%, respectively; p < 0.001). Children with PNCP had more severe motor and associated impairments. Perinatal risk factors for CP were more common in children with PNCP than in the general population. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of PNCP among Norwegian children was low and decreasing. The main causes were cerebrovascular events and head injuries/other accidents. Although spastic hemiplegic CP was the dominating subtype, children with PNCP had more severe motor and associated impairments than children with non-PNCP, as well as a higher occurrence of perinatal risk factors than in the general population.

Comorbidities in cerebral palsy: a patient registry study.

AIM: To describe the total burden of disease in individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) in Norway. METHOD: A comprehensive set of disorder categories were extracted from the Norwegian Patient Registry using International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnosis codes for individuals born between 1996 and 2010 who received specialist healthcare between 2008 and 2017 (0-21y). Individuals with CP were identified through a validation study in cooperation with the Cerebral Palsy Registry of Norway. Risk differences (proportions of individuals recorded with each disorder) were used to compare individuals with CP with the general population without CP. RESULTS: The study included 966 760 individuals. Among these, 2302 (0.24%) had CP (1330 males, 972 females). Of the individuals with CP, 95.0% were recorded with one or more comorbidity, and the risks of medical, neurological, and mental/behavioural disorders were higher compared with the risks in the general population. The most common neurological and mental/behavioural disorders were cocausal, i.e. attributed to the same injury to the developing brain that caused CP, while medical disorders were most often complications of CP or coincidentally co-occurring with CP. INTERPRETATION: Individuals with CP have a considerably higher burden of medical, neurological, and mental/behavioural disorders compared with the general population, including disorders that are not directly caused by, or complications to, the brain injury. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Nearly all individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) had one or more comorbidity. Fifty-two per cent had at least one comorbidity attributed to the same cause as CP, complications of CP, and coincidentally co-occurring with CP. Risks of medical, neurological, and mental/behavioural disorders were considerably higher than in the general population.

Flaunting our assets. Making the most of the Nordic registry goldmine: Cerebral palsy as an example.

Aims:To describe the early experiences of a Nordic multidisciplinary cerebral palsy (CP) registry research program combining data from national medical quality registries, follow-up programs and cohort data, in addition to data from other national registries; to explore the scientific and practical uses of such research, and provide recommendations for facilitating similar work in the future. Methods: The work was divided into three themes: medical outcomes, social and public health outcomes, and health economics; and three cross-cutting teams: a reference team, a challenge team, and a communication and dissemination team. Initially each country will perform domestic research, and in the second stage data will be merged across all Nordic countries. Data from national registries with vital statistics, education and work, social benefits, and healthcare will be used. Comparisons will be matched for both the individuals with CP and their parents. Results: Initial work has been done on agreeing which variables to request from the respective agencies and planning the correct procedures and steps required to acquire the data. As of 2018, Sweden, Norway, and Finland have received approved ethics board applications. Iceland and Denmark are waiting for their approvals. A webpage and a platform for internal communication have been created. Conclusions: Nordic register research has great potential. Linking national CP quality registries and follow-up programs with other large national registries holds particular promise because problems identified through research can be applied at a population level. It is imperative that ethical clearance and data delivery processes are streamlined and transparent, and that data variables are measured the same way in the different countries.