Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 40(8): 1017-1023, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30103874

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate the sustained value of an early pregnancy assessment clinic (EPAC) in the management of early pregnancy complications and its effect on the incidence emergency room (ER) visits. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective study (January 2006 to December 2015) was conducted. The number of patients assessed, sources and reasons for referral, and treatments provided were reviewed. The numbers of ER assessments and reassessments for abortion, hemorrhage, and ectopic pregnancy from January 2004 to December 2005 (pre-EPAC) and January 2006 to December 2015 (post-EPAC) were also reviewed. RESULTS: There were 11 349 new referrals and 10 764 follow-up visits. The reasons for referral were threatened miscarriage (n = 3568, 31.4%), missed miscarriage (n = 3056, 26.9%), incomplete miscarriage (n = 1064, 9.4%), complete miscarriage (n = 991, 8.7%), ectopic pregnancy (n = 857, 7.6%), hyperemesis gravidarum (n = 139, 1.2%), and others (n = 1674, 14.8%). There has been a significant decreasing trend (tau = -0.60, P = 0.0127) and a significant decrease in the post-EPAC rate of ER reassessments (P = 0.0396) for hemorrhage, with a concomitant decrease in EPAC visits for hemorrhage. In addition, there has been a significant increasing trend (tau = 0.64, P = 0.0081) and a significant increase in the post-EPAC rate of ER assessments (P = 0.00001) for ectopic pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Over the 10-year period, the EPAC has remained a vital service for managing early pregnancy complications for women. However, the clinic has not yet had a sustained impact on ER visits for miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, and hemorrhage. It is possible that a reduction in ER assessments and reassessments for early pregnancy complications can be achieved through a clinic with daily access.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Aborto Espontâneo/epidemiologia , Aborto Espontâneo/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Emergências , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Gravidez Ectópica/epidemiologia , Gravidez Ectópica/prevenção & controle , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hemorragia Uterina/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Uterina/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 40(8): 1050-1053, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30103878

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the total number of patient visits required for the conservative, medical, or surgical management of early pregnancy loss in an early pregnancy assessment clinic (EPAC). METHODS: A retrospective study of the number of patient visits at an EPAC for conservative, medical, or surgical management of early spontaneous abortion from October 2013 to September 2015 was undertaken. Visits counted included initial assessment, follow-up visits, and surgery date, if separate from a clinic visit. RESULTS: A total of 945 patients were seen, with 2144 visits during the study period. Conservative management required an average of 3.01 visits (n = 159, median = 3, SD = 1.16, range [1,7]) and misoprostol treatment required an average of 2.51 visits (n = 329, median = 2, SD = 0.83, range [1,6]) to achieve a complete abortion. Dilatation and curettage (D&C) required an average of 1.60 visits (n = 417, median = 1, SD = 0.80, range [1-6]), when including scheduling limitations or an average of 1.13 visits when excluding these limitations. The difference in the number of visits required for the three management options was statistically significant (P <0.0001). Management with D&C was more likely to require less than two visits to achieve complete abortion compared with the other options (93.8% for D&C vs. 64.5% for misoprostol vs. 37.8% for conservative). CONCLUSION: An EPAC provides a significant value in the management of early pregnancy losses. There is a significant difference in the total number of visits required for different treatment options. Patients may find this information helpful when considering and deciding upon their preferred treatment option.


Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo/epidemiologia , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Abortivos não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Aborto Espontâneo/terapia , Adulto , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Dilatação e Curetagem , Feminino , Humanos , Misoprostol/uso terapêutico , Ontário , Gravidez , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Can J Nurs Res ; 47(1): 53-71, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês, Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29509450

RESUMO

Evidence suggests that women who receive uninformative results for breast and ovarian cancer (BRCA1/2) gene mutations may experience as much distress as women whose results indicate the presence of a gene mutation. No intervention to reduce distress after receipt of uninformative results has yet been tested. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility and preliminary effects of a psycho-educational telephone (PET) intervention to reduce distress in women who receive uninformative BRCA1/2 results. A single group with repeated measures was used to assess the impact of the intervention on 72 such women. After receiving the results, most of the women continued to feel uncertain about their carrier genetic status. However, their distress significantly decreased between receipt of uninformative results and 3 months post-intervention (p = 0.01). The preliminary findings suggest that a PET uncertainty intervention is clinically feasible and may reduce the distress of receiving uninformative results.


Les données permettent de croire que les femmes qui obtiennent des résultats non concluants à la suite de tests de dépistage d'une mutation des gènes liés aux cancers du sein et des ovaires (BRCA1 et BRCA2) sont susceptibles d'éprouver une détresse aussi importante que celles dont les résultats indiquent la présence d'une mutation génétique. Aucune intervention visant à atténuer le sentiment de détresse après réception de résultats non concluants n'a encore été mise à l'essai. L'objectif de la présente étude est d'évaluer la faisabilité et les effets préliminaires d'une intervention consistant en un appel psycho-éducatif destiné à réduire la détresse de femmes ayant reçu des résultats de dépistage génétique non concluants concernant les gènes BRCA1 et BRCA2. Un groupe unique sondé à plusieurs reprises a été étudié afin d'évaluer l'effet d'une telle intervention sur 72 femmes. Après la réception de leurs résultats, la plupart éprouvaient toujours de l'incertitude concernant leur statut de porteuse ou non d'une mutation génétique. Toutefois, une diminution considérable de leur détresse a été observée entre la réception des résultats non concluants et une période de trois mois après l'intervention par téléphone (p = 0,01). Les constatations préliminaires donnent à penser qu'une intervention psycho-éducative par téléphone à propos de l'incertitude est réalisable et permet de réduire la détresse des femmes dont les résultats sont non concluants.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA