ARAF mutations confer resistance to the RAF inhibitor belvarafenib in melanoma.

Although RAF monomer inhibitors (type I.5, BRAF(V600)) are clinically approved for the treatment of BRAFV600-mutant melanoma, they are ineffective in non-BRAFV600 mutant cells1-3. Belvarafenib is a potent and selective RAF dimer (type II) inhibitor that exhibits clinical activity in patients with BRAFV600E- and NRAS-mutant melanomas. Here we report the first-in-human phase I study investigating the maximum tolerated dose, and assessing the safety and preliminary efficacy of belvarafenib in BRAFV600E- and RAS-mutated advanced solid tumours (NCT02405065, NCT03118817). By generating belvarafenib-resistant NRAS-mutant melanoma cells and analysing circulating tumour DNA from patients treated with belvarafenib, we identified new recurrent mutations in ARAF within the kinase domain. ARAF mutants conferred resistance to belvarafenib in both a dimer- and a kinase activity-dependent manner. Belvarafenib induced ARAF mutant dimers, and dimers containing mutant ARAF were active in the presence of inhibitor. ARAF mutations may serve as a general resistance mechanism for RAF dimer inhibitors as the mutants exhibit reduced sensitivity to a panel of type II RAF inhibitors. The combination of RAF plus MEK inhibition may be used to delay ARAF-driven resistance and suggests a rational combination for clinical use. Together, our findings reveal specific and compensatory functions for the ARAF isoform and implicate ARAF mutations as a driver of resistance to RAF dimer inhibitors.

FDG metabolic parameter-based models for predicting recurrence after upfront surgery in synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate post- and preoperative models for predicting recurrence after curative-intent surgery using an FDG PET-CT metabolic parameter to improve the prognosis of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis (SCLM). METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, consecutive patients with resectable SCLM underwent upfront surgery between 2006 and 2015 (development cohort) and between 2006 and 2017 (validation cohort). In the development cohort, we developed and internally validated the post- and preoperative models using multivariable Cox regression with an FDG metabolic parameter (metastasis-to-primary-tumor uptake ratio [M/P ratio]) and clinicopathological variables as predictors. In the validation cohort, the models were externally validated for discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. Model performance was compared with that of Fong's clinical risk score (FCRS). RESULTS: A total of 374 patients (59.1 ± 10.5 years, 254 men) belonged in the development cohort and 151 (60.3 ± 12.0 years, 94 men) in the validation cohort. The M/P ratio and nine clinicopathological predictors were included in the models. Both postoperative and preoperative models showed significantly higher discrimination than FCRS (p < .05) in the external validation (time-dependent AUC = 0.76 [95% CI 0.68-0.84] and 0.76 [0.68-0.84] vs. 0.65 [0.57-0.74], respectively). Calibration plots and decision curve analysis demonstrated that both models were well calibrated and clinically useful. The developed models are presented as a web-based calculator ( https://cpmodel.shinyapps.io/SCLM/ ) and nomograms. CONCLUSIONS: FDG metabolic parameter-based prognostic models are well-calibrated recurrence prediction models with good discriminative power. They can be used for accurate risk stratification in patients with SCLM. KEY POINTS: • In this multicenter study, we developed and validated prediction models for recurrence in patients with resectable synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis using a metabolic parameter from FDG PET-CT. • The developed models showed good predictive performance on external validation, significantly exceeding that of a pre-existing model. • The models may be utilized for accurate patient risk stratification, thereby aiding in therapeutic decision-making.

Phase II study of durvalumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient or POLE-mutated metastatic or unresectable colorectal cancer.

The aim of our study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of durvalumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) or polymerase epsilon (POLE)-mutated metastatic or unresectable colorectal cancer (mCRC) who had disease progression after standard chemotherapy. This prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II study enrolled patients with mCRC harboring MSI-H/dMMR or POLE mutations treated with at least one prior line of therapy. The participants received durvalumab (1500 mg) every 4 weeks intravenously. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Of the 33 patients, 30 had MSI-H/dMMR and 3 had POLE-mutated microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC. With a median follow-up duration of 11.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.3-15.0), the ORR was 42.4% (95% CI: 25.5-60.8). Among three patients with POLE-mutated CRC, one patient who had an exonuclease domain mutation (EDM) achieved an objective response, but the others with mutations in the non-exonuclease domain had progressive disease. Overall, the median duration of response was not reached and 85.7% of the responses were ongoing at data cutoff. The progression-free survival rate of 12 months was 58.2% (95% CI: 39.0-73.1) and the 12-month overall survival rate was 68.3% (95% CI: 48.8-81.7). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 36.4% of the patients and were manageable. In conclusion, durvalumab showed promising clinical activity with encouraging response rates and satisfactory survival outcomes in mCRC patients with MSI-H/dMMR or POLE EDM. In patients with POLE-mutated mCRC, clinical response to durvalumab may be restricted to those with EDM.

Encorafenib, Binimetinib, and Cetuximab in BRAF V600E-Mutated Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with the BRAF V600E mutation have a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival of 4 to 6 months after failure of initial therapy. Inhibition of BRAF alone has limited activity because of pathway reactivation through epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. METHODS: In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we enrolled 665 patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer who had had disease progression after one or two previous regimens. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab (triplet-therapy group); encorafenib and cetuximab (doublet-therapy group); or the investigators' choice of either cetuximab and irinotecan or cetuximab and FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan) (control group). The primary end points were overall survival and objective response rate in the triplet-therapy group as compared with the control group. A secondary end point was overall survival in the doublet-therapy group as compared with the control group. We report here the results of a prespecified interim analysis. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 9.0 months in the triplet-therapy group and 5.4 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.70; P<0.001). The confirmed response rate was 26% (95% CI, 18 to 35) in the triplet-therapy group and 2% (95% CI, 0 to 7) in the control group (P<0.001). The median overall survival in the doublet-therapy group was 8.4 months (hazard ratio for death vs. control, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.79; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 58% of patients in the triplet-therapy group, in 50% in the doublet-therapy group, and in 61% in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of encorafenib, cetuximab, and binimetinib resulted in significantly longer overall survival and a higher response rate than standard therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with the BRAF V600E mutation. (Funded by Array BioPharma and others; BEACON CRC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02928224; EudraCT number, 2015-005805-35.).

Clinicogenomic Characteristics and Treatment of Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Palliative Therapy in Real-World Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Young-onset colorectal cancer (YOCR) is increasing. This study aimed to determine the difference between advanced YOCR and non-YOCR patient outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients with recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer treated with palliative systemic therapy between 2016 and 2018. Diagnosis at < 50 years was defined as YOCR. Targeted sequencing was used to assess the mutational status. RESULTS: Among the 969 patients included, 210 (21.7%) were YOCR. The median progression-free survival with first-line chemotherapy (PFS1) was 9.7 vs 9.4 months (P = .755), and the median overall survival (OS) was 25.9 vs 22.3 months (P = .581) in the YOCR and the non-YOCR group, respectively. However, the youngest patients diagnosed at < 30 years showed poorer survival outcomes (median PFS1, 3.9 months; median OS, 8.6 months) compared with other age groups. PFS1 did not differ between YOCR and non-YOCR by choice of treatment regimen. Among the 340 patients with targeted sequencing results, YOCR had fewer APC mutations (61% vs 80%), but had similar KRAS (53% vs 48%), NRAS (7% vs 3%), and BRAF class I mutations (4% vs 6%). The median tumor mutational burden (TMB) was 10.9 vs 12.5 mut/Mb in YOCR and non-YOCR patients, respectively (P = .064). TMB increased with age in tumors with high microsatellite instability (Pearson's R = .69, P = .028), but not in microsatellite-stable tumors (R = .02, P = .658). CONCLUSIONS: Survival outcomes with palliative systemic therapy were similar between recurrent/metastatic YOCR and non-YOCR with an age cut-off of 50 years. However, patients diagnosed at < 30 years of age showed poorer outcomes compared with other age groups.

Involvement of tissue changes induced by neoadjuvant treatment in total mesorectal excision (TME): novel suggestions for determining TME quality.

BACKGROUND: Few studies to date have investigated morphological changes after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) and their implications in total mesorectal excision (TME). This study was primarily designed to evaluate whether tissue changes associated with NAT affected the quality of TME and additionally to suggest a more objective method evaluating TME quality. METHODS: This study enrolled 1322 consecutive patients who underwent curative robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer. Patients who did and did not receive NAT were subjected to propensity-score matching, yielding 402 patients in each group. RESULTS: NAT independently reduced complete achievement of TME [odds ratio (OR) = 2.056, p = 0.017]. Intraoperative evaluation identified seven tissue changes significantly associated with NAT, including tumor perforation, mucin pool, necrosis, fibrosis, fat degeneration, and rectal or perirectal edema NAT (p < 0.001-0.05). Tumor perforation (OR = 5.299, p = 0.001) and mucin pool (OR = 14.053, p = 0.002) were independently associated with inappropriate (near-complete + incomplete) TME. Complete TME resulted in significantly reduced local recurrence (4.3% vs 15.3%, p = 0.003) and increased 5-year DFS rate (80.6% vs 67.6%, p = 0.047) compared with inappropriate one. By contrast, two tiers of complete and near-complete TMEs vs incomplete TME did not. Notably, among patients with complete TME, those who received NAT had a lower 5-year DFS than those who did not (77.8% vs 83.3%, p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: NAT-associated tissue changes, somewhat interrupting complete TME, may provide unsolved clue to the relative inability of NAT to improve overall survival. The conventional three-tier grading of TME seems to be simplified into two tiers as complete and inappropriate.

Impact of UGT1A1 genotype on the efficacy and safety of irinotecan-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

The phase III AXEPT study showed the noninferiority of modified capecitabine plus irinotecan (mXELIRI) with or without bevacizumab relative to fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with or without bevacizumab as a second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. We evaluated the associations between the UGT1A1 genotype linked to adverse events-caused by irinotecan-and the efficacy and safety of mXELIRI and FOLFIRI. The UGT1A1 genotype was prospectively determined and patients were categorized into three groups according to WT (*1/*1), single heterozygous (SH; *28/*1 or *6/*1), and double heterozygous or homozygous (DHH; *28/*28, *6/*6, or *28/*6). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, response rate, and safety were assessed. The UGT1A1 genotype was available in all 650 randomized patients (WT, 309 [47.5%]; SH, 291 [44.8%]; DHH, 50 [7.7%]). The median OS was 15.9, 17.7, and 10.6 months in the WT, SH, and DHH groups, respectively, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-2.09; P = .008) for DHH vs WT or SH. The median OS in the mXELIRI and FOLFIRI arms was 18.1 vs 14.3 months (HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.62-1.03) in the WT group, 16.3 vs 18.3 months (HR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.79-1.36) in the SH group, and 13.0 vs 9.1 months (HR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.39-1.31) in the DHH group, respectively. Modified capecitabine plus irinotecan with or without bevacizumab could be a standard second-line chemotherapy in terms of efficacy and safety regardless of the UGT1A1 genotype.

A phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study to assess the safety and efficacy of CKD-516, a novel vascular disrupting agent, in combination with Irinotecan in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Introduction The combination of an anti-angiogenic agent with cytotoxic chemotherapy is a standard treatment strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer. CKD-516 is an oral vascular disrupting agent that was preliminarily shown to be safe and efficacious as a monotherapy in refractory solid cancers. We evaluated the recommended phase 2 dose, safety, and preliminary efficacy of CKD-516 in combination with irinotecan in treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods This phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study included patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. CKD-516 tablets were administered for five consecutive days followed by two days off in combination with intravenous irinotecan (120 mg/m2) administered on day one of each treatment cycle every two weeks. A traditional 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used. Results In total, 16 and 23 patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation and dose-expansion cohorts, respectively. The most common adverse events included diarrhea (79%), nausea (74%), vomiting (67%), and neutropenia (62%). No dose-limiting toxicity occurred, and the recommended phase 2 dose was determined at CKD-516/irinotecan doses of 11/120 mg/m2. No cases of cardiac ischemia, cardiac dysfunction, or thromboembolism were reported. Among the 34 patients with available tumor response assessments, one patient achieved partial response (3%) and 26 patients achieved stable disease (76%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.1 and 11.6 months, respectively. Conclusion This phase 1 study showed that the combination of oral CKD-516 and irinotecan is safe and tolerable in metastatic, treatment-refractory colorectal patients and showed favorable efficacy outcomes. Further studies to confirm these preliminary findings are warranted. Trial registration number NCT03076957 (Registered at March 10, 2017).

Polypharmacy, Inappropriate Medication Use, and Drug Interactions in Older Korean Patients with Cancer Receiving First-Line Palliative Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is an important issue in the care of older patients with cancer, as it increases the risk of unfavorable outcomes. We estimated the prevalence of polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use, and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in older patients with cancer in Korea and their associations with clinical outcomes. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study of geriatric patients with cancer undergoing first-line palliative chemotherapy. Eligible patients were older adults (≥70 years) with histologically diagnosed solid cancer who were candidates for first-line palliative chemotherapy. All patients enrolled in this study received a geriatric assessment (GA) at baseline. We reviewed the daily medications taken by patients at the time of GA before starting chemotherapy. PIMs were assessed according to the 2015 Beers criteria, and DDIs were assessed by a clinical pharmacist using Lexi-comp Drug Interactions. We evaluated the association between polypharmacy and clinical outcomes including treatment-related toxicity, and hospitalization using logistic regression and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: In total, 301 patients (median age 75 years; range, 70-93) were enrolled; the most common cancer types were colorectal cancer (28.9%) and lung cancer (24.6%). Mean number of daily medications was 4.7 (±3.1; range, 0-14). The prevalence of polypharmacy (≥5 medications) was 45.2% and that of excessive polypharmacy (≥10 medications) was 8.6%. PIM use was detected in 137 (45.5%) patients. Clinically significant DDIs were detected in 92 (30.6%) patients. Polypharmacy was significantly associated with hospitalization or emergency room (ER) visits (odds ratio: 1.73 [1.18-2.55], p < .01). Neither polypharmacy nor PIM use showed association with treatment-related toxicity. CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy, PIM use, and potential major DDIs were prevalent in Korean geriatric patients with cancer. Polypharmacy was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization or ER visits during the chemotherapy period. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study, which included 301 older Korean patients with cancer, highlights the increased prevalence of polypharmacy in this population planning to receive palliative chemotherapy. The prevalence of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy was 45.2% and 8.6%, respectively. The prescription of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) was detected in 45.5% and clinically significant drug-drug interaction in 30.6% of patients. Given the association of polypharmacy with increased hospitalization or emergency room visits, this study points to the need for increased awareness and intervention to minimize polypharmacy in the geriatric cancer population undergoing chemotherapy. Moreover, specific criteria for establishing PIMs should be adopted for the treatment of older adults with cancer.

Chemosensitivity to HM90822, a novel synthetic IAP antagonist, is determined by p-AKT-inducible XIAP phosphorylation in human pancreatic cancer cells.

Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) are overexpressed in the majority of cancers and prevent apoptosis by inhibiting caspases. IAPs have therefore attracted considerable attention as potential targets for anticancer therapy. Here, we demonstrated that HM90822 (abbreviated HM822; a new synthetic IAP antagonist) induced apoptotic cell death via proteasome-dependent degradation of BIR2/3 domain-containing IAPs in human pancreatic cancer cells. HM822 inhibited the expression of XIAP and cIAP1/2 proteins in Panc-1 and BxPC-3 cells, which are sensitive to HM822. HM822 also induced IAP ubiquitination and promoted proteasome-dependent IAP degradation. However, cells expressing phospho-XIAP (Ser87) and AKT exhibited resistance to HM822. In other words, the overexpression of AKT-CA (constitutive active form for AKT) or AKT-WT induced resistance to HM822. In addition, in Panc-1 xenograft and orthotopic mouse models, we revealed that tumor growth was suppressed by the administration of HM822. Taken together, these results suggest that HM822 induces apoptosis through ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent degradation of BIR3 domain-containing IAPs. These findings suggest that phospho-XIAP and phospho-AKT may be used as biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of HM822 in pancreatic cancer patients.

How Cancer Patients Perceive Clinical Trials (CTs) in the Era of CTs: Current Perception and Its Differences Between Common and Rare Cancers.

Perception has recently been highlighted as a critical determinant for participation in clinical trials (CTs) among cancer patients. We evaluated cancer patients' current perceptions of CTs using the PARTAKE questionnaires, focusing on differences between patients with common and rare cancers. From November 2015 to May 2017, we prospectively surveyed patients who had received anti-cancer treatment at Asan Medical Center. Among 333 respondents, 70.9% had common and 29.1% had rare cancers. In the cohort, 87.7% of patients with common cancers and 75.3% of patients with rare cancers answered that they heard of and knew about CTs. However, willingness to participate in CTs was expressed only in approximately 56% of patients, although it was significantly associated with awareness and perception. Surprisingly, patients with rare cancers when compared with patients with common cancers showed significantly lower levels of awareness and perception (64.2% vs 79.9%, p = 0.003 and 77.3% vs 91.9%, p < 0.001), and consequently less willingness to participate in CTs (47.4% vs 58.9%, p = 0.06). In addition, cancer patients still harbored fear and concerns about safety and reward of CTs, and demonstrated substantial lack of knowledge about the voluntary nature of CTs, which was more obvious in patients with rare cancers. We identified relatively modest willingness of cancer patients to participate in CTs regardless of generally favorable perception. These findings are highlighted by the more negative perception of CTs among patients with rare cancers relative to those with common cancers. Further education and encouragement by research and public entities seem essential to improve motivation of CTs in cancer patients beyond good perception, especially for patients with rare cancers.

Efficacy and safety of lanreotide in Korean patients with metastatic, well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective analysis.

Lanreotide autogel is a long-acting somatostatin analogue with proven efficacy and safety in patients with well-differentiated (WD) gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) in a prior randomized phase III trial (CLARINET). However, the CLARINET study only enrolled patients with Ki-67 index <10%, and few patients of Asian ethnicity were included. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of lanreotide in Korean patients with GEP-NETs in the daily practice setting. Between January 2015 and May 2018, 64 patients with metastatic WD GEP-NETs received lanreotide at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Of them, 45 (70.3%) patients who received lanreotide as monotherapy were included in the current analysis. The most common primary tumor site was the pancreas (n = 22, 48.9%), followed by the rectum (10, 22.2%) and the small bowel (7, 15.6%). According to RECIST v1.1, a partial response was achieved in one patient (2.2%) and stable disease was achieved in 40 patients (88.9%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.4 months (95% confidence interval, 9.5-23.3 months). There were no differences in PFS according to the primary tumor site (p = 0.77). Hepatic tumor volume > 25% and prior systemic therapy were significantly associated with poorer PFS in the multivariate analysis. Lanreotide is well-tolerated and effective for Korean patients with GEP-NETs in the daily practice setting.

3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the early prediction of response to Regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to all standard therapies.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for early prediction of standard anatomic response and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving Regorafenib. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with mCRC refractory to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy were enrolled and received Regorafenib (160 mg/day on days 1-21, following a 7-day break). Standard anatomical response was evaluated every 8 weeks. Both scans were performed before and on day 21 of Regorafenib. RESULTS: Of the 61 patients included in per-protocol analysis, complete response was not observed, but partial response was observed in 8.2% (n = 5), stable disease in 67.2% (n = 41), and progressive disease in 24.6% (n = 15). The objective response rate was 8.2% and disease control rate 75.4%. Five responders (8.2%) and 13 non-responders (21.3%) met the CT and 18F-FLT PET/CT criteria (maximum standardized uptake value decrease ≥ 10.6% for responders). Forty-three (70.5%) exhibited discordant responses on CT and 18F-FLT PET/CT (McNemar test, P < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 8.9 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 3.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.34-3.80 months) and 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.95-10.10 months), respectively. Comparison of PFS and OS according to 18F-FLT PET/CT response revealed slightly longer PFS (P = 0.015) in responders, but the correlation with OS was not significant. The PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumours (PERCIST) of 18F-FDG PET/CT revealed differences in PFS and OS between partial metabolic response (PMR) and non-PMR (P = 0.048 and P = 0.014, respectively), and between progressive metabolic disease (PMD) and non-PMD (P = 0.189 and P = 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Survival outcome was significantly associated with PERCIST using 18F-FDG PET/CT but the change of 18F-FLT uptake was only slightly associated with PFS. 18F-FDG PET/CT can be used as imaging biomarker to predict clinical outcomes early in patients with mCRC receiving Regorafenib.

Local excision in mid-to-low rectal cancer patients who revealed clinically total or near-total regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy; a proposed trial.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pre-CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is currently a standard therapy for locally advanced mid-to-low rectal cancer. Less aggressive, organ-preserving option such as local excision (LE) or watchful wait can alternatively be used for patients who respond well to pre-CRT. High-resolution rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most useful methods to assess pre-CRT response, and the MERCURY group has shown that the MR tumor regression grade (mrTRG) correlated with the pathologic TRG. The aim of this study is to compare postoperative complication and oncologic outcomes between LE and TME in mid-to-low rectal cancer patients whose tumors are mrTRG grade 1 (radiological complete remission) or 2 (predominant fibrosis; near-complete remission) after pre-CRT. METHODS: A prospective, double-arm, randomized, open-labeled, single center, clinical trial will be conducted in patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer whose tumors are mrTRG 1/2 after pre-CRT at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, after approval from the Institution Review Board. Patient medical records will be de-identified using a serial number to protect personal information. Inclusion criteria will include rectal adenocarcinoma with an inferior border < 8 cm from the anal verge, mrTRG 1/2, age > 20, and provision of informed consent. Postoperative complications will be assessed by Clavien-Dindo Classification Grade. Oncologic and functional outcomes will be collected and risk factors related to these outcomes will be investigated. DISCUSSION: We believed that the rate of postoperative complication of LE will be comparable to that of TME in mid-to-low advanced rectal cancer patients with a favorable response after pre-CRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: KCT0002579 ( https://cris.nih.go.kr ) Dec-2017.

Predicting cumulative incidence of adverse events in older patients with cancer undergoing first-line palliative chemotherapy: Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) multicentre prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Older patients have increased risk of toxicity from chemotherapy. Current prediction tools do not provide information on cumulative risk. METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 70 years with solid cancer were prospectively enrolled. A prediction model was developed for adverse events (AEs) ≥ Grade 3 (G3), based on geriatric assessment (GA), laboratory, and clinical variables. RESULTS: 301 patients were enrolled (median age, 75 years). Median number of chemotherapy cycles was 4. During first-line chemotherapy, 53.8% of patients experienced AEs ≥ G3. Serum protein < 6.7 g/dL, initial full-dose chemotherapy, psychological stress or acute disease in the past 3 months, water consumption < 3 cups/day, unable to obey a simple command, and self-perception of poor health were significantly related with AEs ≥ G3. A predicting model with these six variables ranging 0-8 points was selected with the highest discriminatory ability (c-statistic= 0.646), which could classify patients into four risk groups. Predicted cumulative incidence of AEs ≥ G3 was discriminated according to risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: This prediction tool could identify the risk of AEs ≥ G3 after chemotherapy and provide information on the cumulative incidence of AEs in each cycle. CLINICAL TRIAL ID: WHO ICTRP number, KCT0001071.

Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of Nivolumab in Korean Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

LESSONS LEARNED: This pharmacokinetic study of nivolumab showed that there is little ethnic difference in the handling of nivolumab.Nivolumab was well tolerated in Korean patients. BACKGROUND: This phase I study of nivolumab, an anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) monoclonal antibody, investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of nivolumab in Korean patients with advanced solid tumors. Findings were compared with results from Japan and the U.S. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this two-part study, patients received a single dose of nivolumab (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg; ONO-4538-13) and were followed up for 3 weeks. Those who met the required criteria proceeded to the second part (ONO-4538-14), and received the same dose as in part one every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Six patients per dose level were enrolled (n = 18). The mean elimination half-life of nivolumab among the groups ranged from 15.0 to 19.1 days. The maximum serum concentration and area under serum concentration-time curve increased almost dose-proportionally at doses from 1 to 10 mg/kg. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs; mostly grade ≤2) were reported in seven patients (38.9%). ADRs grade ≥3 occurred in one patient (5.6%; pneumonitis). Three patients (16.7%) developed ADRs related to thyroid dysfunction. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic parameters of nivolumab were similar among patients from Korea, Japan, and the U.S. The safety profile was consistent with findings from previous studies.

Impact of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach for Managing Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The wide variety of treatment strategies makes clinical decision-making difficult in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer cases. Many hospitals have started multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings comprising a team of dedicated specialists for discussing cases. MDTs for selected cases that are difficult to diagnose and treat are alternatives to regular MDTs. This study's aim was to determine the impact of a MDT for colorectal cancer on clinical decision-making. METHODS: Cases were discussed when clinical specialists had difficulty making decisions alone. All processes done by the MDT were then recorded in prospectively designed medical case forms. RESULTS: From Jan 2011 to Dec 2014, 1383 cases were discussed. A total of 549 (39.8%) case forms were completed for patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer, whereas 833 (60.2%) were completed for those with recurrent diseases. The MDT altered the proposed treatment of the referring physician in 179 (13%) cases. In 85 of the 179 (47.5%) altered cases, the radiologist's review of clinical information affected the diagnosis and decision. Furthermore, 152 of the 1383 MDT decisions were not implemented. Treatment intent, therapeutic plan, and alteration of decision were important reasons for not following the MDT's recommendation. CONCLUSION: Case discussions in MDT meetings resulted in altered clinical decisions in >10% cases. Implementation rates after MDT discussions might be affected by the treatment decision-making process. Imperfect decisions made by individual physicians can be decreased by the multidisciplinary decision-making process.

Increased incidence of chemoport-related thrombosis in patients with colorectal cancer receiving bevacizumab: A single-institutional experience.

OBJECTIVE: Chemoport-related thrombosis (CRT) is a serious complication that causes morbidities and interrupts administration of intravenous cancer therapy. We investigated the incidence and risk of CRT in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients treated with bevacizumab (BEV). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1,534 CRC patients who received chemotherapy with or without BEV using a chemoport between 2014 and 2016. RESULTS: The participants had a median age of 58 (18-85) years, and 60.3% were male. All participants were stratified into three groups: adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) (n=670), palliative chemotherapy (PC) without BEV (n=356), and PC with BEV (n=508). The median follow-up was 20.19 (interquartile range, 14.07-27.19) months. CRT occurred in 3.8% of all patients; incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic CRT was 2.9% and 0.9%, respectively. CRT occurred more in patients with BEV (5.7%) than in patients without BEV (2.9%, P=0.008). The cumulative incidence of CRT in patients administered PC with BEV was significantly higher than that in those administered AC (P=0.011) and there was a trend toward increased CRT in patients administered PC with BEV compared with those administered PC without BEV (P=0.044). Multivariate analysis found that BEV treatment was the only variable that was significantly associated with CRT (hazard ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-3.43; P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: BEV treatment was significantly associated with increased incidence of CRT in CRC patients.

Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRI Regimen in Elderly Versus Nonelderly Patients with Metastatic Colorectal or Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan-based chemotherapy is a standard backbone of therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) or gastric cancer (GC). However, there is still a paucity of information concerning the efficacy and safety of irinotecan-based regimens in elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the patient cohort (n = 1,545) from the UGT1A1 genotype study, we compared the efficacy and safety between elderly and nonelderly patients with metastatic CRC (n = 934) or GC (n = 611) who received first- or second-line FOLFIRI (irinotecan, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy. RESULTS: Despite lower relative dose intensity in elderly patients, progression-free survival and overall survival were similar between elderly (age ≥70 years) and nonelderly (<70 years) patients in the CRC cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 1.117; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.927-1.345; p = .244, and HR, 0.989; 95% CI, 0.774-1.264; p = .931, respectively) and the GC cohort (HR, 1.093; 95% CI, 0.854-1.400; p = .479, and HR, 1.188; 95% CI, 0.891-1.585; p = .241, respectively). In both cohorts, febrile neutropenia (22.1% vs. 14.6% in CRC cohort and 35.2% vs. 22.5% in GC cohort) and asthenia (grade 3: 8.4% vs. 1.7% in CRC cohort and 5.5% vs. 2.9% in GC cohort) were more frequent in elderly patients. In the CRC cohort, mucositis and anorexia were more frequent in elderly patients. In the GC cohort, nausea and vomiting were less frequent in elderly patients. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of the FOLFIRI regimen was similar between elderly and nonelderly patients in both the CRC and the GC cohorts. However, special attention should be paid to elderly patients because of increased risk for febrile neutropenia and asthenia. The Oncologist 2017;22:293-303 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The efficacy of FOLFIRI (irinotecan, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer or gastric cancer was similar to that in nonelderly patients. However, special attention should be paid to elderly patients because of the increased risk for febrile neutropenia and asthenia. These data suggest that the FOLFIRI regimen could be considered as a standard backbone of therapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer or gastric cancer and that the clinical decision between doublet and singlet chemotherapy may not be based solely on age. However, the data require further assessment of frailty and performance status.

Microsatellite Instability was not Associated with Survival in Stage III Colon Cancer Treated with Adjuvant Chemotherapy of Oxaliplatin and Infusional 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin (FOLFOX).

BACKGROUND: The impact of microsatellite instability (MSI) on survival in stage III colon cancer treated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin combination (FOLFOX) chemotherapy is not clear. We evaluated the association between MSI and survival in this population. METHODS: We analyzed 598 patients with curatively resected stage III colon cancer treated with adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy. We determined MSI status using polymerase chain reaction amplification; tumors were classified as high MSI (MSI-H, ≥2 unstable markers), low MSI (MSI-L, 1 unstable marker), or microsatellite stable (MSS, no unstable marker). RESULTS: Of 598 patients, 8.4% showed MSI-H. Tumors classified as MSI-H were more commonly located in the ascending colon (54.0 vs. 27.7%, p < 0.0001) and had poorly differentiated features (32.0 vs. 8.0%, p < 0.0001). After the median follow-up of 52.8 months, 5-year disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 77.0 and 85.9%, respectively. In univariate analysis, pathologic T4 (pT4) and pathologic N2 (pN2) was associated with reduced DFS (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) and OS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively), whereas MSI status did not affect either DFS (p = 0.114) or OS (p = 0.525). In patients with pN2 tumors; however, MSI-H was associated with better survival compared with MSS/MSI-L; DFS and OS in patients with MSI-H/pN2 were comparable to those in patients with pN1 tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stage III colon cancer treated with adjuvant FOLFOX, pT4 and pN2 was associated with reduced survival, but MSI status alone did not affect survival.