Associations between illness perceptions, word recognition, and perceived sound quality in cochlear implant users.

OBJECTIVE: Illness perceptions refer to thoughts and ideas an individual has about an illness. The aim was to understand how cochlear implant (CI) users' illness perceptions, in addition to their monosyllabic word recognition abilities, are associated with their self-perceived sound quality. DESIGN: Data were collected during routine CI check-up appointments. Participants completed the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (assessing their illness perceptions) and the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (assessing their subjective sound quality). Additionally, monosyllabic word recognition abilities were measured with the Freiburg Monosyllable Word Test. Hierarchical regression analysis were utilised to model users' sound quality ratings. Participants' age was entered first as a control variable. In the next step, monosyllabic word recognition was entered. Finally, participants' illness perceptions were entered. STUDY SAMPLE: Fifty-five participants with unilateral CI provision. RESULTS: Monosyllabic word recognition was significant in the second step. When illness perceptions and monosyllabic word recognition were both included in the third step, illness perceptions, but not monosyllabic word recognition, were significant. The model explained 22% of the variance of subjective sound quality. CONCLUSIONS: Monosyllabic word recognition abilities and illness perceptions of CI users are important for their self-reported sound quality, but illness perceptions appear to be potentially more relevant.

Association between lateral wall electrode array insertion parameters and audiological outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to compare speech recognition at different postoperative times for both ears in bilaterally implanted patients and to assess the influence of the time of deafness, frequency-to-place mismatch, angular insertion depth (AID) and angular separation between neighbouring electrode contacts on audiometric outcomes. METHODS: This study was performed at an academic tertiary referral centre. A total of 19 adult patients (6 men, 13 women), who received sequential bilateral implantation with lateral wall electrode arrays, were analysed in retrospective. Statistical analysis was performed using two-sided t test, Wilcoxon test, median test, and Spearman's correlation. RESULTS: Postlingually deafened patients (deafness after the age of 10) had a significantly better speech perception (WRS65[CI]) than the perilingually deafened subjects (deafness at the age of 1-10 years) (p < 0.001). Comparison of cochlear duct length between peri- and postlingually deafened subjects showed a slightly significantly smaller cochleae in perilingual patients (p = 0.045). No association between frequency-to-place mismatch as well as angular separation and speech perception could be detected. There was even no significant difference between the both ears in the intraindividual comparison, even if insertion parameters differed. CONCLUSION: The exact electrode position seems to have less influence on the speech comprehension of CI patients than already established parameters as preoperative speech recognition or duration of deafness.

[Validation of a predictive model for speech discrimination after cochlear implant provision]. / Validierung eines Modells zur Vorhersage des Sprachverstehens nach Cochleaimplantation.

BACKGROUND: If sufficient speech discrimination is no longer achieved with conventional hearing systems, an audiological indication for a cochlear implant (CI) is given. However, there are no established target criteria for CI aftercare with regard to the level of speech comprehension to be achieved. The aim of this study is to validate an existing predictive model for speech comprehension after CI provision. This is applied to different patient groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective study included 124 postlingually deaf adults. The model is based on preoperative maximum monosyllabic recognition score, aided monosyllabic recognition score at 65 dBSPL, and age the time of implantation. The model was investigated with regard to prediction accuracy for monosyllabic recognition with CI after 6 months. RESULTS: Mean speech discrimination improved from 10% with hearing aid to 65% with CI after 6 months, with a statistically significant improvement in 93% of cases. Deterioration of aided unilateral speech discrimination was not observed. The mean prediction error was 11.5 percentage points in the cases with preoperative scores better than zero and 23.2 percentage points in all other cases. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation should also be considered in patients with moderately severe to severe hearing loss and insufficient speech discrimination with hearing aids. The model based on preoperatively measured data for predicting speech discrimination with CI can be used in preoperative consultation and in the context of postoperative quality assurance.

Validation of a predictive model for speech discrimination after cochlear impIant provision.

BACKGROUND: If sufficient speech discrimination is no longer achieved with conventional hearing systems, an audiological indication for a cochlear implant (CI) is given. However, there are no established target criteria for CI aftercare with regard to the level of speech comprehension to be achieved. The aim of this study is to validate an existing predictive model for speech comprehension after CI provision. This is applied to different patient groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective study included 124 postlingually deaf adults. The model is based on preoperative maximum monosyllabic recognition score, aided monosyllabic recognition score at 65 dBSPL, and age the time of implantation. The model was investigated with regard to prediction accuracy for monosyllabic recognition with CI after 6 months. RESULTS: Mean speech discrimination improved from 10% with hearing aid to 65% with CI after 6 months, with a statistically significant improvement in 93% of cases. Deterioration of aided unilateral speech discrimination was not observed. The mean prediction error was 11.5 percentage points in the cases with preoperative scores better than zero and 23.2 percentage points in all other cases. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation should also be considered in patients with moderately severe to severe hearing loss and insufficient speech discrimination with hearing aids. The model based on preoperatively measured data for predicting speech discrimination with CI can be used in preoperative consultation and in the context of postoperative quality assurance.

Evaluation of a Transimpedance Matrix Algorithm to Detect Anomalous Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.

INTRODUCTION: Transimpedance measurements from cochlear implant electrodes have the potential to identify anomalous electrode array placement, such as tip fold-over (TFO) or fold-back, basal electrode kinking, or buckling. Analysing transimpedance may thus replace intraoperative or post-operative radiological imaging to detect any potential misplacements. A transimpedance algorithm was previously developed to detect deviations from a normal electrode position with the aim of intraoperatively detecting TFO. The algorithm had been calibrated on 35 forced, tip folded electrode arrays in six temporal bones to determine the threshold criterion required to achieve a sensitivity of 100%. Our primary objective here was to estimate the specificity of this TFO algorithm in patients, in a prospective study, for a series of electrode arrays shown to be normally inserted by post-operative imaging. METHODS: Intracochlear voltages were intraoperatively recorded for 157 ears, using Cochlear's Custom Sound™ EP 5 electrophysiological software (Cochlear Ltd., Sydney, NSW, Australia), for both Nucleus® CI512 and CI532 electrode arrays. The algorithm analysed the recorded 22 × 22 transimpedance matrix (TIM) and results were displayed as a heatmap intraoperatively, only visible to the technician in the operating theatre. After all clinical data were collected, the algorithm was evaluated on the bench. The algorithm measures the transimpedance gradients and corresponding phase angles (θ) throughout the TIM and calculates the gradient phase range. If this was greater than the predetermined threshold, the algorithm classified the electrode array insertion as having a TFO. RESULTS: Five ears had no intraoperative TIM and four anomalous matrices were identified from heatmaps and removed from the specificity analysis. Using the 148 remaining data sets (n = 103 CI532 and n = 45 CI512), the algorithm had an average specificity of 98.6% (95.80%-99.75%). CONCLUSION: The algorithm was found to be an effective screening tool for the identification of TFOs. Its specificity was within acceptable levels and resulted in a positive predictive value of 76%, with an estimated incidence of fold-over of 4% in perimodiolar arrays. This would mean 3 out of 4 cases flagged as a fold-over would be correctly identified by the algorithm, with the other being a false positive. The measurements were applied easily in theatre allowing it to be used as a routine clinical tool for confirming correct electrode placement.

Diagnosing complications following cochlear implantation using transcutaneous ultrasound.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and reliability of transcutaneous ultrasound for the detection of complications after cochlear implantation. METHODS: In a single center retrospective cohort study, 115 consecutive cases of suspected complications after cochlear implantation (intervention group) were examined. The rate of pathologic ultrasound findings for specific leading symptoms and diagnoses was compared to a control group comprising twenty consecutive cochlear implants in symptom-free patients. RESULTS: Diagnostic ultrasound showed distinctly more pathologic findings in the intervention group (n = 67; 58.3%; p < 0.001) compared to the control group (n = 1; 5%). Ultrasound revealed significantly more pathologic findings in haematoma or seroma around the implant (n = 17; 100%; p < 0.001; ϕ = 0.94) and magnet dislocation (n = 44; 97.7%; p < 0.001; ϕ = 0.92) confirmed by a strong effect. Ultrasound examination showed a medium to high effect size in patients presenting with local infections (n = 3; 21.4%; p = 0.283; ϕ = 0.25) and skin flap oedema (n = 2; 50%; p = 0.061; ϕ = 0.51). In contrast, ultrasound examinations displayed a low effect size in undefined cephalgia (0%; p = 0.444; ϕ = 0.17) and device malfunction or failure (0%; p > 0.999; ϕ = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Transcutaneous ultrasound can be advocated as a feasible and effective method in the diagnostic work-up of magnet dislocation and haematoma or seroma around the implant following cochlear implantation. Contrary, ultrasound findings can be expected to be inconspicuous in patients presenting with undefined cephalgia and device malfunction or failure.

[Effectiveness of hearing aid provision for severe hearing loss]. / Wirksamkeit der Hörgeräteversorgung bei hochgradigem Hörverlust.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In practice, the unilateral monosyllabic speech recognition score with hearing aid (WRS65(HA)) is often below the maximum word recognition score with headphones (WRSmax), in particular for subjects with severe hearing loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency factor Q of hearing aid provision, the ratio WRS65(HA)/WRSmax, in patients with severe to profound hearing loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from real-ear measurements (REM), pure tone and speech audiogram, and speech recognition with and without hearing aid of 93 ears in 64 patients were examined. The patients visited the authors' hearing center for hearing aid evaluation in 2019. Deviations of the real-ear measured frequency-dependent output level values from the prescription targets NAL-NL2 and DSL v5.0 were analyzed. Spearman correlation coefficients for the speech intelligibility index (SII) were calculated for the parameters WRS65(HA) and Q. RESULTS: In more than 67% of the hearing aid fittings, output level values matched the target curves of NAL-NL2 or DSL v5.0 in the range of ±5 dB for frequencies from 0.5 to 4 kHz at 65 dB SPL. Nevertheless, WRSmax was not achieved with hearing aid at conversational speech levels of 65 dB SPL (mean deviations: 34.4%). However, WRS65(HA) and Q were best when target values for DSL v5.0 were achieved at 65 dB SPL, which is associated with a higher SII. CONCLUSION: For patients with severe to profound hearing loss, the prescription targets of NAL-NL2 and DSL v5.0 do not provide sufficient amplification for WRSmax to be achieved at a normal speech level of 65 dB SPL. It remains to be investigated whether alternative prescriptions with better audibility for input levels of 50 and 65 dB SPL might improve the effectiveness of hearing aid provision.

[Word production in children with cochlear implant based on chronological age and hearing age]. / Hör- und Lebensalter-bezogene Wortproduktion von Kindern mit Cochlea-Implantat.

BACKGROUND: For congenitally deaf children, an early bilateral provision with cochlear implant (CI) is a favourable condition for language acquisition. The objective of the present study was to determine the word production in CI children. The focus was on a comparison of chronological age and hearing age performance and on the evaluation of potential effects of multilingualism, additional disabilities and age at provision. METHODS: The data of 62 children with bilateral CI (age at provision in months M=12,1; SD=6,2) were retrospectively analysed. Vocabulary was assessed by the test Aktiver Wortschatztest für 3- bis 5-jährige Kinder - Revision and compared for chronological age and hearing age. Group comparisons and correlation analysis was conducted regarding multilingualism, additional disabilities and age at provision. RESULTS: The cohort performed significantly better when referenced to hearing age: level were within or above the norm in more than 50%; referenced to chronological age in around 37%. The descriptive performance differences for multilingualism and additional disabilities were only significant for children with both characteristics. Performance of monolingual children without additional disabilities was not significantly associated with age at provision. CONCLUSION: CI children may achieve an adequate expressive vocabulary at the age of 3 to 5 years. Multilingualism and additional disabilities seem to be particular challenges for CI children and need a more precise definition in further studies. The use of both chronological and hearing age as reference marks allows a differentiated assessment of the language status. This may lead to benefits in therapeutic interventions and parent councelling.

Depressive symptoms affect short- and long-term speech recognition outcome in cochlear implant users.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of the amount of depressive symptoms in cochlear implant (CI) recipients on the development of speech recognition after CI-activation up to 2 years. DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis of a German short form of the Beck Depression Inventory given at initial activation of the implant in relation to monosyllabic word recognition score at conversational level at initial activation and at 3 months, 1 and 2-year follow-up measurements. STUDY SAMPLE: Thirty-one CI-patients (11 female, 20 male) aged between 41 and 83 (M = 64.77, SD = 10.43) who were German native speakers, postlingually deafened, with severe hearing loss in both sides but unilaterally implanted (19 right-sided, 12 left-sided). RESULTS: The amount of depressive symptoms at initial activation was negatively correlated with the monosyllabic recognition score after 3 months and after 1 year of implant use. CONCLUSION: The psychological status in terms of depressive symptoms is an important parameter regarding the rehabilitative outcome of CI-patients. Care staff and CI-users should be sensitized to the link between depressive symptoms and the development of speech recognition with CI.

Outcomes for a clinically representative cohort of hearing-impaired adults using the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant.

PURPOSE: Hearing performance data was collected from a large heterogeneous group of subjects implanted with the Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI532 with Slim Modiolar Electrode, for the purposes of postmarket clinical follow-up. Data was analysed for factors which may predict postoperative speech recognition scores. METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively from five German clinics for 159 subjects from March 2017 to August 2018. Hearing thresholds and recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and sentences in noise were measured preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There was a mean gain of 44% points (95% CI 39-49%) at 6 months in monosyllable scores in quiet for implanted ears. Preoperative hearing thresholds in implant ears increased systematically with decreasing age; however, younger subjects had better baseline monosyllable scores with hearing aids compared with older subjects. Baseline performance alone explained 14% of the variation in postoperative scores. Residual hearing was preserved on average to within 22 dB at 250 Hz and 30 dB at 500 Hz of preoperative levels. CONCLUSIONS: In a large and varied cohort of routinely treated hearing-impaired adults, speech recognition with the CI532 for German monosyllabic words in quiet at 6 months was equivalent to performance reported at one year or more in other published studies. Although younger subjects had poorer preoperative pure-tone thresholds, they had better preoperative word recognition scores compared with older subjects, and also had higher post implant scores. Further research is required to identify if this phenomenon is just applicable to German health system assessment and referral practices.

Comparison of bimodal benefit for the use of DSL v5.0 and NAL-NL2 in cochlear implant listeners.

Objective: For a group of bimodal subjects with moderate to severe hearing loss contralateral to the cochlear implant (CI), the bimodal benefit of the hearing aid (HA) gain prescriptions DSL v5.0, NAL-NL2 and the recipients' own gain setting were assessed.Design: Speech perception in quiet and in noise as well as self-reported ratings of benefit were determined for all three gain-settings. Speech tests were performed in the bimodal, the HA alone and the CI alone condition. The bimodal benefit was assessed for each prescription as the difference score of the bimodal condition and the better ear.Study Sample: Twenty adults with post-lingual hearing loss.Results: Speech perception with DSL v5.0 was significantly higher compared to NAL-NL2 and the own prescription in both quiet and noise. The median bimodal benefit was highest for DSL v5.0 with an average of 15 percentage points for both words in quiet and sentences in noise.Conclusions: DSL v5.0 and NAL-NL2 are both suitable for HA fitting in bimodal users. For subjects with moderate to severe hearing loss and HA experience contralateral to the implanted side, DSL v5.0 may provide better speech perception and bimodal benefit.

Maximum preimplantation monosyllabic score as predictor of cochlear implant outcome.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the speech perception of cochlear implant (CI) recipients with measurable preoperative ipsilateral speech perception. These data should support improved individual counselling of CI candidates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre- and postoperative speech audiometric parameters were analyzed, including maximum score for phonemically balanced words (PBmax) and monosyllabic score at a normal conversational level of 65 dBSPL, with hearing aids one hand and CI on the other. Data of 284 experienced adult CI wearers were grouped and evaluated in terms of preoperative PBmax. RESULTS: The preoperative PBmax was exceeded by the postoperative monosyllabic score in 96% of cases. The overall median postoperative score was 72.5%. The groups with preoperative PBmax > 0% showed significantly better speech perception scores with CI than the group with PBmax = 0%. Median improvement compared to the preoperative monosyllabic score with hearing aids was 65 percentage points, independent of preoperative PBmax. CONCLUSION: The preoperatively measured PBmax may be used as a predictor for the minimum speech perception obtained with CI. This is of high clinical relevance for CI candidates with a PBmax above zero.

[Hearing aid provision - can the limited obligation of statutory health insurance to provide indemnification only up to the reference price be successfully challenged in the social courts in cases of medical indication?] / Hörgeräteversorgung ­ Kann die Begrenzung der Leistungspflicht der Krankenkassen durch Festbeträge bei medizinischer Indikation erfolgreich vor den Sozialgerichten angefochten werden?

OBJECTIVE: When patients are provided with hearing aids, the question may arise whether they are entitled to technically advanced and therefore more expensive hearing aids in cases of medical indication, or just to hearing aids for the reference price. This work provides an overview of decisions rendered by the German social courts. We investigated whether it is advisable for a patient to go to court if the statutory health insurance has disputed a claim, and how long the proceedings may take. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We looked for decisions in the commercial legal database "juris", using the search parameters "Hörgerät" (hearing aid) and "Zuzahlung" (additional payment). The reviewed decisions were issued between 2009 and 2019. RESULTS: A total of 97 relevant decisions were found. The results varied according to the specifics of the individual case. 63 % of the patients won their cases. The court procedures took between 0.3 years and 10.4 years. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that it is uncertain whether the costs for hearing aids that exceed the reference price will be covered or reimbursed. As each case is in principle unique, the results vary. Nevertheless, taking legal action is recommended after thorough consideration in cases where statutory health insurances or other providers refuse to meet expenses incurred despite indication.

Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.

The objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of place of stimulation on cortical auditory evoked potentials in relation to speech performance in cochlear implant listeners. It was designed that cortical responses were recorded for single-electrode bursts at apical, medial and basal portions of the electrode array with varying inter-stimulus intervals ranging from 300 ms to 5 s. Latency and amplitude of N1 and P2 peaks were analysed in relation to monosyllabic word scores. The study sample was 44 adult cochlear implant users ranging in age from 28 to 86 years. N1, P2 and N1-P2 amplitudes declined significantly from apical to basal electrodes. The most robust and pronounced responses were recorded for slower stimulation rates (5 s). Speech recognition correlated positively with N1 and N1-P2 amplitudes at the medial electrode. P2 latency showed a significant negative correlation with speech performance at the apical electrode. At last, cortical responses varied significantly depending on the stimulation site and rate. We can objectively quantify speech performance with the N1, N1-P2 amplitude and P2 latency in cochlear implant users. Deafness-related neural degeneration persists even after the cochlear implantation and is more distinct at the base than the apex of the cochlea.

[Multicentric analysis of the use behavior of cochlear implant users]. / Multizentrische Analyse des Nutzerverhaltens von Cochlea-Implantat-Trägern.

INTRODUCTION: Novel cochlear implant speech processors are capable of storing data logs. With the help of this information a more individualized patient care can be provided. However, standard data are missing to a greater extent to the individual usage behavior. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, the use data of 2687 patients were evaluated. All patients had the Nucleus 6 system from Cochlear Ltd. RESULTS: The data allow a normal range to be defined for the duration of use of cochlear implant speech processors. Likewise, the identification of conspicuous usage behavior is possible.

Hörgeräte: Indikationen, Technologie, Anpassung und Qualitätskontrolle.

Hearing loss can be caused by a number of different pathological conditions. Some of them can be successfully treated, mainly by surgery, depending on the individual's disease process. However, the treatment of chronic sensorineural hearing loss with damaged cochlear structures usually needs hearing rehabilitation by means of technical amplification. During the last 2 decades tremendous improvements in hearing aid technology led to a higher quality in the hearing rehabilitation process. For example, due to sophisticated signal processing the acoustic feedback path could be reduced and hence open fitting options are available for even more subjects. In particular for high-frequency hearing loss the use of open fitting is an option. Both the users' acceptance and the perceived sound quality were significantly increased by open fittings.However, we are still faced with a low level of readiness in many hearing impaired subjects to accept acoustic amplification. Since ENT specialists play a key-role in hearing aid provision, they should promote early hearing aid rehabilitation and include this in the counselling even in subjects with mild and moderate hearing loss. Recent investigations demonstrated the benefit of early hearing aid use in this group of patients since this may help to reduce subsequent damages as auditory deprivation, social isolation, development of dementia, and cognitive decline. For subjects with tinnitus, hearing aids may also support masking by environmental sounds and enhance cortical inhibition.The present paper describes the latest development of hearing aid technology and the current state of the art for amplification modalities. Implications for both hearing aid indication and provision are discussed.

[Longterm Results of a Screening Procedure for Adult Cochlear Implant Candidates]. / Langzeitergebnisse eines Screeningverfahrens für erwachsene Cochlea-Implantat-Kandidaten.

This study gives an estimation of the long term outcome of a screening procedure for cochlear implant candidacy in hearing aid users.In a recent retrospective study, hearing aid performance and audiometric measures in 185 subjects (318 ears) were analyzed. In the context of 2 years follow-up, the outcome of the ipsilateral screening procedure was analyzed. For patients who did receive a cochlear implant, their audiometric outcome measures were viewed into relation to their preoperative results.From the 96 ears identified as cochlear implant candidates, 34 were provided with a cochlear implant. 222 ears were identified as hearing aid users. Only 4 of these 222 ears were provided with a cochlear implant. Cochlear implant recipients with a preoperative speech recognition score with hearing aids above zero showed a mean improvement of 65% points in Freiburg monosyllabics.The audiometry-based screening procedure enables an effective management of the referral process of cochlear implant candidates.

Speech Perception and Information-Carrying Capacity for Hearing Aid Users of Different Ages.

Hearing impairment in the elderly is usually treated with conventional hearing aids; however, a large number of older people do not achieve sufficient speech recognition with hearing aids. The aim of the study was to describe speech perception with hearing aids in comparison to pure-tone hearing loss and maximum speech recognition scores for phonemically balanced words. Data from 392 hearing aid users with different degrees of hearing loss were evaluated retrospectively. In particular, pure-tone thresholds, the maximum monosyllabic word score, and the monosyllabic word score in quiet at conversational level with a hearing aid were analysed. The results showed that speech perception scores decline with increasing age. Even when corrected for pure-tone hearing loss, a significant decline in speech recognition scores after the age of 80 years was observed. Regarding the maximum monosyllabic word score, the effect is smaller but still observable; thus, speech recognition with hearing aids is significantly lower for older subjects. This can be attributed partially to the reduction of the information-carrying capacity in this group.