RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are prevalent among older people, often leading to reduced mobility, muscle loss, and bone density decline. Malnutrition exacerbates the prognosis post surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a 12-week regimen of a high-calorie, high-protein oral supplement with ß-hydroxy-ß-methylbutyrate (HC-HP-HMB-ONS) on nutritional status, daily activities, and compliance in malnourished or at-risk older patients with hip fractures receiving standard care. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 270 subjects ≥75 years of age, residing at home or in nursing homes, malnourished or at risk of malnutrition, and post hip fracture surgery, received HC-HP-HMB-ONS for 12 weeks. Various scales and questionnaires assessed outcomes. RESULTS: During the 12 weeks of follow-up, 82.8% consumed ≥75% of HC-HP-HMB-ONS. By week 12, 62.4% gained or maintained weight (+0.3 kg), 29.2% achieved normal nutritional status (mean MNA score +2.8), and 46.8% improved nutritional status. Biochemical parameters improved significantly. Subjects reported good tolerability (mean score 8.5/10), with 87.1% of healthcare providers concurring. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of HC-HP-HMB-ONS markedly enhanced nutritional status and biochemical parameters in older hip-fracture patients, with high compliance and tolerability. Both patients and healthcare professionals expressed satisfaction with HC-HP-HMB-ONS.
Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Fraturas do Quadril , Desnutrição , Estado Nutricional , Valeratos , Humanos , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Desnutrição/etiologia , Valeratos/administração & dosagem , Dieta Rica em Proteínas , Administração Oral , Ingestão de Energia , Proteínas Alimentares/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In June 2020, after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, Hospital-Based Liaison Geriatrics units and Primary Care nursing care units were created in the Community of Madrid to improve health care for residents in a coordinated manner. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the situation and the activity of the Hospital-Based Liaison Geriatrics units. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an electronic survey prepared and sent to the liaison geriatricians in March 2022, including the following sections: available resources, areas of health care, reasons for consultation, care interventions, research and teaching activity, profiles of residents attended and coordination with other health professionals at that time. A descriptive analysis of the data was performed. RESULTS: 100% of the existing Liaison Geriatrics units responded, describing essential differences in human resources, hours of care and volume of patients attended. Regarding the care activity of these units, they highlighted the telematic consultation, and the face-to-face assessment during hospitalization and in the emergency department. The main reasons for assessment were decision-making, acute pathology and geriatric syndromes; and the in-hospital drug management or orthoprosthetic aids among the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the heterogeneity in the resources of the different Liaison Geriatric units, there is a similarity in their care activity and the use of telemedicine. It is common to request an assessment for decision-making, acute pathology or geriatric syndromes and interventions for managing in-hospital drugs and tests, orthoprosthetic aids and coordination with other specialists. Liaison Geriatrics units must continue leading quality health care coordinated with nursing homes, as well as continuity of care for residents.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Geriatria , Humanos , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Síndrome , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Casas de SaúdeRESUMO
Increasing numbers of older persons are being treated by specialties other than Geriatric Medicine. Specialists turn to Geriatric Teams when they need to accurately stratify their patients' risk and prognosis, predict the potential impact of their, often, invasive interventions, optimise their clinical status, and contribute to discharge planning. Oncology and Haematology, Cardiology, General Surgery, and other surgical departments are examples where such collaborative working is already established, to a varying extent. The use of the term "Cross-speciality Geriatrics" is suggested when geriatric care is provided in clinical areas traditionally outside the reach of Geriatric Teams. The core principles of Geriatric Medicine (comprehensive geriatric assessment, patient-centred multidisciplinary targeted interventions, and input at point-of-care) are adapted to the specifics of each specialty and applied to frail older patients in order to deliver a holistic assessment/treatment, better patient/carer experience, and improved clinical outcomes. Using Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment methodology and Frailty scoring in such patients provides invaluable prognostic information, helps in decision making, and enables personalised treatment strategies. There is evidence that such an approach improves the efficiency of health care systems and patient outcomes. This article includes a review of these concepts, describes existing models of care, presents the most commonly used clinical tools, and offers examples of excellence in this new era of geriatric care. In an ever ageing population it is likely that teams will be asked to provide Cross-specialty Geriatrics across different Health Care systems. The fundamentals for its implementation are in place, but further evidence is required to guide future development and consolidation, making it one of the most important challenges for Geriatrics in the coming years.
Assuntos
Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Geriatria/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cardiologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Fragilidade/complicações , Fragilidade/epidemiologia , Cirurgia Geral , Hematologia , Humanos , Oncologia , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Prevalência , Resultado do Tratamento , UrologiaRESUMO
The mortality rate after a hip fracture is very high. It doubles those of people of the same age without fracture and the excess of mortality remains for years. There are several patient-dependent factors known to be related to the higher mortality and they allow identifying the patients with a higher risk of death, but the intrinsic mechanisms of the association between fracture and mortality are not well known. The causes of death are the same as the usual in the elderly. Males have a higher risk. The more fragile patients and those with more comorbidities die more frequently during the early postoperative period, but in the following months and years the mortality affects to healthier people too. Some strategies that can reduce the mortality include the reduction of hip fracture incidence, the multidisciplinary management of the process and osteoporosis treatment.