Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 63
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiology ; 311(1): e232191, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38591980

RESUMO

Endometriosis is a prevalent and potentially debilitating condition that mostly affects individuals of reproductive age, and often has a substantial diagnostic delay. US is usually the first-line imaging modality used when patients report chronic pelvic pain or have issues of infertility, both common symptoms of endometriosis. Other than the visualization of an endometrioma, sonologists frequently do not appreciate endometriosis on routine transvaginal US images. Given a substantial body of literature describing techniques to depict endometriosis at US, the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to make recommendations aimed at improving the screening process for endometriosis. The panel was composed of experts in the imaging and management of endometriosis, including radiologists, sonographers, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, and minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons. A comprehensive literature review combined with a modified Delphi technique achieved a consensus. This statement defines the targeted screening population, describes techniques for augmenting pelvic US, establishes direct and indirect observations for endometriosis at US, creates an observational grading and reporting system, and makes recommendations for additional imaging and patient management. The panel recommends transvaginal US of the posterior compartment, observation of the relative positioning of the uterus and ovaries, and the uterine sliding sign maneuver to improve the detection of endometriosis. These additional techniques can be performed in 5 minutes or less and could ultimately decrease the delay of an endometriosis diagnosis in at-risk patients.


Assuntos
Endometriose , Humanos , Feminino , Endometriose/diagnóstico por imagem , Consenso , Diagnóstico Tardio , Ultrassonografia , Radiologistas
2.
Radiographics ; 42(2): 609-624, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35061515

RESUMO

Adnexal cysts are a common incidental finding at US, CT, and MRI but have historically caused a diagnostic dilemma for determining when to follow up and how to manage them. Characteristic imaging features of simple adnexal cysts include a simple fluid collection with smooth walls and no solid or vascular components. Day-to-day practice guidelines were recently updated to reflect the overwhelming evidence that incidental cystic adnexal masses are almost always benign. Three major consensus articles on adnexal cystic masses were published between 2019 and 2020: the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) consensus update on adnexal cysts, the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) US consensus guideline, and the American College of Radiology (ACR) white paper on the management for incidental adnexal findings at CT and MRI. All three standardize reporting terminology, are based on evidence-based data and institutional practice patterns, and apply to nonpregnant women of average risk for ovarian cancer. While there are small differences in follow-up recommendations based on size thresholds, the goal of each is the same-to limit unnecessary imaging follow-up and, by doing so, save the patient time, money, and anxiety. For the diagnostic radiologist to use these guidelines, it is essential that the entire mass is visualized well. Without adequate visualization, further characterization of the mass may be necessary. To put it all together, the SRU consensus guideline and ACR white paper are easily applied in day-to-day practice for masses that are O-RADS 2 and below. An invited commentary by Patel is available online. The online slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Anexos , Cistos , Doenças dos Anexos/diagnóstico por imagem , Cistos/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Radiologistas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ultrassonografia/métodos
3.
Radiographics ; 41(2): 625-640, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33646910

RESUMO

Pelvic adnexal torsion is a collective term referring to twisting of an ovary, fallopian tube, or paraovarian cyst on its axis with varying degrees of vascular compromise. Although it is the fifth most common gynecologic emergency, the diagnosis is challenging and often missed due to symptoms, physical examination findings, and imaging features that are nonspecific. Delay in salvage surgery may lead to ovarian or tubal loss, dysfunction, and infertility. The tips shared herein are based on the authors' observations of key clinical and imaging features of torsion, with the intent of heightening radiologists' index of suspicion and diagnostic accuracy in a clear and memorable fashion. Clinically, severe acute pain with a known adnexal mass or of severity to elicit nausea or vomiting should raise concern. At imaging, features of ovarian edema are key to the diagnosis, including asymmetric ovarian enlargement, peripheralized follicles, adjacent free fluid, and foci of stromal hemorrhage. The converse finding of symmetric nonenlarged ovaries in a normal location with any imaging modality has a high negative predictive value for torsion, obviating the need for additional imaging. The whirlpool sign (twisted vascular pedicle), abnormal ovarian location, and uterine tilting are additional key imaging manifestations. The presence of color Doppler flow or contrast enhancement only suggests that an ovary is still viable and should not be used to exclude the diagnosis of torsion. In cases of isolated tubal or paraovarian cyst torsion, the ovaries may appear normal; therefore, recognition of this entity along with appreciation of several key imaging findings may assist with this difficult diagnosis. An invited commentary by Dighe is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Anexos , Doenças Ovarianas , Doenças dos Anexos/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças Ovarianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Torção Ovariana , Anormalidade Torcional/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia
4.
Radiology ; 294(1): 168-185, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31687921

RESUMO

The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) US risk stratification and management system is designed to provide consistent interpretations, to decrease or eliminate ambiguity in US reports resulting in a higher probability of accuracy in assigning risk of malignancy to ovarian and other adnexal masses, and to provide a management recommendation for each risk category. It was developed by an international multidisciplinary committee sponsored by the American College of Radiology and applies the standardized reporting tool for US based on the 2018 published lexicon of the O-RADS US working group. For risk stratification, the O-RADS US system recommends six categories (O-RADS 0-5), incorporating the range of normal to high risk of malignancy. This unique system represents a collaboration between the pattern-based approach commonly used in North America and the widely used, European-based, algorithmic-style International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa model system, a risk prediction model that has undergone successful prospective and external validation. The pattern approach relies on a subgroup of the most predictive descriptors in the lexicon based on a retrospective review of evidence prospectively obtained in the IOTA phase 1-3 prospective studies and other supporting studies that assist in differentiating management schemes in a variety of almost certainly benign lesions. With O-RADS US working group consensus, guidelines for management in the different risk categories are proposed. Both systems have been stratified to reach the same risk categories and management strategies regardless of which is initially used. At this time, O-RADS US is the only lexicon and classification system that encompasses all risk categories with their associated management schemes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Sistemas de Informação em Radiologia , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Doenças dos Anexos , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos
5.
Radiographics ; 40(3): 895-909, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32281901

RESUMO

Diagnostic imaging after orthotopic liver transplant focuses primarily on depicting complications related to surgical hepatic vascular and biliary anastomoses. Less common preexisting vascular conditions include congenital anatomic variants, atherosclerosis, chronic portal venous thrombosis, splenic artery and variceal steal phenomena, and transarterial embolization (TAE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). If unappreciated or left untreated preoperatively, these conditions negatively impact the transplant by impairing hepatic arterial or portal vascular inflow. Many of the complications related to preexisting vascular conditions can be prevented or mitigated by proper performance and careful evaluation of preoperative imaging studies. The authors describe the diagnosis and treatment of complications arising from narrowing of the celiac axis by atherosclerosis and the median arcuate ligament, variant anatomy of the hepatic artery, insufficiency of the portal vein requiring surgical conduits, and large varices or an enlarged splenic artery and spleen that may steal blood and compromise hepatic arterial or venous inflow. While preoperative evaluation primarily involves CT and MRI, postoperative diagnosis involves screening with sonography and confirmation with other modalities. We propose the use of a preoperative checklist of vascular status and measurements in patients undergoing liver transplant. Reports of imaging studies in recipients after transplant should include details of surgical vascular anastomoses and conduits, any history of HCC and preoperative TAE, details of the preoperative α-fetoprotein levels, and any unusual procedures or pathologic findings in the explanted liver that may affect postoperative surveillance. The authors review the pretransplant imaging evaluation of vascular and HCC issues that may affect surgical outcomes and methods to help recognize complications after transplant that can arise from these conditions.©RSNA, 2020.


Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Comorbidade , Humanos
6.
Radiology ; 293(2): 359-371, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31549945

RESUMO

This multidisciplinary consensus update aligns prior Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) guidelines on simple adnexal cysts with recent large studies showing exceptionally low risk of cancer associated with simple adnexal cysts. Most small simple cysts do not require follow-up. For larger simple cysts or less well-characterized cysts, follow-up or second opinion US help to ensure that solid elements are not missed and are also useful for assessing growth of benign tumors. In postmenopausal women, reporting of simple cysts greater than 1 cm should be done to document their presence in the medical record, but such findings are common and follow-up is recommended only for simple cysts greater than 3-5 cm, with the higher 5-cm threshold reserved for simple cysts with excellent imaging characterization and documentation. For simple cysts in premenopausal women, these thresholds are 3 cm for reporting and greater than 5-7 cm for follow-up imaging. If a cyst is at least 10%-15% smaller at any time, then further follow-up is unnecessary. Stable simple cysts at initial follow-up may benefit from a follow-up at 2 years due to measurement variability that could mask growth. Simple cysts that grow are likely cystadenomas. If a previously suspected simple cyst demonstrates papillary projections or solid areas at follow-up, then the cyst should be described by using standardized terminology. These updated SRU consensus recommendations apply to asymptomatic patients and to those whose symptoms are not clearly attributable to the cyst. These recommendations can reassure physicians and patients regarding the benign nature of simple adnexal cysts after a diagnostic-quality US examination that allows for confident diagnosis of a simple cyst. Patients will benefit from less costly follow-up, less anxiety related to these simple cysts, and less surgery for benign lesions.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Anexos/diagnóstico por imagem , Cistos/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Doenças dos Anexos/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Cistos/patologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/patologia
7.
9.
Radiographics ; 38(5): 1576-1589, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30207945

RESUMO

Adenomyosis is a common benign uterine condition and a frequent cause of pelvic pain in premenopausal women. Transvaginal US is now considered the primary imaging modality for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, and thus radiologists should be familiar with its sonographic appearance. US findings can be divided into three categories, which parallel the histology of adenomyosis: (a) ectopic endometrial glands and stroma, (b) muscular hyperplasia/hypertrophy, and (c) increased vascularity. Ectopic endometrial glands manifest as echogenic nodules and striations, radiating from the endometrium into the myometrium. When the glands contain fluid, myometrial cysts and fluid-filled striations may be visible at US. Muscular hyperplasia and hypertrophy cause focal or diffuse myometrial thickening and globular uterine enlargement, often with thin "venetian blind" shadows. The combination of these findings results in a heterogeneous myometrium, with blurring of the endometrial border. Adenomyosis increases uterine vascularity, depicted as a pattern of penetrating vessels at color Doppler US. Other US techniques that are helpful in the diagnosis of adenomyosis include obtaining cine clips and coronal reformatted images, both of which can survey the entire endometrial-myometrial border, and performing saline-infusion sonohysterography, during which ectopic glands frequently fill with either air or fluid. While most cases of adenomyosis develop spontaneously, there are specific inciting causes that include tamoxifen use, postendometrial ablation syndrome, and deep-infiltrating endometriosis. Mimics of adenomyosis include leiomyomas, uterine contractions, neoplasms, and vascular malformations. This article reviews the pathophysiology of adenomyosis and correlates it with the US findings, highlights specific causes of adenomyosis, and describes how to distinguish this common diagnosis from a variety of mimics. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2018.


Assuntos
Adenomiose/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Adenomiose/etiologia , Adenomiose/fisiopatologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagem
12.
J Ultrasound Med ; 35(7): 1465-73, 2016 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27229130

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit often require considerable support with endotracheal tubes, umbilical arterial and venous catheters, and peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Support device evaluation with radiography exposes neonates to ionizing radiation. This study evaluated the effectiveness of sonographic localization for endotracheal tubes, umbilical arterial and venous catheters, and peripherally inserted central venous catheters. METHODS: This blinded prospective Institutional Review Board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study with informed consent compared sonography to radiography for endotracheal tube, umbilical arterial and venous catheter, and peripherally inserted central venous catheter localization. Participants were consecutively recruited NICU patients of any weight, gestation, and chronologic age who had an endotracheal tube, umbilical arterial catheter, umbilical venous catheter, or peripherally inserted central venous catheter placed or adjusted and had subsequent radiographic confirmation within 24 hours. Sonographic evaluation was obtained as soon as possible, without prior review of the radiograph, and results were compared. RESULTS: Thirty sonographic studies were performed in 25 patients (14 male and 11 female), for a total of 50 lines and tubes: 18 umbilical venous catheters, 12 umbilical arterial catheters, 11 peripherally inserted central venous catheters, and 9 endotracheal tubes. Forty-nine support devices (98%) were visualized with sonography, all concordant with radiography. Forty-four were correctly positioned, and 6 were malpositioned. Sonography identified the location of umbilical venous catheters in all 18 cases (100%), umbilical arterial catheters in all 12 (100%), peripherally inserted central venous catheters in 10 (91%), and endotracheal tubes in 9 (100%). CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of sonography was excellent for evaluation of umbilical arterial and venous catheters, endotracheal tubes, and peripherally inserted central venous catheters. These results support the goal of further point-of-care training and accreditation to use sonography as a primary modality for complete evaluation of NICU support devices.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/instrumentação , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Intubação Intratraqueal/instrumentação , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Cateterismo/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentação , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Estudos Prospectivos , Método Simples-Cego , Veias Umbilicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular
13.
Radiographics ; 35(7): 2135-48, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26562242

RESUMO

Since being introduced more than 30 years ago, endovaginal ultrasonography (US) and quantitative testing of serum levels of the beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin have become the standard means of establishing the presence of normal intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), failed IUP, and ectopic pregnancy. Appropriate use of these powerful tools requires clear, standardized interpretations based on conservative criteria to protect both the pregnancy and the mother. Since diagnoses are assigned earlier and available medical treatments for ectopic pregnancy and failed IUP are expanding, emphasis must carefully shift toward watchful waiting when the mother is clinically stable and a definitive location for the pregnancy cannot be established with US. To this end and to prevent inadvertent harm to early normal pregnancies, the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a consensus panel of radiologists, obstetricians, and emergency medicine physicians in 2012 with the goal of reviewing current literature and clinical practices and formulating modern criteria and terminology for the various first-trimester outcomes.


Assuntos
Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Gonadotropina Coriônica Humana Subunidade beta/sangue , Estatura Cabeça-Cóccix , Erros de Diagnóstico , Feminino , Morte Fetal , Coração Fetal/diagnóstico por imagem , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Especificidade de Órgãos , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Testes de Gravidez/métodos , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez/sangue , Gravidez Ectópica/sangue , Gravidez Ectópica/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravidez Ectópica/patologia , Gravidez Ectópica/terapia , Valores de Referência , Terminologia como Assunto , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal/métodos , Conduta Expectante , Saco Vitelino/diagnóstico por imagem
14.
J Ultrasound Med ; 34(10): 1901-10, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26307123

RESUMO

The purposes of this pictorial essay are as follows: (1) Review a systematic approach to using sonography in the initial evaluation of patients with acute arm swelling and permanent dialysis access. (2) Identify normal grayscale and Doppler findings in arteriovenous fistulas and grafts. (3) Discuss a spectrum of vascular differential diagnoses for arm swelling in this setting, including stenosis of the access, draining vein complications, thrombosis, steal syndrome, and aneurysms, as well as several nonvascular causes. (4) Recognize findings that warrant further imaging evaluation or intervention.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Edema/diagnóstico por imagem , Edema/etiologia , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose Venosa/etiologia , Algoritmos , Braço , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Posicionamento do Paciente/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia Doppler/métodos , Veias/diagnóstico por imagem
15.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 213(2): W95, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31328994
16.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 201(3): W479-86, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23971480

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and types of significant vascular findings on bedside sonography immediately after renal transplantation and which abnormalities would suggest a benefit from early surgical revision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred seventy-five renal transplant sonograms obtained within 4 hours of surgery were retrospectively reviewed for major vascular abnormalities: lack of renal artery (RA) or renal vein (RV) flow, elevated peak systolic velocity (PSV)>300 cm/s, parvus tardus waveforms, and markedly decreased or no color parenchymal flow. Clinical outcomes of abnormal cases were reviewed, including reoperations and percutaneous interventions. RESULTS: Thirty-two (5.6%) patients underwent repeat surgery within the first week, 16 for nonvascular causes. Forty-seven (8.2%) patients had positive sonography findings. In 16 patients, sonography impacted the decision for reoperation, with 14 confirmed vascular diagnoses: compartment syndrome (n=7), RV thrombosis (n=3), RA thrombosis (n=1), RA and RV thromboses (n=2), and vascular steal (n=1). All were salvaged except the three RV thromboses. Two patients had no vascular abnormality at surgery. All 16 had markedly decreased color flow and varying abnormalities of PSV and waveforms. Outcomes of the remaining 31 cases were infarct (n=1), renal or iliac artery stenoses eventually requiring stents (n=4), and normalized (n=26). These 26 had elevated PSV with normal or near-normal color flow. Unpaired Student t tests showed no significant difference in PSV between patients requiring surgery or stents and those who normalized (p=0.34). CONCLUSION: Immediate postoperative sonography has a spectrum of vascular findings, of which markedly decreased color flow is most likely to benefit from immediate reoperation.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Rim/irrigação sanguínea , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia Doppler em Cores , Doenças Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Período Pós-Operatório , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Vasculares/cirurgia
17.
Radiographics ; 32(6): 1693-712, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23065165

RESUMO

Cesarean delivery is a commonly performed operation and accounts for nearly one-third of all births in the United States. Although it is a safe procedure, cesarean delivery has a variety of acute and chronic complications that prompt imaging with ultrasonography (US), computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Acute complications include hematomas in specific locations that are unique to the procedure, as well as a variety of infections. A bladder flap hematoma occurs in the space between the bladder and the lower uterine segment, whereas a subfascial hematoma is an extraperitoneal collection located in the prevesical space posterior to the rectus muscles and anterior to the peritoneum. Puerperal infections after cesarean delivery include abscesses, wound infections and dehiscence, uterine dehiscence and rupture, and pelvic thrombophlebitis. The prevalence of chronic complications related to the healed cesarean delivery scar is unknown, but the scar may result in technical limitations for pelvic US due to the adhesions between the anterior lower uterine segment and the anterior abdominal wall. The cesarean delivery scar also leaves the patient susceptible to several unique diagnoses. A cesarean scar "niche" is a tethering of the endometrium that can serve as a reservoir for intermenstrual blood and fluid. Intrauterine devices can be malpositioned in the cesarean delivery scar, and endometrial implants can develop in the abdominal wall years after surgery. These patients are also at increased risk for implantation abnormalities including cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, retained products of conception, and placenta accreta. Familiarity with the normal postoperative findings following cesarean delivery is necessary to recognize acute and chronic complications, which are being encountered with increasing frequency.


Assuntos
Cesárea , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Puerperais/diagnóstico , Adulto , Meios de Contraste , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez
18.
Ultrasound Q ; 38(4): 272-283, 2022 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35439236

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: As the treatment of ectopic pregnancy (EP) has shifted increasingly to medical therapies, the ultrasound (US) diagnosis of EP must necessarily favor specificity over sensitivity. Our review of peer learning cases of EP and early intrauterine pregnancies found several types of pitfalls and problems, which will be described in this essay. These issues include the following: differentiation of tubal EP from a corpus luteum by echogenicity relative to ovarian parenchyma, push technique, and claw sign; how to distinguish interstitial EP from eccentrically located intrauterine pregnancies (angular); use of trophoblastic flow in abnormal intrauterine locations to help identify cesarean scar or cervical implantations; recognition that hemoperitoneum without visualized EP may be due to EP or hemorrhagic cyst; and that distinguishing an abortion in progress from a pregnancy of unknown location may not always be possible and requires clinical follow-up. This essay will also illustrate the consensus terminology that our radiology department has developed in conjunction with our obstetrics and gynecology colleagues to communicate clear diagnoses and reduce the risk of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes.


Assuntos
Gravidez Ectópica , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez Ectópica/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia , Cicatriz , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ovário
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA