A meta-analysis of the impact of pharmacist interventions on clinical outcomes in patients with type-2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of pharmacist interventions in type-2 diabetes patients by collecting and evaluating literature. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across six databases, including CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, from January 2001 to January 2023. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical outcomes of pharmacist interventions on type-2 diabetes patients were searched, and data were extracted and analysed by RevMan version 5.4 software. RESULTS: A total of 35 studies involving 4827 patients were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated that pharmacist interventions had an influence on improving patients' HbA1c (MD=-0.70), LDL-C (MD=-5.51), SBP (MD=-4.58), DBP (MD=-1.90], BMI (MD=-0.47) and FBG (MD=-19.82), but there was no evidence from the study that pharmacist interventions could significantly improve HDL-C (MD=-0.61), TC (MD=-5.12) or TG (MD=-3.14). In addition, medication adherence was significantly improved. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist interventions significantly improved HbA1c, BP, and LDL-C control levels, BMI, and medication adherence in type-2 diabetes patients, but there was no evidence from this study that pharmacist interventions significantly improved HDL-C, TC, or TG. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Effective pharmacist interventions are important to improve type-2 diabetes patients' clinical outcomes.

Correlation between serum lipid levels and endocrine resistance in patients with ER-positive breast cancer.

Lipid metabolism may be involved in the development of endocrine drug resistance in ER-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between serum lipid levels, risk stratification of dyslipidemia, and endocrine resistance. We collected the data from 166 ER + breast cancer patients who received endocrine therapy (ET). 73 of 166 patients (44.0%)developed endocrine resistance. Univariate and multivariate COX regression were conducted to explore the potential factors affecting endocrine resistance in BC. The clinical T stage, mean serum lipid levels in ET progression-free-survival (total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein A, and triglycerides/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) were correlated with endocrine resistance (R = 0.214, P = .006; R = 0.268, P < .001; R = 0.182, P = .019;R = 0.197, P = .011; R = 0.211, P = .006; R = 0.159, P < .041). Clinical stage, triglycerides (TG) in endocrine therapy progression-free-survival (ePFS) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in ePFS were independent predictors of endocrine resistance (P < .05; OR = 1.406, CI 1.108-1.783, P < .05; OR = 1.309, CI 1.026-1.669, P < .05, respectively). Moreover, in clinical stage III, the ePFS was worse in patients with in the high-risk and extremely high-risk group the median ePFS time was 8.0 months (95% CI: 1.140-14.860, P < .05). Clinical stage, TG in ePFS and LDL-C in ePFS may act as a new predictive biomarker for endocrine resistance in BC. The lipid levels of BC patients should be closely monitored throughout the treatment process, and patients with dyslipidemia should receive treatment immediately.

Is Alpelisib Plus Fulvestrant Cost-Effective for Treating PIK3CA-Mutation, HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer in the USA?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is a considerable survival benefit of alpelisib in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (HR+/HER2- ABC), yet the financial burden may limit its use. Therefore, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of alpelisib plus fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+/HER2- ABC in the USA. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to simulate the progression of PIK3CA-mutated, HR+/HER2- ABC. Efficacy and safety data were derived from the SOLAR-1 trial. A parametric survival model was used to explore the long-term effect. From a US payer perspective, only direct medical costs were considered. The cost data were estimated based on local pricing and relevant literature. The health outcomes were expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Model stability was assessed using one-way sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore cost-effectiveness outcomes for patients with different clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The QALY increased by 0.28 with alpelisib plus fulvestrant with an additional cost of $94,345.87 compared with placebo plus fulvestrant, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $340,153.30/QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the model is most sensitive to the price of alpelisib. At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000/QALY, alpelisib plus fulvestrant was cost effective when the cost of alpelisib was less than $71 per 300 mg (36.5 % of the original price), whereas this cost would be less than $168 per 300 mg (86.5 % of the original price) at a WTP threshold of $300,000/QALY. In addition, alpelisib + fulvestrant was not cost effective in all subgroups compared with placebo + fulvestrant at the WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY. In contrast, at the WTP threshold of $300,000/QALY, alpelisib + fulvestrant was cost effective in nearly all subgroups except for endocrine-sensitive patients. CONCLUSION: At current drug prices, alpelisib plus fulvestrant is not cost effective for patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+/HER2- ABC from a US payer perspective. Given the considerable progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits observed with alpelisib in this setting, further discussion and negotiation of the price of alpelisib are warranted to provide more favorable economic outcomes and thereby increase the value of the alpelisib plus fulvestrant regimen in patients.