Acute myeloid leukemia with complex cytogenetic abnormalities associated with long-term use of oral colloidal silver as nutritional supplement - Case report and review of literature.

We report a case of acute myeloid leukemia with complex cytogenetic abnormalities suggestive of preexisting myelodysplastic syndrome in a patient with habitual ingestion of colloidal silver as nutritional supplement for over 10 years and the medical literature is reviewed.

Spontaneous hematoma of the thigh associated with antiproteinase-3 antibody in a patient with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab.

We report an unusual case of spontaneous intramuscular hematoma associated with antiproteinase 3 antibody in a patient with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab and the medical literature is reviewed.

Successful use of uridine triacetate (Vistogard) three weeks after capecitabine in a patient with homozygous dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutation: A case report and review of the literature.

5-fluorouracil and capecitabine are chemotherapeutic agents commonly used to treat solid malignancies. Increased susceptibility to 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine, caused by impaired clearance, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency, or other genetic mutations in the enzymes that metabolize 5-fluorouracil can lead to severe life-threatening toxicities and are typically manifested by an early onset of symptoms. We report and discuss the management and outcome of capecitabine toxicity with the recently FDA approved antidote, uridine triacetate (Vistogard), in a 57-year-old female breast cancer patient with homozygous dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency who received treatment beyond the recommended 96 h window from the last dose of capecitabine.

A case of recurrent pancytopenia in a patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia on maintenance chemotherapy and concomitant methyltetrahydrofolate reductase and thiopurine S-methyltransferase mutation - review of literature.

Pharmacogenetics is a study of how genetic variation of an individual affects the drug response. We report a case of recurrent pancytopenia resulting from maintenance chemotherapy in a patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia and two pharmacogenetic mutations, namely, methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T homozygous mutation and thiopurine methyltransferase mutation.

Phase II randomized trial of a non-steroidal mouth wash for prevention and treatment of stomatitis in women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer treated with everolimus.

BACKGROUND: Stomatitis is a frequent dose limiting toxicity of everolimus, an approved therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer. No randomized trials of a prophylactic measure to prevent mucositis have been reported. METHODS: We conducted a phase II, open-label trial in which patients with metastatic breast cancer starting everolimus were randomized to best supportive care (BSC) versus prophylactic use of an oral mucoadhesive, non-steroid containing mouth wash. The primary endpoint was rate of any grade stomatitis as reported by the treating physicians. Secondary endpoints were severity of stomatitis according to the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS) and rates of everolimus dose reduction or discontinuation due to mucositis. RESULTS: Of 61 evaluable patients, 32 were randomized to and treated with oral mucoadhesive and 29 with BSC. Any grade stomatitis developed in 46.9% (15/32) of study arm and 65.5% (19/29) of BSC arm patients (p = 0.14). The difference between the two arms was significantly in favor of the mucoadhesive arm when mucositis was scored according to the OMAS with average score of 0.3 in study arm versus 0.5 in the control arm (p = 0.03). There were fewer dose adjustments or therapy discontinuations in the study arm compared with BSC (16% versus 31%, respectively) but the difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Here we provide early evidence from the first randomized trial supporting the use of oral prophylactic mucoadhesive for everolimus-associated stomatitis. A trial comparing prophylactic oral mucoadhesive to steroid mouth wash may be warranted.

Phase Ib/II single-arm trial evaluating the combination of everolimus, lapatinib and capecitabine for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases (TRIO-US B-09).

BACKGROUND: Improving outcomes for patients with human epidermal growth factor 2-positive (HER2+) central nervous system (CNS) metastases remains an unmet clinical need. This trial evaluated a novel combination of everolimus, lapatinib and capecitabine for this disease. METHODS: Patients with trastuzumab-pretreated, HER2+ breast cancer brain metastasis without prior therapy with a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor were eligible. Patients received lapatinib and everolimus daily (continuously) and capecitabine twice daily (d1-14) in 21-d cycles. The primary endpoint was the 12-week CNS objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), best CNS ORR and extra-CNS ORR. RESULTS: A total of 19 participants were enrolled and treated with ⩾1 dose of the study drug. The median age was 58.5 years, the median number of therapies for metastatic breast cancer was 2.5 (0-11). Pretrial, 74% of participants had received prior lapatinib, capecitabine or both. A total of 63% had received previous CNS radiation or surgical resection and CNS radiation. The maximum tolerated doses were lapatinib at 1000 mg, everolimus at 10 mg, and capecitabine at 1000 mg/m2. Phase II proceeded with capecitabine at 750 mg/m2 due to better tolerability. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were mucositis (16%), diarrhea, fatigue, and hypokalemia (11% each). Of 11 participants evaluable for 12-week CNS ORR, 3 (27%) had partial response and 7 (64%) had stable disease. The best CNS ORR in eligible participants was 28% (5/18). The median PFS and OS were 6.2 and 24.2 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This novel triplet combination of lapatinib, everolimus, and capecitabine is well tolerated and yielded a 27% response rate in the CNS at 12 weeks in heavily pretreated participants. Larger studies are warranted to further evaluate this regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01783756. Registered 05 February 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01783756.

Randomized phase II study of fulvestrant and erlotinib compared with erlotinib alone in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This open-label, randomized phase II trial evaluated antitumor efficacy of an antiestrogen, fulvestrant, in combination with human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, erlotinib, in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, ECOG 0-2, previous chemotherapy unless patient refusal, and no prior EGFR-directed therapy were randomized 2:1 to erlotinib 150 mg oral daily plus 500 mg intramuscular fulvestrant on day 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter or erlotinib alone 150 mg oral daily. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 106 randomized patients, 100 received at least one dose of study drug. ORR was 16.4% (11 of 67 patients) for the combination versus 12.1% (4 of 33 patients) for erlotinib (p = 0.77). PFS median 3.5 versus 1.9 months [HR = 0.86, 95% CI (0.52-1.43), p = 0.29] and OS median 9.5 versus 5.8 months [HR = 0.92, 95% CI (0.57-1.48), p = 0.74] numerically favored the combination. In an unplanned subset analysis, among EGFR wild type patients (n = 51), but not EGFR mutant patients (n = 17), median PFS was 3.5 versus 1.7 months [HR = 0.35, 95% CI (0.14-0.86), p = 0.02] and OS was 6.2 versus 5.2 months [HR = 0.72, 95% CI (0.35-1.48), p = 0.37] for combined therapy versus erlotinib, respectively. Notably, EGFR WT patients were more likely to be hormone receptor-positive (either estrogen receptor α- and/or progesterone receptor-positive) compared to EGFR mutant patients (50% versus 9.1%, respectively) (p = 0.03). Treatment was well tolerated with predominant grade 1-2 dermatologic and gastrointestinal adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Addition of fulvestrant to erlotinib was well tolerated, with increased activity noted among EGFR wild type patients compared to erlotinib alone, albeit in an unplanned subset analysis.

Panitumumab with irinotecan/leucovorin/5-fluorouracil for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor and is indicated for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have experienced disease progression after standard chemotherapy. We conducted this phase II study to assess the ability of panitumumab to be administered with first-line irinotecan-containing regimens in patients with mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a 2-part multicenter study of panitumumab 2.5 mg/kg weekly with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin. Part 1 used bolus 5-FU (IFL), and part 2 used infusional 5-FU (FOLFIRI). Tolerability (measured by grade 3/4 diarrhea) was the primary endpoint. Objective response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety were also examined. RESULTS: Nineteen patients in part 1 and 24 patients in part 2 received panitumumab plus chemotherapy. Grade 3/4 diarrhea occurred in 11 patients (58%) in part 1 and 6 patients (25%) in part 2. All patients had a skin-related toxicity (no grade 4 events). Objective response rates were 46% in part 1 and 42% in part 2. Disease control rates were 74% in part 1 and 79% in part 2. Median progression-free survival (95% confidence interval) was 5.6 months (4.4-8.3 months) for part 1 and 10.9 months (7.7-22.5 months) for part 2. Median overall survival (95% confidence interval) was 17 months (13.7 months to not estimable) for part 1 and 22.5 months (14.4 months to not estimable) for part 2. CONCLUSION: In patients with mCRC, panitumumab/IFL was not well tolerated. Panitumumab/FOLFIRI was well tolerated, showed promising activity, and is undergoing further investigation.

A phase II trial of docetaxel with bevacizumab as first-line therapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (TORI B01).

INTRODUCTION: Addition of the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab to paclitaxel significantly improves response rates and progression-free survival for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). To assess the activity of docetaxel plus bevacizumab, a multicenter phase II trial was conducted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable first-line HER2/neu-negative MBC were eligible. This trial began as a 2-arm study with a docetaxel-alone arm. When bevacizumab became widely available, it was converted to a 1-arm open-label trial of docetaxel/bevacizumab. Patients enrolled in the docetaxel-alone arm were permitted to cross over to docetaxel/bevacizumab. Patients received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 intravenously (I.V.) every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. RESULTS: From March 2005 to September 2006, 76 patients were enrolled. Of the 7 patients who were randomized to docetaxel alone, 6 crossed over to docetaxel/bevacizumab (included in the safety analysis only). Two patients were found to be ineligible before receiving drug. Efficacy data are based on the 67 patients who were originally enrolled in the docetaxel/bevacizumab arm and received at least 1 dose of study medication. The confirmed objective response rate is 51% (34 of 67) with 9% complete responses (6 of 67) and 42% partial responses (28 of 67). Nine additional patients (13%) had stable disease lasting >or= 6 months. With a median follow-up of 21.7 months, the median time to progression is 9.3 months, and median overall survival is 26.3 months. Common grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (33%), leukopenia/lymphopenia (25%), fatigue (22%), infection (17%), pain (16%), and hypertension (9%). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel/bevacizumab was generally well tolerated with manageable toxicity and promising efficacy results.

Randomized comparison of every-2-week darbepoetin alfa and weekly epoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia: the 20030125 Study Group Trial.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced anemia is widely treated in the United States with darbepoetin alfa (DA) or epoetin alfa (EA). This noninferiority study systematically compares efficacy and safety of DA and EA using common doses and schedules used in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients had a diagnosis of nonmyeloid malignancy with > or = 8 weeks of planned chemotherapy, age >or = 18 years, and anemia (hemoglobin < or = 11 g/dL). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to DA 200 microg every two weeks (Q2W) or EA 40,000 units every week (QW) for up to 16 weeks with identical dose adjustment rules. Efficacy was assessed by the incidence of RBC transfusion (Kaplan-Meier estimate). The definition of noninferiority was that the upper 95% CI limit of the observed difference in RBC transfusions between groups was less than 11.5%; this noninferiority margin was based on the treatment effect observed in placebo-controlled EA studies. RESULTS: Of 1,220 patients randomly assigned, 1,209 received > or = one dose of the study drug. Common tumor types were lung (26%), breast (21%), and gastrointestinal (18%). Transfusion incidence from week 5 to the end of the treatment phase (the primary end point) was 21% in the DA group and 16% in the EA group; noninferiority was concluded because the upper 95% CI limit of the difference between groups (10.8%) was below the prespecified noninferiority margin. Sensitivity analyses using alternate statistical methods and analysis sets yielded similar results. Hemoglobin, quality of life, and safety end points further support equivalency of the erythropoietic therapies. CONCLUSION: This large, phase III study demonstrates comparable efficacy of DA Q2W and EA QW. Less frequent dosing offers potential benefits for patients, caregivers and health care providers.