[Pathological changes of rectal cancer after irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil or combined short-term radiotherapy].

OBJECTIVE: To observe and evaluate the pathologic changes and curative effects of irinotecan (CPT-11), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and combined short-term radiotherapy before low-set rectal cancer operation so as to provide a theoretic basis for formulating a new effective adjuvant therapeutic regimen. METHODS: A total of 41 patients of low rectal cancer were treated with CPT-11, 5-FU therapy or CPT-11 plus 5-FU combined short-term radiotherapy from April 2002 to April 2009. They were divided into 2 groups according to different treatment schemes, including irinotecan group (n = 18) and irinotecan combined short-term radiotherapy group (n = 23). The pathologic changes before and after treatment were observed and the differences of two treatment approaches compared. RESULTS: Tumor cells had different degrees of degeneration and necrosis under microscope in two groups. Compared with computed tomographic findings before therapy, tumor sizes of two groups were reduced by an average of 33.1% (13.5 mm vs 20.2 mm) and 34.4% (12.8 mm vs 19.5 mm) respectively. Two groups were graded according to the RCRG (rectal cancer regression grade) score: RCRG1: 7 cases vs 18 cases, RCRG2: 4 cases vs 3 cases and RCRG3: 7 cases vs 2 cases. According to the pathologic evaluation standard, 3-degree necrosis, cell interstitial fibrosis and intimal thickening in vessels were observed in two groups: 7 cases vs 17 cases, 6 cases vs 17 cases and 3 cases vs 14 cases respectively (all P < 0.05). Five patients achieved complete pathological remission in the irinotecan combined short-term radiotherapy group. CONCLUSION: Based on the pathological changes and mitigation results after treatment, CPT-11 and 5-FU may be used as neoadjuvant drugs for rectal cancer. If the above two drugs can be used in combination with short-term radiation, the curative effect will be better.

[Relationship of c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha gene mutation features with prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha(PDGFRA) gene mutation features and the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST). METHODS: Clinicopathological, genetic testing and follow-up informations of patients admitted to the Shanxi Tumor Hospital from June 2000 to January 2009 were collected. The survival was calculated and univariate analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was conducted by the Cox regression method. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 61.5% and the 5-year overall survival rate was 67.4%. The 5-year disease-free survival rates of patients without disease among those with c-kit exon 11 mutation (n=77), c-kit exon 9 mutation(n=4), and PDGFRA exon 18 mutation (n=2) were 63.4%, 14.3% and 100%, and the 5-year overall survival rates were 70.8%, 50.0% and 100%, respectively. In the patients with c-kit exon 11 mutation, the 5-year disease-free survival rates among those with point mutations(n=26), deletion mutations(n=44), and duplication mutations(n=7) were 87.1%, 44.9% and 80.0%, and the 5-year overall survival rates were 88.1%, 57.0% and 100%, respectively. There were significant differences in overall survival among different factors. Multivariate analysis showed that gene mutation was not the independent factor of prognosis(P=0.492). CONCLUSIONS: In GIST patients undergoing surgery without imatinib treatment, mutated genotype is better than wild type in terms of prognosis. Gene mutation is not the independent factor of prognosis in GIST patients.

Antibody persistence at 18-20 months of age and safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of a combined DTaP-IPV//PRP∼T vaccine compared to separate vaccines (DTaP, PRP∼T and IPV) following primary vaccination of healthy infants in the People's Republic of China.

This study assessed the antibody persistence, and the immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of a DTaP-IPV//PRP∼T (Pentaxim®, Sanofi Pasteur's AcXim family) combined vaccine and of standalone vaccines one year after primary vaccination in the People's Republic of China. Participants (N=719) previously primed with DTaP-IPV//PRP∼T at 2, 3, 4 months (Group A, N=255), 3, 4, 5 months (Group B, N=233), or DTaP (Wuhan Institute of Biological Products), PRP-T (Act-Hib®) and IPV (Imovax® Polio) at 3, 4, 5 months (Group C, N=231) received boosters of the same vaccines at 18-20 months of age. Seroprotection (SP) and seroconversion (SC) were determined before and 1 month after the booster. Safety was monitored from parental reports. In all groups 87.6-100% of participants had pre-booster protective anti-PRP, -diphtheria, -tetanus and -poliovirus antibody titers; post-booster, all SP rates were 100% and SC was ≥ 80.4% for anti-pertussis titers ≥ 4-fold increase. Reactogenicity was low for each group. These data support the use of the DTaP-IPV//PRP∼T vaccine in the People's Republic of China compared to separate DTaP, IPV, and PRP∼T administration in terms of both safety and immunogenicity.

[Immunogenicity and safety of DTaP-IPV//PRP-T combined vaccine in infants in China].

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the immunogenicity and safety of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (acellular, component), poliomyelitis (inactivated) vaccine (adsorbed) and Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (DTaP-IPV//PRP-T) combined vaccine compared with commercially available DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), tetanus conjugate and IPV monovalent vaccine. METHODS: Subjects were randomly divided into three groups, Group A and Group B were DTaP-IPV//PRP-T combined vaccine (PENTAXIM(TM)) vaccinated at 2, 3, 4 months of age or 3, 4, 5 months of age respectively; Group C was commercially available DTaP. Hib tetanus conjugate (Act-HIB(TM)) and IPV (IMOVAX PolioTM(TM)) vaccines vaccinated at 3, 4, 5 months of age. All groups received booster dose at 18 to 20 months of age, with antibody titers tested. Non-inferiority analysis was demonstrated in terms of seroprotection/seroconversion rates between Group A, Group B respectively and Group C. Safety information was collected after each vaccination to assess the safety of investigational vaccines. RESULTS: The non-inferiority of DTaP-IPV//PRP-T combined vaccine vaccinated at 2, 3, 4 or 3, 4, 5 months of age versus DTaP, Hib tetanus conjugate and IPV vaccine was demonstrated for all vaccine antigens in both primary and booster phases in terms of seroprotection/seroconversion rates. DTaP-IPV//PRP-T combined vaccine was well tolerated. The rate of solicited/unsolicited severe adverse reactions was very low and similar to the control vaccines. CONCLUSION: DTaP-IPV//PRP-T combined vaccine was highly immunogenic with good safety profile in Chinese infants, which was comparable to the commercially available control vaccines.

Immunogenicity and safety of a pentavalent acellular pertussis combined vaccine including diphtheria, tetanus, inactivated poliovirus and conjugated Haemophilus Influenzae type b polysaccharide for primary vaccination at 2, 3, 4 or 3, 4, 5 months of age in infants in China.

The aim was to demonstrate the immunogenicity and safety of a DTaP-IPV//PRP-T combined vaccine (Pentaxim(®)) compared to individual vaccines in infants in the People's Republic of China. Infants (N=792) were randomly assigned to receive DTaP-IPV//PRP-T at 2, 3 and 4 months of age (Group A) or 3, 4 and 5 months of age (Group B), or DTaP (Wuhan Institute of Biological Products), PRP-T (Act-Hib(®)) and IPV (Imovax(®) Polio) at 3, 4 and 5 months of age (Group C). Antibody titers were measured pre- and 1 month after the third vaccination; non-inferiority analyses were performed for seroprotection/seroconversion (SP/SC) rates. Safety was assessed 1 month after the primary series. SP/SC rates for the DTaP-IPV//PRP-T vaccine were high and non-inferior to the controls. Reactogenicity was low for each group and no hypotonic hyporesponsive episode or seizure was reported. In conclusion, the DTaP-IPV//PRP-T vaccine was highly immunogenic, non-inferior to the commercially available control vaccines and had a good safety profile for both primary administration schedules.