RESUMO
The 8p23.1 duplication syndrome (8p23.1 DS) is a recurrent genomic condition with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 58,000. The core 3.68 Mb duplication contains 32 genes of which five are currently candidates for the phenotypic features. Here we describe four patients and five families with eight microduplications of 8p23.1 ranging from 187 to 1082 kb in size and one atypical duplication of 4 Mb. These indicate that a minimal region of overlap (MRO) in medial 8p23.1 can give rise to features of 8p23.1 DS including developmental delay, dysmorphism, macrocephaly and otitis media, but not congenital heart disease (CHD). This MRO spans 776 kb (chr8:10,167,881-10,943,836 hg19) and contains SOX7 and seven of the other 32 core 8p23.1 DS genes. In centromeric 8p23.1, microduplications including GATA4 can give rise to non-syndromic CHD but the clinical significance of two smaller centromeric microduplications without GATA4 was uncertain due to severe neurological profiles not usually found in 8p23.1 DS. The clinical significance of three further 8p23.1 microduplications was uncertain due to additional genetic factors without which the probands might not have come to medical attention. Variable expressivity was indicated by the almost entirely unaffected parents in all five families and the mildly affected sibling in one. Intronic interruptions of six genes by microduplication breakpoint intervals had no apparent additional clinical consequences. Our results suggest that 8p23.1 DS is an oligogenetic condition largely caused by the duplication and interactions of the SOX7 and GATA4 transcription factors.
Assuntos
Anormalidades Múltiplas/genética , Cromossomos Humanos Par 8/genética , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/genética , Duplicação Gênica/genética , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Deleção Cromossômica , Feminino , Fator de Transcrição GATA4/genética , Cardiopatias Congênitas/genética , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , SíndromeRESUMO
We report a case of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) M1 showing a 48,XY,+13,+13 karyotype. Treatment was according to the Medical Research Council AML14 trial protocol with two courses of DAT chemotherapy. Postchemotherapy bone marrow examination failed to show complete remission or cytogenetic normalization. Despite having resistant disease, the patient initially remained clinically well although requiring regular blood transfusions for anemia. However his leukocyte count gradually increased and he became symptomatic. He was treated subsequently with FLAG but died approximately 2 weeks later, 6 months after first presenting. Tetrasomy 13 as the sole cytogenetic abnormality has not been reported previously in M1 AML and has only been reported in three other AML cases, all with an immature phenotype and poor outcome.
Assuntos
Aneuploidia , Cromossomos Humanos Par 13 , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Citarabina/administração & dosagem , Daunorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Evolução Fatal , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tioguanina/administração & dosagem , Vidarabina/administração & dosagem , Vidarabina/análogos & derivadosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have potential for promoting vascular repair and revascularization of ischemic retina. However, the highly heterogeneous nature of these cells causes confusion when assessing their biological functions. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive comparison between the two main EPC subtypes, early EPCs (eEPCs) and outgrowth endothelial cells (OECs), and to establish the potential of OECs as a novel cell therapy for ischemic retinopathy. METHODS: Two types of human blood-derived EPCs were isolated and compared using immunophenotyping and multiple in vitro functional assays to assess interaction with retinal capillary endothelial cells and angiogenic activity. OECs were delivered intravitreally in a mouse model of ischemic retinopathy, and flat mounted retinas were examined using confocal microscopy. RESULTS: These data indicate that eEPCs are hematopoietic cells with minimal proliferative capacity that lack tube-forming capacity. By contrast, OECs are committed to an endothelial lineage and have significant proliferative and de novo tubulogenic potential. Furthermore, only OECs are able to closely interact with endothelial cells through adherens and tight junctions and to integrate into retinal vascular networks in vitro. The authors subsequently chose OECs to test a novel cell therapy approach for ischemic retinopathy. Using a murine model of retinal ischemia, they demonstrated that OECs directly incorporate into the resident vasculature, significantly decreasing avascular areas, concomitantly increasing normovascular areas, and preventing pathologic preretinal neovascularization. CONCLUSIONS: As a distinct EPC population, OECs have potential as therapeutic cells to vascularize the ischemic retina.