The cementless taper wedge vs. fit-and-fill stem in primary total hip arthroplasty: risk of stem-related complication differs across Dorr types.

INTRODUCTION: The choice between a cementless taper wedge stem and a fit-and-fill stem in total Hip arthroplasty (THA) for various proximal femoral morphological types has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study aimed to compare the risk of stem-related complications between these two stem types in Dorr type A, B, and C femurs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2015 through April 2021, we retrospectively reviewed 1995 cementless THA procedures. We stratified all procedures into three groups: Dorr type A (N = 360, 18.0%), B (N = 1489, 74.7%) and C (N = 146, 7.3%). The primary outcome domain was stem-related complications, including stem subsidence ≥ 3 mm, intraoperative fracture, periprosthetic fracture and aseptic stem loosening. We performed multivariate regression analysis to compare the risk of stem-related complication between the two stem types. Other factors included age, sex, body mass index, diagnosis, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, stem alignment and canal fill ratio. RESULTS: The incidence of stem-related complications in the taper wedge and fit-and-fill stem groups was 4.4% (N = 15) and 6.5% (N = 107), respectively. Fit-and-fill stems showed an increased risk of stem-related complications (aOR: 9.903, 95% CI: 1.567-62.597) only in Dorr type C femurs. No significant difference in risk was observed in Dorr type A and B femurs. Furthermore, the canal fill ratio at the lesser trochanter, 2 cm and 7 cm below the lesser trochanter, did not exhibit an association with stem-related complications in any Dorr type. CONCLUSIONS: Concerning the risk of stem-related complications, the taper wedge stem was a better choice in Dorr type C femurs. However, there was no difference in risk between the taper wedge stem and fit-and-fill stem in Dorr type A and B femurs.

Leg length discrepancy risk differs between fit-and-fill and taper wedge stems across Dorr types.

INTRODUCTION: The comparison between the cementless taper wedge stem and fit-and-fill stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for various proximal femoral morphological types has not been thoroughly assessed. This study aimed to compare the risk of leg length discrepancy (LLD) ≥ 10 mm between these two stem types in Dorr type A, B, and C femurs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2015 through April 2021, we analyzed 1178 unilateral primary cementless THA procedures. We categorized all procedures into three groups: Dorr type A (N = 220, 18.7%), B (N = 875, 74.3%), and C (N = 83, 7.0%). Within each Dorr type, we compared the incidence and risk of postoperative LLD ≥ 10 mm between the two stem types. The factors considered in the multivariate regression analyses included stem type, age, sex, body mass index, diagnosis, canal flare index, femoral cortical index and stem alignment. RESULTS: The taper wedge stem group had a higher overall incidence of LLD ≥ 10 mm (12.8% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.012) and in Dorr type A femurs (22.2% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.014), compared with the fit-and-fill stem group. In multivariate analysis, the taper wedge stem exhibited an increased risk of LLD ≥ 10 mm only in Dorr type A femurs (aOR: 3.449, 95% CI: 1.325-8.794). The incidence and risk of LLD ≥ 10 mm were not different between the two stems in Dorr type B and C femurs. CONCLUSIONS: The taper wedge stem demonstrated an elevated risk of LLD ≥ 10 mm in Dorr type A femurs compared with the fit-and-fill stem, necessitating meticulous preoperative templating and intraoperative femoral canal preparation.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Structural Allograft in Medial Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Patients With and Without a Lateral Hinge Fracture.

Background: A lateral hinge fracture is a common complication in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) and is associated with delayed union or nonunion. A comparison of outcomes between patients with or without a lateral hinge fracture after MOWHTO with a structural allograft has not been investigated. Purpose: To validate the outcomes of MOWHTO with a structural allograft, especially in the presence of a lateral hinge fracture. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We conducted a single-surgeon cohort study at a tertiary referral hospital between April 2017 and August 2022 and included patients who had undergone MOWHTO with a structural allograft for isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis with genu varum. We compared the incidence of delayed union or nonunion events and functional scores between patients with a lateral hinge fracture and those without using the Fisher exact test and independent t test. Results: A total of 88 MOWHTO procedures (77 patients) were analyzed. The overall incidence of lateral hinge fractures was 29.5% (n = 26), including type I (n = 20 [22.7%]) and type II (n = 6 [6.8%]). Notably, 42.3% (n = 11) of these fractures had not been detected intraoperatively but during the follow-up visits. The overall Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Score-Function (KSS-F), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were 90.0 ± 10.0, 93.4 ± 10.8, and 93.8 ± 7.1 points, respectively. None of the patients had delayed union or nonunion, and none underwent a reoperation because of bony union problems. The functional scores (KSS, KSS-F, and WOMAC) were not different between patients who had a lateral hinge fracture and those who did not (P > .05). Conclusion: The routine use of a structural allograft was associated with satisfactory outcomes after MOWHTO, regardless of whether there was a lateral hinge fracture.