The timing and duration of depressive symptoms from adolescence to young adulthood and young adults' NEET status: the role of educational attainment.

PURPOSE: Depressive symptoms are negatively associated with labour market outcomes but whether the timing and duration of depressive symptoms or educational attainment (EA) affect NEET (Neither in Employment, Education, nor Training) is unknown. Therefore, this study aims to examine the effects of timing and duration of depressive symptoms in adolescence and the moderating and mediating role of EA on NEET in young adulthood. METHODS: Data were used from 1512 participants in the Vestliv Study, a Danish prospective cohort study. Depressive symptoms were measured at age 14, 18 and 21. EA at age 21 and NEET at age 23 were derived from national registers. Logistic regression analyses and a 4-way decomposition approach were applied. RESULTS: Among boys, depressive symptoms at ages 14 and 21 increased the risk of NEET (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.00-2.74 and OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.37-3.53). Among girls, this regarded depressive symptoms at ages 18 and 21 (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.26-2.46 and OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.13-2.22). For the duration of depressive symptoms, among boys any depressive symptoms increased the risk of NEET. Among girls, only persistent depressive symptoms increased the risk of NEET. EA did not mediate or moderate the association between depressive symptoms and NEET. CONCLUSION: The timing and duration of depressive symptoms in adolescence matter for the association with NEET in young adulthood, with a double burden for those with both depressive symptoms and low EA. The results emphasize the importance of support for those who experience depressive symptoms in the school-to-work transition.

Cognitive impairments and recovery in patients with work-related stress complaints - four years later.

Patients on sick leave due to work-related stress often present with cognitive complaints. The primary aim of this prospective cohort study was to examine potential long-term consequences of previous ongoing work-related stress in terms of cognitive functioning four years after initial professional care seeking. We tested a group of patients with work-related stress complaints with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery. Patients were examined at a department of occupational medicine and tested at baseline, one-year follow-up and four-year follow-up. At each time point, we compared the performance of patients with healthy controls matched pairwise on sex, age and length of education. This paper presents the results from the four-year follow-up. Patients improved on their neuropsychological test performance during the four years but the main improvements took place during the first year. At baseline, the main impairments in the patient group concerned executive function and mental speed. At four-year follow-up, patients displayed slightly lower scores on the neuropsychological tests relative to controls but only the difference on immediate memory was significant corresponding to a small effect size (Cohen's d). More than half of the patients who participated in the four-year follow-up reported that they felt only slightly or partially recovered. The level of work participation among the former patients improved considerably during the four-year follow-up period.Lay SummaryThis study examines the long-term consequences of work-related stress in terms of cognitive functioning and recovery four years after initial professional care seeking. After four years, patients continued to display significantly lower memory scores than controls but no other significant differences between the groups were found on neuropsychological tests. Levels of work participation among patients improved considerably over time, yet, more than half of the former patients who participated in the four-year follow-up did not feel completely recovered.

Computer work and self-reported variables on anthropometrics, computer usage, work ability, productivity, pain, and physical activity.

BACKGROUND: Computer users often report musculoskeletal complaints and pain in the upper extremities and the neck-shoulder region. However, recent epidemiological studies do not report a relationship between the extent of computer use and work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD).The aim of this study was to conduct an explorative analysis on short and long-term pain complaints and work-related variables in a cohort of Danish computer users. METHODS: A structured web-based questionnaire including questions related to musculoskeletal pain, anthropometrics, work-related variables, work ability, productivity, health-related parameters, lifestyle variables as well as physical activity during leisure time was designed. Six hundred and ninety office workers completed the questionnaire responding to an announcement posted in a union magazine. The questionnaire outcomes, i.e., pain intensity, duration and locations as well as anthropometrics, work-related variables, work ability, productivity, and level of physical activity, were stratified by gender and correlations were obtained. RESULTS: Women reported higher pain intensity, longer pain duration as well as more locations with pain than men (P < 0.05). In parallel, women scored poorer work ability and ability to fulfil the requirements on productivity than men (P < 0.05). Strong positive correlations were found between pain intensity and pain duration for the forearm, elbow, neck and shoulder (P < 0.001). Moderate negative correlations were seen between pain intensity and work ability/productivity (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present results provide new key information on pain characteristics in office workers. The differences in pain characteristics, i.e., higher intensity, longer duration and more pain locations as well as poorer work ability reported by women workers relate to their higher risk of contracting WMSD. Overall, this investigation confirmed the complex interplay between anthropometrics, work ability, productivity, and pain perception among computer users.

How do people with chronic pain explain their use, or non-use, of pain-related healthcare services? A qualitative study of patient experiences.

PURPOSE: This study aims to explore how people with chronic pain explain their use or non-use of pain-related healthcare services and their expectations of the healthcare provider, and explore how explanations and expectations vary between different levels of pain-related healthcare use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted 20 individual semi-structured interviews with purposely sampled adults between 39 and 77 years of age with chronic pain. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using a thematical template analysis approach. RESULTS: Four key drivers for pain-related healthcare use were identified: (1) the healthcare system facilitates clinical pathways, (2) appraisal of pain-related healthcare initiatives influences future use, (3) autonomy, beliefs and values determine healthcare behaviour, and (4) recommendations from others impact healthcare behaviour. Comparing explanations across different pain-related healthcare user groups (high, medium and low) showed that perceived needs, beliefs and values, and appraisal of previous healthcare experiences differed between these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Beliefs, pain characteristics, recommendations, and the search for a diagnostic label, often initiate pain-related healthcare use. Healthcare is modified by two interconnected systems: (1) perceived needs, beliefs and values and (2) previous healthcare experiences. Differences related to these systems could explain some of the variance in pain-related healthcare use.Implications for RehabilitationDifferent use of pain-related healthcare services for people with chronic pain could be related to differences in perceived needs, beliefs and values and appraisal of previous healthcare.It may be helpful to explore the perceived needs and beliefs of those seeking healthcare due to chronic pain.Previous healthcare experiences may impact and should be explored.