Discordance of Penta D x.4 microvariant alleles results between three capillary electrophoresis and one massively parallel sequencing short tandem repeat kits.

Forensic Biology is contingent upon matching DNA profiles between a crime sample and a reference sample. There are several capillary electrophoresis kits available to generate a short tandem repeat (STR) profile from DNA samples, while newer methods using massively parallel sequencing are slowly being implemented in forensic laboratories worldwide. During evaluation of a newer capillary electrophoresis kit, Applied Biosystems™ VeriFiler™ Plus, a discordance was observed in the Penta D locus. The previous kit, Promega PowerPlex 21® System produced a 13.4,14 genotype, whilst VeriFiler™ Plus produced a 14,14 genotype. An expanded investigation into Penta D microvariant alleles revealed that multiple discordances were observed for DNA profiles containing larger x.4 variants. There was full concordance between PowerPlex® 21 and QIAGEN Investigator® 26plex, however discordances were observed between VeriFiler™ Plus and the other three kits tested, including the massively parallel sequencing kit, Verogen ForenSeq® MainstAY. Notably, four of these discordances resulted in null alleles with the VeriFiler™ Plus kit. A review of the Penta D DNA sequences in MainstAY revealed fully concordant microvariant alleles involved deletions within the repeat region, whilst variability in the discordances observed were dependent on the location of the variation outside the repeat region and the analysis method used. Variations observed within the 5' flanking region produced the same allele designation across all capillary electrophoresis kits. However, deletions within the 3' region either produced a null allele for VeriFiler™ Plus where the deletion is thought to overlap the primer binding site, or microvariant alleles for the PowerPlex® 21 and Investigator 26plex kits, which produced longer Penta D amplicons. The discovery of these variations in the Penta D flanking sequences is informative as it increases the awareness of Penta D discordances between different kit chemistries in nominated reference DNA profile comparisons and DNA database searching and matching alike, and provides support for this phenomenon when providing evidence as to the admissibility of such results in trial proceedings.

Interpretation and reporting considerations of low-level DNA profiles following MinElute® purification of PowerPlex® 21 amplified products.

The generation of high-quality DNA profiles from trace amounts of DNA continues to be an issue in forensic casework. Several methods have been proposed over the years to increase recovery rates for low input DNA, including purification of PCR products, an increase in PCR cycle numbers and increasing injection time or voltage during electrophoresis. In this study, the characteristics of DNA profiles generated using QIAGEN MinElute® purification of Promega PowerPlex® 21 amplified products for low DNA input samples, ranging from 80 pg down to 4 pg, were evaluated. MinElute® purification was found to be a simple, effective and time efficient method, which can greatly improve the resolution of amplified PCR products, recovering 100% of donor concordant alleles from as little 16 pg of input template DNA and generating sufficient allelic information for interpretation from as low as 4 pg inputs. However, as is commonly observed with low template DNA samples, the results exhibited extensive disparity in the effects of stochastic variation in amplification, including increased heterozygote peak height imbalance, stutter ratios and instances of allelic drop-in and drop-out, both within and between replicates. As such, it is important that the extent and variability of these stochastic effects are appropriately incorporated in the development of robust profile interpretation guidelines for DNA profiles generated from purified PCR products.

A comparison of six adhesive tapes as tape lifts for efficient trace DNA recovery without the transfer of PCR inhibitors.

Tape-lifting is a non-destructive method employed in the laboratory to recover and collect trace DNA evidence from crime scene exhibits with porous surfaces. The success of tape-lifting is a balance between capturing the biological material and compatibility with downstream DNA extraction processes to ensure efficient release of the tape-lifted material during DNA extraction. In this study, six commercially available low-, regular- and high-tack adhesive tapes were evaluated. The low-tack S183 tape and the highly adhesive S-Hold tape were compared for DNA recovery efficiency from different materials commonly encountered in casework. All tape-lifts were processed using PrepFiler Express™ BTA and AutoMate Express™ Forensic DNA extraction systems, DNA samples quantitated by Quantifiler TRIO, amplified using Powerplex® 21 and VeriFiler™ PLUS (VFP), and analysed on a 3500xl genetic analyser to evaluate the quality of the resultant STR profiles obtained. The more adhesive S-Hold tape recovered comparable or more DNA than the low-tack S183 tape from the majority of materials tested. However, STR profiles obtained from S183 tape-lifts were of markedly higher quality compared to S-Hold tape-lifts. This was most evident for towel, denim and printed chiffon, where S-Hold samples exhibited severe PCR inhibition, with VFP internal quality markers confirming the presence of inhibitors. The findings suggest that strong adhesion is not necessarily beneficial for tape-lifting, as the low tack S183 tape was able to efficiently recover cellular material from the surface of porous substrates commonly encountered in casework, while avoiding the co-transfer of PCR-inhibitory substances from the sampled material.