Impact of bridging thrombolysis on clinical outcome in stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: a retrospective analysis of a regional stroke registry.

PURPOSE: It is unclear whether stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) should receive bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), if eligible. This study aims at analyzing the impact of bridging IVT on short-term clinical outcome. METHODS: In a prospective regional stroke registry, all stroke patients with premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 who were admitted within 4.5 h after onset and treated with EVT were analyzed retrospectively. Patients receiving "IVT prior to EVT" (IVEVT) were compared to those undergoing "EVT only" regarding the ratio of good outcome, discharge mRS, mRS shift, hospital mortality, and occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: In total, 2022 patients were included, 816 patients (40.4%) achieved good clinical outcome; 1293 patients (63.9%) received bridging IVT. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding the ratio of good outcome (IVEVT 41.4% vs. EVT 38.5%, P = 0.231), discharge mRS (median, IVEVT 3 vs. EVT 3, P = 0.178), mRS shift (median, IVEVT 3 vs. EVT 3, P = 0.960), and hospital mortality (IVEVT 19.3% vs. EVT 19.5%, P = 0.984). Bridging IVT was not a predictor of outcome (adjusted OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.79-1.26, P = 0.979). However, it was an independent predictor of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.21-2.72, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that bridging IVT does not seem to improve short-term clinical outcome of patients undergoing EVT. Nonetheless, there might be a subgroup of patients that benefits from IVT. This needs to be addressed in randomized controlled trials.

Outcome of endovascular stroke therapy in a large mandatory stroke-registry.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular stroke treatment (EST) has become the standard treatment for patients with stroke due to large vessel occlusion, especially in earlier time windows. Only few data from population-based registries on effectiveness of EST have been published. METHODS: Baden-Wuerttemberg is the third largest state in Germany in terms of area and population and has a structured stroke concept since 1998 which includes mandatory collection of quality assurance data. In 2018 and 2019, 3820 of 39,168 ischemic stroke patients (9.8%) were treated by EST (age median 78 y, NIHSS median 14). We analyzed the clinical outcome of these patients determined with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge from the hospital or with the initiation of palliative therapy using logistic regression analysis with adjustment for the mRS at admission, additive IVT, age, and NIHSS. RESULTS: The probability of an excellent clinical outcome (mRS 0 or 1 at discharge) and for a good clinical outcome (mRS 0-2) were significantly higher in EST-patients (odds-ratio (OR) 1.27; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.13-1.43, and OR of 1.15 (95% CI 1.04-1.28). Also, the regression model showed an advantage for EST-patients with less frequent 'decision for palliative care' (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.78-0.98). Sensitivity analysis adjusting for intracranial vessel occlusion as further factor showed similar results. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that EST can be of benefit also for an area-wide unselected stroke population, in a large German federal state with sometimes long distance to the next thrombectomy center.

MRI as a first-line imaging modality in acute ischemic stroke: a sustainable concept.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) scans are the first-line imaging technique in acute stroke patients based on the argument of rapid feasibility. Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the first-line imaging technique is the exception to the rule, although it provides much more diagnostic information and avoids exposure to radiation. We evaluated whether an MRI-based acute stroke concept is fast, suitable, and useful to improve recanalization rates and patient outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study comparing patients treated at a comprehensive stroke center (Ulm/Germany) applying an MRI-based acute stroke concept with patients recorded in a large comprehensive stroke registry in Baden-Württemberg (Germany). We analyzed the quality indicators of acute stroke treatment, patient's outcome, and the rate of transient ischemic attack (TIA) at discharge. RESULTS: A total of 2182 patients from Ulm and 82,760 patients from the Baden-Württemberg (BW) stroke registry (including 29,575 patients of comprehensive stroke centers (BWc)) were included. Intravenous thrombolysis rate was higher in Ulm than in BW or the BWc stroke centers (Ulm 27.4% versus BW 20.9% versus BWc 26.1; p < 0.01), while a door-to-needle time <30 min could be achieved more frequently (Ulm 73.6% versus BW 44.1% versus BWc 47.1%; p < 0.01). Thrombectomy rate in patients with a proximal vascular occlusion was higher (Ulm 69.2% versus BW 50.7% versus BWc 59.3; p < 0.01). The number of TIA diagnoses was lower (Ulm 16.2% versus BW 24.6% versus BWc 19.9%; p < 0.01). More patients showed a shift to a favorable outcome (Ulm 21.1% versus BW 16.9% versus BWc 15.3; p < 0.01). Complication rates were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The MRI-based acute stroke concept is suitable, fast and seems to be beneficial. The time-dependent quality indicators were better both in comparison to all stroke units and to the comprehensive stroke units in the area. Based on the MRI concept, high rates of recanalization procedures and fewer TIA diagnoses could be observed. In addition, there was a clear trend towards an improved clinical outcome. A clinical trial comparing the effects of CT and MRI as the primary imaging technique in otherwise identical stroke unit settings is warranted.

Direct Admission vs. Secondary Transfer to a Comprehensive Stroke Center for Thrombectomy : Retrospective Analysis of a Regional Stroke Registry with 2797 Patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed at comparing short-term clinical outcome after thrombectomy in patients directly admitted (DA) to a comprehensive stroke center with patients secondarily transferred (ST) from a primary stroke center. METHODS: In a prospective regional stroke registry, all stroke patients with a premorbid modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 0-2 who were admitted within 24 h after stroke onset and treated with thrombectomy between 2014 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with DA and ST were compared regarding the proportion of good outcome (discharge mRS 0-2), median discharge mRS, mRS shift (difference between premorbid mRS and mRS on discharge) and occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: Out of 2797 patients, 1051 (37.6%) achieved good clinical outcome. In the DA group (n = 1657), proportion of good outcome was higher (DA 42.2% vs. ST 30.9%, P < 0.001) and median discharge mRS (DA 3 vs. ST 4, P < 0.001) and median mRS shift (DA 3 vs. ST 4, P < 0.001) were lower. The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar in both groups (DA 9.3% vs. ST 7.5%, P = 0.101). Multivariate analysis revealed that direct admission was an independent predictor of good clinical outcome (adjusted odds ratio, OR 1.32, confidence interval, CI 1.09-1.60, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: These results confirm prior studies stating that DA to a comprehensive stroke center leads to better outcome compared to ST in stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy.

Only a Minority of Thrombectomy Candidates Are Admitted During Night Shift: A Rationale for Diurnal Stroke Care Planning.

Background: Widespread quick access to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is one of the main challenges in stroke care. It is unclear if newly established MT units are required 24 h/7 d. We explored the diurnal admission rate of patients with AIS potentially eligible for MT to provide a basis for discussion of daytime-adapted stroke care concepts. Methods: Data collected from the Baden-Württemberg Stroke Registry in Germany were assessed (2008-2012). We analyzed the admission rate of patients with AIS stratified by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission in 3-h intervals. An NIHSS score ≥10 was considered a predictor of large vessel occlusion. The average annual admission number of patients with severe AIS were stratified by stroke service level and calculated for a three-shift model and working/non-working hours. Results: Of 91,864, 22,527 (21%) presented with an NIHSS score ≥10. The average admission rates per year for a hospital without Stroke Unit (SU), with a local SU, with a regional SU and a stroke center were 8, 52, 90 and 178, respectively. Approximately 61% were admitted during working hours, 54% in the early shift, 36% in the late shift and 10% in the night shift. Conclusions: A two-shift model, excluding the night shift, would cover 90% of the patients with severe AIS. A model with coverage during working hours would miss ~40% of the patients with severe AIS. To achieve a quick and area-wide MT, it seems preferable for newly implemented MT-units to offer MT in a two-shift model at a minimum.

Genetic analysis of familial connective tissue alterations associated with cervical artery dissections suggests locus heterogeneity.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cervical artery dissections (CAD) can be associated with connective tissue aberrations in skin biopsies. The analysis of healthy relatives of patients suggested that the connective tissue phenotype is familial with an autosomal dominant inheritance. METHODS: We performed genetic linkage studies in 3 families of patients with CAD. Connective tissue phenotypes for the patients and all family members were assessed by electron microscopic study of skin biopsies. A genome-wide linkage analysis of 1 family (1 patient with 8 healthy relatives) indicated 2 candidate loci. Three genes were subsequently studied by sequence analysis. Part of the genome was also studied by linkage analysis in 2 further families. RESULTS: The genome-wide scan in a single family suggested linkage between the hypothetical mutation causing the connective tissue phenotype and informative genetic markers on chromosome 15q24 (logarithm of the odds score: Z= +2.1). A second possible candidate locus (Z=+1.9) was found on chromosome 10q26. Sequence analysis of 3 candidate genes in the suggestive locus (chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan4 [CSPG4], lysyl oxidase-like1 [LOXL1] and fibroblast growth factor receptor2 [FGFR2]) did not lead to the identification of a mutation responsible for connective tissue alterations. In 2 additional smaller families the loci on chromosome 15q24 and 10q26 were excluded by linkage analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Linkage analysis of a large family with CAD-associated connective tissue alterations suggested the presence of a candidate locus on chromosome 15q2 or on chromosome 10q26. Sequence analysis did not lead to the identification of a mutated candidate gene in 1 of these loci. The study of 2 additional pedigrees indicated locus heterogeneity for the connective tissue phenotype of CAD patients.