RESUMO
SUMMARYGiven the importance of gut microbial homeostasis in maintaining health, there has been considerable interest in developing innovative therapeutic strategies for restoring gut microbiota. One such approach, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), is the main "whole gut microbiome replacement" strategy and has been integrated into clinical practice guidelines for treating recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). Furthermore, the potential application of FMT in other indications such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), metabolic syndrome, and solid tumor malignancies is an area of intense interest and active research. However, the complex and variable nature of FMT makes it challenging to address its precise functionality and to assess clinical efficacy and safety in different disease contexts. In this review, we outline clinical applications, efficacy, durability, and safety of FMT and provide a comprehensive assessment of its procedural and administration aspects. The clinical applications of FMT in children and cancer immunotherapy are also described. We focus on data from human studies in IBD in contrast with rCDI to delineate the putative mechanisms of this treatment in IBD as a model, including colonization resistance and functional restoration through bacterial engraftment, modulating effects of virome/phageome, gut metabolome and host interactions, and immunoregulatory actions of FMT. Furthermore, we comprehensively review omics technologies, metagenomic approaches, and bioinformatics pipelines to characterize complex microbial communities and discuss their limitations. FMT regulatory challenges, ethical considerations, and pharmacomicrobiomics are also highlighted to shed light on future development of tailored microbiome-based therapeutics.
Assuntos
Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Humanos , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/microbiologia , AnimaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Disorders of gut-brain interaction may arise after acute gastroenteritis. Data on the influence of pathogen type on the risk of postinfection IBS (PI-IBS), as on postinfection functional dyspepsia (PI-FD), are limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine prevalence of PI-IBS or PI-FD after acute gastroenteritis. DESIGN: We included observational studies recruiting ≥50 adults and reporting prevalence of IBS or FD after acute gastroenteritis with ≥3-month follow-up. A random effects model was used to estimate prevalence and ORs with 95% CIs. RESULTS: In total, 47 studies (28 170 subjects) were eligible. Overall prevalence of PI-IBS and PI-FD were 14.5% and 12.7%, respectively. IBS persisted in 39.8% of subjects in the long-term (>5 years follow-up) after diagnosis. Individuals experiencing acute gastroenteritis had a significantly higher odds of IBS (OR 4.3) and FD (OR 3.0) than non-exposed controls. PI-IBS was most associated with parasites (prevalence 30.1%), but in only two studies, followed by bacteria (18.3%) and viruses (10.7%). In available studies, Campylobacter was associated with the highest PI-IBS prevalence (20.7%) whereas Proteobacteria and SARS-CoV-2 yielded the highest odds for PI-IBS (both OR 5.4). Prevalence of PI-FD was 10.0% for SARS-CoV-2 and 13.6% for bacteria (Enterobacteriaceae 19.4%). CONCLUSION: In a large systematic review and meta-analysis, 14.5% of individuals experiencing acute gastroenteritis developed PI-IBS and 12.7% PI-FD, with greater than fourfold increased odds for IBS and threefold for FD. Proinflammatory microbes, including Proteobacteria and subcategories, and SARS-CoV-2, may be associated with the development of PI-IBS and PI-FD.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Dispepsia , Gastroenterite , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável , Humanos , Doença Aguda , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Dispepsia/epidemiologia , Dispepsia/microbiologia , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/complicações , Gastroenterite/microbiologia , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/epidemiologia , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/microbiologia , Prevalência , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although there have been multiple drugs tested in gastroparesis, their relative efficacy and safety are unknown. We evaluated this in a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We searched the literature to September 7, 2022. We judged the efficacy of drugs based on global symptoms of gastroparesis; individual symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, bloating, or fullness; and safety according to total adverse events and adverse events leading to withdrawal. We extracted data as intention-to-treat analyses, assuming dropouts to be treatment failures and reporting pooled relative risks (RRs) of not improving with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), ranking drugs according to P-score. RESULTS: We identified 29 RCTs (3772 patients). Based on global symptoms, clebopride ranked first for efficacy (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57; P-score = .99) followed by domperidone (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.98; P-score = .76). No other drug was superior to placebo. Only 2 drug classes were efficacious: in rank order, oral dopamine antagonists (RR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.77; P-score = .96) and tachykinin-1 antagonists (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.93; P-score = .83). For individual symptoms, oral metoclopramide ranked first for nausea (RR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-1.00; P-score = .95), fullness (RR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.35-1.28; P-score = .86), and bloating (RR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30-0.93; P-score = .97), based on only 1 small trial. Only prucalopride was more likely to be associated with adverse events than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In a network meta-analysis, oral dopamine antagonists and tachykinin-1 antagonists were more efficacious than placebo for gastroparesis, but confidence in the evidence was low to moderate for most comparisons. There is an unmet need for efficacious therapies for gastroparesis.
Assuntos
Gastroparesia , Humanos , Gastroparesia/tratamento farmacológico , Metanálise em Rede , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Náusea/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Taquicininas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
This narrative review describes the settlement of the neonatal microbiome during the perinatal period and its importance on human health in the long term. Delivery methods, maternal diet, antibiotic exposure, feeding practices, and early infant contact significantly shape microbial colonization, influencing the infant's immune system, metabolism, and neurodevelopment. By summarizing two decades of research, this review highlights the microbiome's role in disease predisposition and explores interventions like maternal vaginal seeding and probiotic and prebiotic supplementation that may influence microbiome development. CONCLUSION: The perinatal period is a pivotal phase for the formation and growth of the neonatal microbiome, profoundly impacting long-term health outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN: ⢠The perinatal period is a critical phase for the development of the neonatal microbiome, with factors such as mode of delivery, maternal diet, antibiotic exposure, and feeding practices influencing its composition and diversity, which has significant implications for long-term health. ⢠The neonatal microbiome plays a vital role in shaping the immune system, metabolism, and neurodevelopment of infants. WHAT IS NEW: ⢠Recent studies have highlighted the potential of targeted interventions, such as probiotic and prebiotic supplementation, and innovative practices like maternal vaginal seeding, to optimize microbiome development during the perinatal period. ⢠Emerging evidence suggests that specific bacterial genera and species within the neonatal microbiome are associated with reduced risks of developing chronic conditions, indicating new avenues for promoting long-term health starting from early life.
RESUMO
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common healthcare-associated infections and one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients in the world. Although several antibiotics effectively treat CDI, some individuals may not respond to these drugs and may be cured by transplanting stool from healthy donors. FMT has demonstrated extraordinary cure rates for the cure of CDI recurrences.Moreover, FMT has also been investigated in other disorders associated with the alteration of gut microbiota, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), where the alterations of the gut microbiota ecology have been theorized to play a causative role. Although FMT is currently not recommended to cure IBD patients in clinical practice, several studies have been recently carried out with the ultimate goal to search new therapeutic options to patients.This review summarizes data on the use of FMT for the treatment of both CDI and IBD, with a special attention to highlight studies conducted in European countries.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Humanos , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Fezes , Antibacterianos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapiaRESUMO
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common causes of cancer deaths, and GC treatments represent a large area of research. Although initially regarded as a sterile organ and unsuitable for microbial communities, the discovery of Helicobacter pylori made us realize that some microbes can colonize the stomach. In recent years, growing interest in gastric bacteria has expanded to the gut microbiota and, more recently, to the oral microbiota. Indeed, the oral-gastric-gut microbiota axis may play a crucial role in maintaining homeostasis, while changes in microbiota composition in GC patients can influence clinical outcomes. On the one hand, the microbiota and its metabolites may significantly influence the progression of GC, while anti-GC treatments such as gastrectomy and chemotherapy may significantly impact the oral-gastric-gut microbiota axis of GC patients. In this context, the role of nutritional therapies, including diet, prebiotics, and probiotics, in treating GC should not be underestimated. Wit this review, we aim to highlight the main role of the gastric, oral, and gut microbiota in GC onset and progression, representing potential future biomarkers for early GC detection and a target for efficient nutritional therapies during the course of GC.
Assuntos
Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Microbiota , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/metabolismo , Mucosa Gástrica/metabolismo , Infecções por Helicobacter/microbiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several randomised clinical trials (RCTs) performing faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly for ulcerative colitis, have recently been published, but with major variations in study design. These include differences in administered dose, route and frequency of delivery, type of placebo and evaluated endpoints. Although the overall outcomes appear to be promising, they are highly dependent on both donor and recipient factors. OBJECTIVE: To develop concensus-based statements and recommendations for the evaluation, management and potential treatment of IBD using FMT in order to move towards standardised practices. DESIGN: An international panel of experts convened several times to generate evidence-based guidelines by performing a deep evaluation of currently available and/or published data. Twenty-five experts in IBD, immunology and microbiology collaborated in different working groups to provide statements on the following key issues related to FMT in IBD: (A) pathogenesis and rationale, (B) donor selection and biobanking, (C) FMT practices and (D) consideration of future studies and perspectives. Statements were evaluated and voted on by all members using an electronic Delphi process, culminating in a plenary consensus conference and generation of proposed guidelines. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Our group has provided specific statements and recommendations, based on best available evidence, with the end goal of providing guidance and general criteria required to promote FMT as a recognised strategy for the treatment of IBD.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Humanos , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Cidade de Roma , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/microbiologia , Colite Ulcerativa/terapia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Multiple drugs have been used to treat gastroparesis symptoms, yet their therapeutic benefits are poorly understood partly due to lack of insight into response and adverse event rates with placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We evaluated these issues systematically in drug trials for gastroparesis. METHODS: We searched the medical literature through August 2, 2022 to identify RCTs comparing active drug with placebo in patients with gastroparesis. We assessed placebo response rates according to at least one of the following endpoints: improvement according to a composite outcome, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, bloating, or fullness, as well as total adverse events, and adverse events leading to withdrawal. We extracted data as intention-to-treat analyses with dropouts assumed to be treatment failures. We pooled placebo response and adverse event rates using a random effects model and expressed as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were eligible. Among 23 trials reporting a composite endpoint of improvement, the pooled placebo response rate was 29.3% (95% CI, 23.7%-35.2%). Pooled placebo response rates were higher in idiopathic compared with diabetic gastroparesis (34.2% vs 28.1%), among trials that did not use validated symptom questionnaires (31.2% vs 27.4%), and in RCTs of shorter duration (<4 weeks, 32.6% vs ≥9 weeks, 23.2%). Adverse events occurred in 33.8% (95% CI, 26.4%-41.8%) of patients with placebo, in 27 trials, and were less common in idiopathic compared with diabetic gastroparesis (17.9% vs 43.4%), trials of shorter duration (<4 weeks, 33.7% vs ≥9 weeks, 40.7%), and trials with lower randomization ratios of active drug to placebo (1:1, 26.7% vs 3:1, 50.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis assessed placebo response and adverse event rates in gastroparesis. To accurately assess therapeutic gain, future trials should be a minimum of 8 weeks duration, use validated questionnaires, and distinguish gastroparesis subtypes.
Assuntos
Gastroparesia , Humanos , Gastroparesia/tratamento farmacológico , Vômito , NáuseaRESUMO
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is known to be highly effective in patients with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI), but its role in patients who also suffer from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is unclear. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMT for the treatment of rCDI in patients with IBD. We searched the available literature until November 22, 2022 to identify studies that included patients with IBD treated with FMT for rCDI, reporting efficacy outcomes after at least 8 weeks of follow-up. The proportional effect of FMT was summarized with a generalized linear mixed-effect model fitting a logistic regression accounting for different intercepts among studies. We identified 15 eligible studies, containing 777 patients. Overall, FMT achieved high cure rates of rCDI, 81% for single FMT, based on all included studies and patients, and 92% for overall FMT, based on nine studies with 354 patients, respectively. We found a significant advantage of overall FMT over single FMT in improving cure rates of rCDI (from 80% to 92%, p = 0.0015). Serious adverse events were observed in 91 patients (12% of the overall population), with the most common being hospitalisation, IBD-related surgery, or IBD flare. In conclusion, in our meta-analysis FMT achieved high cure rates of rCDI in patients with IBD, with a significant advantage of overall FMT over single FMT, similar to data observed in patients without IBD. Our findings support the use of FMT as a treatment for rCDI in patients with IBD.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Humanos , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Recidiva , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/etiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Infecções por Clostridium/etiologiaRESUMO
The gut microbiome plays a key role in influencing several pathways and functions involved in human health, including metabolism, protection against infection, and immune regulation. Perturbation of the gut microbiome is recognised as a pathogenic factor in several gastrointestinal and extraintestinal disorders, and is increasingly considered as a therapeutic target in these conditions. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the transfer of the microbiota from healthy screened stool donors into the gut of affected patients, and is a well-established and highly effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Despite the mechanisms of efficacy of FMT not being fully understood, it has been investigated in several chronic noncommunicable disorders, with variable results. This review aims to give an overview of mechanisms of efficacy of FMT in chronic noncommunicable disorders, and to paint the current landscape of its investigation in these medical conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), chronic liver disorders, and also extraintestinal autoimmune conditions.
Assuntos
Infecções por Clostridium , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Microbiota , Humanos , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Fezes , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Doença CrônicaRESUMO
AIMS: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major challenge for healthcare systems. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease, is a risk factor for primary and recurrent CDI (rCDI). Moreover, CDI itself often worsens the clinical picture of IBD, increasing the risk of complications. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a highly effective treatment for rCDI, but data from patients with IBD and CDI are limited and often referred to mixed cohorts. We aimed to report outcomes from a cohort of patients with UC treated with FMT for rCDI superinfection. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a retrospective, single-centre cohort study we evaluated characteristics and outcomes of patients with UC who received FMT for rCDI. The primary outcome was negative C. difficile toxin 8 weeks after FMT. Thirty-five patients were included in the analysis. Sixteen patients were cured after single FMT, while 19 patients received repeat FMT. Overall, FMT cured rCDI in 32 patients (91%), and repeat FMT was significantly associated with sustained cure of CDI compared with single FMT (84% vs 50%, p = 0.018). Twenty-four patients (69%) experienced remission or an amelioration of UC activity. Serious adverse events were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of patients with UC, FMT was highly effective in curing rCDI without severe adverse events and repeat FMT was significantly associated with CDI cure. Most patients also experienced remission or amelioration of UC activity after FMT. Our findings suggest that a sequential FMT protocol may be used routinely in patients with UC and rCDI.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Colite Ulcerativa , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Humanos , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/efeitos adversos , Colite Ulcerativa/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Recidiva , Infecções por Clostridium/complicações , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/etiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Background and Objectives: JAK inhibitors entered current clinical practice as treatment for several immune-related diseases and, recently, for atopic dermatitis. These drugs target the Janus Kinase intracellular cascade, rendering them suitable for treating both Th1 and Th2 immune-mediated responses. Materials and Methods: We report the case of a 36-year-old male patient presenting an overlap of ulcerative colitis, a Th1-related disease, and atopic dermatitis, a Th2-mediated condition. Treatment with upadacitinib was initiated, and laboratory and instrumental follow-ups were carried out for 8 months. Results: The complete and persistent clinical remission of both conditions was observed at a low dose of 15 mg of upadacitinib, even though ulcerative colitis guidelines usually recommend a dosage of 45 mg. No serious adverse responses to therapy were reported. Conclusions: Upadacitinib may be the most suitable management strategy in subjects with coexisting severe conditions mediated by Th1 inflammation, such as ulcerative colitis, and by Th2 cytokines, such as atopic dermatitis.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Dermatite Atópica , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 3 Anéis/uso terapêutico , InflamaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) harms a large proportion of patients with cirrhosis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is recommended for recurrent CDI, but its effects in patients with cirrhosis have not been established. We performed a multicenter observational study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMT for CDI in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 63 adults with cirrhosis (median model for end-stage liver disease score, 14.5; 24 patients with decompensated cirrhosis) who underwent FMT for CDI from January 2012 through November 2018 at 8 academic centers in the United States, Canada, and Italy. We collected data on patient demographics and characteristics of cirrhosis, CDI, and FMT from medical records and compared differences among patients with different severities of cirrhosis, and FMT successes vs failures at the 8-week follow-up evaluation. We also obtained data on adverse events (AEs) and severe AEs within 12 weeks of FMT. RESULTS: Patients underwent FMT for recurrent CDI (55 of 63; 87.3%), severe CDI (6 of 63; 9.5%), or fulminant CDI (2 of 63; 3.2%) primarily via colonoscopy (59 of 63; 93.7%) as outpatients (47 of 63; 76.8%). FMT success was achieved for 54 patients (85.7%). Among FMT failures, a higher proportion used non-CDI antibiotics at the time of FMT (44.4% vs 5.6%; P < .001), had Child-Pugh scores of B or C (100% vs 37.7%; P < .001), used probiotics (77.8% vs 24.1%; P = .003), had pseudomembranes (22.2% vs 0; P = .018), and underwent FMT as inpatients (45.5% vs 19%; P = .039), compared with FMT successes. In multivariable analysis, use of non-CDI antibiotics at the time of FMT (odds ratio, 17.43; 95% CI, 2.00-152.03; P = .01) and use of probiotics (odds ratio, 11.9; 95% CI, 1.81-78.3; P = .01) were associated with a greater risk of FMT failure. FMT-related AEs occurred in 33.3% of patients (21 of 63)-most were self-limited abdominal cramps or diarrhea. There were only 5 severe AEs that possibly were related to FMT; none involved infection or death. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective study, we found FMT to be safe and effective for the treatment of CDI in patients with cirrhosis.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Doença Hepática Terminal , Clostridioides , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Cirrose Hepática/terapia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an exponential increase in SARS-CoV-2 infections and associated deaths, and represents a significant challenge to healthcare professionals and facilities. Individual countries have taken several prevention and containment actions to control the spread of infection, including measures to guarantee safety of both healthcare professionals and patients who are at increased risk of infection from COVID-19. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has a well-established role in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection. In the time of the pandemic, FMT centres and stool banks are required to adopt a workflow that continues to ensure reliable patient access to FMT while maintaining safety and quality of procedures. In this position paper, based on the best available evidence, worldwide FMT experts provide guidance on issues relating to the impact of COVID-19 on FMT, including patient selection, donor recruitment and selection, stool manufacturing, FMT procedures, patient follow-up and research activities.
Assuntos
Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Infecções por Coronavirus , Seleção do Doador , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Gastroenterologia , Pandemias , Seleção de Pacientes , Pneumonia Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Gestão de Mudança , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Gastroenterologia/organização & administração , Gastroenterologia/tendências , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Risco Ajustado/métodos , Risco Ajustado/normas , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
The involvement of Helicobacter pylori infection in many extra-gastroduodenal manifestations remains a fascinating field of investigation. However, for several of these supposed associations, the potential pathogenic mechanism remains unclear. The present review highlights the main associations of H pylori with extra-gastroduodenal manifestations reported during the last year. We searched for the most relevant studies on this topic, published between April 2019 and March 2020, identified using the term "Helicobacter" in the MEDLINE/Pubmed database. Consistent data emerged from studies investigating metabolic syndrome and ischaemic cardiovascular diseases. Other reported fields of investigation were hepatology, especially focused on non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, neurology, including Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease, as well as dermatology. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), that comprises Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, may originate from a dysregulation of the host's immune response to commensal bacteria in individuals with genetic predisposition. The reduction of biodiversity and other specific imbalances in the faecal microbiome composition of IBD patients compared to that of healthy controls support this hypothesis. In this context, an inverse correlation between H pylori infection and IBD prevalence has been confirmed. Similar results were found in patients with kidney diseases and allergic manifestations. There are indications of the possible involvement of H pylori infection in metabolic syndrome and ischaemic cardiovascular diseases. However, due to a series of factors linked to study designs and the multifactorial pathogenesis of some diseases, further studies are needed.
Assuntos
Infecções por Helicobacter , Animais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/patologia , Comorbidade , Doenças do Sistema Digestório/epidemiologia , Doenças do Sistema Digestório/patologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/epidemiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/patologia , Humanos , Doenças do Sistema Imunitário/epidemiologia , Doenças do Sistema Imunitário/patologia , Doenças Metabólicas/epidemiologia , Doenças Metabólicas/patologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/epidemiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/patologia , PrevalênciaRESUMO
The need to shed light on the unknown aspects of pathophysiology of common disorders, such as gastrointestinal ones, has led researchers through last decades to study and define the role of microorganisms within the human intestine and their interactions with the host. The progress of technology has permitted the overcoming of culture-based methods to study microbes and paved the way to molecular techniques, which allow the analysis of microbial genome, microbial functions, and metabolism. These progresses opened a window on the world of microbiology and permitted to deepen into the key role played by gut microbiota and dysbiosis in health status and diseases, both gastrointestinal and extraintestinal. So, scientists focused their attention in developing new strategies to restore eubiosis and to manipulate gut microbes by modifying dietary habits, administrating antibiotics, probiotics, and prebiotics and using fecal microbiota transplantation as treatment of gastrointestinal, infectious, cardiovascular, metabolic, immune-mediated, neuro-psychiatric, and oncological disorders. The next challenges will be to elaborate standard protocols with definite outcomes predictors in disease-specific settings.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Since December 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged as a novel etiologic agent of viral pneumonia. We aimed to compare clinical features of 165 Italian patients with laboratory confirmed or unconfirmed 2019-nCoV pneumonia. METHODS: On March 31, 2020, hospitalized patients who presented with fever and/or respiratory symptoms, exposures, and presence of lung imaging features consistent with 2019-nCoV pneumonia were included. Before admission to a hospital ward, patients underwent RT-PCR based SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in their nasopharyngeal swab samples. RESULTS: Of 165 patients studied, 119 had positive RT-PCR results and 46 were RT-PCR negative for 2 days or longer (i.e., when the last swab sample was obtained). The median age was 70 years (IQR, 58-78), and 123 (74.6%) of 165 patients had at least one comorbidity. The majority of patients (101/165, 61.2%) had a mild pneumonia, and the remaining patients (64/165, 38.8%) a severe/critical pneumonia. We did not find any substantial difference in symptoms, incubation periods, and radiographic/CT abnormalities as well as in many of the biological abnormalities recorded. However, at multivariable analysis, higher concentrations of hemoglobin (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.11-1.65; P = 0.003) and lower counts of leukocytes (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.90; P < 0.001) were statistically associated with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. While mortality rates were similar, patients with confirmed diagnosis were more likely to receive antivirals (95% vs 19.6%, P < 0.001) and to develop ARDS (63% vs 37%, P = 0.003) than those with unconfirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that unconfirmed 2019-nCoV pneumonia cases may be actually COVID-19 cases and that clinicians should be cautious when managing patients with presentations compatible with COVID-19.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Idoso , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/fisiopatologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Febre , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/fisiopatologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Manejo de EspécimesRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has proven to be very effective in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) when compared with standard antibiotic therapy. However, given the lack of validated criteria, decision regarding number and timing of infusions is currently based on the clinician's experience, severity of infection, and clinical response. We performed a longitudinal assessment of fecal calprotectin concentration (FCC) in CDI patients undergoing FMT. FCCs were correlated with the need for multiple infusions and with the clinical status of the patient. METHODS: Fecal calprotectin concentration measurement was performed just before first procedure (T0 ) and 2 (T1 ) and 5 (T2 ) days later. The need for reinfusion was accounted for in the 8 weeks following procedure, and clinical status was evaluated at the end of the given period. Both outcomes were correlated with measured FCCs. RESULTS: A total of 28 CDI patients undergoing FMT were enrolled. Median FCCs at T0 were significantly higher in patients who needed repeat FMT, 540 µg/g versus patients who underwent single FMT, 290 µg/g (P < 0.05). Differences were not significant for FCC at T1 and T2 . Regarding correlation with clinical outcome, median FCC at T0 was found to be lower in responders compared with non-responders with a trend towards statistical significance (P = 0.07). Correlation at T1 and T2 was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an easily obtainable parameter such as fecal calprotectin could possibly optimize overall management of FMT procedural framework potentially being able to immediately identify patients who may benefit from repeat infusions.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Colite/microbiologia , Colite/terapia , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Fezes/química , Complexo Antígeno L1 Leucocitário/análise , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/análise , Colite/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva , Retratamento , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a risk factor for bloodstream infection (BSI). Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is more effective than antibiotics in treating recurrent CDI, but its efficacy in preventing CDI-related BSI is uncertain. Objective: To assess incidence of primary BSI in patients with recurrent CDI treated with FMT versus antibiotics. Design: Prospective cohort study. Patients treated with FMT and those treated with antibiotics were matched on propensity score. Setting: Single academic medical center. Patients: 290 inpatients with recurrent CDI (57 patients per treatment in matched cohort). Intervention: FMT or antibiotics. Measurements: The primary outcome was primary BSI within 90 days. Secondary outcomes were length of hospitalization and overall survival (OS) at 90 days. Results: Of the 290 patients, 109 were treated with FMT and 181 received antibiotics. Five patients in the FMT group and 40 in the antibiotic group developed BSI. Because of differences in the patients treated with FMT versus antibiotics in many baseline characteristics, including number of recurrences and CDI severity, comparative analyses were limited to the matched cohort. Risk for BSI was 23 percentage points (95% CI, 10 to 35 percentage points) lower in the FMT group; the FMT group also had 14 fewer days of hospitalization (CI, 9 to 20 fewer days) and a 32-percentage point increase in OS (CI, 16 to 47 percentage points) compared with the antibiotic group. Limitation: Nonrandomized study with potential for unmeasured or residual confounding; limited generalizability of the propensity score-matched cohort. Conclusion: In a propensity score-matched cohort, patients with recurrent CDI treated with FMT were less likely to develop primary BSI. Primary Funding Source: None.