RESUMO
Historically, heparin has had the longest historical use as an anticoagulant and continues this day to be the primary therapeutic option for preventing thrombosis and thromboembolism in critically ill hospitalized patients. Heparin is also used to treat sepsis and sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in various countries. However, the efficacy and safety of heparin for this indication remains controversial, as adequately powered randomized clinical studies have not demonstrated as yet a survival benefit in sepsis and sepsis-associated DIC, despite meta-analyses and propensity analyses reporting improved outcomes without increasing bleeding risk. Further, activated protein C and recombinant thrombomodulin showed greater improvements in outcomes compared with heparin, although these effects were inconclusive. In summary, further research is warranted, despite the ongoing clinical use of heparin for sepsis and sepsis-associated DIC. Based on Japanese guidelines, antithrombin or recombinant thrombomodulin may be a preferable choice if they are accessible.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) syndrome is a highly lethal condition characterized by the complication of multiple organ damage. Although the effects of combined antithrombin (AT) and recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM) on DIC syndrome have previously been examined, the results are inconsistent and inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review on the combined administration of AT and rTM for the treatment of septic DIC to investigate the superiority of the combination therapy over either AT or rTM monotherapy using a random-effects analysis model. METHOD: We searched electronic databases, including Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Igaku-Chuo Zasshi (ICHU-SHI) Japanese Central Review of Medicine Web from inception to January 2022. Studies assessing the efficacy of combined AT and rTM were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was occurrence of serious bleeding complications compared to monotherapy. We presented the pooled odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) depending on reporting results in each primary study. RESULTS: We analyzed seven enrolled clinical trials, all of which were observational studies. Combination therapy had a non-significant favorable association with lower 28-day mortality compared to monotherapy (HR 0.67 [0.43-1.05], OR 0.73 [0.45-1.18]). The I2 values were 60% and 72%, respectively, suggesting high heterogeneity. As a secondary outcome, bleeding complications were similar between the two groups (pooled OR 1.11 [0.55-2.23], I2 value 55%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the findings in this analysis could not confirm a statistically significant effect of AT and rTM combination therapy for septic DIC, it showed a promising effect in terms of improving mortality. The incidence of bleeding was low and clinically feasible. Further research is warranted to draw more conclusive results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN ID: 000049820).
RESUMO
Although thrombosis frequently occurs in infectious diseases, the coagulopathy associated with COVID-19 has unique characteristics. Compared with bacterial sepsis, COVID-19-associated coagulopathy presents with minimal changes in platelet counts, normal prothrombin times, and increased D-dimer and fibrinogen levels. These differences can be explained by the distinct pathophysiology of the thromboinflammatory responses. In sepsis-induced coagulopathy, leukocytes are primarily responsible for the coagulopathy by expressing tissue factor, releasing neutrophil extracellular traps, multiple procoagulant substances, and systemic endothelial injury that is often associated with vasoplegia and shock. In COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, platelet activation is a major driver of inflammation/thrombogenesis and von Willebrand factor and platelet factor 4 are deeply involved in the pathogenesis. Although the initial responses are localized to the lung, they can spread systemically if the disease is severe. Since the platelets play major roles, arterial thrombosis is not uncommon in COVID-19. Despite platelet activation, platelet count is usually normal at presentation, but sensitive biomarkers including von Willebrand factor activity, soluble P-selectin, and soluble C-type lectin-like receptor-2 are elevated, and they increase as the disease progresses. Although the role of antiplatelet therapy is still unproven, current studies are ongoing to determine its potential effects.
Assuntos
Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea , COVID-19 , Ativação Plaquetária , Trombose , Humanos , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/sangue , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/virologia , COVID-19/complicações , Trombose/sangue , Trombose/virologia , Fator de von Willebrand/metabolismoRESUMO
Soon after the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), unexplained sustained fatigue, cognitive disturbance, and muscle ache/weakness were reported in patients who had recovered from acute COVID-19 infection. This abnormal condition has been recognized as "long COVID (postacute sequelae of COVID-19 [PASC])" with a prevalence estimated to be from 10 to 20% of convalescent patients. Although the pathophysiology of PASC has been studied, the exact mechanism remains obscure. Microclots in circulation can represent one of the possible causes of PASC. Although hypercoagulability and thrombosis are critical mechanisms of acute COVID-19, recent studies have reported that thromboinflammation continues in some patients, even after the virus has cleared. Viral spike proteins and RNA can be detected months after patients have recovered, findings that may be responsible for persistent thromboinflammation and the development of microclots. Despite this theory, long-term results of anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, and vascular endothelial protection are inconsistent, and could not always show beneficial treatment effects. In summary, PASC reflects a heterogeneous condition, and microclots cannot explain all the presenting symptoms. After clarification of the pathomechanisms of each symptom, a symptom- or biomarker-based stratified approach should be considered for future studies.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The number of heatstroke victims hit record numbers in 2022 as global warming continues. In heat-induced injuries, circulatory shock is the most severe and deadly complication. This review aims to examine the mechanisms and potential approaches to heat-induced shock and the life-threatening complications of heatstroke. METHODS: A computer-based online search was performed using the PubMed database and Web of Science database for published articles concerning heatstroke, shock, inflammation, coagulopathy, endothelial cell, cell death, and heat shock proteins. RESULTS: Dehydration and heat-induced cardiomyopathy were reported as the major causes of heat-induced shock, although other heat-induced injuries are also involved in the pathogenesis of circulatory shock. In addition to dehydration, the blood volume decreases considerably due to the increased vascular permeability as a consequence of endothelial damage. Systemic inflammation is induced by factors that include elevated cytokine and chemokine levels, dysregulated coagulation/fibrinolytic responses, and the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) from necrotic cell death that cause distributive shock. The cytoprotective heat shock proteins can also facilitate circulatory disturbance under excess heat stress. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of heat-induced shock. In addition to dehydration, heat stress-induced cardiomyopathy due to the thermal damage of mitochondria, upregulated inflammation via damage-associated molecular patterns released from oncotic cells, unbalanced coagulation/fibrinolysis, and endothelial damage are the major factors that are related to circulatory shock.
Assuntos
Desidratação , Golpe de Calor , Humanos , Golpe de Calor/complicações , Golpe de Calor/metabolismo , Golpe de Calor/patologia , Inflamação/etiologia , Resposta ao Choque Térmico , Proteínas de Choque Térmico/metabolismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a common and critical complication in sepsis. Antithrombin activity, which is considered a biomarker for disease severity, was measured in septic DIC treated with antithrombin concentrates in this study. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of post-marketing survey data that included 1,800 patients with sepsis-associated DIC and antithrombin activity of 70% or less who were treated with antithrombin concentrates. The changes in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, DIC score, and antithrombin activity were sequentially assessed. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to evaluate the performance of antithrombin activity to assess 28-day survival. Furthermore, the relationship between post-treatment antithrombin activity and survival was examined by Logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Sex, baseline SOFA score, baseline antithrombin activities, and the presence of pneumonia and soft tissue infection were significantly associated with 28-day mortality. The area under the curve for mortality was 0.639 for post-treatment antithrombin activity, and higher than those of baseline- and delta antithrombin activities. Logistic regression analysis revealed that higher post-treatment antithrombin activity was associated with better 28-day survival. When post-treatment antithrombin activity was more than 80%, the estimated survival was 88.2%. Whereas, the survival was 74.4% when the antithrombin activity was 80% or less (P < 0.0001). However, the relationship between post-treatment antithrombin activity and 28-day survival was considerably different between patients who recovered from DIC by Day 6 compared to those who did not. Similarly, the estimated 28-day survival, based on antithrombin activity, varied among patients with high and low SOFA scores, and the calculation needs to be adjusted based on the severity of the condition. CONCLUSIONS: Post-treatment antithrombin activity measurement was helpful in estimating the 28-day survival in patients with sepsis-associated DIC. However, patient outcomes vary considerably depending on factors that include baseline SOFA score, age, and baseline antithrombin activity. These variables play a substantial role in determining patient prognosis and should be considered when evaluating and interpreting the results.
RESUMO
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread, with thrombotic complications being increasingly frequently reported. Although thrombosis is frequently complicated in septic patients, there are some differences in the thrombosis noted with COVID-19 and that noted with bacterial infections. The incidence (6-26%) of thrombosis varied among reports in patients with COVID-19; the incidences of venous thromboembolism and acute arterial thrombosis were 4.8-21.0% and 0.7-3.7%, respectively. Although disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is frequently associated with bacterial infections, a few cases of DIC have been reported in association with COVID-19. Fibrin-related markers, such as D-dimer levels, are extremely high in bacterial infections, whereas soluble C-type lectin-like receptor 2 (sCLEC-2) levels are high in COVID-19, suggesting that hypercoagulable and hyperfibrinolytic states are predominant in bacterial infections, whereas hypercoagulable and hypofibrinolytic states with platelet activation are predominant in COVID-19. Marked platelet activation, hypercoagulability and hypofibrinolytic states may cause thrombosis in patients with COVID-19.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Trombofilia , Trombose , Humanos , COVID-19/complicações , SARS-CoV-2 , Trombose/etiologia , Trombofilia/complicações , Ativação PlaquetáriaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia is an unexpected consequence of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic era. We reviewed the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of this rare side effect. DATA SOURCES: Online search of published medical literature through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using the terms "COVID-19," "vaccine," "thrombosis" was performed. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were chosen for inclusion based on their relevance to coronavirus disease 2019, vaccine, and thrombosis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia manifests most often as unusual thromboses (cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, splanchnic vein thrombosis) but sometimes also "usual" thromboses (arterial stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep-vein thrombosis), with oftentimes severe thrombocytopenia, that becomes clinically evident 5-30 days after adenovirus-vectored coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine administration. Most patients have disseminated intravascular coagulation. These features are the result of vaccine-triggered formation of anti-platelet factor 4 immunoglobulin G that activate platelets, clinically mimicking autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Early recognition based on thrombosis (sometimes, hemorrhage), thrombocytopenia, and d-dimer elevation within the day 5-30 postvaccine "window" is important given treatment with high-dose IV immunoglobulin plus nonheparin anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia is a serious complication of vaccination that is not feasible to anticipate or prevent. When the patient presents with sustained headache, neurologic symptoms/signs, abdominal pain, dyspnea, or limb pain/swelling beginning 5-30 days post vaccination, platelet count and d-dimer must be measured, and imaging for thrombosis performed. Confirmation of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia diagnosis should be ordered (platelet factor 4/polyanion enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; platelet factor 4-enhanced platelet activation testing) as treatment is initiated (nonheparin anticoagulation, IV immunoglobulin).
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente , Trombose/induzido quimicamente , Fatores Etários , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Fatores Sexuais , Trombocitopenia/imunologia , Trombose/imunologiaRESUMO
Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) has been understood as a consumptive coagulopathy. However, impaired hemostasis is a component of DIC that occurs in a progressive manner. The critical concept of DIC is systemic activation of coagulation with vascular endothelial damage. DIC is the dynamic coagulation/fibrinolysis disorder that can proceed from compensated to decompensated phases, and is not simply impaired hemostasis, a misunderstanding that continues to evoke confusion among clinicians. DIC is a critical step of disease progression that is important to monitor over time. Impaired microcirculation and subsequent organ failure due to pathologic microthrombi formation are the pathophysiologies in sepsis-associated DIC. Impaired hemostasis due to coagulation factor depletion from hemodilution, shock, and hyperfibrinolysis occurs in trauma-associated DIC. Overt-DIC diagnostic criteria have been used clinically for more than 20 years but may not be adequate to detect the compensated phase of DIC, and due to different underlying causes, there is no "one-size-fits-all criteria." Individualized criteria for heterogeneous conditions continue to be proposed to facilitate the diagnosis. We believe that future research will provide therapeutics using new diagnostic criteria. Finally, DIC is also classified as either acute or chronic, and acute DIC results from progressive coagulation activation over a short time and requires urgent management. In this review, we examine the advances in research for DIC.
Assuntos
Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada , Humanos , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/diagnóstico , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/etiologia , Hemostasia/fisiologia , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/etiologia , FibrinóliseRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column direct hemoperfusion (PMX-DHP) is used for patients with septic shock, and the recommended hemoperfusion period is 2 h. However, it remains unclear whether the optimal duration is 2 h or longer. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of PMX-DHP between conventional and longer duration of PMX-DHP. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 103 patients with sepsis who underwent PMX-DHP. The demographic data, routine biochemistry, microbiological data, and primary infection site were reviewed in the medical chart. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS), and PaO2/FiO2, at baseline and day 3, were compared between the standard group (2 h of PMX-DHP) and the extended group (>2 h of PMX-DHP). RESULTS: Median MAP was significantly lower and median VIS was significantly higher in the extended group at baseline (p < 0.05, 0.01, respectively) There were no significant differences in APACHE II score, SOFA score, and PaO2/FiO2 at baseline between the 2 groups. The increase of MAP and the decrease in VIS from baseline to day 3 were significantly greater in the extended group (p < 0.01, respectively). In the extended group, increase in PaO2/FiO2 was significantly larger in the patients who underwent ≥8 h duration than that in patients who underwent <8 h duration (p < 0.01). The ventilator-free days, the incidence of continuous renal replacement therapy, and the 28-day mortality were not different between the groups. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Longer duration of PMX-DHP was associated with the improved MAP and decreased volume of vasoactive-inotropic agents compared with the conventional duration. Eight and longer hours duration of PMX-DHP was associated with the improvement in the pulmonary oxygenation. Further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of longer duration of PMX-DHP in patients with septic shock.
Assuntos
Hemodinâmica , Hemoperfusão/instrumentação , Polimixina B , Sepse/terapia , APACHE , Idoso , Cardiotônicos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Oxigênio/metabolismo , Polimixina B/química , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/metabolismo , Sepse/fisiopatologia , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In patients with infectious diseases, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is often diagnosed without the fibrinogen value. The relationship between hypofibrinogenemia and outcomes of DIC in infectious diseases has thus remained unclear. METHODS: We analyzed 3204 patients who received with thrombomodulin alfa (TM-α) for DIC and suspected DIC. Hypofibrinogenemia was defined by a fibrinogen level < 1.5 g/L. RESULTS: Hypofibrinogenemia was observed in 10.3% of patients with infectious diseases. The frequencies of both bleeding and organ failure symptoms, and the scores for organ failure or the DIC diagnostic criteria were significantly higher in infectious disease patients with hypofibrinogenemia, suggesting that in patients with infectious diseases, hypofibrinogenemia is associated with more progressive and severe DIC. Although the 28-day survival rate and the DIC resolution rate were both significantly lower for infectious disease patients with DIC with hypofibrinogenemia than for those without hypofibrinogenemia, this difference was not observed in DIC patients with hematological diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofibrinogenemia among infectious disease patients with DIC may reflect increased consumption of fibrinogen due to accelerated coagulation reactions, while hypofibrinogenemia among hematological disease patients with DIC may be caused by fibrinogenolysis due to hyperfibrinolysis, and frequently results in bleeding and multiple-organ failure.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Hyperglycemia induces vascular dysfunction that is thought to be initiated by neutrophils. Neutrophil activation produces endothelial injury by pathways that include NETosis, a type of specific cell death. In this study, we investigated the effects of hyperglycemia on neutrophil activation, cell death, NETosis, and endothelial glycocalyx damage using a mouse diabetes model. METHODS: We used db/db mice as a type 2 diabetes model, and C57BL/6 mice were the controls. At 5, 8, and 12 weeks of age, the proportion of CD11b+ granulocytes/monocytes, neutrophil extracellular trap (NET)-forming granulocytes/monocytes, and damaged and nonviable granulocytes/monocytes was analyzed. In addition, serum levels of high mobility group box 1, histone H3, and glycocalyx components that included syndecan-1 and hyaluronan were measured. RESULTS: In diabetic mice, we observed an increased proportion of CD11b+ granulocytes/monocytes. The proportion of NET-forming granulocytes/monocytes increased from the early stages of the experiments. The proportions of damaged and nonviable granulocytes/monocytes increased over time. In the 12-week-old diabetic mice, serum histone H3 levels increased. Circulating levels of syndecan-1 and hyaluronan decreased over time and were lower in diabetic mice. CONCLUSION: Neutrophil activation and cell death induce endothelial glycocalyx damage, and NET formation also participates in the mechanisms of vascular injury in type 2 diabetes.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Endotélio Vascular/metabolismo , Armadilhas Extracelulares/metabolismo , Glicocálix/metabolismo , Hiperglicemia/metabolismo , Animais , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/patologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/patologia , Endotélio Vascular/patologia , Armadilhas Extracelulares/genética , Glicocálix/genética , Glicocálix/patologia , Hiperglicemia/genética , Hiperglicemia/patologia , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Transgênicos , Ativação de Neutrófilo , Neutrófilos/metabolismo , Neutrófilos/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have reported a high prevalence of thrombotic events in coronavirus disease 2019. However, the significance of thromboembolic complications has not been widely appreciated. The purpose of this review is to provide current knowledge of this serious problem. DESIGN: Narrative review. DATA SOURCES: Online search of published medical literature through PubMed using the term "COVID-19," "SARS," "acute respiratory distress syndrome," "coronavirus," "coagulopathy," "thrombus," and "anticoagulants." STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Articles were chosen for inclusion based on their relevance to coagulopathy and thrombosis in coronavirus disease 2019, and anticoagulant therapy. Reference lists were reviewed to identify additional relevant articles. DATA SYNTHESIS: Coronavirus disease 2019 is associated with a strikingly high prevalence of coagulopathy and venous thromboembolism that may contribute to respiratory deterioration. Monitoring coagulation variables is important, as abnormal coagulation tests are related to adverse outcomes and may necessitate adjuvant antithrombotic interventions. In the initial phase of the infection, D-dimer and fibrinogen levels are increased, while activated partial prothrombin time, prothrombin time, and platelet counts are often relatively normal. Increased D-dimer levels three times the upper limit of normal may trigger screening for venous thromboembolism. In all hospitalized patients, thromboprophylaxis using low-molecular-weight heparin is currently recommended. The etiology of the procoagulant responses is complex and thought to be a result of specific interactions between host defense mechanisms and the coagulation system. Although the coagulopathy is reminiscent of disseminated intravascular coagulation and thrombotic microangiopathy, it has features that are markedly distinct from these entities. CONCLUSIONS: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2/coronavirus disease 2019 frequently induces hypercoagulability with both microangiopathy and local thrombus formation, and a systemic coagulation defect that leads to large vessel thrombosis and major thromboembolic complications, including pulmonary embolism in critically ill hospitalized patients. D-dimers and fibrinogen levels should be monitored, and all hospitalized patients should undergo thromboembolism prophylaxis with an increase in therapeutic anticoagulation in certain clinical situations.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Betacoronavirus , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/etiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/epidemiologia , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/prevenção & controle , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/fisiopatologia , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Pneumonia Viral/fisiopatologia , Gravidez , Prevalência , SARS-CoV-2 , Tromboembolia/etiologia , Trombofilia/etiologiaRESUMO
Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) has been recognized as a deadly complication in sepsis, and its early recognition followed by appropriate management of the underlying infection are the current management strategies. The activation of coagulation, inflammation, and other pathways are fundamental host responses against infection but also produce injury to the host. Recent advances have helped define the critical roles of thrombus formation in overcoming infection. In addition to activation of coagulation induced by pathogens, other important pathways including damage-associated molecular patterns, neutrophil extracellular traps, extracellular vesicles, and glycocalyx damage are involved in the pathogenesis of sepsis-induced DIC. The hallmark of DIC is thrombosis in the microvasculature; however, sepsis-induced DIC is a laboratory diagnosis based on coagulation test results and clinical setting. Although simplified criteria were recently introduced, DIC should be distinguished from other similar conditions such as thrombotic microangiopathy and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. In DIC, treating the underlying cause is crucial, and additional adjunct therapies including antithrombin, thrombomodulin, and heparins may have potential benefit, but evidence supporting their use in terms of improvement of clinically relevant outcomes continues to be debated. In this review, we introduce recent findings regarding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of sepsis-induced DIC. In addition, we also discuss future potential therapeutic approaches regarding this complex, life-threatening complication.
Assuntos
Antitrombinas/uso terapêutico , Sepse , Trombomodulina/uso terapêutico , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/sangue , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/diagnóstico , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/tratamento farmacológico , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/etiologia , Armadilhas Extracelulares/metabolismo , Vesículas Extracelulares/metabolismo , Glicocálix/metabolismo , Heparina , Humanos , Sepse/sangue , Sepse/complicações , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/terapia , Trombose/sangue , Trombose/diagnóstico , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC) characterized by the elevated D-dimer without remarkable changes of other global coagulation markers is associated with various thrombotic complications and disease severity. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the pathophysiology of this unique coagulopathy. METHODS: The authors performed online search of published medical literature through PubMed using the MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) term "COVID-19," "SARS-CoV-2," "coronavirus," "coagulopathy," and "thrombus." Then, selected 51 articles that closely relevant to coagulopathy in COVID-19. RESULTS: The primary targets of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are the pneumocytes, immune cells, and vascular endothelial cells. The alveolar damage and the pulmonary microvascular thrombosis are the major causes of acute lung injury in COVID-19. The endotheliopathy that occurs is due to direct SARS-CoV-2 infection and activation of other pathways that include the immune system and thromboinflammatory responses leading to what is termed CAC. As a result, both microvascular and macrovascular thrombotic events occur in arterial, capillary, venule, and large vein vascular beds to produce multiorgan dysfunction and thrombotic complications. In addition to the endothelial damage, SARS-CoV-2 also can cause vasculitis and presents as a systemic inflammatory vascular disease. Clinical management of COVID-19 includes anticoagulation but novel therapies for endotheliopathy, hypercoagulability, and vasculitis are needed. CONCLUSION: The endotheliopathy due to direct endothelial infection with SARS-COV-2 and the indirect damage caused by inflammation play the predominant role in the development of CAC. The intensive control of thromboinflammation is necessary to improve the outcome of this highly detrimental contagious disease.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/virologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Endotélio Vascular/fisiopatologia , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Vasculite/virologia , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/tratamento farmacológico , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/fisiopatologia , Células Endoteliais , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/análise , Humanos , Pulmão/irrigação sanguínea , Microvasos , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/fisiopatologia , PubMed , Embolia Pulmonar , SARS-CoV-2 , Trombose/virologiaRESUMO
Thrombotic complications and coagulopathy frequently occur in COVID-19. However, the characteristics of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC) are distinct from those seen with bacterial sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), with CAC usually showing increased D-dimer and fibrinogen levels but initially minimal abnormalities in prothrombin time and platelet count. Venous thromboembolism and arterial thrombosis are more frequent in CAC compared to SIC/DIC. Clinical and laboratory features of CAC overlap somewhat with a hemophagocytic syndrome, antiphospholipid syndrome, and thrombotic microangiopathy. We summarize the key characteristics of representative coagulopathies, discussing similarities and differences so as to define the unique character of CAC.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/sangue , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea/métodos , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/sangue , Humanos , Mediadores da Inflamação/sangue , Pandemias , Agregação Plaquetária/fisiologia , Pneumonia Viral/sangue , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) has been recognized as an urgent and critical condition in patients with sepsis. Therefore, unfamiliar and time-consuming tests or a complex scoring system are not suitable for diagnosis. Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC), a newly proposed category delineated by a few global coagulation tests, has been established as an early warning sign for DIC. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the characteristics of SIC, especially in relation to the score of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) for overt DIC. METHOD: A data set for 332 patients with sepsis who were suspected to have DIC, antithrombin activity <70%, and treated with antithrombin substitution was utilized to examine the relationship between SIC and overt DIC. The performance of SIC calculated at baseline (ie, before treatment) as well as on days 2, 4, or 7 was analyzed in terms of its ability to predict 28-day mortality and overt DIC. RESULTS: At baseline, 149 (98.7%) of 151 patients with overt DIC according to the ISTH definition were diagnosed as having SIC. Of the 49, 46 (93.9%) patients who developed overt DIC between days 2 and 4 had received a prior diagnosis of SIC. The sensitivity of baseline SIC for the prediction of death was significantly higher than that of overt DIC (86.8% vs 64.5%, P < .001). The sensitivity of SIC on days 2, 4, and 7 was significantly higher than those of overt DIC (96.1%, 92.3%, and 84.4% vs 67.1%, 57.7%, and 50.0%, P < .001, .001, and .001, respectively), although the specificity of SIC was lower at all time points.
Assuntos
Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/diagnóstico , Sepse/mortalidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antitrombinas/sangue , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Resultados de Cuidados Críticos , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/etiologia , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/mortalidade , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , Sepse/complicaçõesRESUMO
(1) Background: The endothelial glycocalyx is a primary target during the early phase of sepsis. We previously reported a newly developed recombinant non-fucosylated antithrombin has protective effects in vitro. We further evaluated the effects of this recombinant antithrombin on the glycocalyx damage in an animal model of sepsis. (2) Methods: Following endotoxin injection, in Wistar rats, circulating levels of hyaluronan, syndecan-1 and other biomarkers were evaluated in low-dose or high-dose recombinant antithrombin-treated animals and a control group (n = 7 per group). Leukocyte adhesion and blood flow were evaluated with intravital microscopy. The glycocalyx was also examined using side-stream dark-field imaging. (3) Results: The activation of coagulation was inhibited by recombinant antithrombin, leukocyte adhesion was significantly decreased, and flow was better maintained in the high-dose group (both p < 0.05). Circulating levels of syndecan-1 (p < 0.01, high-dose group) and hyaluronan (p < 0.05, low-dose group; p < 0.01, high-dose group) were significantly reduced by recombinant antithrombin treatment. Increases in lactate and decreases in albumin levels were significantly attenuated in the high-dose group (p < 0.05, respectively). The glycocalyx thickness was reduced over time in control animals, but the derangement was attenuated and microvascular perfusion was better maintained in the high-dose group recombinant antithrombin group (p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: Recombinant antithrombin maintained vascular integrity and the microcirculation by preserving the glycocalyx in this sepsis model, effects that were more prominent with high-dose therapy.
Assuntos
Antitrombina III/farmacologia , Endotélio Vascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Endotoxinas/toxicidade , Glicocálix/efeitos dos fármacos , Substâncias Protetoras/farmacologia , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Antitrombinas/farmacologia , Endotélio Vascular/metabolismo , Glicocálix/metabolismo , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Sepse/induzido quimicamente , Sepse/patologiaAssuntos
Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada , Fibrinólise , Hemostasia , Humanos , Fibrinólise/fisiologia , Fibrinólise/efeitos dos fármacos , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/sangue , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/diagnóstico , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/fisiopatologia , Hemostasia/fisiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The usefulness of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) waveform has been reported in hemophilia, acquired hemophilia and monitoring for anticoagulants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The APTT waveform was examined in patients suspected of having disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) to analyze its usefulness for the diagnosis of DIC or the prediction of the outcome or bleeding risk. RESULTS: DIC with fibrinogen < 2 g/L was frequently associated with infectious diseases (43.3%). The heights of the first derivative peak (1stDP) and second DP (2ndDP) were extremely low in DIC, especially DIC with hypofibrinogenemia, but high in infectious patients without DIC. The peak time and width of the 1stDP and 2ndDP were prolonged in patients with DIC. The heights of the 1stDP and 2ndDP were markedly low in patients with a poor outcome or those with hemoglobin < 8.0 g/dl. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: As bleeding type DIC was observed in infectious DIC, DIC without hypofibrinogenemia might switch to DIC with hypofibrinogenemia by the progression of DIC. The height of the 1stDP and 2ndDP is useful for the diagnosis of DIC and prediction of the bleeding risk or outcome.