Successful osimertinib rechallenge without concomitant corticosteroids after osimertinib-induced pneumonitis.

A 60-year-old woman was diagnosed with cT4N3M1c stage IVB lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation of exon19 deletion. After one month of treatment with osimertinib, a cough and diffuse ground glass opacities were observed in the bilateral lung field. Based on the clinical course and the exclusion of other etiologies, osimertinib-induced pneumonitis was diagnosed. The shadows resolved after osimertinib was discontinued. However, brain metastasis and leptomeningeal metastasis developed 20 months later; therefore, osimertinib was re-administered without concomitant corticosteroids. The pulmonary lesion and leptomeningeal metastasis were successfully treated without recurrence of drug-induced pneumonitis for eight months.

Effect of epoprostenol-induced thrombocytopaenia on lung transplantation for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: Preoperative intravenous epoprostenol therapy can cause thrombocytopaenia, which may increase the risk of perioperative bleeding during lung transplantation. This study aimed to determine whether lung transplantation can be safely performed in patients with epoprostenol-induced thrombocytopaenia. METHODS: From June 2008 to July 2022, we performed 37 lung transplants in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), including idiopathic PAH (n = 26), congenital heart disease-associated PAH (n = 7), pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (n = 3) and peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis (n = 1) at our institution. Of these, 26 patients received intravenous epoprostenol therapy (EPO group), whereas 11 patients were treated with no epoprostenol (no-EPO group). We retrospectively analysed the preoperative and postoperative platelet counts and post-transplant outcomes in each group. RESULTS: Preoperative platelet counts were relatively lower in the EPO group than in the no-EPO group (median EPO: 127 000 vs no-EPO: 176 000/µl). However, blood loss during surgery was similar between the 2 groups (EPO: 2473 ml vs no-EPO: 2615 ml). The platelet counts significantly increased over 1 month after surgery, and both groups showed similar platelet counts (EPO: 298 000 vs no-EPO: 284 000/µl). In-hospital mortality (EPO: 3.9% vs no-EPO: 18.2%) and the 3-year survival rate (EPO: 91.4% vs no-EPO: 80.8%) were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PAH treated with intravenous epoprostenol showed relatively lower platelet counts, which improved after lung transplantation with good post-transplant outcomes.

Hypereosinophilia-associated acute intradialytic hypotension: a report of three cases and literature review.

Occasionally, patients undergoing dialysis develop acute severe hypotension that requires interruption of dialysis within minutes of initiating every dialysis session. Although the underlying causes of recurrent intradialytic hypotension are evaluated extensively, including dialysis-associated allergic reactions or other possible causes, the definitive cause is sometimes missed. Dialysis is a life-sustaining procedure; therefore, prompt identification and management of the underlying cause of dialysis intolerance are crucial. Herein, we report three cases of patients undergoing dialysis who presented with hypereosinophilia-associated acute intradialytic hypotension. All three patients developed acute severe hypotension within minutes after the start of every dialysis session. The prescriptions for dialysis were changed, but episodes of intradialytic hypotension persisted. Pretreatment with methylprednisolone given intravenously before the dialysis session was also ineffective. All patients had hypereosinophilia (> 1500/µL) of different etiology. Eosinophil-lowering therapy with 0.5 mg/kg of prednisolone given orally daily was initiated, and all of them could restart dialysis without any hypotensive episodes within a few days. Our case report and literature review indicated that hypereosinophilia, regardless of its etiology, could result in severe acute hypotension shortly after the start of dialysis session. The oral administration of prednisolone daily was highly effective on hypereosinophilia-associated intradialytic hypotension, while pretreatment with intravenous corticosteroid therapy just before dialysis had no effect. Hypereosinophilia-associated acute intradialytic hypotension is an under-recognized condition; therefore, clinicians need to be aware of this clinical entity and initiate effective treatment strategies. We also provide a brief summary of previously published cases.

Olanzapine Plus Triple Antiemetic Therapy for the Prevention of Carboplatin-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of antiemetic therapy with olanzapine, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (RA), a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) RA, and dexamethasone for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving carboplatin-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients scheduled to receive carboplatin (AUC ≥5) were randomly assigned to receive either olanzapine 5 mg once daily (olanzapine group) or placebo (placebo group) in combination with aprepitant, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone. The primary end point was the complete response (CR; no vomiting and no rescue therapy) rate in the overall phase (0-120 hours). Secondary end points included the proportion of patients free of nausea and safety. RESULTS: In total, 355 patients (78.6% male, median age 72 years, 100% thoracic cancer), including 175 and 180 patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups, respectively, were evaluated. The overall CR rate was 86.9% in the olanzapine group versus 80.6% in the placebo group. The intergroup difference in the overall CR rate was 6.3% (95% CI, -1.3 to 13.9). The proportions of patients free of chemotherapy-induced nausea in the overall (88.6% in the olanzapine group v 75.0% in the placebo group) and delayed (89.7% v 75.6%, respectively) phases were significantly higher in the olanzapine group than in the placebo group (both P < .001). Somnolence was observed in 43 (24.6%) and 41 (22.9%) patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups, respectively, and no events were grade ≥3 in severity. CONCLUSION: The addition of olanzapine was not associated with a significant increase in the overall CR rate. Regarding the prevention of nausea, adding olanzapine provided better control in patients receiving carboplatin-containing chemotherapy, which needs further exploration.