Linked-color imaging with or without artificial intelligence for adenoma detection: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important indicator of colonoscopy quality and colorectal cancer incidence. Both linked-color imaging (LCI) with artificial intelligence (LCA) and LCI alone increase adenoma detection during colonoscopy, although it remains unclear whether one modality is superior. This study compared ADR between LCA and LCI alone, including according to endoscopists' experience (experts and trainees) and polyp size. METHODS: Patients undergoing colonoscopy for positive fecal immunochemical tests, follow-up of colon polyps, and abdominal symptoms at a single institution were randomly assigned to the LCA or LCI group. ADR, adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, number of adenomas per location, and adenoma size were compared. RESULTS: The LCA (n=400) and LCI (n=400) groups showed comparable cecal intubation and withdrawal times. The LCA group showed a significantly higher ADR (58.8% vs. 43.5%; P<0.001) and mean (95%CI) APC (1.31 [1.15 to 1.47] vs. 0.94 [0.80 to 1.07]; P<0.001), particularly in the ascending colon (0.30 [0.24 to 0.36] vs. 0.20 [0.15 to 0.25]; P=0.02). Total number of nonpolypoid-type adenomas was also significantly higher in the LCA group (0.15 [0.09 to 0.20] vs. 0.08 [0.05 to 0.10]; P=0.02). Small polyps (≤5, 6-9mm) were detected significantly more frequently in the LCA group (0.75 [0.64 to 0.86] vs. 0.48 [0.40 to 0.57], P<0.001 and 0.34 [0.26 to 0.41] vs. 0.24 [0.18 to 0.29], P=0.04, respectively). In both groups, ADR was not significantly different between experts and trainees. CONCLUSIONS: LCA was significantly superior to LCI alone in terms of ADR.

Usefulness of a long hood for the detection of bleeding sites in colonic diverticular hemorrhage: A randomized controlled trial.

Background and Aim: The use of a hood at the tip of a colonoscope enables aspiration, inversion of the diverticulum, and observation of the inside of the diverticulum. In most previous studies, a short hood was used; however, observation of the diverticulum is often inadequate. Long food is promising by previous research, but it was a retrospective study using propensity matching and has some limitations. We compared the identification rate of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) between the long and standard hoods in cases of suspected colonic diverticular hemorrhage (CDH) to confirm the usefulness of long hood by prospective randomized controlled trial. Methods: Eighty patients (42 in the long hood group [L group] and 38 in the short hood group [S group]) who visited the Saitama Medical University Hospital and Tokai University Hachioji Hospital between December 2018 and July 2021 with a chief complaint of bloody stool and suspected CDH, based on the clinical course and imaging studies, were included. Patients were randomly assigned to the L or S group. Results: Regarding patient background, age was significantly higher in the L group; however, no significant differences were found in medical history or history of antithrombotic medication or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Identification rate of SRH was significantly higher in the L group (58.5%, 24/42 patients) than in the S group (26.3%, 10/38 patients) (P < 0.05). All patients were treated using the clip method, and the rate of rebleeding within 1 month was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: A long hood was more useful compared with a short hood in identifying SRH of CDH (UMIN000034603).