Correlates of anesthetic properties in isolated spinal cord: cyclobutanes.

Two halogenated cyclobutanes, one anesthetic and one not, were compared on receptor-specific pathways in isolated neonatal rat spinal cord. The anesthetic 1-chloro-1,2,2-trifluorocyclobutane depressed the monosynaptic reflex (glutamate non-NMDA receptors) and abolished a slow ventral root potential (glutamate NMDA, non-NMDA and tachykinin receptors). This compound slightly enhanced the muscimol-evoked dorsal root potential (GABAA) but reversibly depressed the dorsal root potential elicited by dorsal root stimulation. The non-anesthetic 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane increased monosynaptic reflex, depressed slow ventral root potential approximately 50%, had little effect on muscimol-evoked dorsal root potential, and irreversibly depressed dorsal root-evoked dorsal root potential. Hypoxia accounts for slow ventral root potential depression, but not monosynaptic reflex enhancement. In this preparation and for this pair of compounds, anesthetic properties are related to blockade of transmission at glutamate synapses, with a small component of GABAA enhancement. Monosynaptic reflex increase may be related to the non-anesthetic cyclobutane's convulsant and anti-anesthetic properties.

Development of an irradiated vaccine that protects against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhoea.

In the pathogenesis of diarrhoea in man bacteria adhesion to enterocytes is mediated by specific CFA/I or CFA/II antigens. A perorally administered vaccine was prepared from E. coli H10407 (078:H11) by irradiation with electrons with high energy (EHE). Two hours after cimetidine administration rats were immunized per os with 5 irradiated vaccine doses at 4-day intervals. Seven days after the last immunization animals were infected by inoculating 1 x 10(9) germs in the ligated intestinal loop. Reduction of the intestinal secretion by over 50% 18 hours after inoculation was considered an efficient protection marker. The obtained results have proved a significant reduction of the intestinal secretion in immunized animals infected with serotypes 078:H11(63 +/- 4%) and 078:H12(59 +/- 5%) as compared to non-immunized animals. Experimental induction of the intestinal protection against Escherichia coli enterotoxigenic (ETEC) strains points to the possibility of using this type of irradiated vaccine in the prophylaxis of diarrhoea in man.

Direct determination of oil/saline partition coefficients.

Oil/saline partition coefficients for inhaled compounds often are defined by the ratio of the separately determined oil/gas and saline/gas partition coefficients. This approach assumes that the concurrent presence of oil with saline has no effect on the characteristics of either solvent. To test this assumption, we measured the oil/gas and saline/gas partition coefficients for CF3(CCIF)2CF3 and 1,2-dichloroperfluorocyclobutane (C4Cl2F6) separately and with the two phases mixed in a common container. We chose these compounds because they have radically different oil/gas and saline/gas partition coefficients and thus would provide a severe test of the assumption. For CF3(CCIF)2CF3, olive oil/saline partition coefficients were, respectively, 13,200 and 13,300 when measured separately and in mixed phases, and the octanol/saline partition coefficients were 19,200 and 18,100. Similarly, olive oil/saline partition coefficients for 1,2-dichloroperfluorocyclobutane were 3660 and 3500 when measured separately and in mixed phases, respectively, and the octanol/saline partition coefficients were 5140 and 4560. We conclude that differences between separate and mixed-phase determinations of ratios are small or nonexistent.

Circuit absorption of halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane.

UNLABELLED: Uptake of inhaled anesthetics may be measured as the amount of anesthetic infused to maintain a constant alveolar concentration of anesthetic. This method assumes that the patient absorbs all of the infused anesthetic, and that none is lost to circuit components. Using a standard anesthetic circuit with a 3-L rebreathing bag simulating the lungs, and simulating metabolism by input of carbon dioxide, we tested this assumption for halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane. Our results suggest that after washin of anesthetic sufficient to eliminate a material difference between inspired and end-tidal anesthetic, washin to other parts of the circuit (probably the ventilator) and absorbent (soda lime) continued to remove anesthetic for up to 15 min. From 30 min to 180 min of anesthetic administration, circuit components absorbed trivial amounts of isoflurane (12 +/- 13 mL vapor at 1.5 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration, slightly more sevoflurane (39 +/- 15 mL), and still more halothane (64 +/- 9 mL). During this time, absorbent degraded sevoflurane (321 +/- 31 mL absorbed by circuit components and degraded by soda lime). The amount degraded increased with increasing input of carbon dioxide (e.g., the 321 +/- 31 mL increased to 508 +/- 48 mL when carbon dioxide input increased from 250 mL/min to 500 mL/min). Measurement of anesthetic uptake as a function of the amount of anesthetic infused must account for these findings. IMPLICATIONS: Systems that deliver inhaled anesthetics may also remove the anesthetic. Initially, anesthetics may diffuse into delivery components and the interstices of material used to absorb carbon dioxide. Later, absorbents may degrade some anesthetics (e.g., sevoflurane). Such losses may compromise measurements of anesthetic uptake.

Factors affecting production of compound A from the interaction of sevoflurane with Baralyme and soda lime.

Various alkali (e.g., soda lime) convert sevoflurane to CF2=C(CF3)OCH2F, a vinyl ether called "Compound A, " whose toxicity raises concerns regarding the safe administration of sevoflurane via rebreathing circuits. In the present investigation, we measured the sevoflurane degradation and output of Compound A caused by standard (13% water) Baralyme brand absorbent and standard (15% water) soda lime, and Baralyme and soda lime having various water contents (including no water). We used a flow-through system, applying a gas flow rate relative to absorbent volume that roughly equaled the rate/volume found in clinical practice. Both absorbents, at similar water contents, temperatures, and sevoflurane concentrations, produced roughly equal concentrations of Compound A. Dry and nearly dry absorbents produced less Compound A early in exposure to sevoflurane, and more later, than standard absorbents. Increases in temperature and sevoflurane concentration increased output of Compound A. Both absorbents, especially when dry, also destroyed Compound A, the concentration exiting from absorbent resulting from a complex sum of production and destruction. We conclude that the variability of concentrations of Compound A found in clinical practice may be largely explained by the inflow rate used (i.e., by rebreathing), sevoflurane concentration, and absorbent temperature and dryness. The effect of dryness is complex, with fresh dry absorbent destroying Compound A as it is made, and with dry absorbent that has been exposed to sevoflurane for a period of time providing a sometimes unusually high output of Compound A.

Potentiation of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor-mediated chloride currents by novel halogenated compounds correlates with their abilities to induce general anesthesia.

The Meyer-Overton hypothesis, predicting that the potency of an anesthetic correlates with its affinity for lipid, is a cornerstone of modern anesthetic theory. Several halogenated compounds were recently found to deviate from this prediction, whereas others did not. We tested the abilities of enflurane and five of these compounds to potentiate gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor responses in Xenopus oocytes expressing alpha 1 beta 2 or alpha 1 beta 2 gamma 2S GABAA receptors. Enflurane and the anesthetic 1-chloro-1,2,2-trifluorocyclobutane (F3) strongly potentiated chloride currents produced by 5 microM GABA with both alpha 1 beta 2 and alpha 1 beta 2 gamma 2S receptors. This potentiation decreased as the GABA concentration was raised. The transitional compound (less potent than predicted by its lipid solubility) 2-bromoheptafluoropropane produced modest enhancement, whereas three nonanesthetics (neither causing anesthesia in vivo nor decreasing the requirement for known anesthetics), 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane, 2-chloroheptafluoropropane, and 2,3-chlorooctafluorobutane, did not affect GABAA receptor currents. Although all five compounds were predicted to be anesthetics by the Meyer Overton hypothesis, only F3 behaved as an anesthetic in vivo and only F3 markedly potentiated GABAA receptor responses in oocytes. These results strongly implicate the GABAA receptor in general anesthesia. Fluorescence polarization studies showed that anesthetics (enflurane and F3), but not nonasthetics (1,2 dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane and 2,3-chlorooctafluorobutane) disordered membrane lipids. Thus, for the compounds studied actions on both GABAA receptor function and lipid order distinguish between anesthetics and nonanesthetics.

Maturation decreases ethanol minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration in mice as previously demonstrated in rats: there is no species difference.

The potency of conventional inhaled anesthetics increases with maturation: the 50% effective dose (minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration [MAC]) for conventional inhaled anesthetics in the neonatal rat or human exceeds MAC in the young adult. This increase also applies to ethanol in rats tested using MAC as the measure of anesthesia. However, the converse appears to be true for studies in mice assessed with the righting reflex; that is, adult mice are six times more resistant than neonates to the effects of ethanol. These disparate findings imply that maturation in rats and mice may produce opposing changes in the quantity or sensitivity of one or more receptors that mediate the actions of anesthetics that lead to the anesthetic state. Such a finding would be important for two reasons. First, both rodents are widely used in studies of anesthetic effects, and, thus, a species-dependent divergence in anesthetic effects has immediate experimental implications. Second, confirmation of such a species difference would supply an opportunity to test which receptors might be crucial to anesthetic mechanisms. Accordingly, we investigated whether maturation decreased ethanol potency in mice, using MAC as the measure of anesthesia. Applying standard techniques, we tested MAC for ethanol in 15 CF-1 mice aged 10 days (6-8.5 g) and in 13 mice aged 77-84 days (34-39 g). MAC decreased with maturation, and the decrease was indistinguishable from that found in our previous studies of rats.

Baralyme dehydration increases and soda lime dehydration decreases the concentration of compound A resulting from sevoflurane degradation in a standard anesthetic circuit.

UNLABELLED: Soda lime and Baralyme brand carbon dioxide absorbents degrade sevoflurane to CF2 = C(CF3)OCH2F, a potentially nephrotoxic vinyl ether called Compound A. Dehydration of these absorbents increases both the degradation of sevoflurane to Compound A and the degradation of Compound A. The balance between sevoflurane degradation and Compound A degradation determines the concentration of Compound A issuing from the absorbent (the net production of Compound A). We studied the effect of dehydration on the net production of Compound A in a simulated anesthetic circuit. Mimicking continuing oxygen delivery for 1, 2, or 3 days after completion of an anesthetic, we directed a "conditioning" fresh gas flow of 5 L/min or 10 L/min retrograde through fresh absorbent in situ in a standard absorbent system for 16, 40, and/or 64 h. The conditioned absorbent was subsequently used (without mixing of the granules) in a standard anesthetic circuit in which a 3-L rebreathing bag substituted for the lung. Metabolism was mimicked by introducing 250 mL/min carbon dioxide into the "lung," and the lung was ventilated with a minute ventilation of 10 L/ min. At the same time, we introduced sevoflurane in a fresh gas inflow of 2 L/min at a concentration sufficient to produce an inspired concentration of 3.2%. Because of increased sevoflurane destruction by the absorbent, progressively longer periods of conditioning (dehydration) and/or higher inflow rates increased the delivered (vaporizer) concentration of sevoflurane required to sustain a 3.2% concentration. Dehydration of Baralyme increased the inspired concentration of Compound A by up to sevenfold, whereas dehydration of soda lime markedly decreased the inspired concentration of Compound A. IMPLICATIONS: Economical delivery of modern inhaled anesthetics requires rebreathing of exhaled gases after removal of carbon dioxide. However, carbon dioxide absorbents (Baralyme/soda lime) may degrade anesthetics to toxic substances. Baralyme dehydration increases, and soda lime dehydration decreases, degradation of the inhaled anesthetic sevoflurane to the toxic substance, Compound A.

Compound A: solubility in saline and olive oil; destruction by blood.

Compound A is a degradation product of sevoflurane. Knowledge of the solubility of Compound A, CH2F-O-C(=CF2)(CF3), in blood and other solvents would aid in the definition of its kinetics. Accordingly, we determined solvent/gas partition coefficients of Compound A for saline (0.166 +/- 0.002 [mean +/- SD; n = 4]) and olive oil (20.1 +/- 1.1 [n = 4]). Measurement of solubility in blood was confounded by degradation of Compound A in blood and blood components. If a mixture of 99.3% saline and 0.7% oil provides the solubility equivalent to that possessed by blood (as it does for the parent compound, sevoflurane), then blood solubility and solubility in plasma, albumin, red blood cells, or pure hemoglobin is approximately 0.31. The order of Compound A degradation was human plasma = rat blood > whole human blood >5% human serum albumin = washed human red blood cells (hematocrit 50%) = 5% pure hemoglobin. Presuming a solvent/gas partition coefficient of 0.31, respective approximate times for 50% degradation equaled 2.7, 2.8, 4.6, 9.9, 11.0, and 12 min. The accuracy of these approximations was limited by the need to estimate, rather than determine, the solubility of Compound A in such solvents. Pasteurization (heating to 60 degrees C for 12 h) or pretreatment with N-ethylmaleimide (a compound that reversibly binds to sulfhydryl groups) decreased the degradation rate in plasma. These results suggest that degradation arises, at least in part, from reaction of Compound A with proteins in blood, possibly from covalent reaction of Compound A with protein and/or from an enzymatically mediated reaction. The products of degradation, the binding sites, and the clinical implications of such binding and degradation remain to be determined.

Detection of intraoperative segmental wall-motion abnormalities by transesophageal echocardiography: the incremental value of additional cross sections in the transverse and longitudinal planes.

Because biplane and multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are more complex and expensive than single-plane TEE, we performed this study to determine whether the use of multiple single-plane (transverse) cross sections is as reliable for detection of left ventricular segmental wall-motion abnormalities (SWMA) as biplane TEE. We used biplane TEE to acquire nine standard cross sections of the left ventricle in 41 consecutive adults undergoing cardiac or vascular surgery. Six of these cross sections were in the transverse plane (i.e., achievable with single-plane TEE) and three in the longitudinal plane (i.e., achievable only with biplane or multiplane TEE). Each cross section was divided into myocardial segments for analysis. A total of 1810 segments were analyzed by independent investigators using a standardized evaluation system. Seventeen percent of all SWMA detected in this study were in the midpapillary transverse-plane cross section, an additional 48% in other transverse-plane cross sections, and 35% exclusively in the longitudinal-plane cross sections. Thus, most (65%), but not all, SWMA were in cross sections achievable with single-plane TEE. We conclude that the MP-T cross section should be the foundation for assessment of segmental function, but additional cross sections in the transverse and longitudinal planes are required for detection of the majority of segmental wall-motion abnormalities.

Enhanced choline acetyltransferase activity does not explain the action of inhaled convulsants.

Enhancement of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity and increased intraneuronal acetylcholine (ACh) may explain the convulsant activity of some inhaled compounds. Enflurane, for example, enhances such activity. Accordingly, we measured choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity in rat cortical synaptosomes in the presence of two inhaled convulsants, flurothyl (CF3CH2OCH2CF3) and 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane at partial pressures below and greatly exceeding those which produce convulsions in vivo. Neither agent changed the kinetic parameters, maximum velocity (vmax) or Michaelis constant (Km). The vmax for controls in the flurothyl series was 016 (0.06) nmol mg-1 min-1 and the Km was 0.23 (0.11) mmol litre-1. For the 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane series of experiments the results for the controls were vmax 0.23 (0.10) nmol mg-1 min-1 and Km 0.20 (0.08) mmol litre-1. Modification of ChAT activity did not contribute to the excitatory effects of these agents.

Changing from isoflurane to desflurane toward the end of anesthesia does not accelerate recovery in humans.

BACKGROUND: In an attempt to combine the advantage of the lower solubilities of new inhaled anesthetics with the lesser cost of older anesthetics, some clinicians substitute the former for the latter toward the end of anesthesia. The authors tried to determine whether substituting desflurane for isoflurane in the last 30 min of a 120-min anesthetic would accelerate recovery. METHODS: Five volunteers were anesthetized three times for 2 h using a fresh gas inflow of 2 l/min: 1.25 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) desflurane, 1.25 MAC isoflurane, and 1.25 MAC isoflurane for 90 min followed by 30 min of desflurane concentrations sufficient to achieve a total of 1.25 MAC equivalent ("crossover"). Recovery from anesthesia was assessed by the time to respond to commands, by orientation, and by tests of cognitive function. RESULTS: Compared with isoflurane, the crossover technique did not accelerate early or late recovery (P > 0.05). Recovery from isoflurane or the crossover anesthetic was significantly longer than after desflurane (P < 0.05). Times to response to commands for isoflurane, the crossover anesthetic, and desflurane were 23 +/- 5 min (mean +/- SD), 21 +/- 5 min, and 11 +/- 1 min, respectively, and to orientation the times were 27 +/- 7 min, 25 +/- 5 min, and 13 +/- 2 min, respectively. Cognitive test performance returned to reference values 15-30 min sooner after desflurane than after isoflurane or the crossover anesthetic. Isoflurane cognitive test performance did not differ from that with the crossover anesthetic at any time. CONCLUSIONS: Substituting desflurane for isoflurane during the latter part of anesthesia does not improve recovery, in part because partial rebreathing through a semiclosed circuit limits elimination of isoflurane during the crossover period. Although higher fresh gas flow during the crossover period would speed isoflurane elimination, the amount of desflurane used and, therefore, the cost would increase.

Maturation decreases ethanol minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) more than desflurane MAC in rats.

The potency of conventional inhaled anesthetics increases with increasing age: the 50% effective dose (minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration [MAC]) for anesthesia in the neonatal animal or human exceeds MAC in the young adult by approximately 30% to 60%. We tested whether this relationship also applies to the alkanols, using ethanol as a representative alkanol. We found that the MAC of ethanol in neonatal rats was 1.86 times (86% greater than) the MAC for adult rats, based on ethanol partial pressures determined from brain specimens. In contrast, the MAC of desflurane in neonatal rats was 1.19 times (19% greater than) the MAC for adult rats, less than one-fourth the 86% found for ethanol. These differences must be explained by any unitary theory of narcosis. Alternatively, the mechanistic basis for alkanol versus conventional inhaled anesthetics may differ in part or whole.

Ventilatory effects of the nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (2N) in swine.

UNLABELLED: Nonimmobilizers (inhaled compounds that do not suppress movement in response to a noxious stimulus) resemble anesthetics in their capacity to suppress memory, but unlike anesthetics, they can cause convulsions. Higher concentrations of nonimmobilizers may cause death, even with apparent suppression of convulsions by the concurrent administration of conventional inhaled anesthetics. We hypothesized that nonimmobilizers can depress ventilation and can cause death by adding to the depression of ventilation produced by conventional anesthetics. To test these hypotheses, we administered 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (2N) to four pigs anesthetized with desflurane. The addition of 2N decreased PaCO2 and tended to increase the slope of the ventilatory response to imposed increases in PETCO2. Limited results from study of two other nonimmobilizers (2,3-dichlorooctafluorobutane and perfluoropentane), in two pigs each, were consistent with the findings for 2N. However, experimental limitations (e.g., toxicity of 2,3-dichlorooctafluorobutane, and hypoxia from perfluoropentane) confound interpretation of these latter results. Our findings do not support our hypotheses--2N (and presumably all nonimmobilizers) seems to be a respiratory stimulant, not a depressant. IMPLICATIONS: A new class of inhaled compounds, nonimmobilizers, allow tests of how inhaled anesthetics act. Nonimmobilizers may act like anesthetics (e.g., impair learning) or may not (e.g., do not prevent movement in response to a noxious stimulus). The present work shows that, unlike anesthetics,nonimmobilizers do not depress breathing.

Automated real-time analysis of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiograms.

BACKGROUND: Although transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) produces real-time images depicting left ventricular (LV) filling and ejection, the quantitative analysis of these images has been too time consuming to be of practical value in the operating room. Therefore, the authors investigated whether a new automated border detection system (ABD) could track the endocardial border continuously and compute the cross-sectional area of the LV cavity. METHODS: Using data from 25 patients who were monitored with TEE as part of their routine clinical care, the authors compared ABD estimates of LV end-diastolic area (EDA in square centimeters), end-systolic area (ESA in square centimeters), and fractional area change (FAC) with the laboratory measurements made independently by an expert. RESULTS: ABD slightly underestimated EDA (10.7 +/- 1.0 vs. 11.2 +/- 1.0 cm2) and slightly overestimated ESA (5.6 +/- 0.7 vs. 4.8 +/- 0.6 cm2, mean +/- standard error). However, when ABD tracking of the endocardial border was judged as "good" or "excellent" (84% of the patients at end diastole and 72% at end systole), the limits of agreement between ABD and the expert's findings were within the limits expected for two experts. By contrast, ABD significantly underestimated FAC (0.44 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.56 +/- 0.03) and the limits of agreement between ABD and the expert were more than twice as great as expected for experts, even when ABD performance was judged as "excellent." CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that, when ABD appears to be performing adequately, it underestimates LV FAC, but provides valid real-time estimates of LV EDA and ESA. Thus, it warrants further evaluation as a potentially powerful clinical and research tool.

Carbon monoxide production from degradation of desflurane, enflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and sevoflurane by soda lime and Baralyme.

Anecdotal reports suggest that soda lime and Baralyme brand absorbent can degrade inhaled anesthetics to carbon monoxide (CO). We examined the factors that govern CO production and found that these include: 1) The anesthetic used: for a given minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC)-multiple, the magnitude of CO production (greatest to least) is desflurane > or = enflurane > isoflurane >> halothane = sevoflurane. 2) The absorbent dryness: completely dry soda lime produces much more CO than absorbent with just 1.4% water content, and soda lime containing 4.8% or more water (standard soda lime contains 15% water) generates no CO. In contrast, both completely dry Baralyme and Baralyme with 1.6% water produce high concentrations of CO, and Baralyme containing 4.7% water produces concentrations equaling those produced by soda lime containing 1.4% water. Baralyme containing 9.7% or more water and standard Baralyme (13% water) do not generate CO.3) The type of absorbent: at a given water content, Baralyme produces more CO than does soda lime. 4) The temperature: an increased temperature increases CO production. 5) The anesthetic concentration: more CO is produced from higher anesthetic concentrations. These results suggest that CO generation can be avoided for all anesthetics by using soda lime with 4.8% (or more) water or Baralyme with 9.7% (or more) water, and by using inflow rates of less than 2-3 L/min. Such inflow rates are low enough to ensure that the absorbent does not dry out.

Polyhalogenated and perfluorinated compounds that disobey the Meyer-Overton hypothesis.

Fourteen polyhalogenated, completely halogenated (perhalogenated), or perfluorinated compounds were examined for their anesthetic effects in rats. Anesthetic potency or minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) was quantified using response/nonresponse to electrical stimulation of the tail as the end-point. For compounds that produced excitable behavior, and/or did not produce anesthesia when given alone, we determined MAC by additivity studies with desflurane. Nine of 14 compounds had measurable MAC values with products of MAC x oil/gas partition coefficient ranging from 3.7 to 24.8 atm. Because these products exceed that for conventional inhaled anesthetics (1.8 atm), they demonstrate a deviation from the Meyer-Overton hypothesis. Five compounds (CF3CCIFCF3, CF3CCIFCCIFCF3, perfluorocyclobutane, 1,2-dichloroperfluorocyclobutane, and 1,2-dimethylperfluorocyclobutane) had no anesthetic effect when given alone, had excitatory effects when given alone, and tended to increase the MAC for desflurane. These five compounds had no anesthetic properties in spite of their abilities to dissolve in lipids and tissues, to penetrate into the central nervous system, and to be administered at high enough partial pressures so that they should have an anesthetic effect as predicted by the Meyer-Overton hypothesis. Such compounds will be useful in identifying and differentiating anesthetic sites and mechanisms of action. Any physiologic or biophysical/biochemical change produced by conventional anesthetics and deemed important for the anesthetic state should not be produced by nonanesthetics.

Concentrations of desflurane and propofol that suppress response to command in humans.

The anesthetic concentration just suppressing appropriate response to command (minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration awake [MAC-awake] for volatile anesthetics or plasma concentration to prevent a response in 50% of patients [Cp50]-awake for intravenous anesthetics) provides three important measures. First, along with pharmacokinetics, the ratio of the awakening concentration to the anesthetizing concentration (MAC-awake/MAC or Cp50-awake/Cp50) determines time to awakening. Second, a correlation between MAC-awake and the anesthetic concentration sufficient to prevent learning suggests MAC-awake provides a surrogate measure of amnestic potency. Third, population values for MAC-awake provide evidence for or against commonality in anesthetic mechanisms. We studied 22 male volunteers twice to determine both MAC-awake for desflurane (2.60% +/- 0.46%) and Cp50-awake for propofol (2.69 +/- 0.56 microgram/mL). Awakening with desflurane occurs at a concentration closer to its anesthetizing concentration (36% of MAC) than propofol (18% of Cp50); that is, 1) desflurane requires less of a decrement in anesthetic concentration at the effect site for arousal; and 2) if MAC-awake (Cp50-awake) values reflect the concentrations providing amnesia, propofol is a more potent amnestic. Of interest, the dose response curves of desflurane and propofol were equivalently steep, a finding consistent with a common mechanism of action. In contrast, sensitivity of each volunteer to desflurane did not correlate with sensitivity to propofol (r2 < 0.01, P = 0.98) arguing against a common mechanism.

Minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration values for the enantiomers of isoflurane differ minimally.

Results of in vivo and in vitro studies of the anesthetic potencies of the enantiomers (optical isomers) of isoflurane provide various results ranging from no difference to differences of nearly two fold. A finding of a difference in anesthetic requirement in the whole animal has particular relevance to theories of anesthetic mechanisms of action because it suggests that anesthesia may result from a specific anesthetic-receptor interaction. This led to our decision to redetermine the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of (+)-S and (-)-R enantiomers of isoflurane in 12 Sprague-Dawley rats (six per group). The (+)-S enantiomer gave a MAC of 0.0144 +/- 0.0012 atm (i.e., 1.44% +/- 0.12% at 1 atm pressure; mean +/- SD) and the (-)-R enantiomer gave a MAC of 0.0169 +/- 0.0020 atm. Although the 17% greater value for the (-)-R enantiomer is qualitatively consistent with previous results the difference is not significant (P = 0.06), and the absolute difference is smaller than that found by a previous study. However, given the small sample size, our power to define a small significant difference is limited. Regardless of statistical significance, our results do not confirm the conclusion that interaction with a specific receptor is important to the mechanism of action of inhaled anesthetics.