RESUMO
Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is caused by mutations in the tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP) gene in an autosomal recessive or dominant manner and characterized by defective mineralization of bone and low serum ALP levels. In this report, we present a family with HPP mother (case 1) and HPP child (case 2) who have identical TNSALP gene mutation (c.1015G>A p.Gly339Arg heterozygous mutation) but distinct clinical phenotypes. Whereas case 1 appeared to be asymptomatic despite extremely low levels of serum ALP, case 2 had several HPP-related symptoms, such as tooth loss, fractures, short stature, with slightly decreased ALP levels. Upon the diagnosis of HPP, case 1 discontinued denosumab, which was used to treat her rheumatoid arthritis, concerning the risk of atypical femoral fractures. The clinical course of this family was suggestive in a genotype-phenotype imbalance in HPP, the underdiagnosis of HPP in adults, and the risk of atypical femoral fractures using bone resorption inhibitors.
Assuntos
Fosfatase Alcalina/genética , Hipofosfatasia/enzimologia , Hipofosfatasia/genética , Mutação/genética , Adulto , Família , Feminino , Heterozigoto , Humanos , Hipofosfatasia/diagnóstico , Hipofosfatasia/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linhagem , Fenótipo , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genéticaRESUMO
CONTEXT: Whether continuation of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) or switching to oral semaglutide is more beneficial for ß-cell function is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of switching from DPP-4is to oral semaglutide for ß-cell function compared with DPP-4i continuation. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of SWITCH-SEMA 2, a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial on the switch to oral semaglutide vs DPP-4i continuation without dose adjustment for 24 weeks in subjects with type 2 diabetes treated with DPP-4is, was conducted. Changes in markers for glucose metabolism, including homeostatic model assessment (HOMA2) scores and disposition index (DI), were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 146 subjects (semaglutide group, 69; DPP-4i group, 77) were analyzed. In the semaglutide group, glycemic control, liver enzyme deviations, and lipid profiles improved after 24 weeks. Regarding indices for ß-cell function, changes in HOMA2-ß as well as DI, reflecting the ability of ß-cells to compensate for insulin resistance, were significantly higher in the semaglutide group compared with the DPP-4i group (mean change, +10.4 vs +0.6 in HOMA2-ß [P = .001] and +0.09 vs 0.0 in DI [P < .001]). Improvement in DI in the semaglutide group was correlated significantly to changes in body mass index (BMI), HbA1c, and fatty liver index reflecting liver steatosis. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that dose of semaglutide (≥â¯7â mg/day), reduction in fatty liver index, and metformin nonuse were independently associated with improvement of DI. CONCLUSION: Switching to oral semaglutide ameliorated ß-cell function compared with DPP-4is, presumably via tissue-to-tissue crosstalk between liver and ß-cells.
RESUMO
BACKGRUOUND: Fibrates have renal toxicity limiting their use in subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, pemafibrate has fewer toxic effects on renal function. In the present analysis, we evaluated the effects of pemafibrate on the renal function of diabetic subjects with or without CKD in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: We performed a sub-analysis of data collected during a multi-center, prospective, observational study of the effects of pemafibrate on lipid metabolism in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by hypertriglyceridemia (the PARM-T2D study). The participants were allocated to add pemafibrate to their existing regimen (ADD-ON), switch from their existing fibrate to pemafibrate (SWITCH), or continue conventional therapy (CTRL). The changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over 52 weeks were compared among these groups as well as among subgroups created according to CKD status. RESULTS: Data for 520 participants (ADD-ON, n=166; SWITCH, n=96; CTRL, n=258) were analyzed. Of them, 56.7% had CKD. The eGFR increased only in the SWITCH group, and this trend was also present in the CKD subgroup (P<0.001). On the other hand, eGFR was not affected by switching in participants with severe renal dysfunction (G3b or G4) and/or macroalbuminuria. Multivariate analysis showed that being older and a switch from fenofibrate were associated with elevation in eGFR (both P<0.05). CONCLUSION: A switch to pemafibrate may be associated with an elevation in eGFR, but to a lesser extent in patients with poor renal function.
Assuntos
Butiratos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Hipolipemiantes , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular/efeitos dos fármacos , Idoso , Estudos Prospectivos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Butiratos/uso terapêutico , Butiratos/farmacologia , Benzoxazóis/uso terapêutico , Benzoxazóis/farmacologia , Hipertrigliceridemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertrigliceridemia/complicações , Nefropatias Diabéticas/tratamento farmacológico , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Rim/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
Incretins reduce glycemic variability (GV) in patients with type 2 diabetes, but it is unknown whether switching from a combination of basal insulin and a DPP-4 inhibitor to insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) improves GV. We performed an exploratory prospective observational study to compare the effect of IDegLira and the combination on GV. We recruited hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes who had stable glycemic control with insulin degludec (≤16 units/day) and taking a DPP-4 inhibitor. GV was analyzed using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) before and after switching the medication to IDegLira. The principal endpoint was the change in mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE). Other indices of GV and CGM parameters were analyzed as the secondary endpoints. Fifteen participants were enrolled and 12 completed the study. In these participants, the DPP-4 inhibitor and insulin degludec were discontinued, and the equivalent dose of IDegLira was commenced. Switching to IDegLira significantly improved MAGE from 74.9 (60.3, 97.7) mg/dL to 64.8 (52.0, 78.2) mg/dL (P < 0.05), as well as other indices of GV and 24-hour mean blood glucose concentration. Analysis of the ambulatory glucose profile showed marked reductions in postprandial glucose concentration. Nocturnal glucose concentration was similar under the two treatment regimens. IDegLira improved GV as well as the mean and the postprandial glucose concentration by switching from insulin degludec plus DPP-4 inhibitor combination. IDegLira might be beneficial for patients being treated with low-dose basal insulin.