The Effects of Language Barriers and Time Constraints on Online Learning Performance: An Eye-Tracking Study.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to model the effect of language use and time pressure on English as a first language (EFL) and English as a second language (ESL) students by measuring their eye movements in an on-screen, self-directed learning environment. BACKGROUND: Online learning is becoming integrated into learners' daily lives due to the flexibility in scheduling and location that it offers. However, in many cases, the online learners often have no interaction with one another or their instructors, making it difficult to determine how the learners are reading the materials and whether they are learning effectively. Furthermore, online learning may pose challenges to those who face language barriers or are under time pressure. METHOD: The effects of two factors, language use (EFL vs. ESL) and time constraints (high vs. low time pressure), were investigated during the presentation of online materials. The effects were analyzed based on eye movement measures (eye fixation rate-the total number of eye fixations divided by the task duration and gaze entropy) and behavioral measures (correct rate and task completion time). RESULTS: The results show that the ESL students had higher eye fixation rates and longer task completion times than the EFL students. Moreover, high time pressure resulted in high fixation rates, short task completion time, low correct rates, and high gaze entropy. CONCLUSION AND APPLICATION: The results suggest the possibility of using unobtrusive eye movement measures to develop ways to better assist those who struggle with learning in the online environment.

Nephrology Nurses' Perspectives for the Designs of Mobile Hemodialysis Devices: A Human Factors Engineering Approach.

The goal of this study was to guide the early conceptual designs of two devices intended to improve the quality of life for patients on hemodialysis: a portable hemodialysis device and a wearable hemodialysis device. Thirty-two nephrology nurses were interviewed using a mixed approach of open-ended, rating, and rank-order questions. Results show most nurses try to persuade patients to try a modality of treatment that offers them the best clinical outcome and highest quality of life. Many nurses, however, indicate that patients are often not given the opportunity to choose their preferred modality of treatment, and that current hemodialysis treatments are one-size-fits-all and should be more individualized. Nurses also believe high-frequency home-based, portable, or wearable hemodialysis treatments are better for patients than in-center treatments, and patients can learn to safely connect and disconnect a hemodialysis device to their catheter. Using content analysis, we identified six categories of potential benefits a patient may experience using either a portable or a wearable hemodialysis device. We also identified six categories of potential barriers that may hinder nephrology nurses in recommending either a portable or a wearable hemodialysis device to their patients and seven categories of ideal features for the designs of the devices. Statistical analysis of rank-order questions shows nephrology nurses prefer a wearable hemodialysis device in the form of a belt compared to other designs (p < 0.05). Findings from this study provide valuable information guiding the design process of mobile hemodialysis devices that nephrology nurses will feel comfortable recommending to their patients.