Characterization of pathogenic human monoclonal autoantibodies against GM-CSF.

The origin of pathogenic autoantibodies remains unknown. Idiopathic pulmonary alveolar proteinosis is caused by autoantibodies against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). We generated 19 monoclonal autoantibodies against GM-CSF from six patients with idiopathic pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. The autoantibodies used multiple V genes, excluding preferred V-gene use as an etiology, and targeted at least four nonoverlapping epitopes on GM-CSF, suggesting that GM-CSF is driving the autoantibodies and not a B-cell epitope on a pathogen cross-reacting with GM-CSF. The number of somatic mutations in the autoantibodies suggests that the memory B cells have been helped by T cells and re-entered germinal centers. All autoantibodies neutralized GM-CSF bioactivity, with general correlations to affinity and off-rate. The binding of certain autoantibodies was changed by point mutations in GM-CSF that reduced binding to the GM-CSF receptor. Those monoclonal autoantibodies that potently neutralize GM-CSF may be useful in treating inflammatory disease, such as rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis, cancer, and pain.

Ascertainment Bias in the Association Between Elevated Lipoprotein(a) and Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) is an atherogenic low-density lipoprotein-like particle and circulating levels are largely determined by genetics. Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have elevated lipoprotein(a); however, it remains unclear why. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the levels of lipoprotein(a) and associated genetic factors between individuals that were ascertained for FH clinically versus genetically. METHODS: We investigated causes of elevated lipoprotein(a) in individuals with clinically diagnosed FH (FH cohort, n = 391) and in individuals with genetically diagnosed FH from the general population (UK Biobank; n = 37,486). RESULTS: Patients in the FH cohort had significantly greater lipoprotein(a) levels than either the general population or non-FH dyslipidemic patients. This was accounted for by increased frequency of the rs10455872-G LPA risk allele (15.1% vs. 8.8%; p < 0.05). However, within the FH cohort, lipoprotein(a) levels did not differ based on the presence or absence of an FH-causing variant (means = 1.43 log mg/dl vs. 1.42 log mg/dl; p = 0.97). Lipoprotein(a) levels were also not statistically different between individuals with and without an FH-causing variant in the UK Biobank cohort, which represents a population sample not biased to cardiovascular ascertainment (n = 221 vs. 37,486). We performed a phenome-wide association study between LPA genotypes and 19,202 phenotypes to demonstrate that elevated lipoprotein(a) is associated with increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, a family history of cardiovascular disease, premature coronary artery disease, and a diagnosis of FH. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that FH does not cause elevated lipoprotein(a), but that elevated lipoprotein(a) increases the likelihood that an individual with genetic FH will be clinically recognized.

Risk of Premature Atherosclerotic Disease in Patients With Monogenic Versus Polygenic Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: A pathogenic variant in LDLR, APOB, or PCSK9 can be identified in 30% to 80% of patients with clinically-diagnosed familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Alternatively, ∼20% of clinical FH is thought to have a polygenic cause. The cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk associated with polygenic versus monogenic FH is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of monogenic and polygenic causes of FH on premature (age <55 years) CVD events in patients with clinically diagnosed FH. METHODS: Targeted sequencing of genes known to cause FH as well as common genetic variants was performed to calculate polygenic scores in patients with "possible," "probable," or "definite" FH, according to Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Criteria (n = 626). Patients with a polygenic score ≥80th percentile were considered to have polygenic FH. We examined the risk of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, or stoke. RESULTS: A monogenic cause of FH was associated with significantly greater risk of CVD (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.96; 95% confidence interval: 1.24 to 3.12; p = 0.004), whereas the risk of CVD in patients with polygenic FH was not significantly different compared with patients in whom no genetic cause of FH was identified. However, the presence of an elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) polygenic risk score further increased CVD risk in patients with monogenic FH (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.56 to 5.99; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with monogenic FH and superimposed elevated LDL-C polygenic risk scores have the greatest risk of premature CVD. Genetic testing for FH provides important prognostic information that is independent of LDL-C levels.

A simplified method for the efficient refolding and purification of recombinant human GM-CSF.

Human granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (hGM-CSF) is a haematopoietic growth factor and proinflammatory cytokine. Recombinant hGM-CSF is important not only as a research tool but also as a biotherapeutic. However, rhGM-CSF expressed in E. coli is known to form inclusion bodies of misfolded, aggregated protein. Refolding and subsequent purification of rhGM-CSF from inclusion bodies is difficult with low yields of bioactive protein being produced. Here we describe a method for the isolation, refolding and purification of bioactive rhGM-CSF from inclusion bodies. The method is straightforward, not requiring extensive experience in protein refolding nor purification and using standard laboratory equipment.