Reintervention and mortality risk after total anomalous pulmonary venous connection repair.

BACKGROUND: Management of total anomalous pulmonary venous connections has been extensively studied to further improve outcomes. Our institution previously reported factors associated with mortality, recurrent obstruction, and reintervention. The study purpose was to revisit the cohort of patients and evaluate factors associated with reintervention, and mortality in early and late follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective review at our institution identified 81 patients undergoing total anomalous pulmonary venous connection repair from January 2002 to January 2018. Demographic and operative variables were evaluated. Anastomotic reintervention (interventional or surgical) and/or mortality were primary endpoints. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients met the study criteria. Follow-up ranged from 0 to 6,291 days (17.2 years), a mean of 1263 days (3.5 years). Surgical mortality was 16.1% and reintervention rates were 19.8%. In re-interventions performed, 80% occurred within 1.2 years, while 94% of mortalities were within 4.1 months. Increasing cardiopulmonary bypass times (p = 0.0001) and the presence of obstruction at the time of surgery (p = 0.025) were predictors of mortality, while intracardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous connection type (p = 0.033) was protective. Risk of reintervention was higher with increasing cardiopulmonary bypass times (p = 0.015), single ventricle anatomy (p = 0.02), and a post-repair gradient >2 mmHg on transesophageal echocardiogram (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of a larger cohort with longer follow-up demonstrated the relationship of anatomic complexity and symptoms at presentation to increased mortality risk after total anomalous pulmonary venous connection repair. The presence of a single ventricle or a post-operative confluence gradient >2 mmHg were risk factors for reintervention. These findings support those found in our initial study.

Lung lobectomy surgical approach and resource utilization differ by anatomic lobe in a statewide discharge registry.

Background: Anatomic lobe-specific differences with respect to pulmonary lobectomy have been suggested in the thoracic surgery literature but hard data has been lacking in larger population studies in part due to coding systems that do not distinguish pulmonary lobectomy by anatomic lobe. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) procedure codes, adopted in the United States in 2015, may provide novel methodologic accessibility for pulmonary lobectomy studies as they classify lobectomy operations by specific anatomic lobe. We queried the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (TPUDF) ICD-10 codes for both open and endoscopic approach lobectomy with a specific view to differences based on anatomic lobes. Methods: Between fourth fiscal quarter (Q4) 2015 and Q4 2017, all pulmonary lobectomy operations performed in Texas state-licensed hospitals were identified by querying the TPUDF for ICD-10 procedure codes for pulmonary lobectomy as classified by anatomic lobe. Surgical approach, additional procedures and diagnosis codes, length of hospital stay (LOS), and discharge status were recorded with aggregate values undergoing statistical analysis. Results: Right and left upper versus lower lobe resections were more prevalent however minimally invasive surgery was less commonly performed for upper than right lower lobectomy. LOS, irrespective of surgical approach, was longer for upper versus lower lobe resection as was need for transfer to additional inpatient facilities. LOS was longer and need for additional surgical or procedural interventions days after the primary procedure of lobectomy was greater for right versus left upper lobe resection, suggesting some differential properties of the right versus left pleural space. Conclusions: The marked clinical differences between anatomic lobes in the setting of pulmonary lobectomy observed in this study have the potential to translate to differences in expected hospital and health system costs and surgeon time-expenditure and experience premium that currently have no mechanism for their accounting. These findings highlight the value of ICD-10 coding for analysis of pulmonary lobectomy in administrative databases and suggest a possible path to more informed patient counseling and equitable hospital and surgeon reimbursement based on payment adjustment by anatomic lobe in pulmonary lobectomy operations.

Jet Ventilation in the Pregnant Patient with Airway Stenosis: Surgical Safety and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To review pregnancy outcomes and the safety of jet ventilation use in the gravid patient undergoing surgical airway intervention. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective review of medical records was performed to identify women who underwent low-frequency jet ventilation during pregnancy for surgical treatment of airway stenosis. Postoperative complications were noted, and patients were interviewed regarding pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: Six women were included in this series. No immediate complications relating to anesthesia or surgical intervention were noted in five of the six women. One patient with a well-known history of uncontrolled seizures experienced seizure activity postoperatively. One patient returned to the operating room at a later date for debridement of tracheal crusts. Five mothers delivered via cesarean section and one via spontaneous vaginal delivery. The mean gestation age was 37.3 weeks. One of the six infants delivered prematurely and three were delivered at low birth weight. Three of the six infants required elevated care immediately post-delivery but, at present, all are in good health. CONCLUSION: Low-frequency jet ventilation and surgical management of airway stenosis should be recognized as a safe treatment option in the gravid patient. Surgical intervention should not be delayed in patients with severe symptoms, particularly given the potential risk associated with prolonged corticosteroid use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.