An entropy-based method to control COVID-19 rumors in online social networks using opinion leaders.

- In the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, people spread various COVID-19-related rumors and hoaxes that negatively influence human civilization through online social networks (OSN). The proposed research addresses the unique and innovative approach to controlling COVID-19 rumors through the power of opinion leaders (OLs) in OSN. The entire process is partitioned into two phases; the first phase describes the novel Reputation-based Opinion Leader Identification (ROLI) algorithm, including a unique voting method to identify the top-T OLs in the OSN. The second phase describes the technique to measure the aggregated polarity score of each posted tweet/post and compute each user's reputation. The empirical reputation is utilized to calculate the user's trust, the post's entropy, and its veracity. If the experimental entropy of the post is lower than the empirical threshold value, the post is likely to be categorized as a rumor. The proposed approach operated on Twitter, Instagram, and Reddit social networks for validation. The ROLI algorithm provides 91% accuracy, 93% precision, 95% recall, and 94% F1-score over other Social Network Analysis (SNA) measures to find OLs in OSN. Moreover, the proposed approach's rumor controlling effectiveness and efficiency is also estimated based on three standard metrics; affected degree, represser degree, and diffuser degree, and obtained 26%, 22%, and 23% improvement, respectively. The concluding outcomes illustrate that the influence of OLs is exceptionally significant in controlling COVID-19 rumors.

Prevalence of myths regarding oral health among pregnant women in North India.

OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence of myths regarding oral health care in pregnant women in North Indian population. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a self-administered closed-ended questionnaire to assess oral healthcare related beliefs and practices in 400 pregnant women who reported for prenatal checkup in a tertiary healthcare centre in North India. The questionnaire included questions to elicit information on socio-demographic factors, beliefs and practices of oral hygiene during pregnancy, attitude towards dental problems occurring during pregnancy and the reasons associated with a specific belief. Prevalence of various myths was observed, and its associations with various socio-demographic factors, adverse pregnancy outcomes and dental symptoms were analysed. RESULTS: 84.2% of the respondents harboured at least one oral healthcare related myth. 63.4% of respondents deferred brushing for many days after delivery. 36.6% of respondents avoided consumption of hot/cold food and drinks during pregnancy due to fear of tooth loss. 24.5% of respondents believed local anaesthesia could affect baby's developing organs, and 21.8% of the studied population believed tooth extraction might cause miscarriage. Females possessing more myths were more likely to experience severe oral health problems during pregnancy. Education was depicted as a significant negative predictor of the prevalence of myths. No significant correlation between myths prevalence and history of adverse pregnancy outcomes was found. CONCLUSION: Neglect of oral health due to myths about oral hygiene practices and dental treatment during pregnancy is a serious concern. A very high prevalence of these myths is an obstacle to goal of optimal maternal and child health.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition) model to support dose rationale in diabetes patients, including those with renal impairment, for once-weekly administered omarigliptin.

AIMS: To characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor omarigliptin in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and use these models to support the dosing recommendation for patient labelling including patients with renal impairment. METHODS: PK and PD were assessed from a total of 9827 omarigliptin concentrations collected from 1387 healthy subjects and patients participating in Phase 1, 2 and 3 studies examining single- or multiple-dose weekly administration of omarigliptin at doses ranging from 0.25 to 400 mg. Population PK and PD analyses were performed using nonlinear mixed effect modelling. RESULTS: A semi-mechanistic 2-compartment model with linear unbound clearance and concentration-dependent binding of omarigliptin to the DPP-4 enzyme in both the central and peripheral compartments adequately described omarigliptin PK. Key covariates on omarigliptin PK included reduced unbound clearance with renal impairment. A direct effect sigmoid maximum inhibitory efficacy model adequately described the relationship between omarigliptin plasma concentrations and DPP-4 inhibition. These models supported the current Japan label instructions that the approved omarigliptin 25-mg once-weekly dose be halved in patients with severe renal impairment and in those with end-stage renal disease. Also, if patients missed a dose, the next dose of omarigliptin should be taken as soon as remembered up to and including the day before the next scheduled dose. No other clinically important covariates were identified. CONCLUSION: The models in the present analysis adequately described PK and PD characteristics of omarigliptin and supported the dosing and administration section of the omarigliptin label.

Implications of choosing a correlation structure on model selection and parameter estimation.

The purpose of this research was to evaluate implications of choosing a statistical or biological correlation structure on model selection and parameter estimation. were performed with and without biological (weight as a common covariate) or statistical (off diagonal element in omega matrix) correlation between clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd). One-compartment model with IV bolus administration was used with 30% interindividual variability (%CV) on CL and Vd. The results were compared for model selection, parameter equivalence, bias, and imprecision. We found that estimation of fixed-effect parameters (CL, Vd) was robust and estimates of random-effect parameters were not influenced by inclusion or exclusion of statistical correlation irrespective of true correlation structure. However, CVCL and CVV were inflated (by 18 - 35%) when true biological correlation was ignored or accounted for by statistical correlation. It is important to note that in spite of the inflated estimates; these values represent the true variability in the simulated dataset, i.e., reflecting the random variance plus the variance associated with weight. Therefore, if statistical correlation was used in absence of true covariate information, the range of individual parameters in future simulations would be similar compared to a model that uses true biological correlation. A true correlation structure is unknown for real life examples; a statistical correlation is a suitable alternative.

Exposure-Response Analyses for Belzutifan to Inform Dosing Considerations and Labeling.

Belzutifan (Welireg, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA) is an oral, potent hypoxia-inducible factor-2α inhibitor, recently approved in the United States for the treatment of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease-associated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and other VHL disease-associated neoplasms. Safety and efficacy were investigated in two clinical studies: a Phase 1 dose escalation/expansion study in solid tumors and RCC and a Phase 2 study in VHL-RCC. A population pharmacokinetic model was used to estimate belzutifan exposures to facilitate exposure-response (E-R) analyses for efficacy and safety endpoints. Relationships between exposure and efficacy (overall response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, best overall tumor size response, and other endpoints), safety outcomes (Grade ≥3 anemia, Grade ≥3 hypoxia, and time to first dose reduction/dose interruption), and pharmacodynamic biomarkers (erythropoietin [EPO] and hemoglobin [Hgb]) were evaluated using various regression techniques and time-to-event analyses. Efficacy E-R was generally flat with non-significant positive trends with exposure. The safety E-R analyses demonstrated a lack of relationship for Grade ≥3 hypoxia and a positive relationship for Grade ≥3 anemia, with incidences also significantly dependent on baseline Hgb. Exposure-dependent reductions in EPO and Hgb were observed. Based on the cumulative benefit-risk assessment in VHL disease-associated neoplasms using E-R, no a priori dose adjustment is recommended for any subpopulation. These analyses supported the benefit-risk profile of belzutifan 120 mg once daily dosing in patients with VHL-RCC for labeling and the overall development program.

Serum endotoxin, inflammatory mediators, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy before and after treatment in patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy.

BACKGROUND: Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) represents the mildest form of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), with abnormal neuropsychologic findings. Inflammatory response may be important in the pathogenesis of MHE. On magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), improvement of metabolic ratios after liver transplantation suggests an important role of myoinositol (mI) and choline (cho) in the development of MHE. AIMS: To investigate arterial ammonia, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-18, serum endotoxin, and MRS before and after treatment in MHE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients of cirrhosis with MHE were randomized to two groups, Gr. MHE-L (n = 30), treated with lactulose for 3 months, and Gr. MHE-NL (n = 30), who did not received lactulose. Arterial ammonia, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-18, serum endotoxin, and MRS were performed in all patients at baseline and at 3 months and 20 patients of cirrhosis without MHE and 20 healthy controls. RESULTS: After 3 months, median arterial ammonia (69.4 vs 52.7 mcg/dL), TNF-α (26.6 vs 22 pg/mL), IL-6 (17.6 vs 12.4 pg/mL), IL-18 (42.5 vs 29 pg/mL), and serum endotoxin (0.68 vs 0.43 EU/mL) significantly decreased in Gr. MHE-L compared with baseline (P < 0.0001), while no change was seen in Gr. MHE-NL patients. On MRS, compared with patients of cirrhosis without MHE, mI and cho were significantly lower (P < 0.001) and glutamine (Glx) was significantly higher in both MHE groups (P < 0.001). After 3 months, mI and cho increased and Glx decreased significantly in Gr. MHE-L (P < 0.001), without changes in Gr. MHE-NL patients. Psychometric hepatic encephalopathic score (PHES) correlated well with arterial ammonia, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-18, serum endotoxin, and metabolic parameters on MRS. CONCLUSIONS: Arterial ammonia, inflammatory mediators (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-18), and serum endotoxin reduce and MRS abnormalities improve after treatment with lactulose in patients with MHE.

Population pharmacokinetic analyses for belzutifan to inform dosing considerations and labeling.

Belzutifan (Welireg, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA) is an oral, potent inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor 2α, approved for the treatment of certain patients with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease-associated renal cell carcinoma (RCC), central nervous system hemangioblastomas, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. It is primarily metabolized by the polymorphic uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B17 and cytochrome (CYP) 2C19. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was built, using NONMEM version 7.3, based on demographics/PK data from three clinical pharmacology (food effect, formulation bridging, and genotype/race effect) and two clinical studies (phase I dose escalation/expansion in patients with RCC and other solid tumors; phase II in patients with VHL). Median (range) age for the combined studies was 55 years (19-84) and body weight was 73.6 kg (42.1-165.8). Belzutifan plasma PK was well-characterized by a linear two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. For patients with VHL, the predicted geometric mean (% coefficient of variation) apparent clearance was 7.3 L/h (51%), apparent total volume of distribution was 130 L (35%), and half-life was 12.39 h (42%). There were no clinically relevant differences in belzutifan PK based on the individual covariates of age, sex, ethnicity, race, body weight, mild/moderate renal impairment, or mild hepatic impairment. In this model, dual UGT2B17 and CYP2C19 poor metabolizers (PMs) were estimated to have a 3.2-fold higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve compared to UGT2B17 extensive metabolizer and CYP2C19 non-PM patients. This population PK analysis enabled an integrated assessment of PK characteristics with covariate effects in the overall population and subpopulations for belzutifan labeling.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of sorafenib in patients with solid tumours.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with activity against B-raf, C-raf, VEGFR2, PDGFRß and FGFR1. Sorafenib is clinically approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The pharmacokinetics (PK) of sorafenib are highly variable between subjects. Sorafenib exposure increases less than dose proportionally (likely due to limited solubility). Sorafenib undergoes enterohepatic recycling (EHC). WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This is the first study to characterize the PK of sorafenib using a model based on sorafenib's known disposition characteristics such as delayed/solubility-limited GI absorption and EHC. The parameterization of the EHC model used a square wave function to describe the gall bladder emptying. This study evaluated the effect of baseline bodyweight, BSA, age, gender, liver function parameters, kidney function parameters and genotype with respect to CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A5*3C, UGT1A9*3 and UGT1A9*5 on sorafenib PK. No clinically important covariates were identified. This model can be used to simulate and explore alternative dosing regimens and to develop exposure-response relationships for sorafenib. AIMS: To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of sorafenib in patients with solid tumours and to evaluate the possible effects of demographic, clinical and pharmacogenetic (CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A5*3C, UGT1A9*3 and UGT1A9*5) covariates on the disposition of sorafenib. METHODS: PK were assessed in 111 patients enrolled in five phase I and II clinical trials, where sorafenib 200 or 400 mg was administered twice daily as a single agent or in combination therapy. All patients were genotyped for polymorphisms in metabolic enzymes for sorafenib. Population PK analysis was performed by using nonlinear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM). The final model was validated using visual predictive checks and nonparametric bootstrap analysis. RESULTS: A one compartment model with four transit absorption compartments and enterohepatic circulation (EHC) adequately described sorafenib disposition. Baseline bodyweight was a statistically significant covariate for distributional volume, accounting for 4% of inter-individual variability (IIV). PK model parameter estimates (range) for an 80 kg patient were clearance 8.13 l h(-1) (3.6-22.3 l h(-1) ), volume 213 l (50-1000 l), mean absorption transit time 1.98 h (0.5-13 h), fraction undergoing EHC 50% and average time to gall bladder emptying 6.13 h. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, population PK analysis was consistent with known biopharmaceutical/PK characteristics of oral sorafenib. No clinically important PK covariates were identified.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Selumetinib to Evaluate Drug-Drug Interactions and Pediatric Dose Regimens.

Selumetinib (ARRY-142886), an oral, potent and highly selective allosteric mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 inhibitor, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of pediatric patients aged ≥2 years with neurofibromatosis type 1 with symptomatic, inoperable plexiform neurofibromas. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was constructed to predict plasma concentration-time profiles of selumetinib, and to evaluate the impact of coadministering moderate cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/2C19 inhibitors/inducers. The model was also used to extrapolate pharmacokinetic exposures from older children with different body surface area to guide dosing in younger children. This model was built based on physiochemical data and clinical in vivo drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies with itraconazole and fluconazole, and verified against data from an in vivo rifampicin DDI study and an absolute bioavailability study. The pediatric model was updated by changing system-specific input parameters using the Simcyp pediatric module. The model captured the observed selumetinib pharmacokinetic profiles and the interactions with CYP inhibitors/inducers. The predictions from the PBPK model showed a DDI effect of 30% to 40% increase or decrease in selumetinib exposure when coadministered with moderate CYP inhibitors or inducers, respectively, which was used to inform dose management and adjustments. The pediatric PBPK model was applied to simulate exposures in specific body surface area brackets that matched those achieved with a 25 mg/m2 dose in SPRINT clinical trials. The pediatric PBPK model was used to guide the dose for younger patients in a planned pediatric clinical study.

Pivotal Dose of Pembrolizumab: A Dose-Finding Strategy for Immuno-Oncology.

Despite numerous publications emphasizing the value of dose finding, drug development in oncology is dominated by the mindset that higher dose provides higher efficacy. Examples of dose finding implemented by biopharmaceutical firms can change this mindset. The purpose of this article is to outline a pragmatic dose selection strategy for immuno-oncology (IO) and other targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The approach was implemented for pembrolizumab. Selecting a recommended phase II dose (RP2D) with a novel mechanism of action is often challenging due to uncertain relationships between pharmacodynamics measurements and clinical end points. Additionally, phase I efficacy and safety data are generally inadequate for RP2D selection for IO mAbs. Here, the RP2D was estimated based on phase I (clinical study KN001 A and A2) pharmacokinetics data as the dose required for target saturation, which represents a surrogate for maximal pharmacological effect for antagonist mAbs. Due to limitations associated with collecting and analyzing tumor biopsies, characterizing intratumoral target engagement (TE) is challenging. To overcome this gap, a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model was implemented to predict intratumoral TE. As tumors are spatially heterogeneous, TE was predicted in well-vascularized and poorly vascularized tumor regions. Additionally, impact of differences in target expression, for example, due to interindividual variability and cancer type, was simulated. Simulations showed that 200 mg every 3 weeks can achieve ≥ 90% TE in clinically relevant scenarios, resulting in the recommendation of 200 mg every 3 weeks as the RP2D. Randomized dose comparison studies (KN001 B2 and D) showing similar efficacy over a fivefold dose/exposure range confirmed the RP2D as the pivotal dose.

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response of selumetinib and its N-desmethyl metabolite in pediatric patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 and inoperable plexiform neurofibromas.

PURPOSE: Selumetinib (ARRY-142886) is a potent, selective, MEK1/2 inhibitor approved in the US for the treatment of children (≥ 2 years) with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and symptomatic, inoperable plexiform neurofibromas (PN). We characterized population pharmacokinetics (PK) of selumetinib and its active N-desmethyl metabolite, evaluated exposure-safety/efficacy relationships, and assessed the proposed therapeutic dose of 25 mg/m2 bid based on body surface area (BSA) in this patient population. METHODS: Population PK modeling and covariate analysis (demographics, formulation, liver enzymes, BSA, patients/healthy volunteers) were based on pooled PK data from adult healthy volunteers (n = 391), adult oncology patients (n = 83) and pediatric patients with NF1-PN (n = 68). Longitudinal selumetinib/metabolite exposures were predicted with the final model. Exposure-safety/efficacy analyses were applied to pediatric patients (dose levels: 20, 25, 30 mg/m2 bid). RESULTS: Selumetinib and metabolite concentration-time courses were modeled using a joint compartmental model. Typical selumetinib plasma clearance was 11.6 L/h (95% CI 11.0-12.2 L/ h). Only BSA had a clinically relevant (> 20%) impact on exposure, supporting BSA-based administration in children. Selumetinib and metabolite exposures in responders (≥ 20% PN volume decrease from baseline) and non-responders were largely overlapping, with medians numerically higher in responders. No clear relationships between exposure and safety events were established; exposure was not associated with key adverse events (AEs) including rash acneiform, diarrhea, vomiting, and nausea. CONCLUSION: Findings support continuous selumetinib 25 mg/m2 bid in pediatric patients. Importantly, the updated dosing nomogram ensures that patients will receive a clinically active, yet tolerable, dose regardless of differences in BSA and allows dose reductions, if necessary.

Hand-foot skin reaction increases with cumulative sorafenib dose and with combination anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.

PURPOSE: Sorafenib, a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-2 and RAF kinase inhibitor, commonly causes skin toxicity. We retrospectively analyzed dermatologic toxicity in patients receiving combined antiangiogenic therapy involving sorafenib and bevacizumab. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Castration-resistant prostate cancer and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients were accrued to phase II studies, receiving sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. A phase I study explored sorafenib 200 to 400 mg twice daily with bevacizumab 5 to 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors. The probability of development of maximum grade of dermatologic toxicity as a function of the cumulative dose of sorafenib was determined. Additional analyses compared extent of toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and patient risk factors. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were enrolled: 54 received sorafenib and 42 received bevacizumab/sorafenib. Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) was observed in 50 of 96 (52%) patients. Grade 2 to 3 HFSR developed in 16 of 54 (30%) sorafenib patients and 24 of 42 (57%) bevacizumab/sorafenib patients (P=0.012) and was associated with cumulative sorafenib exposure (P=0.0008). Twenty-four of 42 phase I patients randomized to start with bevacizumab had increased risk of grade 2 to 3 HFSR than those starting with sorafenib (P=0.013) after adjusting for association between HFSR risk and hypertension (P=0.01), which was the only toxicity associated with HFSR. There was no association between HFSR and baseline history of neuropathy, prior taxane/platinum treatment, or systemic sorafenib levels. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib-related HFSR is associated with increasing cumulative sorafenib dose. HFSR is increased in patients treated with bevacizumab/sorafenib combination anti-VEGF therapy, and this finding is not explained by pharmacokinetic interaction between the two agents. Our results suggest that the pathophysiology of HFSR may be related to VEGF inhibition.

A six-weekly dosing schedule for pembrolizumab in patients with cancer based on evaluation using modelling and simulation.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab is approved for multiple cancer types at 200 mg and 2 mg/kg dose every 3 weeks (Q3W). We used a model-based approach to compare the exposure of pembrolizumab 400 mg dose every 6 weeks (Q6W) with the Q3W regimens. METHODS: The Q6W dose was selected by matching exposure with the 200 mg and 2 mg/kg Q3W doses. Concentration-time profiles were simulated using the established population pharmacokinetic model of pembrolizumab based on 2993 subjects from five clinical trials across tumour types. Efficacy was bridged by evaluating projections of average concentration over the dosing interval (Cavg) and trough concentration (Cmin) at steady state (ss). Safety was bridged by ensuring that concentrations were below those at 10 mg/kg dose every 2 weeks (Q2W), the maximum clinical dose. RESULTS: The 400 mg Q6W dose had similar predicted exposure (Cavg,ss, geometric mean âˆ¼1% higher) as the 200 mg Q3W dose. Fewer than 1% of subjects had transiently lower Cmin,ss than that observed for 200 mg and 2 mg/kg Q3W. Despite these reductions, similar target saturation is expected. The predicted peak concentrations (Cmax,ss) for 400 mg Q6W were substantially (∼65%) lower than the 10 mg/kg Q2W dose. CONCLUSIONS: Exposures expected for pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W were similar to the 200 mg and 2 mg/kg Q3W and below the 10 mg/kg Q2W regimens. Established exposure-response relationships for pembrolizumab over a 5-fold dose range (2 mg/kg Q3W to 10 mg Q2W) support that clinical efficacy and safety of 400 mg Q6W would be similar to the 200 mg and 2 mg/kg Q3W doses across tumour types. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT01295827, NCT01704287, NCT01866319, NCT01905657, NCT02142738.

Final analysis of a phase II trial using sorafenib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if sorafenib is associated with an improved 4-month probability of progression-free survival, using radiographic and clinical criteria alone, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, toxicity analysis and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was an open-label, phase II, two-stage design, focusing on the results from the second stage, as criteria for progression were modified after completing the first stage. Sorafenib was given at a dose of 400 mg orally twice daily in 28-day cycles. Clinical and laboratory assessments were done every 4 weeks, and radiographic scans were obtained every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were accrued in the second stage; the median (range) age was 66 (49-85) years, the on-study prostate-specific antigen level was 68.45 (5.8-995) ng/mL, the Gleason score 8 (6-9) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 1 (in 17 patients). Of the 24 patients, 21 had previous chemotherapy with docetaxel. All patients had bony metastases, either alone (in 11) or with soft-tissue disease (in 13). One patient had a partial response; 10 patients had stable disease (median duration 18 weeks, range 15-48). At a median potential follow-up of 27.2 months, the median progression-free survival was 3.7 months and the median overall survival was 18.0 months. For the whole trial of 46 patients the median survival was 18.3 months. Most frequent toxicities included hand-foot skin reaction (grade 2 in nine patients, grade 3 in three), rash, abnormalities in liver function tests, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib has moderate activity as a second-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

A phase II clinical trial of sorafenib in androgen-independent prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine if sorafenib is associated with a 4-month probability of progression-free survival, which is consistent with 50%, as determined by clinical, radiographic, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) criteria in patients with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with progressive metastatic AIPC were enrolled in an open-label, single-arm phase II study. Sorafenib was given continuously at a dose of 400 mg orally twice daily in 28-day cycles. Clinical assessment and PSA measurement were done every cycle whereas radiographic measurements were carried out every two cycles. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled in the study to date, completing a planned first stage of the trial. Baseline patient characteristics included a median age of 63.9 years (range, 50-77 years), Gleason score of 9 (range, 4-9.5), and PSA concentration of 53.3 ng/mL (range, 2-1,905 ng/mL). Fifty-nine percent of patients had received one prior chemotherapy regimen. Of the 21 patients with progressive disease, 13 progressed only by PSA criteria in the absence of evidence of clinical and radiographic progression. Two patients were found to have dramatic reduction of bone metastatic lesions as shown by bone scan, although they met PSA progression criteria at the time when scans were obtained. Toxicities likely related to treatment included one grade 3 hypertension; one grade 3 hand-foot syndrome; and grade 1/2 toxicities: fatigue, anorexia, hypertension, skin rash, nausea, and diarrhea. Results from in vitro studies suggested that PSA is not a good marker of sorafenib activity. The geometric mean exposure (AUC(0-12)) and maximum concentration (C(max)) were 9.76 h mg/L and 1.28 mg/L, respectively. The time to maximum concentration (t(max)) and accumulation ratio (after second dose) ranged from 2 to 12 h and 0.68 to 6.43, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib is relatively well tolerated in AIPC with two patients showing evidence of improved bony metastatic lesions. Interpretation of this study is complicated by discordant radiographic and PSA responses. PSA may not be an adequate biomarker for monitoring sorafenib activity. Based on these observations, further investigation using only clinical and radiographic end points as progression criteria is warranted. Accrual to the second stage of trial is ongoing.

Pattern of uveitis in North East India: a tertiary eye care center study.

We conducted an institutional-based retrospective study on 308 uveitic patients and analyzed the pattern of uveitis in Northeastern India. Anterior uveitis was the most common type (47.07%) followed by posterior (29.87%), intermediate (12.98%) and panuveitis (10.06%). Toxoplasmosis (40.21%) had the highest incidence among posterior uveitis cases. Harada's form of Vogt Koyanagi Harada's disease is a frequent occurrence in this subset of the population.

Immunogenicity of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced tumors.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab is a potent, humanized, monoclonal anti-programmed death 1 antibody that has demonstrated effective antitumor activity and acceptable safety in multiple tumor types. Therapeutic biologics can result in the development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs), which may alter drug clearance and neutralize target binding, potentially reducing drug efficacy; such immunogenicity may also result in infusion reactions, anaphylaxis, and immune complex disorders. Pembrolizumab immunogenicity and its impact on exposure, safety, and efficacy was assessed in this study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pembrolizumab immunogenicity was assessed in 3655 patients with advanced or metastatic cancer treated in 12 clinical studies. Patients with melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, urothelial cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma were treated with pembrolizumab at 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 200 mg every 3 weeks. An additional study involving 496 patients with stage III melanoma treated with 200 mg adjuvant pembrolizumab every 3 weeks after complete resection was analyzed separately. RESULTS: Of 3655 patients, 2000 were evaluable for immunogenicity analysis, 36 (1.8%) were treatment-emergent (TE) ADA-positive; 9 (0.5%) of these TE-positive patients had antibodies with neutralizing capacity. The presence of pembrolizumab-specific ADAs did not impact pembrolizumab exposure, nor did pembrolizumab immunogenicity affect the incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) or infusion-related reactions. There was no clear relationship between the presence of pembrolizumab-specific ADAs and changes in tumor size across treatment regimens. Of the 496 patients treated with pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy, 495 were evaluable, 17 (3.4%) were TE ADA-positive; none had neutralizing antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TE (neutralizing positive) ADAs against pembrolizumab was low in patients with advanced tumors. Furthermore, immunogenicity did not appear to have any clinically relevant effects on the exposure, safety, or efficacy of pembrolizumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01295827 (February 15, 2011), NCT01704287 (October 11, 2012), NCT01866319 (May 31, 2013), NCT01905657 (July 23, 2013), NCT02142738 (May 20, 2014), NCT01848834 (May 8, 2013), NCT02255097 (October 2, 2014), NCT02460198 (June 2, 2015), NCT01953692 (October 1, 2013), NCT02453594 (May 25, 2015), NCT02256436 (October 3, 2014), NCT02335424 (January 9, 2015), NCT02362594 (February 13, 2015).

Development of a rapid and sensitive LC-MS/MS assay for the determination of sorafenib in human plasma.

A rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric (LC/MS/MS) assay was developed for the quantitative determination of sorafenib in human plasma. Sample pretreatment involved simple protein precipitation by the addition of 0.5 mL acetonitrile, containing internal standard ([2H3, 15N] sorafenib), to 50 microL of plasma sample volume. Separation was achieved on a Waters SymmetryShield RP8 (2.1 mm x 50 mm, 3.5 microm) column at room temperature using an isocratic elution method with acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid in water: 65/35 (v/v) at a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min. Detection was performed using electrospray ionization in positive ion multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode by monitoring the ion transitions from m/z 464.9 --> 252.0 (sorafenib) and m/z 469.0 --> 259.0 (internal standard). Calibration curves were linear in the concentration range of 5-2000 ng/mL. The accuracy and precision values, calculated from three different sets of quality control samples analyzed in quintuplicate on six different days, ranged from 92.86% to 99.88% and from 1.19% to 4.53%, respectively.

Indirect optic nerve injury in two-wheeler riders in northeast India.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association of posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy and superior temporal orbital rim injury in two-wheeler riders and documentation of the clinical profile of such cases. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of all patients reporting with cranio-orbital injury and vision loss following road traffic accidents between October 1994 and April 2006 were reviewed and from them cases with vision loss solely from indirect optic nerve injury were taken up for study. The prognostic significance of different presenting features, role of intravenous methyl prednisolone (IVMP) and relative risk of superior orbital rim injury to posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy (at 95% confidence interval) was calculated. RESULTS: Out of 129 consecutive cases of cranio-orbital injury, 35 had posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy with minor ipsilateral superior temporal orbital rim trauma and none used any protective headwear. Presenting clinical features like relative afferent pupillary defect ( P = 0.365), optic disc status ( P = 0.518) and visual evoked potential (VEP) ( P = 0.366) were disproportionate to visual loss. Only VEP had prognostic significance. The IVMP did not provide any added therapeutic benefit. The remaining 94 cases sustained direct blinding ocular trauma and 28 of them had associated intracranial pathology. The relative risk of superior temporal orbital rim injury to posterior indirect optic nerve trauma was 2.25. CONCLUSION: Superior temporal orbital rim injury, even when minor, carries a potential risk for development of blindness from indirect posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy in two-wheeler drivers. Presenting signs do not correlate with visual status. Only VEP has prognostic significance and the condition is untreatable.

Innovation at the Intersection of Clinical Trials and Real-World Data Science to Advance Patient Care.

While efficacy and safety data collected from randomized clinical trials are the evidentiary standard for determining market authorization, this alone may no longer be sufficient to address the needs of key stakeholders (regulators, providers, and payers) and guarantee long-term success of pharmaceutical products. There is a heightened interest from stakeholders on understanding the use of real-world evidence (RWE) to substantiate benefit-risk assessment and support the value of a new drug. This review provides an overview of real-world data (RWD) and related advances in the regulatory framework, and discusses their impact on clinical research and development. A framework for linking drug development decisions with the value proposition of the drug, utilizing pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic-pharmacoeconomic models, is introduced. The summary presented here is based on the presentations and discussion at the symposium entitled Innovation at the Intersection of Clinical Trials and Real-World Data to Advance Patient Care at the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (ASCPT) 2017 Annual Meeting.