Coordinate interaction between IL-13 and epithelial differentiation cluster genes in eosinophilic esophagitis.

We have previously proposed that the pathogenesis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is mediated by an IL-13-driven epithelial cell response associated with marked gene dysregulation including eotaxin-3 overproduction. In this study, we compared epithelial responses between healthy patients and those with EE, aiming to uncover molecular explanations for EE pathogenesis. Esophageal epithelial cells could be maintained for up to five passages, with 67% and 62% of cell lines reaching confluence in healthy controls and EE cases, respectively. Both sets of epithelial cells avidly responded to IL-13 at similar levels as assessed by eotaxin-3 production. Acidic pH increased cellular release of eotaxin-3 (4.6 +/- 1.98 ng/ml versus 12.46 +/- 2.90 ng/ml at pH 7.4 and 4, respectively; p < 0.05). Numerous epidermal differentiation complex (EDC) genes, such as filaggrin and SPRR3, were downregulated both in IL-13-stimulated esophageal epithelial cells and in EE biopsies specimens compared with healthy controls. Whereas the filaggrin loss of function mutation 2282del4 was overrepresented in EE compared with control individuals (6.1% versus 1.3% respectively; p = 0.0172), the decreased filaggrin expression was uniformly seen in all EE cases in vivo. Indeed, expression of the EDC genes filaggrin and involucrin was strongly decreased directly by IL-13. These results establish that the epithelial response in EE involves a cooperative interaction between IL-13 and expression of EDC genes.

A striking local esophageal cytokine expression profile in eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is an emerging worldwide disease that mimics gastroesophageal reflux disease. OBJECTIVE: Early studies have suggested that esophageal eosinophilia occurs in association with T(H)2 allergic responses, yet the local and systemic expression of relevant cytokines has not been well characterized. METHODS: A human inflammatory cytokine and receptor PCR array containing 84 genes followed by PCR validation and multiplex arrays were used to quantify cytokine mRNA in esophageal biopsies and blood samples. RESULTS: Esophageal transcripts of numerous chemokines (eg, chemokine [C-C motif] ligand [CCL] 1, CCL1, CCL23, CCL26 [eotaxin-3], chemokine [C-X-C motif] ligand [CXCL] 1, and CXCL2), cytokines (eg, IL13 and ATP-binding cassette, subfamily F, member 1), and cytokine receptors (eg, IL5 receptor, alpha) were induced at least 4-fold in individuals with EE. Analysis of esophageal biopsies (n = 288) revealed that eotaxin-3 mRNA level alone had 89% sensitivity for distinguishing individuals with and without EE. The presence of allergy was associated with significantly increased esophageal expression of IL4 and IL5 mRNA in patients with active EE. We identified 8 cytokines (IL-4, IL-13, IL-5, IL-6, IL-12p70, CD40 ligand, IL-1α, and IL-17) whose blood levels retrospectively distinguished 12 patients without EE from 13 patients with EE with 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity. When applied to a blind, prospectively recruited group of 36 patients, the cytokine panel scoring system had a 79% positive predictive value, 68% negative predictive value, 61% sensitivity, and 83% specificity for identifying EE. CONCLUSION: Evidence is presented that IL13 and IL5 associate with eosinophil and eotaxin-3 levels, indicating the key role of adaptive T(H)2 immunity in regulating eotaxin-3-driven esophageal eosinophilia in the absence of a consistent systemic change in cytokines.

Eotaxin-3 and a uniquely conserved gene-expression profile in eosinophilic esophagitis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is an emerging disorder with a poorly understood pathogenesis. In order to define disease mechanisms, we took an empirical approach analyzing esophageal tissue by a genome-wide microarray expression analysis. EE patients had a striking transcript signature involving 1% of the human genome that was remarkably conserved across sex, age, and allergic status and was distinct from that associated with non-EE chronic esophagitis. Notably, the gene encoding the eosinophil-specific chemoattractant eotaxin-3 (also known as CCL26) was the most highly induced gene in EE patients compared with its expression level in healthy individuals. Esophageal eotaxin-3 mRNA and protein levels strongly correlated with tissue eosinophilia and mastocytosis. Furthermore, a single-nucleotide polymorphism in the human eotaxin-3 gene was associated with disease susceptibility. Finally, mice deficient in the eotaxin receptor (also known as CCR3) were protected from experimental EE. These results implicate eotaxin-3 as a critical effector molecule for EE and provide insight into disease pathogenesis.

Clinical, pathologic, and molecular characterization of familial eosinophilic esophagitis compared with sporadic cases.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) occurs in families. METHODS: Record review confirmed patient kinship and provided clinical information. Slide review confirmed the diagnosis (threshold peak number > or = 24 eosinophils/high-power field). RESULTS: Fifty-nine members (41 males, 18 females) of 26 families were 3 months to 47 years of age (mean age, 10.3 y) at diagnosis. The only recorded race was Caucasian. In 4 families a parent of an affected male had EE. The most common complaint at diagnosis was dysphagia (68% of patients). Endoscopy showed esophageal mucosal furrows (93% of patients) and exudates (44%). Fifty-one percent had asthma. Skin prick tests to food and aeroallergens were positive in 76% and 71%, respectively. Familial EE characteristics (clinical, endoscopic, pathologic, and global esophageal transcript expression profile analysis) were similar to sporadic EE, except among patients with mucosal furrows: familial patients had lower peak eosinophil counts in the distal esophagus (P = .03) compared with sporadic patients. The basic characteristics of EE (eg, eosinophil levels, rate of atopy) did not vary with patient age. By using genome-wide microarray analysis, no significant differences (P < .05, false-discovery rate) were observed between familial and sporadic EE. Among all patients, chest pain was more common in females (P = .02), and thickened mucosa was more common in males (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: These data support a familial pattern of inheritance of EE and a pathogenesis shared with sporadic EE. EE should be considered in symptomatic family members of patients who have EE.

Pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis: an 8-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is a gastrointestinal disorder that is increasingly diagnosed in pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to define, in pediatric patients with EE, their demographic and atopic characteristics, the histopathology of all segments of the gastrointestinal tract, and the effect of therapeutic interventions on the natural history. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a database of pediatric patients with EE followed over a period of 8 years. RESULTS: In 89 pediatric patients with EE, male sex (78.6%), white race (94.4%), young age at diagnosis, mean +/- SD, 6.2 +/- 4.8 years, and atopy with sensitization to environmental and food allergens in 79% and 75%, respectively, were prevalent. Patients had EE of the proximal and distal esophagus, and 77% had in addition either mucosal eosinophilia or noneosinophilic histopathology in the stomach, duodenum, and colon. EE was chronic, with a duration of mean +/- SD, 0.91 +/- 0.84 years, until first resolution, and was recurrent; of 66% of the patients who had resolution, 79% later relapsed. CONCLUSION: Eosinophilic esophagitis in the pediatric population is a chronic and relapsing condition, associated with atopy and sometimes with subsequent histopathology in segments of the gastrointestinal tract other than the esophagus. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Physicians evaluating pediatric patients with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms should consider the diagnosis of EE, particularly in young white male patients with atopy. Once diagnosed and treated, the physicians should follow the patients over a period of several years because the course of the disease is protracted, other gastrointestinal segments may be affected, and relapses are common.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fluticasone propionate for pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis is an increasingly recognized disorder with distinctive endoscopic, histologic, and allergic features. Although several therapies are advocated, no placebo-controlled trials have been conducted. We aimed to determine the efficacy of swallowed fluticasone propionate (FP) in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of swallowed FP in pediatric patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis. Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to receive either 880 mug of FP (21 patients) or placebo (15 patients) divided twice daily for 3 months. The primary end point was histologic remission, defined by a peak eosinophil count of

Clinical and immunopathologic effects of swallowed fluticasone for eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is a recently recognized clinical disorder that is understood poorly. We aimed to determine the efficacy of swallowed fluticasone propionate on the immunopathologic features associated with EE. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 20 pediatric patients with EE. Inclusion criteria specified a peak eosinophil density of > or =24 cells per 400x field in the esophagus and treatment with swallowed fluticasone between 2 endoscopic assessments. Histologic specimens were examined for eosinophil and CD8(+) lymphocyte infiltration, papillary lengthening, and proliferation of the basal layer as determined by monoclonal anti-Ki-67 (MIB-1) antibody staining. RESULTS: The mean time interval between endoscopic assessments was 4.8 months. The patients were divided equally between allergic and nonallergic groups based on the results of skin-prick testing. All of the nonallergic patients responded to fluticasone propionate. The endoscopic appearance of the mucosa improved and microscopic evaluation showed markedly reduced eosinophil infiltration, reduced basal layer hyperplasia documented by a reduced number of MIB-1(+) cells, and a reduced number of CD8(+) lymphocytes. However, allergic patients were relatively refractory to therapy; 20% had a partial response, whereas 20% had no detectable improvement. Esophageal eosinophil levels before and after therapy in all patients strongly correlated with the level of epithelial cell proliferation as measured by MIB-1 staining. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these results suggest that patients treated with swallowed fluticasone have improved endoscopic, histologic, and immunologic parameters associated with EE. However, patients with identifiable allergies who fail dietary elimination may have a blunted response to treatment.

Anti-interleukin-5 (mepolizumab) therapy for hypereosinophilic syndromes.

BACKGROUND: IL-5 is a cytokine critically involved in regulating several aspects of eosinophils including their production, activation, and tissue recruitment. As such, IL-5 may be involved in the pathogenesis of hypereosinophilic syndromes, a group of poorly treated diverse disorders characterized by sustained peripheral blood and/or tissue eosinophilia. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of a humanized blocking monoclonal antibody against IL-5 (mepolizumab) in patients with several forms of hyper-eosinophilic syndromes. METHODS: We performed an open-label trial of anti-IL-5 in which 3 intravenous doses (10 mg/kg, maximum 750 mg) were administered at 4-week intervals to 4 patients with hypereosinophilic syndromes (defined by peripheral blood and/or tissue eosinophilia). The effects of treatment on safety, eosinophil levels (in peripheral blood and/or diseased tissue), pulmonary function, and quality of life were measured over a 28-week period. RESULTS: Anti-IL-5 was well tolerated in all patients and lowered peripheral blood eosinophil counts despite ongoing systemic glucocorticoid therapy. The decline in circulating eosinophil counts was sustained for at least 12 weeks after the last dose of anti-IL-5. In addition, anti-IL-5 improved clinical and quality of life measurements. In one patient with striking tissue eosinophilia (eosinophilic esophagitis), anti-IL-5 resulted in a 10-fold reduction in tissue eosinophil levels. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that anti-IL-5 is safe, effective in lowering eosinophil levels, and has potential glucocorticoid-sparing effects in patients with a variety of hyper-eosinophilic syndromes. As such, anti-IL-5 may have significant therapeutic potential for hypereosinophilic syndromes.