Pilot non dialysis chronic renal insufficiency study (P-ND-CRIS): a pilot study of an open prospective hospital-based French cohort.

BACKGROUND: Before establishing a prospective cohort, an initial pilot study is recommended. However, there are no precise guidelines on this subject. This paper reports the findings of a French regional pilot study carried out in three nephrology departments, before realizing a major prospective Non Dialysis Chronic Renal Insufficiency study (ND-CRIS). METHODS: We carried out an internal pilot study. The objectives of this pilot study were to validate the feasibility (regulatory approval, providing patients with information, availability of variables, refusal rate of eligible patients) and quality criteria (missing data, rate of patients lost to follow-up, characteristics of the patients included and non-included eligible patients, quality control of the data gathered) and estimate the human resources necessary (number of clinical research associates required). RESULTS: The authorizations obtained (CCTIRS - CNIL) and the contracts signed with hospitals have fulfilled the regulatory requirements. After validating the information on the study provided to patients, 1849 of them were included in three centres (university hospital, intercommunal hospital, town hospital) between April 2012 and September 2015. The low refusal rate (51 patients) and the characteristics of non-included patients have confirmed the benefit for patients of participating in the study and provide evidence of the feasibility and representativeness of the population studied. The lack of missing data on the variables studied, the quality of the data analyzed and the low number of patients lost to follow-up are evidence of the quality of the study. By taking into account the time spent by CRAs to enter data and to travel, as well as the annual patient numbers in each hospital, we estimate that five CRAs will be required in total. CONCLUSION: With no specific guidelines on how to realize a pilot study before implementing a major prospective cohort, we considered it pertinent to report our experience of P-ND-CRIS. This experience confirms that i) feasibility, ii) quality of data and iii) evaluating the resources required must be validated before carrying out a large prospective cohort study such as ND-CRIS.

The Non-Dialysis Chronic Renal Insufficiency study (ND-CRIS): an open prospective hospital-based cohort study in France.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) amounts to a heavy burden for health services. There is no long-running epidemiological tool for CKD before dialysis. We here present the protocol for a cohort of patients with "non-dialysis" CKD receiving care in the Bourgogne-Franche-Comté region of France. The aim of this cohort was to periodically describe the characteristics of patients included and their care provision, to analyse evolution in care and patients' kidney function outcomes. METHODS: The ND-CRIS cohort is prevalent and incident. Patients are included in the cohort if over 18, with a glomerula filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, non-dialysed, informed on the research and not having opposed it, and followed by a nephrologist in one of the 9 centres in the region, (3 pilot centres joined by 6 others in 2015). All the patients are followed up, with varying time lapses according to the degree of GFR deterioration. Data is collected by clinical research assistants (CRAs) using a dedicated computerised case-report form (CRF). Professional practices are assessed using indicators defined by the French Health Authority. The follow-up of patients included should enable assessment of the evolution of their GFR and co-morbidities. The periodic descriptions should give insight into evolution in epidemiological terms. DISCUSSION: The ND-CRIS meets a need in epidemiological tools in France for CKD. The cohort does claim to be representative, of ND-CKD patients receiving care from nephrologists. The open and incident nature of the cohort and the number of patients included in the ND-CRIS should provide answers to questions that cannot be answered by smaller solely prevalent cohorts. The numbers of patients included over the study period (2391 patients in 3 centres in 3 years) suggests that the figure of 5000 patients should be reached by 2017. The participation of nephrologists and the rate of inclusions point to the feasibility of the implementation of this cohort. Beyond the information to be found in the CRFs, this cohort should also enable ad hoc studies, in particular in the area of pharmaco-epidemiology, and it could later serve as a research platform and as a public health surveillance tool.

Course of chronic kidney disease in French patients.

BACKGROUND: In 1998, a French survey showed that the referral of patients with chronic kidney disease to a nephrologist was delayed, resulting in many emergency initiations of dialysis. In 2009, the ORACLE study aimed to describe the renal course of dialysis patients from their first nephrology visit to their first dialysis session. METHODS: The ORACLE study was a multicentre retrospective study of all patients who started chronic dialysis. Data were collected at the first nephrology visit and at the first dialysis session. RESULTS: In total, 720 patients were included (69 centres). At the first nephrology visit, the mean Cockcroft-Gault (CG) indicator was 31.8 mL/min (22.7 in 1998) and 52.4% of patients (73% in 1998) had a CG <30. The mean time between the first nephrology visit and the first dialysis session was 48 months (35 months in 1998). CONCLUSION: In 2009, most patients were referred a long time before dialysis initiation, which likely allowed them to benefit from the impact of nephrology care on early outcomes when on dialysis. However, 34.2% of the dialysis sessions were still initiated under emergency conditions.

Anemia normalization in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: results of the NEPHRODIAB2 randomized trial.

STATEMENTS OF THE PROBLEM: Correction of anemia in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3-4 may slow the decline of kidney function but may increase cardiovascular risk through higher hematocrit. The NEPHRODIAB2 study was designed to assess efficacy and safety of complete hemoglobin (Hb) normalization in these patients. METHODS: We randomly assigned 89 T2DM patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; abbreviated 175 Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula) of 25 to 60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) and moderate anemia (Hb, 100-129 g/l) to a target Hb value in subnormal range (110-129g/l, group 1, n=43) or normal range (130-149 g/l, group 2, n=46). The primary end point was eGFR decline after 2 years of follow-up. Secondary end points included iron and erythropoietin dosage, quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey scores) and adverse events. RESULTS: Six months after randomization, the mean Hb levels were <120 g/l in group 1 and >130 g/l in group 2 (P<.05 at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months). Blood pressure, 24-h proteinuria and HbA1c did not differ during follow-up (P>.05). Two-year declines in eGFR were -8.7±12.2 in group 1 and -5.1±7.8 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) in group 2 (P=.29). Mean weekly use of erythropoietin was 7.8±11.6 µg in group 1 and 30.1±33.6 µg in group 2 (P<.0001). There was no significant difference regarding Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey score change or adverse event occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, normalization of Hb level in T2DM patients with chronic kidney disease was safe but did not significantly slow renal function decline and increased treatment cost due to erythropoietin use.