Fecal incontinence and associated pelvic floor dysfunction during and one year after the first pregnancy.

INTRODUCTION: Obstetric anal sphincter injury is an important risk factor for postpartum fecal incontinence but few studies have reported fecal incontinence occurring, even during pregnancy. The first objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of fecal incontinence, obstructed defecation and vaginal bulging early and late in pregnancy and postpartum. The second objective was to assess the association between symptoms in pregnancy, delivery characteristics, and bowel and vaginal bulging symptoms at 1 year postpartum. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted between October 2014 and October 2017, including 898 nulliparous women enrolled with the maternity healthcare service in Örebro County, Sweden. The women responded to questionnaires regarding pelvic floor dysfunction in early and late pregnancy and at 8 weeks and 1 year postpartum. The data were analyzed using random effect logistic models estimating odds ratios (ORs) and generalized linear models estimating relative risks, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: At 1 year postpartum, the prevalence of fecal incontinence, obstructed defecation and vaginal bulging was 6% (40/694), 28% (197/699) and 8% (56/695), respectively. Among women with vaginal delivery, the risk of fecal incontinence and vaginal bulging increased significantly both in late pregnancy, with ORs of 3.4 (95% CI 1.5-7.7) and 3.6 (95% CI 1.6-8.1), respectively, and at 1 year postpartum, with ORs of 5.0 (95% CI 2.1-11.5) and 8.3 (95% CI 3.8-18.1), respectively, compared with early pregnancy. Among all women, factors associated with increased prevalence of fecal incontinence 1 year postpartum were fecal incontinence during pregnancy (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 7.4; 95% CI 4.1-13.3), obstructed defecation during pregnancy (aRR 2.0; 95% CI 1.1-3.9) and concurrent obstructed defecation (aRR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3-4.5). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study shows an increased risk of fecal incontinence by late pregnancy, suggesting that the pregnancy itself may be involved in the development of postpartum fecal incontinence. Obstructed defecation during pregnancy and postpartum was found to be associated with increased risk of fecal incontinence postpartum, indicating that postpartum fecal incontinence may be a result of incomplete bowel emptying.

Risk factors for perineal and vaginal tears in primiparous women - the prospective POPRACT-cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of second-degree perineal tears, obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI), and high vaginal tears in primiparous women, and to examine how sociodemographic and pregnancy characteristics, hereditary factors, obstetric management and the delivery process are associated with the incidence of these tears. METHODS: All nulliparous women registering at the maternity health care in Region Örebro County, Sweden, in early pregnancy between 1 October 2014 and 1 October 2017 were invited to participate in a prospective cohort study. Data on maternal and obstetric characteristics were extracted from questionnaires completed in early and late pregnancy, from a study-specific delivery protocol, and from the obstetric record system. These data were analyzed using unadjusted and adjusted multinomial and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 644 women were included in the study sample. Fetal weight exceeding 4000 g and vacuum extraction were found to be independent risk factors for both second-degree perineal tears (aOR 2.22 (95% CI: 1.17, 4.22) and 2.41 (95% CI: 1.24, 4.68) respectively) and OASI (aOR 6.02 (95% CI: 2.32, 15.6) and 3.91 (95% CI: 1.32, 11.6) respectively). Post-term delivery significantly increased the risk for second-degree perineal tear (aOR 2.44 (95% CI: 1.03, 5.77), whereas, maternal birth positions with reduced sacrum flexibility significantly decreased the risk of second-degree perineal tear (aOR 0.53 (95% CI 0.32, 0.90)). Heredity of pelvic floor dysfunction and/or connective tissue deficiency, induced labor, vacuum extraction and fetal head circumference exceeding 35 cm were independent risk factors for high vaginal tears (aOR 2.32 (95% CI 1.09, 4.97), 3.16 (95% CI 1.31, 7.62), 2.53 (95% CI: 1.07, 5.98) and 3.07 (95% CI 1.5, 6.3) respectively). CONCLUSION: The present study corroborates previous findings of vacuum extraction and fetal weight exceeding 4000 g as risk factors of OASI. We found that vacuum extraction is a risk factor for second-degree tear, and vacuum extraction, fetal head circumference exceeding 35 cm and heredity of pelvic floor dysfunction and/or connective tissue deficiency were associated with increased risk of high vaginal tears. These findings have not been documented previously and should be confirmed by additional studies.

Development and validation of a protocol for documentation of obstetric perineal lacerations.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to develop a new protocol for documentation of perineal lacerations and to validate the latter against the most common obstetric record system in Sweden. The hypothesis was that the new protocol would render more complete data on perineal lacerations than the current documentation method. METHODS: A protocol for documentation of perineal lacerations was developed to be sufficiently comprehensive to serve research purposes. All women delivering their first child vaginally from 13 October 2015 to 1 February 2016 at Örebro University Hospital were eligible for the validation study. Perineal lacerations were documented using the protocol in parallel with the regular obstetric record system (ObstetriX). Cross tabulations were used to compare the coverage regarding perineal lacerations between the two documentation methods. McNemar's test was used to evaluate systematic differences between the methods. RESULTS: A total of 187 women were included. The coverage of documentation regarding perineal laceration was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the new protocol (89%) compared with ObstetriX (18%). Incidence of second-degree perineal tears was 26% according to the new protocol and 11% according to ObstetriX. The incidence of third-degree perineal tears A, B, and C was 2.7%, 2.1%, and 2.1%, respectively, according to the new protocol, and 3.2%, 2.7%, and 1.1% according to ObstetriX. CONCLUSIONS: This validation study of a new documentation protocol showed that it delivered significantly more comprehensive information regarding perineal lacerations than the most common obstetric record system in Sweden.