Screening of PCSK9 and LDLR genetic variants in Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients in India.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal, dominant, inherited disorder characterized by severely elevated LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels with high risk for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). There are limited genetic studies especially on genes other than Low Density Lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) conducted in Indian population. Thus, our aim was to screen the entire Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin type 9 gene (PCSK9) gene & hotspot exons 3, 4 and 9 of LDLR gene in FH cases and controls. 50 FH cases were categorized into definite, probable and possible cases according to Dutch Lipid Network Criteria (DLNC) who were gender matched with 50 healthy controls. All 12 exons of PCSK9, and hotspot exons 3, 4 & 9 of LDLR gene were screened through High Resolution Melt (HRM) curve analysis. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay was performed to measure circulating PCSK9 levels. Total cholesterol and LDL-C were significantly high in all three groups of cases. Total 8 nonpathogenic variants in exon 1, 5, 7 and 9 of the PCSK9 gene were detected. In LDLR gene, 3 known pathogenic and 1 benign variant were found in exon 3 & 4. In FH cases, PCSK9 levels were significantly high compared to controls (P = 0.0001), and were directly correlated to LDL-C (P = 0.0001) and Total Cholesterol (P = 0.0001). Our study is first to screen the entire PCSK9 gene in western part of India. Since no pathogenic variants were identified, it is possible that PCSK9 variants are clinically less relevant. However, 3 known pathogenic variants were found in the LDLR gene. These findings support our understanding of the genetic spectrum of FH in India.

Submental flap: Game changer in oral cancer reconstruction-A study of 1169 cases.

BACKGROUND: Free-flap reconstructions (FFRs) are the standard-of-care following resections for oral cancer. This study assessed an alternative, the pedicled submental flap (SF) for its versatility, oncological outcomes, and comparative operative time and cost. METHODS: This was a longitudinal prospective study of 1169 patients of oral cancer reconstructed with the SF. Oncological outcomes in terms of recurrence rate and disease-free survival (DFS), were analyzed in 730 cases with a minimum of 18 months follow-up. Surgical time and cost were compared between 20 SFs and 14 FFRs performed consecutively. RESULTS: SF was used to reconstruct defects in the cheek (29.2%), mandible (41.6%), tongue (26.3%) and palate (2.7%) with a 94% flap survival. N+ at level 1 did not adversely affect the recurrence rate as compared with N+ at levels other than level 1 (27.52% vs 29.81%). SFs took a shorter time (186 minutes vs 474 minutes) and cost significantly less than FFRs (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: SF can reconstruct various oral defects, is sturdy, and esthetically and functionally satisfactory. The procedure time is much shorter than for FFR and costs considerably less. With careful case selection and meticulous clearance, SF reconstruction is oncologically safe even in N+ neck.

Evaluation of CSF pyrosequencing to diagnose tuberculous meningitis: A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the performance of pyrosequencing, a genotypic test which detects TB and XDR-defining mutations within 6 h, directly on CSF samples for diagnosing TB meningitis(TBM). METHODS: This retrospective, diagnostic accuracy study was conducted in Hinduja hospital, Mumbai from May-2017 to May-2019. 107 consecutive patients with physician-suspected TBM for whom CSF pyrosequencing was requested were screened. Seven patients with incomplete data were excluded. Diagnostic accuracy of pyrosequencing was compared with Xpert MTB/Rif and TBMGIT (TB Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube) culture against the uniform case definition of definite or probable TBM. Susceptibility concordance rate of pyrosequencing with TBMGIT culture and Xpert MTB/Rif was determined. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised of 100 patients[Definite(n = 33), Probable(n = 20), Possible(n = 30), Alternative(n = 17)] with 50% males[median age(years):38(Range:2-87)]. Against the uniform case definition, pyrosequencing had 98·11%(95%CI 89·93-99·95; n = 52/53) sensitivity and 97·79%(86·31-99·67; n = 44/45) negative predictive value(NPV) compared with 43.39%(29·83-57·72; n = 23/53,p < 0.0001) sensitivity and 61.04%(55·31-66·48; n = 47/77) NPV for Xpert MTB/Rif and 45·28%(31·56-59·55; n = 24/53,p < 0.0001) sensitivity and 61·84%(55·92-67·43; n = 47/76) NPV for TBMGIT culture. Susceptibility concordance rate of pyrosequencing with phenotypic Drug Susceptibility Testing was 91.3%(n = 21/23) and with Xpert MTB/Rif was 95·45%(n = 21/22). CONCLUSION: CSF pyrosequencing is significantly more sensitive than Xpert MTB/Rif and TBMGIT culture for diagnosing TBM. Additionally, it facilitates early therapeutic decision-making by providing information on XDR-defining mutations.

An Indian national survey of therapeutic drug monitoring with anti-tumor necrosis (TNF) medications in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Evidence supports therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in improving efficacy and cost-effectiveness of anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data on perceptions and barriers to TDM use are limited and no data are available from India. Our objective was to assess clinicians' attitudes and barriers to TDM use in IBD. METHODS: A 16-question survey was distributed to members of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology. Information on clinician characteristics, demographics, use and barriers towards TDM with anti-TNFs was collected. Logistic regression was used to predict factors influencing TDM use. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-two respondents participated (92.5% male); 83% were consultant gastroenterologists. Of 104 respondents meeting inclusion criteria (treating > 5 IBD patients and at least 1 with an anti-TNF per month), complete responses were available for 101 participants. TDM was utilized by 20% (n = 20) of respondents. Of them, 89.5% (n = 17) used TDM for secondary loss of response; 73.7% (n = 14) for primary non-response and 5.3% (n = 1) proactively. Barriers to TDM use were cost (71.2%), availability (67.8%), time lag in results (58.7%) and the perception that TDM is time-consuming (45.7%). Clinicians treating > 30 IBD patients were more likely to check TDM (OR = 4.9, p = 0.02). Of 81 respondents not using TDM, 97.5% (n = 79) would do so if all the barriers were removed. CONCLUSION: Significant barriers to TDM use were availability, cost and time lag for results. If these barriers were removed, almost all the clinicians would use TDM at least reactively and 25% would use proactively. There is an urgent need to address these barriers and optimize anti-TNF therapy for optimal outcomes.