Distribution of ESBLs, AmpC ß-lactamases and carbapenemases among Enterobacteriaceae isolates causing intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in the Asia-Pacific region during 2008-14: results from the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART).

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the antimicrobial resistance and assess the molecular characteristics of ß-lactamases (ESBLs, AmpC ß-lactamases and carbapenemases) among Enterobacteriaceae isolates that caused intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) in patients hospitalized in the Asia-Pacific region during 2008-14. METHODS: Multiplex PCR was used to detect the specific types of ß-lactamase in 2893 isolates with MICs of ertapenem >0.5 mg/L. In-hospital acquisition times for most isolates were also delineated. RESULTS: Among 2728 (94.3%) isolates proven with ß-lactamase production, the rates of non-susceptibility to imipenem were low (average = 7.9%) among IAI Enterobacteriaceae isolates from all Asia-Pacific countries except Vietnam (17.7%) and the Philippines (10.2%). A stepwise and significant increase in annual rates of carbapenemase production among these isolates was noted. CTX-M-15 and CTX-M-14 were the dominant ESBL variants in most IAI Enterobacteriaceae species. The most abundant AmpC ß-lactamase variants were blaCMY-2 among isolates of Escherichia coli and blaDHA-1 among isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. In addition, the IAI Enterobacteriaceae isolates harbouring a blaCMY-2 or blaDHA-1 allele were associated with high community-acquired rates (38.0% and 42.6%, respectively). AmpC ACT and MIR variants were mostly detected in Enterobacter species. The blaNDM-1,4,5,7-harbouring isolates of E. coli, K. pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae were most commonly identified among IAI isolates from Vietnam and the Philippines. Also of note, blaOXA-48-harbouring IAI Enterobacteriaceae isolates were detected exclusively in Vietnam. CONCLUSIONS: The high resistance burden in Vietnam and the Philippines warrants aggressive control policies to combat the worsening trend in antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae species causing IAIs.

Geographic differences in susceptibility profiles of potential non-class B carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales isolates against ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, colistin, amikacin, gentamicin, and tigecycline: Data from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance, 2018-2022.

To evaluate the susceptibility profiles of regional meropenem-resistant (MEM-R) potential non-class B carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) isolates (without confirmation by phenotypic tests) against important antibiotics, we extracted data from the 2018-2022 Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance. This data included susceptibility information of MEM-R potential non-class B CPE isolates against indicated antibiotics - amikacin [AMK], gentamicin [GM], ceftazidime-avibactam [CZA], colistin [CST], meropenem-vaborbactam [MVB], and tigecycline [TGC] - from sepsis patients hospitalized in ICUs across six major regions. Carbapenemase-encoding genes of the tested CPE isolates, determined by multiplex PCR and Sanger sequencing, were also analyzed. Susceptibility breakpoints recommended by CLSI 2024 and US FDA criteria (for TGC only) against Enterobacterales were employed. A total of 1,500 potential non-class B CPE isolates (89% of which were Klebsiella pneumoniae) were tested globally. Resistance rates to AMK and GM against the evaluated isolates were statistically higher in Africa/the Middle East, Europe, and India compared to other regions. A similar pattern was observed in the susceptibility of these potential CPE isolates to CZA and MVB. High CST resistance rates were noted in Asia, Latin America, and Europe (29%-35%). Furthermore, the proportions of potential CPE isolates carrying genes encoding blaOXA variants were notably higher among the tested CPE isolates in India, Europe, and Africa/the Middle East regions (99.2%, 53.3%, and 96.7%, respectively) compared to other regions. Trends in resistance to important antibiotics among potential non-class B CPE isolates warrant close monitoring.

In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility data of global meropenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates causing pneumonia: Data from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance Program, 2014-2021, and re-estimations of susceptibility breakpoints and appropriate dosages of important antibiotics for pneumonia treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the susceptibility of globally pneumonia-causing meropenem-resistant (MEM-R) Acinetobacter baumannii isolates against important antibiotics and estimate appropriate dosages of indicated antibiotics. METHODS: We extracted the 2014-2021 Antimicrobial Testing of Leadership Surveillance database regarding the susceptibility of MEM-R A. baumannii isolates causing pneumonia against important antibiotics. The susceptibility and carbapenemase-encoding gene (CPEG) data of pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates from patients hospitalized in intensive care units of five major regions were analyzed. The susceptibility breakpoints (SBP) recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) in 2022, other necessary criteria [SBP of MIC for colistin, 2 mg/L, in the CLSI 2018; and cefoperazone-sulbactam (CFP-SUL), 16 mg/L], and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of indicated antibiotics were employed. RESULTS: Applying the aforementioned criteria, we observed the susceptible rates of colistin, minocycline, and CFP-SUL against the pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates globally (n = 2905) were 93.2%, 69.1%, and 26.3%, respectively. Minocycline was significantly more active in vitro (MIC ≤4 mg/L) against the pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates collected from North and South America compared to those from other regions (>90% vs. 58-72%). Additionally, blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-72 were the predominant CPEG in pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates. CONCLUSIONS: After deliberative estimations, dosages of 200 mg minocycline intravenously every 12 h (SBP, 8 mg/L), 100 mg tigecycline intravenously every 12 h (SBP, 1 mg/L), and 160 mg nebulized colistin methanesulphonate every 8 h (SBP, 2 mg/L) are needed for the effective treatment of pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates.

Bacterial profile, and independent predictors for healthcare-associated pneumonia persistently caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria for patients with the preceding multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pneumonia in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES: To understand the microbial profile and investigate the independent predictors for healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) pertinaciously caused by isolates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). METHODS: Multicenter ICU patients who received appropriate antibiotic treatments for preceding pneumonia due to MDR GNB isolates and subsequently developed HCAP caused by either MDR GNB (n = 126) or non-MDR GNB (n = 40) isolates in Taiwan between 2018 and 2023 were enrolled. Between the groups of patients with HCAP due to MDR GNB and non-MDR GNB, the proportions of the following variables, including demographic characteristics, important co-morbidities, nursing home residence, physiological severity, intervals between two hospitalizations, steroid use, the tracheostomy tube use alone, ventilator support, and the predominant GNB species involving HCAP, were analyzed using the chi-square test. Logistic regression was employed to explore the independent predictors for HCAP persistently caused by MDR GNB in the aforementioned variables with a P-value of <0.15 in the univariate analysis. RESULTS: MDR-Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex were the three predominant species causing HCAP. Chronic structural lung disorders, diabetes mellitus, intervals of ≤30 days between two hospitalizations, use of the tracheostomy tube alone, and prior pneumonia caused by MDR A. baumannii complex were shown to independently predict the HCAP tenaciously caused by MDR GNB. Conversely, the preceding pneumonia caused by MDR P. aeruginosa was a negative predictor. CONCLUSION: Identifying predictors for HCAP persistently caused by MDR GNB is crucial for prescribing appropriate antibiotics.

Potentially effective antimicrobial treatment for pneumonia caused by isolates of carbapenem-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex species: what can we expect in the future?

INTRODUCTION: Acinetobacter baumannii complex (Abc) is currently a significant cause of difficult-to-treat pneumonia. Due to the high prevalence rates of carbapenem- and extensively drug-resistant (CR, XDR) phenotypes, limited antibiotic options are available for the effective treatment of pneumonia caused by CR/XDR-Abc. AREAS COVERED: In vitro susceptibility data, relevant pharmacokinetic profiles (especially the penetration ratios from plasma into epithelial-lining fluid), and pharmacodynamic indices of key antibiotics against CR/XDR-Abc are reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: Doubling the routine intravenous maintenance dosages of conventional tigecycline (100 mg every 12 h) and minocycline (200 mg every 12 h) might be recommended for the effective treatment of pneumonia caused by CR/XDR-Abc. Nebulized polymyxin E, novel parenteral rifabutin BV100, and new polymyxin derivatives (SPR206, MRX-8, and QPX9003) could be considered supplementary combination options with other antibiotic classes. Regarding other novel antibiotics, the potency of sulbactam-durlobactam (1 g/1 g infused over 3 h every 6 h intravenously) combined with imipenem-cilastatin, and the ß-lactamase inhibitor xeruborbactam, is promising. Continuous infusion of full-dose cefiderocol is likely an effective treatment regimen for CR/XDR-Abc pneumonia. Zosurabalpin exhibits potent anti-CR/XDR-Abc activity in vitro, but its practical use in clinical therapy remains to be evaluated. The clinical application of antimicrobial peptides and bacteriophages requires validation.

Minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungals against invasive isolates of Cryptococcus species worldwide: Global antifungal antimicrobial testing leadership and surveillance program, 2010-2020.

This study examined the geographic distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antifungals against Cryptococcus isolates. Data were collected on the MICs of specific antifungals (amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine, fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole) against various Cryptococcus species for the period 2010 to 2020 from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance database. Cryptococcus isolates were collected from samples of blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients hospitalized in different regions worldwide. We applied the epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) of antifungals against various Cryptococcus species to distinguish wild-type (WT) from non-WT Cryptococcus isolates. A total of 395 isolates of Cryptococcus species cultured from blood (n = 201) or CSF (n = 194) were analyzed. C. grubii (n = 270), C. neoformans (n = 111), and C. gattii (n = 11) were the three predominant species causing bloodstream infections (BSI) or meningitis/meningoencephalitis (MME). The proportion of MICs above the ECV (1 mg/L) for amphotericin B among C. neoformans isolates was significantly lower than that among C. gattii isolates (MICs >0.5 mg/L; P < 0.001), as evaluated using the chi-square test. For most isolates of the three predominant Cryptococcus species, the MICs of new triazoles were ≤0.25 mg/L. The MICs of fluconazole and amphotericin B in the BSI/MME-causing Cryptococcus isolates collected from patients hospitalized in the Asia-Western Pacific region and Europe were significantly lower (i.e., the distributions were more leftward) than those in North America and Latin America. Ongoing monitoring of MIC data for important antifungals against cryptococcosis is crucial.

Use of Multiple Doses of Intravenous Infusion of Umbilical Cord-Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Severe COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Literature Review.

Objectives: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a critical complication in severe COVID-19 patients. The intravenous infusion (IVF) of umbilical cord- (UC-) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), validated to substantially reduce the release of several inflammatory cytokines in vivo, was also shown to exhibit benefits in improving hypoxemia among severe COVID-19 patients. A single dose of IVF-UC-MSCs therapy for severe COVID-19 patients was shown to alleviate the initial ARDS severity, but have 50%-67% case-fatality rates. In Taiwan, few adult patients with severe COVID-19-induced ARDS receiving compassionate adjuvant treatment consisting of either a single dose (1-10 × 106 cells/kg body weight (kg BW)) or three doses (5 × 106 cells/kg BW in each dose) of IVF-UC-MSCs had good outcomes. However, the optimal dosage and rounds of IVF-UC-MSCs administration for the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with ARDS are undetermined. Methods: We reviewed the 2020-2022 PubMed literature database concerning the clinical efficacy of IVF-UC-MSCs among severe COVID-19 patients. Results: The data of COVID-19 case series in the PubMed literature revealed a notable heterogeneity in the therapeutic dosage (a single dose: 1-10 × 106 cells/kg BW; and three doses: 50-200 × 106 cells/kg BW in each dose) and the post-ARDS days of IVF-UC-MSCs administration (a single dose: 1-12; and multiple doses: 5-14) for the treatment of severe COVID-19-associated ARDS. The survival rates among these severe COVID-19 patients ranged from 50% to 76%. However, an overall rate of 93.1% of significant improvement in hypoxemia was observed for the COVID-19 survivors receiving IVF-UC-MSCs at the initial ARDS stage. Conclusions: According to our analysis, the ideal treatment dosage of IVF-UC-MSCs for severe COVID-19-induced ARDS is likely 5 × 106 cells/kg BW for three cycles within 5 days of ARDS onset in severe COVID-19 patients.

Off-label use versus formal recommendations of conventional and novel antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria.

The infections caused by multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant (MDR, XDR) bacteria, including Gram-positive cocci (GPC, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MDR-Streptococcus pneumoniae and vancomycin-resistant enterococci) and Gram-negative bacilli (GNB, including carbapenem-resistant [CR] Enterobacterales, CR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa and XDR/CR-Acinetobacter baumannii complex) can be quite challenging for physicians with respect to treatment decisions. Apart from complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections (cUTIs, cIAIs), bloodstream infections and pneumonia, these difficult-to-treat bacteria also cause infections at miscellaneous sites (bones, joints, native/prosthetic valves and skin structures, etc.). Antibiotics like dalbavancin, oritavancin, telavancin and daptomycin are currently approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structural infections (ABSSSIs) caused by GPC. Additionally, ceftaroline, linezolid and tigecycline have been formally approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and ABSSSI. Cefiderocol and meropenem-vaborbactam are currently approved for the treatment of cUTIs caused by XDR-GNB. The spectra of ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam are broader than that of ceftolozane-tazobactam, but these three antibiotics are currently approved for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, cIAIs and cUTIs caused by MDR-GNB. Clinical investigations of other novel antibiotics (including cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam and sulbactam-durlobactam) for the treatment of various infections are ongoing. Nevertheless, evidence for adequate antibiotic regimens against osteomyelitis, arthritis and infective endocarditis due to several GPC and MDR-GNB is still mostly lacking. A comprehensive review of PubMed publications was undertaken and the formal indications and off-label use of important conventional and novel antibiotics against MDR/XDR-GPC and GNB isolates cultured from miscellaneous sites are presented in this paper.

Global Threat of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including carbapenem-resistant (CR) Enterobacterales (CRE; harboring mainly blaKPC, blaNDM, and blaOXA-48-like genes), CR- or MDR/XDR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (production of VIM, IMP, or NDM carbapenemases combined with porin alteration), and Acinetobacter baumannii complex (producing mainly OXA-23, OXA-58-like carbapenemases), have gradually worsened and become a major challenge to public health because of limited antibiotic choice and high case-fatality rates. Diverse MDR/XDR-GNB isolates have been predominantly cultured from inpatients and hospital equipment/settings, but CRE has also been identified in community settings and long-term care facilities. Several CRE outbreaks cost hospitals and healthcare institutions huge economic burdens for disinfection and containment of their disseminations. Parenteral polymyxin B/E has been observed to have a poor pharmacokinetic profile for the treatment of CR- and XDR-GNB. It has been determined that tigecycline is suitable for the treatment of bloodstream infections owing to GNB, with a minimum inhibitory concentration of ≤ 0.5 mg/L. Ceftazidime-avibactam is a last-resort antibiotic against GNB of Ambler class A/C/D enzyme-producers and a majority of CR-P. aeruginosa isolates. Furthermore, ceftolozane-tazobactam is shown to exhibit excellent in vitro activity against CR- and XDR-P. aeruginosa isolates. Several pharmaceuticals have devoted to exploring novel antibiotics to combat these troublesome XDR-GNBs. Nevertheless, only few antibiotics are shown to be effective in vitro against CR/XDR-A. baumannii complex isolates. In this era of antibiotic pipelines, strict implementation of antibiotic stewardship is as important as in-time isolation cohorts in limiting the spread of CR/XDR-GNB and alleviating the worsening trends of resistance.

Non-susceptibilities to antibiotics against important Gram-negative bacteria, and imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam against carbapenem non-susceptible Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates implicated in complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in Taiwan, 2019.

INTRODUCTION: Susceptibility of isolates of top-ranking Enterobacterales species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa implicated in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) and urinary tract infections (cUTI) to important antibiotics, including imipenem-relebactam (IMR) and meropenem-vaborbactam (MVB), in Taiwan in 2019 were evaluated. METHODS: MICs to various antibiotics were determined using broth microdilution method. Susceptibility results were interpreted mainly based on the MIC breakpoints of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2021, but susceptibilities of IMR and MVB were interpreted based on the CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) 2021. Resistance genes amongst carbapenem-non-susceptible (NS) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were investigated using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Escherichia coli (n = 356), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 165) and Enterobacter cloacae complex (n = 42) isolates accounted for 85.3% of the 660 Enterobacterales isolates. RESULTS: The non-susceptibility rates of imipenem (IPM), IMR against isolates of non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales, and meropenem (MEM), MVB against all Enterobacterales isolates were 92.2%/94.8%, 98.4-98.7%/98.4-99%, 95%/98.2% and 98.8-100%/99.4-100% for the cIAI/cUTI subgroups, respectively. Amongst the 40 IPM-NS-non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales isolates, when the CLSI 2021 criteria were applied, 10 were NS to IMR, and four Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (harbouring blaKPC but neither blaMBL nor blaOXA-48-like genes) were NS to IMR and MVB. Amongst the 93 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates under evaluation, the addition of relebactam (4 mg/L) resulted in a 4-to-16-fold reduction in the MICs of IPM in all 15 IPM-NS-Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (including 10 porin-deficient ones) not harbouring blaMBL/blaOXA-48-like genes. Contrastingly, the addition of vaborbactam (8 mg/L) improved the non-susceptibility to MEM in one (20%) of five IPM/MEM-NS Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. CONCLUSION: Continuous monitoring of susceptibility to clinically important GNB is warranted.

Multicenter surveillance of in vitro activities of cefepime-zidebactam, cefepime-enmetazobactam, omadacycline, eravacycline, and comparator antibiotics against Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex causing bloodstream infection in Taiwan, 2020.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the in vitro activities of novel and comparator antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in Taiwan. METHODS: Isolates of Escherichia coli (n = 335), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 316; 144 isolates with hyperviscosity characteristics), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 271), Acinetobacter baumannii complex (n = 187), and non-typhoidal Salmonella species (n = 226), Shigella species (n = 13) from miscellaneous culture sources were collected in 2020 in Taiwan. The MICs of the isolates to test antibiotics were determined using the broth microdilution method. GeneXpert was used to detect genes encoding carbapenemases among the carbapenem-non-susceptible (NS) Enterobacterales isolates. RESULTS: The MIC values of the cefepime-enmetazobactam combination against extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates (MIC90 ≤ 0.5 mg/L), blaKPC-harboring E. coli isolates (0.25 mg/L; n = 2), and 80% of blaOXA-48-like gene-harboring K. pneumoniae isolates (≤2 mg/L) were low. The MIC ranges of the cefepime-zidebactam against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales isolates (irrespective of the carbapenemase type [MIC90 ≤ 4 mg/L]) and carbapenem-NS or ceftolozane-tazobactam-NS P. aeruginosa isolates (MIC90 value, 8 mg/L) were significantly lower than those of the cefepime-enmetazobactam. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of novel antibiotics against important drug-resistant GNB must be monitored and validated during the clinical treatment of patients.

In vitro susceptibilities of isolates of potentially naturally inducible chromosomal AmpC-producing metallo-ß-lactamase-negative carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales species to ceftazidime-avibactam: Data from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance Programme, 2012-2019.

OBJECTIVES: A total of 74 570 potentially naturally inducible chromosomal AmpC-producing (PNIC-AmpC) Enterobacterales isolates included in the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance Programme were obtained worldwide during 2012-2019 (22 503 from 2012-2014 and 52 067 from 2015-2019). Of these isolates, 117 and 711 obtained during 2012-2014 and 2015-2019, respectively, were carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (PNIC-AmpC-CRE). The MICs of ceftazidime-avibactam for these isolates were determined using the broth microdilution method. METHODS: Genes encoding different Ambler classes of ß-lactamases were investigated using multiplex PCR. After 97 isolates harbouring genes encoding metallo-ß-lactamases (MßL) were excluded, 731 PNIC-AmpC MßL-negative CRE isolates (101 from 2012-2014 and 630 from 2015-2019) were included in this study. RESULTS: Enterobacter cloacae (E. cloacae) complex species, Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Citrobacter freundii (C. freundii) complex species accounted for 36.3% (n = 265), 30.4% (n = 222) and 11.8% (n = 86), respectively, followed by Providencia species (n = 72), Serratia species (n = 52) and Klebsiella aerogenes (n = 34). The resistance rates to ceftazidime-avibactam for the overall PNIC-AmpC MßL-negative CRE isolates markedly differed between the two periods (35.6% vs. 63.3%; P < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for the MßL-negative-CR-E. cloacae complex species (47.4% vs. 65.2%; P = 0.046) and MßL-negative-CR-E. coli (16.2% vs. 63.8%; P < 0.001) but not for MßL-negative-CR-C. freundii complex species (40% vs. 62%; P = 0.153). Amongst the PNIC-AmpC MßL-negative CRE isolates, resistance rates to ceftazidime-avibactam worsened. CONCLUSIONS: Caution should be taken when empirically prescribing ceftazidime-avibactam for infections caused by PNIC-AmpC-CRE before susceptibility data are available.

In Vitro Susceptibilities of Worldwide Isolates of Intrapulmonary Aspergillus Species and Important Candida Species in Sterile Body Sites against Important Antifungals: Data from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance Program, 2017-2020.

To understand the changes of resistance in clinically commonly encountered fungi, we used the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) database to explore in vitro antifungal susceptibilities against clinically important isolates of Aspergillus and Candida species (collected from intrapulmonary and sterile body areas, respectively). We applied the CLSI antifungal 2020 and the EUCAST antifungal 2020 guidelines. From 2017 to 2020, isolates of intrapulmonary Aspergillus fumigatus (n = 660), Aspergillus niger (n = 107), Aspergillus flavus (n = 96), Aspergillus terreus (n = 40), and Aspergillus nidulans species complex (n = 26) and sterile site-originated isolates of Candida albicans (n = 1,810), Candida glabrata (n = 894), Candida krusei (n = 120), Candida dubliniensis (n = 107), Candida lusitaniae (n = 82), Candida guilliermondii (n = 28), and Candida auris (n = 7) were enrolled in this study. Using the EUCAST 2020 breakpoints, it was demonstrated that amphotericin B and posaconazole displayed poor in vitro susceptibility rates against A. fumigatus isolates (<50% and 18.9%, respectively). In contrast, isavuconazole and itraconazole showed high in vitro potency against most Aspergillus isolates (>92%). Most intrapulmonary Aspergillus isolates exhibited MICs of ≤0.06 µg/mL to anidulafungin. Furthermore, intrapulmonary A. fumigatus isolates collected from Italy and the United Kingdom exhibited lower in vitro susceptibility to isavuconazole (72.2% and 69%, respectively) than those in the remaining ATLAS participant countries (>85%). Higher isavuconazole MIC90s against C. auris and C. guilliermondii (1 and 4 µg/mL, respectively) were observed compared to the other five Candida species. Despite the aforementioned MICs and susceptibilities against fungi, research needs to consider the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, and clinical treatment experience with antifungals against specific Aspergillus species. IMPORTANCE In addition to monitoring the antifungal susceptibilities of clinically important fungi, reviewing the PK/PD indices and the clinical therapy experience of antifungals under evaluation are important to guide an appropriate antifungal prescription. The efficacies of liposomal amphotericin B complex and anidulafungin for the treatment of pulmonary aspergillosis caused by different Aspergillus species need to be periodically evaluated in the future.

Multicenter surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibilities and resistance mechanisms among Enterobacterales species and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria from different infection sources in Taiwan from 2016 to 2018.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility among clinically important Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in Taiwan. METHODS: From 2016 through 2018, a total of 5458 GNB isolates, including Escherichia coli (n = 1545), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 1255), Enterobacter species (n = 259), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1127), Acinetobacter baumannii complex (n = 368), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 179), were collected. The susceptibility results were summarized by the breakpoints of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of CLSI 2020, EUCAST 2020 (for colistin), or published articles (for ceftolozane/tazobactam). The resistance genes among multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-GNB were investigated by multiplex PCR. RESULTS: Significantly higher rates of non-susceptibility (NS) to ertapenem and carbapenemase production, predominantly KPC and OXA-48-like beta-lactamase, were observed in Enterobacterales isolates causing respiratory tract infection than those causing complicated urinary tract or intra-abdominal infection (12.7%/3.44% vs. 5.7%/0.76% or 7.7%/0.97%, respectively). Isolates of Enterobacter species showed higher rates of phenotypic extended-spectrum ß-lactamase and NS to ertapenem than E. coli or K. pneumoniae isolates. Although moderate activity (54-83%) was observed against most potential AmpC-producing Enterobacterales isolates, ceftolozane/tazobactam exhibited poor in vitro (44.7-47.4%) activity against phenotypic AmpC Enterobacter cloacae isolates. Additionally, 251 (22.3%) P. aeruginosa isolates exhibited the carbapenem-NS phenotype, and their MDR and XDR rate was 63.3% and 33.5%, respectively. Fifteen (75%) of twenty Burkholderia cenocepacia complex isolates were inhibited by ceftolozane/tazobactam at MICs of ≤4 µg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: With the increase in antibiotic resistance in Taiwan, it is imperative to periodically monitor the susceptibility profiles of clinically important GNB.

Bacteriophages and phage-delivered CRISPR-Cas system as antibacterial therapy.

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections in humans are increasing worldwide. The global spread of antimicrobial resistance poses a considerable threat to human health. Phage therapy is a promising approach to combat MDR bacteria. An increasing number of reports have been published on phage therapy and the successful application of antibacterials derived using this method. Additionally, the CRISPR-Cas system has been used to develop antimicrobials with bactericidal effects in vivo. The CRISPR-Cas system can be delivered into target bacteria in various ways, with phage-based vectors being reported as an effective method. In this review, we briefly summarise the results of randomised control trials on bacteriophage therapy. Moreover, we integrated mechanisms of the CRISPR-Cas system antimicrobials in a schematic diagram and consolidated the research on phage-delivered CRISPR-Cas system antimicrobials.

Antimicrobial drug resistance in Taiwan.

Antimicrobial resistance is a major global health threat associated with high mortality rates and high medical costs. Geographic variations in resistance profiles of bacterial and fungal pathogens have had a considerable impact on antimicrobial prescription. In Taiwan, there is an alarmingly high prevalence of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, penicillin- and fluoroquinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and azole-resistant Candida species. In addition, the emergence of XDR Mycobacterium tuberculosis has illustrated the need for regular monitoring of the resistance profiles of clinical isolates. A few clones of XDR A. baumannii and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of unique sequence type (ST 59) have disseminated in Taiwanese hospital settings. Besides, the existence of a transposon-harboring carbapenemase gene has been verified in XDR P aeruginosa strains throughout Taiwan. An end to the worsening trends in the emergence of antimicrobial resistance will require continuous survey of resistance data from clinical isolates and effective implementation of strict infection control policies in healthcare settings and animal husbandry.

In vitro susceptibility of ceftaroline against clinically important Gram-positive cocci, Haemophilus species and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Taiwan: Results from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) in 2012-2018.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Ceftaroline, with a unique activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), was not launched in Taiwan before 2019. The in vitro susceptibility data of ceftaroline against important Taiwanese pathogens are lacking. METHODS: The in vitro susceptibility of ceftaroline against important pathogens collected from 2012 through 2018 were extracted from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program. Broth microdilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to ceftaroline against all isolates. RESULTS: During the study period, the in vitro data regarding isolates of S. aureus (n = 2049), Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 185), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 334), Streptococcus pyogenes (n = 170), Haemophilus influenzae (n = 75), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (n = 10) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 680) regardless of hospital sites of collection were analyzed. Among the S. aureus isolates studied, 19.4% showed MICs of 1 mg/L to ceftaroline, and 4.4% showed in vitro susceptible-dose dependent to ceftaroline (all MICs, 2 mg/L). Most of other Gram-positive cocci, all H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline. By contrast, about one-third (35.9%) of K. pneumoniae isolates, irrespective of infection sources, exhibited non-susceptibility to ceftaroline (MIC range, 0.015-256 mg/L; MIC50 and MIC90 values, 0.12 and 256 mg/L, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: From the pharmacodynamic perspectives, the ceftaroline dosage of 600 mg as a 2-h intravenous infusion every 8 h is effective against all S. aureus and other Gram-positive isolates regardless of acquisition sites in Taiwan. Before ceftaroline is prescribed in treatment of the patient with Gram-negative infection, a cautious evaluation about patient's healthcare-associated factor is warranted.

Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Global and Narrative Review.

The emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) has become a major public health concern. Moreover, its colonization among residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is associated with subsequent infections and mortality. To further explore the various aspects concerning CRE in LTCFs, we conducted a literature review on CRE colonization and/or infections in long-term care facilities. The prevalence and incidence of CRE acquisition among residents of LTCFs, especially in California, central Italy, Spain, Japan, and Taiwan, were determined. There was a significant predominance of CRE in LTCFs, especially in high-acuity LTCFs with mechanical ventilation, and thus may serve as outbreak centers. The prevalence rate of CRE in LTCFs was significantly higher than that in acute care settings and the community, which indicated that LTCFs are a vital reservoir for CRE. The detailed species and genomic analyses of CRE among LTCFs reported that Klebsiella pneumoniae is the primary species in the LTCFs in the United States, Spain, and Taiwan. KPC-2-containing K. pneumoniae strains with sequence type 258 is the most common sequence type of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae in the LTCFs in the United States. IMP-11- and IMP-6-producing CRE were commonly reported among LTCFs in Japan. OXA-48 was the predominant carbapenemase among LTCFs in Spain. Multiple risk factors associated with the increased risk for CRE acquisition in LTCFs were found, such as comorbidities, immunosuppressive status, dependent functional status, usage of gastrointestinal devices or indwelling catheters, mechanical ventilation, prior antibiotic exposures, and previous culture reports. A high CRE acquisition rate and prolonged CRE carriage duration after colonization were found among residents in LTCFs. Moreover, the patients from LTCFs who were colonized or infected with CRE had poor clinical outcomes, with a mortality rate of up to 75% in infected patients. Infection prevention and control measures to reduce CRE in LTCFs is important, and could possibly be controlled via active surveillance, contact precautions, cohort staffing, daily chlorhexidine bathing, healthcare-worker education, and hand-hygiene adherence.

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of the ertapenem-non-susceptible non-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales isolates causing intra-abdominal infections in the Asia-Pacific region during 2008-2014: Results from the Study for Monitoring the Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART).

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the susceptibility profiles amongst ertapenem-non-susceptible non-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (ETP-NS-non-CPE) isolates. METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 404 ETP-NS-non-CPE isolates collected from different intra-abdominal infection (IAI) sites amongst patients in the Asia-Pacific region during 2008-2014 were determined using the broth microdilution method. The susceptibility results were interpreted according to the MIC breakpoints recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) in 2018. The MICs data of several agents were evaluated based on their published pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profiles. RESULTS: The majority (>84%) of IAI-ETP-NS-non-CPE isolates - including Escherichia coli (n=83), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=91) and Enterobacter species (n=210) - were susceptible to imipenem and amikacin. The 193 hepatobiliary ETP-NS-non-CPE isolates exhibited a trend of lower cefepime MIC (≤4mg/L) distribution than those (n=145) cultured from the peritoneal space (P=0.058). Amongst the ETP-NS-non-CP Enterobacter isolates, 65.7% displayed a cefepime MIC≤4mg/L. In addition, compared with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, 82.9% and 72.9% of the ETP-NS-non-CP Enterobacter isolates were susceptible to levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively. Of note, 74.5% and 70.3% of the ETP-NS-non-CP Enterobacter isolates cultured from the hepatobiliary tract and peritoneal space exhibited a ciprofloxacin MIC≤2mg/L and ≤0.25mg/L, respectively. Imipenem and amikacin showed good in vitro susceptibility rates against the IAI-ETP-NS-non-CPE isolates. The hepatobiliary ETP-NS-non-CPE displayed lower cefepime MICs than those cultured from the peritoneal space. Additionally, a significant fraction of IAI-ETP-NS-non-CP Enterobacter isolates exhibited ciprofloxacin MIC ≤ 2mg/L. CONCLUSION: Based upon the PK/PD analyses, ciprofloxacin, imipenem and cefepime are probably effective against IAI-ETP-NS-non-CPE isolates.

Old and re-purposed drugs for the treatment of COVID-19.

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has developed since December 2019. It has caused a global pandemic with more than three hundred thousand case fatalities. However, apart from supportive care by respirators, no standard medical therapy is validated. Areas covered: This paper presents old drugs with potential in vitro efficacy against SARS-CoV-2. The in vitro database, adverse effects, and potential toxicities of these drugs are reviewed regarding their feasibility of clinical prescription for the treatment of patients with COVID-19. To obtain convincing recommendations, we referred to opinions from the US National Institute of Health regarding drugs repurposed for COVID-19 therapy. Expert opinion: Although strong evidence of well-designed randomized controlled studies regarding COVID-19 therapy is presently lacking, remdesivir, teicoplanin, hydroxychloroquine (not in combination with azithromycin), and ivermectin might be effective antiviral drugs and are deemed promising candidates for controlling SARS-CoV-2. In addition, tocilizumab might be considered as the supplementary treatment for COVID-19 patients with cytokine release syndrome. In future, clinical trials regarding a combination of potentially effective drugs against SARS-CoV-2 need to be conducted to establish the optimal regimen for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19.